Re: www.slipstick.com/

Just for a few days ... she had to speak at another conference held that same week at some other place. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Tim Au

Re: Exchange 2000

Upgrading from Standard to Enterprise is very easy and has almost no risc :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Andy Haigh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Moving information store to a network drive

Yep, forgot those 2 steps, but were implicitly included in my points. Thanks anyway to remind us to be always cear 1 step further. Best Regards Peter Don't put off for tomorrow what you can do today, because if you enjoy it today you can do it again tomorrow. -Original Message- Fr

RE: Moving information store to a network drive

If you are asking me, the drive is sitting on a 100Mbit LAN connection. -Eirik > -Original Message- > From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Moving information store to a network drive > > > How is t

RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox AND send NDR?

Forward all the mail to the lawyers, then. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan, John Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2

RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!

Were you using a machine that has the Exchange administrative tools installed? You are aware that if you use, say a domain controller, that doesn't have them installed you won't see the Exchange attributes, right? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to

RE: OWA Newbie

In a nutshell, I wouldn't do it because an Exchange 5.5 OWA server talks MAPI to the Exchange server, so needs a whole crapload of ports to be opened. You should implement a VPN. You can get a pretty good one for free with Windows 2000 Server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq

RE: Exchange Password

Write the password on a piece of paper and store it in a safe place. Better, two safe places. Make the password so difficult (like lU8&dFB92!gz;) that nobody will remember it. That's okay, because you shouldn't ever need it. If you do, it should be easy enough to go get it from the safe. Ed Cr

RE: Meeting requests over internet - one org.

Users also have to have their correspondents' addresses configured for Rich Text. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ro

RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's

*** Amended *** MS Proxy is fine, but you could do that yourself just as well. I prefer to have the IIS SMTP Service that ships with the NT Option Pack relay SMTP instead of installing the MSP client on the Exchange server. You can put this service on the same box as the Proxy server if you wan

RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's

MS Proxy is fine, but you could do that yourself just as well. I prefer to have the IIS SMTP Service that ships with the NT Option Pack relay SMTP instead of installing the MSP client on the Exchange server. See the FAQ Appendix H and Q198415 for more information on this. Ed Crowley MCSE+Intern

RE: ADC Problem

John, You need an adc installed in each domain that you want to replicate to or from. In your case, If I understand correctly you have Exchange installed in both child domains and need to replicate information between exchange 5.5 in domain 1 and AD/E2K in domain 2. This will require you to have a

RE: Security: Interesting DoS vs. 98, ME & XP Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-054

Sorry, I thought they may be on your network and may be using Exchange. ԿԬ - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Since Exchange doesn't run on any of these operating systems is it really relevant Joe?

RE: OWA Newbie

It's a debate which has been made a number of times here... And can be read at your leisure by purchasing a copy of the list archives on CD. Short answer: IMNSHO, based on the information provided I'd choose my internal Exchange server and allow SSL access only. Long answer: In the archives. ;)

RE: Security: Interesting DoS vs. 98, ME & XP Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-054

Since Exchange doesn't run on any of these operating systems is it really relevant Joe? > -Original Message- > From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Security: Interesting DoS vs. 98, ME & XP Microsoft

Security: Interesting DoS vs. 98, ME & XP Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-054

Another vote for Win2K superiority? *shrug* - - - -- Title: Invalid Universal Plug and Play Request can Disrupt System Operation Date: 01 November 2001 Software: Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows X

OWA Newbie

Greetings: I've would greatly appreciate some help planning an OWA implementation. I've heard that there's a few experts here who might be able to help... Here's some specifics of my situation: I've got a back-to-back DMZ using ISA 2000 Server Standard Edition. The ISA Server Systems, and the

RE: Blank emails

Or what happens if they try through OWA? ...Joel -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails What happens when the user logs on to his mailbox on a different PC? You als

Exchange 2000

We are looking at installing Exchange 2000 and are unsure whether we will require Standard or Enterprise edition. I just want to check that if we purchase standard that it is an easy upgrade path if we find we require Enterprise further down the track. Thanks Andy __

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Sue was at MEC2001, btw.. just chimin' in, here.. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ Sure looks like an issue on your end. Sue has a few nice articles on

Re: ADC Problem

Ahh did not read through all of the thread. OK - Original Message - From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:14 PM Subject: RE: ADC Problem > Yes but it wasn't the first server in the forest. That

RE: ADC Problem

Yes but it wasn't the first server in the forest. That was previously ran before the the server in question. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thurs

Re: ADC Problem

Don't you have to ForestPrep first before DomainPrep. ?? - Original Message - From: "Kim Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:55 PM Subject: RE: ADC Problem > let's keep this on the list - you'll get much more go

Re: Mail sitting in queue

DNS ?? Try pinging or traceroute a bad address. If bad try clearing nbstat cache then try again. Resolve a address and put it in your host file(s). If then woeks then call your ISP or check that your internal DNS is working OK. Just off top of my head. Time to go good luck - Original Message -

RE: ADC Problem

But how do you just get another Config_CA? Wouldn't you have to install ADC from another domain to get that Config_CA? Cause the Config_CA is created when joining an Exch2K server to 5.5 site. Yes I did follow the whitepaper on setting up this Exch2K server. I did run domain prep on the serv

RE: Mail sitting in queue

What do you have DNS pointing to? The Exchange server has to be able to resolve outbound domains Frank Buechler Network Systems Administrator Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. 716.325.6880 X7857 rm -rf /bin/Laden -

Mail sitting in queue

I have an exchange 5.5 server with sp4. I have no problem recieving mail but the outgoing mail sits in the outbound queue. When I look at the properties of the message I see the following Unable to reach host [Network error during host resolution]. I can telnet into ports 25 and 110 with no probl

RE: ADC Problem

let's keep this on the list - you'll get much more good information than I have the time to provide. you didn't list the steps you took to set this up. Did you run domainprep, for instance? Are you following a setup whitepaper like the one at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/admini

RE: E2k Disclaimers

The section "Application Development" (Ch27) covers a little of what's needed to make SMTP Transport Event Sinks which could provide this functionality, but I don't think a prefab tool exists as part of the resource kit. William -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2k Disclaimers

There is an Exchange 2K Res Kit. Unfortunately, I have it at home and couldn't tell you if it has this, but... The idea was look in the Res kit I would imagine. D -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchang

RE: E2k Disclaimers

There are many developers working on products so you don't need your own C++ compiler. One example I used in beta was quite good: http://www.disclaimit.com/ I do not consider it silly that Microsoft did not include this useless feature. "Developers. Developers. Developers. Developers. Developer

RE: E2k Disclaimers

One of many, my favorite is the vendor who sent mail to "Vain & Co." Unfortunately I had to smash my head against a brick wall several times to get that Carly Simon song unstuck. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:32 PM To: E

SMTP from Exchange on port other then 25

Greetings all Quick question.. Can I send mail to another internal email server, and ONLY that other server on a port other then 25? Here is my scenario: I have a Sendmail server sitting in my DMZ that I use for POP and SMTP for outside clients. Our MX record points to the Exchange server, so wh

RE: E2k Disclaimers

Bork is for 5.5. I am looking for a precompiled disclaimer for e2k (hence the subject line "e2k disclaimers"). -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers BORK -- Drew **

RE: E2k Disclaimers

Sounds like it is the Bain of your existence... -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers Other than it exists? This message is coming from 5.5, where I don't hav

RE: E2k Disclaimers

BORK -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a memory leak is really not a memory leak but a perform

RE: Blank emails

...or the other way around, as plain-text is the one format where the reader gets to pick the color, and he or she may have made a bad choice. I you click-drag across the blankness do the letters appear in the highlighted area? -Peter -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: E2k Disclaimers

Other than it exists? This message is coming from 5.5, where I don't have to Get a c++ compiler to create the disclaimer. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers Whats

RE: E2k Disclaimers

Whats wrong with the disclaimer you are using now? -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2k Disclaimers Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share fo

E2k Disclaimers

Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for disclaimers? Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful to us non developer administrators if some generous Adminis

RE: host unreachable

If the server to which Exchange is speaking doesn't recognize EHLO, it will then try HELO, so it does it automatically. But, that's not really relevant to this discussion. -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tig

RE: host unreachable

Is there a way to dumb down exchange and not send ESMTP commands? 5.5 sp4 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable Not entirely true. That was an old version that

RE: Blank emails

no, no, definitely an Outlook2000 issue... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "A citizen's constitutional rights can hardly be infringed simply because a majority of the people choose that it be." - Earl Warren (1891-1974) Chief Justice,

RE: Not in Office Assistant doesn't send message

What you need is a beautiful utility called CleanSweep (or clnswp32). Search Technet for that to find more information (Q174045 is a good start). You can install it on your own workstation and log on as that user to and run cleansweep. S. -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mail

RE: Internet mail problem

I just spoke with their administrator again and he said they are not going any reverse lookup. I have verified that I can connect on a backup internet connection so I'm going to route everything to that domain through the backup connection. The only way I know of to do this is through the SMTP con

RE: OWA

I am using Exchange 2k. I dont get a logon window. I get the normal paswword promtp for username and password. Mike -Original Message- From: John Q Sent: Thu 11/1/2001 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: OWA

RE: Blank emails

BeesKnees, LongThong and Curlz LT. Oh wait, you were asking Andrea werent you? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails What is under the 3 mail font choices under To

RE: Blank emails

Yeah, but that was an EGA 16 color card and running under Gnoates. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails maybe, but it wouldn't display the email text... -- Drew

RE: Blank emails

What is under the 3 mail font choices under Tools, Options, Mail Format, Fonts? -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails Recreated the profile. Ran Detect & Repai

RE: host unreachable

Not entirely true. That was an old version that munged stuff that way. Our P*x* d*n* d* *hat t** o*t*n, *u* h*ve *o** oth*r i*su*s. Seriously, the newer code bases are the ones that cause dupes, because they selectively drop packets that have ESMTP commands in them.

RE: another OWA question....

Epoch? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: another OWA question.

RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox AND send NDR?

Ok then... Any other solution will require a 3rd party product and the words cheap and free probably won't even enter into the conversation. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Ryan, John [mailto:

Re: OWA

I use Mozilla 8.1 and have been unable to "see" the Gold logon window. Exchange 5.5, SP4, Win 2K, Sp 2.Have you seen different results? - Original Message - From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:56 AM S

RE: another OWA question....

I figured it out. Our ISP (who shall remain nameless until new contract time..heh heh) had the MX records on their DNS servers entered wrong. Thanks to all for their suggestions. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [m

RE: Internet mail problem

Aaah. But, he has already stated that he has verified the IP with the other company. David, did you check what Tom M. asked you? S. -Original Message- From: ExchAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet

RE: Exchange Password

Also limit the knowledge of the service account password to two individuals (pleasant reason: in case you need it when one of them is on vacation; real reason: in case one of them gets ran over by a truck). Make sure that these two individuals are not among the bozos that currently abuse the acc

RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox AND send NDR?

My suggestion exactly. The client's lawyers didn't like it. Sigh. John Ryan dhs&associatesinc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox A

RE: Blank emails

maybe, but it wouldn't display the email text... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "Words - so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how t

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Mine was down at the time, too, which was funny because I had a Slipstick window open from earlier in the morning. Then a few minutes later it fired right up. I'm betting Elizabeth can get in now. > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thur

RE: host unreachable

You'll be able to identify the Cisco mailguard feature because it filters everything except 2 and 0, and replaces it with an asterisk. So your telnet session will be answered by **22*0**20*** And it's not an extension of SMTP; it's a forced limitation of it. >

RE: Blank emails

What happens when the user logs on to his mailbox on a different PC? You also said that when he forwards the messages you can see the text. Can he see the text while forwarding (after he clicks forward and before he clicks send)? S. -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:

RE: www.slipstick.com/

time to reboot the internet. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "Only those who dare to fail greatly can achieve greatly." - Robert F. Kennedy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eli

RE: Blank emails

It couldnt handle what? You being at home? -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails it makes a difference, actually. When I was fired, and getting email at home, I had to ch

RE: Blank emails

gee, thanks for not being snide... and I don't snore. :P -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "I am mindful of the difference between the executive branch and the legislative branch. I assured all four of these leaders that I know the di

RE: Blank emails

it makes a difference, actually. When I was fired, and getting email at home, I had to change the resolution on my monitor because my video card couldn't handle it. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! I see in the near future a crisis ap

RE: another OWA question....

Ok. What happens when you login to these mailboxes with the standard client? Do you see any messages then? S. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: another OWA question

RE: Auto Accept Script

Exchange 5.5 OWA is build with CDO 1.21. So, if you experience such calendar corruption go and install the postSP4 fixes. > -Original Message- > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Auto Accep

RE: Not in Office Assistant doesn't send message

Thanks for replying, Kim. We do permit auto-replies/Out of Office thru IMS. But, the replies are not being forwarded to internal users as well as external recipients. And this is happening for just one of my users. > Derrick, > you have auto-replies to the internet disabled on your IMS. of co

RE: Blank emails

Recreated the profile. Ran Detect & Repair. No change. Word is not set as the email editor. > WTF? How often do you sleep with Drew? ;) > > I'd look at removing Word as the email editor or recreating the profile. > > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: DL's very very slow to open in Exchange Admin.

Through the Exchange Admin program - I have tried it directly from the console of each server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL's very very slow to open in Exchange Adm

RE: Auto Accept Script

The problem was as Lori has told us all along... I just like seeing those words again. Glad to hear it's fixed for you Ken! Mine (shaking the leftover sage smudge) has not had a single hiccup since I told my users to suck it up. Now if I ever finish recovering files from my file server disaster

RE: DL's very very slow to open in Exchange Admin.

How exactly are you trying to "open" a DL? -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: - "They couldn't hit an elephant fro

RE: host unreachable

The user usually does not receive the message. Though I would say about 20% of the time they do receive the msg. Usually user gets an NDR -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: host u

RE: www.slipstick.com/

You do that well on your own, Bridgeboy... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent:

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Sue's might, however, since IIRC correctly the site is hosted, and most hosting companies don't care for ICMP traffic on their networks. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.pereg

RE: Blank emails

Did you type something there? All I can see is a blank message... -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails No Fish Tacos or Secret Cabal for you. -Original Messa

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Sure looks like an issue on your end. Sue has a few nice articles on the site about Outlook2002 patches and Nimda protection. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com

RE: ADC Problem

So are you suggesting that I need to install ADC on (Site 2) and run it to my Exchange 5.5 server? John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, Novemb

RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox AND send NDR?

Its not exactly what you want, since Ex 5.5 can't really do what you're looking for, but you could set a per domain size restriction of 0kb (on the Internet Mail tab) for the domains you want to reject. Alternately, use a third party MTA -- Rog

RE: Disabling Mail Relay

More info here: also available here: -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggerca

RE: Blank emails

Looks the .edu license pak, CRT Only... -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails Did you purchase the 640x480 license agreement or the 800x600 license agreement? --

RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000

I'm thinking in this case he leaves the "SERVER_NAME" as is however... It looks like it may actually be a passed string constant... -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q279681 Forc

RE: ADC Problem

is there a Config CA in the second domain? i think one is needed per domain. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Problem All, Currently I have W2K w/AD running I have two c

Re: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000

OK Sorry http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q279/6/81.asp I am 99% sure I have to put in my server name "SERVER_NAME" but it didn't say. So reason for 2nd ? Thought maybe it would fetch it. - Original Message - From: "Kim Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discus

RE: Blank emails

No Fish Tacos or Secret Cabal for you. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails Doug thinks its the monitor resolution... -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [

Re: One OWA web site can service multiple Exchange 5.5 sites?

Not unless there are latency issues as well. And even so, I've found intermittent problems connecting to sites that are separated by multiple connector hops, but Serdar's right that it SHOULD work if you have working dir rep. Eric - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Blank emails

Did you purchase the 640x480 license agreement or the 800x600 license agreement? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails Doug thinks its the

RE: Auto Accept Script

I would think there is scripting involved with OWA, but am not sure. Surely someone will correct me if I am wrong. Although, having the old CDO did not prevent me from accessing the calendar from OWA so I would think that it would not be the culprit. We have been using Exchange 5.5 OWA and sp4 fo

Re: host unreachable

Can you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask her if she's received the message, or multiple copies of the message? If so, you're probably right about the Cisco fixup_smtp thing. Eric - Original Message - From: "Siegel, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Restrict Sending

Hello Kim, I'm using Exchange 5.5. Thanks so much for your response. Thuzar -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restrict Sending Thuzar, are you using Exchange 5.5? if so, i

RE: One OWA web site can service multiple Exchange 5.5 sites?

As long as you have dir repl setup between sites, there are no issues with multiple sites. S. -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One OWA web site can service multiple Exchange 5.5 s

RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000

i'm supposed to go look it up? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000 That would be the Q article mentioned in the subject line :) -Original

host unreachable

The question [I'll ask first] is why would mail to this specific domain not work? All other hosts work. And intellocity claims that they have no problems from any other mail servers. now the info: I am having a mildy intermittent mail delivery problem, and for the most part it is non-working v

RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000

That would be the Q article mentioned in the subject line :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000 i have no idea what

RE: Blank emails

Doug thinks its the monitor resolution... -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank emails What has changed since it worked? SB -Original Message- From: Farquharson, A

RE: Blank emails

What has changed since it worked? SB -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blank emails I have a user who today started getting email messages with the body of the message bein

RE: Q279681 Force SSL on OWA 2000

i have no idea what you're talking about, because you didn't include the link to the Q article, but if you don't know to replace SERVER_NAME with your actual server name, you should probably wait to do whatever it is you're doing, dearie. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EM

Re: Exchange Password

Ditto make an Exchange admin group. Better way to go. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:41 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Password > Well, you could change the service account

DL's very very slow to open in Exchange Admin.

6 Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6 servers in our site. Any local DL I try to open takes a very long time to open - minutes. Mailboxes open very quickly. I had to put server protect on those servers, but made sure to exclude the exchange directories. I have stopped the Server Protect services but still g

RE: Can you block inbound SMTP from mailbox AND send NDR?

Dear %e-mail account%, All mail you send to this domain in the future will not be delivered to its intended recipient. We won't even bother wasting the bandwidth to send you a non-delivery report. If you have any questions, please don't contact us. > -Original Message- > From: Ryan, John

  1   2   >