It can be done in mixed mode. There are some limitation with
distribution list permission. Do you have Technet or Internet access?
Amit Zinman
Project Manager and Systems Consultant
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The version conflict that it talks about is after you have migrated to a new
server. Seeings as though you don't say you have migrated, and it has 'just
started' it more likely seems as though it could be something else.
If a reboot doesn't help, remove the IMS and install it again. Obviously
thi
The ADC is hard-coded to convert DLs to UDGs, which are upgraded as
needed by the store.exe process to USGs. The USGs can't exist in a
mixed mode domain. A problem if you use DLs for public folder
permissions!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Dear all,
I have several exchange servers which work fine through a firewall except
one, using the TechNet recommended ports for DS and IS of 1300 and 1301
respectively. The one that doesn't work is one which is running Win2K. The
others run NT4. I have set the ports to 1300 and 1301 in the re
i'd like to open our exchange server through the firewall, but my boss thinks this is
a 'massive security risk'. i think if i open it just to specified hosts, then that
would be ok. what does anyone else think?
dan.
> -Original Message-
> From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Se
Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk increases with the
amount you "open up" on your firewall. Personally, I would only ever allow
SMTP traffic to an (relay protected) exchange box inside a firewall.
Anything else and I would relay from a box sitting in the DMZ (for smtp, OWA
etc
How would you know if the hosts attached (seeming to be specified) are
actually the hosts you specified?
.. you would not.
B
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 01:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: firewall problem
i'd like
Please note new name change: We-Were-It.com.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory
So you just went and did this without
And then: now-we-are-for-it.com
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 12 December 2001 12:32
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory
Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC
you mean if they spoofed the IP address? well our PIX takes care of that, to a
point
> -Original Message-
> From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 12:00
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
>
>
> How would you know if the hosts
thanks for the information
> -Original Message-
> From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 11:55
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
>
>
> Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk
> increases with the
> amount you
Too risky IMHO..
80 25 & 110 only over here I'm afraid..
B
--Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 02:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: firewall problem
you mean if they spoofed the IP address? well our PIX takes care of
that, to
MailMarshal is also easily capable of this.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Gateway antivirus for serveral domains (MX)
Hi
My customer need a antivirus gate
Soory for my late reaction.
I think we are about to solve this problem.
When i made a second mailbox for the same user and tested it then i dont
recieve any NDR.
Now the Q is what will happen when i remove it again.
I ll see it tonight. And after i remove it i ll try inconsistency check,
DS/IS i
Thanks,
I will keep this in mind ... when it happens again ...
I ended up removing (physically and uninstalling) the exchng/webdata folder
... reinstalling ... and everything works fine ...
Mike
>-Original Message-
>From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, Dec
What about monitoring of those servers in the DMZ? Do you use PerfMon to
check queues or critical processes? If so, what ports are needed there if
your monitoring workstation is on the other side of the DMZ? Or do you
simply use some kind of paging system when it reaches a threshold?
Nate Couc
Folks,
Another interesting problem.
Calender Sync btw client (notebook) and server is not going good.
The other users who has access to these calenders see only dark
higlighted days but when they try to see what is planned , it is empty.
Replacing .ost file, recreating new profile or mailbox dont
Hi,
Does anyone know about the original question which was why exchange on Win2K
changes its ports and how it can be stopped?
many thanks
Vanessa
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 13:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: firewall pro
there is a KB about that i think, have a search
>
> Hi,
> Does anyone know about the original question which was why
> exchange on Win2K
> changes its ports and how it can be stopped?
> many thanks
> Vanessa
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
Discussed in the Release Notes.
Ian Moran
Konnexion Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 14:38
> To: Exchange Discussions (E-mail); Exchange2000 (E-mail)
> Subject: [Exchange2000] Exchange management service
>
>
> Hi All,
>
Hi
I had a Dev group get XP OS and Outlook XP on their systems and they seem to
have lost the ability to send encrypted emails through the KMserver on our
exchange site(not sending external).
Anyone running XP? Any ideas?
I'm not entirely convinced that it's a Outlook problem, I had to disabl
Set NoOST=3 in the registry.
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/12/2001 7:35 AM
Subject: Calender sync
Folks,
Another interesting problem.
Calender Sync btw client (notebook) and server is not going good.
The other users who has access to these calen
Hi all,
I am having a problem that includes several apps and I hope someone has
seen a similar issue. The list of products involved:
NT Server 4.0 Cluster Server
SP 6a
Exchange Server 5.5
SP 4
ArcServeIT 6.61 SP 2a
Trend ScanMail for Exchange 3.52
Problem: Since switching ScanMail to run in A
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I
had a user that received a message that was infected with the
"WORM_BADTRANS.B" virus (attachment "HAMSTER.DOC.pif"). ScanMail caught the
virus and deleted the attachment.
Now if the user gets into OWA
Ummm, how about deleting the message?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally figured out what is causing our I
1. Dont do BLBs.
2. Dump Arcserve.
3. Pat yourself on the back afterwards.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Ludwig, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
Hi all,
I am
Well, the real solution to your problem is
1. Stop doing brick level backups
2. Get rid of ArghServe
3. Buy CommVault Galaxy to do backups. Their product provides real item
level recovery and also supports restores
4. Upgrade ScanMail to 3.6 and use ESE scanning.
If this is too much to do right
Have you applied SP4 to your workstation as well?
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: extension smtp cannot be loaded
Hoping someone has run into this before.
I am receiving "ex
Does anybody know where I can get Microsoft Exchange Setup Editor? It is
not on my 5.5 CD.
Marc
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's
infected. I don't see an option to delete the actual message.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
The variable is because we wanted the backup date in the label. This problem
was occurring before it was ever added. The running is intermittent, some
days it works some days it don't.
Audio International
Chris Hyche
MIS Technician
Phone: (501) 801-0457
Fax: (501) 801-0421
www.audiointl.com
--
Is groupshield involved in this setup?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: extension smtp cannot be loaded
Have you applied SP4 to your workstation as well?
-Origina
Don't give us half the story, tell us what would be better than BLB's
and ArcServe...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing
I absolutely agree with you and I've suggested the Ed Crowley Never Restore
method. However I work for a small company and the owners name is on the
building and he wants to be able to get back one piece of mail that someone
deleted six months ago if they decide they want it back. We are talking
a
The archives and FAQs cover that more extensively than Mr. David could ever
hope to in a single post.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Devin Heese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday,
No we tested it twice in a completely replicated/separate domain and had
0 problems. When we did it on the real domain we ran into the problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:43 AM
To: E
You're new here arent ya?
Exchange Nirvana:
1. Check FAQ and Archives for reams of info.
2. Full Online Exch aware backups.
3. Have a recovery server at the ready.
4. Suitable DIR for your situation.
5. NTBACKUP. (The price is right)
6. Beers with Missy.
Andy
-Original Message-
Fr
I stand corrected.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-sca
or a thousand posts!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
The archives and FAQs cover that more extensively than Mr. David cou
Were they already enrolled in KMS, and they got new computers? If so,
you'll need to run each of them through the advanced security recovery
process. It's very simple, look in the KMS docs for intstructions.
-aseigler
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
> I'm hoping someone has been able to resolve a similar issue because
management is
> talking about going back to MAPI mode in order to continue bricklevel
backups which I am
> trying to fight against.
It's quite amusing that management would rather switch back to a virus
scanning method that do
The script is not Y2K compliant. Notice in the 2nd line it references
8/15/98. Clearly to be Y2K compliant the year needs to be in a 4 digit
format. Also the month should be 2 digits as well. So 08/15/1998 would be
the Y2K compliant version.
Also, you might have a problem with your sound card tha
> Don't give us half the story, tell us what would be better
> than BLB's and ArcServe...
I) Real backups that work.
II) NTBackup. Already installed on your NT Server unless you removed it.
--
Robert Moir,
IT Systems Engineer,
Luton Sixth Form College
"Rome did not create a mighty empire by h
Some people are whipped by their bosses and don't know how to manage
properly
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
> I'm hopin
Ah ha! Somebody else has this problem! We have the same problem although
we are using InoculateIT and I figured it was to blame, but it appears that
Scanmail does the same.
Even though the message's attachment has been deleted, when the message is
read via OWA, you immediately start getting the
Not an answer but Symantec have commented that this can happen using NAV for
Exchange (in their usual extremely humours way):
Use the following link to see what they say and what their solution is !!
http://service2.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568
180069e1c0/e3f32b3b
How did you get your browser to do that? Some sick ultra-verboxe mode?
Here's the URL in a somewhat more concise form:
http://service2.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/pfdocs/20010108134
41448
-Original Message-
From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday
I've got a open incident call with Microsoft on this issue. I'll keep you
informed.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Ah ha! Somebody else h
Running E2K/SP2 on a Global Controller in mixed mode.
When I go to System Manger\Servers\%servername%\Protocols\Http\Public and
then right click on to Properties and uncheck Read, Write, Script Access and
Directory Browsing. I then launch the browser to access via OWA. The public
folder does n
Why are you running ScanMail 3.02? There are older versions than that you
can use. Maybe it's time to downgrade.
I think the problem is with ScanMail here. I have a similar setup with
up-to-date software and my logs show that I catch that same virus. Never
had that issue.
S.
-Origina
It's catching the virus and deleting it. The message header is causing the
problem from what I can see.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Why
After reading most of the documentation around VAPI/MAPI and NAV for
Exchange (their documentation is some of the funniest stuff I have ever
read) I am not amazed at the link or the fact that they use a Domino server.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't control permissions or access to anything OWA related in ESM.. The IIS
Admin MMC is for that. One might ask why they give you the ability to dink
with anything in ESM then... but one would miss the beauty of the forest for
the trees.
I believe what you want to do is either edit the navbar.
If I have an SSL cert for 123.com, can I use it on my mail server as well
which is known as mail.123.com?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
_
List posting FAQ:
Does anybody know where I can get Microsoft Exchange Setup Editor? It is
not on my 5.5 CD.
CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are
confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and
immediately delete it. You may not disseminat
Real link my a** - that looks like some kinda buffer overflow "code purple"
exploit to me...
-Original Message-
From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level back
Apologies..
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm using Ed Crowly Move Sever method...
You spelled my name
Look in the bin directory on your 5.5 server. STFEDTR.EXE
Should also be in your Exch Program group on the server...
-Original Message-
From: Whitken, Marc - eSpeed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange
I will be doing an exchange server move in the near future, I wanted to ask
if anyone has had any experience with a Blackberry server running on the
exchange server and performing a move using the Crowley method.
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York
I got this today
It's not Friday now is it?
Must be a time warp.
-Original Message-
From: Melanie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I new to this group
I quite enjoy the chatter
Have a good Friday
-
I already looked on the Exchange Server and on the CD. Nowhere to be found.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Setup Editor
Look in the bin directory on your
In addition to Chris' reply, there's a patch to run as well. I'm sure it's
mentioned on Slipstick.com.
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calender sync
Folks,
Another interesting
The BB is SUPPOSED to pick up the new server. That hasn't been my
experienceI had to "rejoin" all the BB's after.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm using Ed Crowly M
Greetings all,
I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've done for
other lists (including this one), I've created a public folder to receive
the list messages. I've given myself rights to send as the public folder,
unhidden it from the GAL, and sent a subscription message
The customized feature that I tried and has failed is on page 80 of the
Customizing Microsoft Outlook Web Access White Paper dated 11/2001. Has
anyone tried this one and get the same results?
>
>Don't control permissions or access to anything OWA related in ESM.. The
>IIS
>Admin MMC is for t
Great moogely boogely. An industrial length disclaimer _and_ a hyperlink to
a potentially longer and more worthless version of same. Course for me, the
hyperlink winds up just taking me to the homepage..
> CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail, including its contents and
> attachments, if any, are confident
Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF?
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
>>>
>>>
>>>Greetings all,
>>>
Check that last statement. I should probably read the whole question before
answering..Sorry.
Matt
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:53 AM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: RE: S
Naturally :) It resolves and is underlined. The SMTP reply to address for
the PF is also correct.
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Send
There's a law against typing while under the influence.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
You shouldn't have to do this but, What happens if you populate the "Send
replies to" option with the PF SMTP?
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: RE: SMTP issue with
Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies
sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF.
Jim Blunt
Network / E-mail Admin
Network / Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMA
Always nice to include what you're trying in the original post, but I think
my answer is still the correct one.
As I mentioned, the navbar.js can be edited to remove the PF icon or, the
sp2deply.doc included with the SP2 download describes a post 11/2001
methodology for restricting access to PFs.
What would be the cause of messages getting hung in the Internet mail,
"Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion queue?" I've literrally got 2500
message stuck in that queue that have been there since the 10th. I cannot
find any error logs in eventviewer.
We have this problem periodically and the o
Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It
didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Do you just have the one exchange server? Is the IMS on a separate server?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 17:07
To: Exchange Discussion
Do you have a file based AV scanner on the server which is scanning the
Exchange working directories by chance?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent
Don't know if it would make any difference in the return-path or not, but
are you the owner of the PF, or just a user?
-Original Message-
From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending
I have 3 servers total, 2 of which have an IMS on them. The one that we are
having problems with is an IMS that is used only to send/receive secure
client e-mail via direct connections or vpn connections with clients.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I am using Nav for Exchange 2.0 which is set to scan in MAPI only mode
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion
Do you have a file based AV sc
I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Don't know if it would make any dif
On the Properties of the PF, what are the permission levels set to, for the
Default and Anonymous entries?
-Original Message-
From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public F
Have you tried reinstalling the IMS? It sounds like the MAPI thread inside
the IMS that removes the inbound messages from the queue might be screwed up
somewhat.
Does restarting the IMS have any effect?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
Default = Author, Anonymous = None. There are no other perms specified. My
guess is it's not a permissions problem - there are no errors or anything of
that nature.
Maybe this is just the way it works - but it seems kind of pointless to send
as a PF if your address is going to show up in the
I haven't tried reinstalling the IMS yet but stopping and restarting does
not work either
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion
Have you tri
This article describes what I think you're trying to do.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_exch2k_getting_existing_items.asp
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.h
I'm trying to find the home server of a replicated public folder.
I've read and found that I'm searching for the PR_REPLICA_SERVER
property of the folder, which should tell me the home server. My
problem is in trying to get this property.
The Situation: I have two servers with a folder replicat
You do know about PFAdmin from the BORK, right?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
"I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest." John Keats
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behal
No, I reinstalled KMS, deleted the old KMS database per the installer, and
reenrolled the clients.
Ive done this before with exchange clients and outlook clients and have
never had any problems, I blame XP.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
If there is another Exchange list like this?
Thanks.
Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE
Network Consultant
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
NO, this is one of a kind..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Does anyone know...
If there is another Exchange list like this?
Thanks.
Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE
N
This is one of a kind.
But there are other exchange lists, yes.
public.microsoft.exchange.*
public.microsoft.exchange2000.*
www.groups.yahoo.com/group/exchange2000
www.groups.yahoo.com/group/MSExchange
Among others.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Casey,
I have seen several instances of corrupted messages getting stuck in the
MTS-IN queue as you describe. Most were messages that had a virus and were
partially cleaned at a remote site and them mailed out.
Have a look a Q165505 at the MS Support website. Also, are you sure this
particular s
It's Friday on Mars
Mel must be space alien
Or Comcast user
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I got this today
It's not Friday now is it?
Must be a time warp.
Why would you want to go anywhere else but a list that has Haiku Fridays
and berates people for stupid questions. I wish every one of my lists
had a sense of humor.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Excha
This one would appear to be the best, imo.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know...
This is one of a kind.
But there are other exchange lists, yes.
publi
I'm just trying to say that you shouldn't rule out ScanMail as a potential
problem. You're running a very old version.
S>
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
What's Exchange?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Does anyone know...
If there is another Exchange list like this?
Thanks.
Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE
Network Consultant
Next to the innner circle.. That does not exist in 17 forms.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST, HWPHHIICP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
What other lists are you on.. I will join and fix the problem : >
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST, HWPHHIICP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Musheno
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sub
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
