YES
Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing
exchange server.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Possibly. We ran into that problem often during the beta, and I still do
occasionally with the RTM version.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered. Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with. How hard is it to do, and
how
Pro:
Con: Tener is thinking of clustering as well.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering Exchange
My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new
Now stop it! Damn you Andy, coke coming out my nose just isn't what I wanted to
experience today!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My favourite cluster deployment is single-node - Ed Crowley
I assume that to be an active cluster.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Pro:
Con: Tener is
William gets me all the time with the coke. Ruined a Keyboard last week.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Thursday,
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 17:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering Exchange
My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get
new Exchange Servers that we should have them clustered.
Nope you
Clustering...I was thinking about doing that w/my new E2K servers, but after
everyone talking about suspected problems w/clustering I just bagged it and
just bought a high end server that will take care of the servers we have
hosting mailboxes. It's more of a problem then what it's worth.
Good to hear you finally gave up on that one.. Now all you have to do it
finish the upgrade then all will be well.
You might be shot on the spot for dinking Pepsi.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original
How about Mr. Pibb???
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:51 PM
To:
not anymore but if you want me too hahaha
oh can I practice on your server first
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Pro:
Con: Tener is thinking of clustering
Perhaps try running outlook with /cleanfreebusy switch.
Also, is the user running an OST?
-Original Message-
From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 3:01 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Problems
These are recurring
Isn't Q224493 simpler?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: SPAM Deletion
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion
OK thanks. Simple is good.
-Original Message-
I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different
reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system.
This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and
restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own
First things first. What version is your Outlook client? I'm not talking
about Outlook 2K. I'm talking the exact version number?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
But with Q224493, it suggests you run ISSCAN to scan for text/attachments
that are already in the IS. If you've been spammed and have messages from
xxx to breakfast in your MTA that suggests that they haven't yet reached
your IS, so wouldn't it be more appropriate to try and remove them before
Dear DL Members,
On any given business day, we have e-mail messages queued at the
Internet Mail Service (Outbound messages awaiting delivery).
Normally, there is one of two error categories associated with
these queued up e-mail messages.
01. Host Unreachable
02. Network Error
These are valid error messages. I would also indicate the email address to
your help desk so they can determine if the domain name of the email is
valid. You get them every fours hours because that is how often Exchange
trys to resend the msgs by default for a 48 hour period.
Dear DL
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files)
I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen
talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
is desired between the client and server.
Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any
form of encryption.
does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? my server
exchange 2000 w/sp2.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally shareable,
so any other program can use it, having an open access to the user's
mailbox. Since this is a critical hole from a security point of view,
is there any way to disable this feature ?
When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error: Unable to render folder. There are no
published folders.
What did I forget to do?
TIA
__
Chris Levis
Applied Geographics, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Anyone know what's the performance in Gb/hr when migrating mailboxes from
Exch.5.5 to Exch.2000 using either Sp1/Sp2 Exchange Migration
Tool-Migration Wizard method or the Active Directory Connector + Migration
Wizard method, if exists any difference between them.
Thanks in advance
Hi all,
Anyone know what is the performance in Gb/hr when migrating mailboxes from
Exch.5.5 to Exch.2000 using either Sp1/Sp2 Exchange Migration
Tool-Migration Wizard method or the Active Directory Connector + Migration
Wizard method, if exists any difference between them.
Thanks in advance
Hi. I have Exchange 2000 SP2 running with the Conferencing Server add-on
(SP2).
My clients cannot schedule meetings with the web-based scheduler because
they cannot drop-down a list of conferencing resources (Virtual Rooms
List).
Also, when they attempt to cancel or delete a conference from the
Ex 5.5 SP3, IIS 5.
When using Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error: Unable to render folder. There are no
published folders.
What did I forget to do?
TIA
__
Chris Levis
Applied Geographics, Inc.
OK. It's a stupid question, but I can't seem to find an answer. I've been
asked to create about 200 new mailboxes that will begin with a number. The
boss INSISTS on this naming scheme. When I pointed out to him that these
200 mailboxes would appear first in the Global Address Book, he was
equally
Explanation: RPC is cool.
-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
We are using Exchange
Quit doing a flat file backup.
-Original Message-
From: Richard S Kahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archive Mails
does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes?
my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.
You need to be running an Online, Exchange Aware backup. NTBackup on the
exchange box will be able to do this for you. Read the Disaster Recovery White
papers, and the FAQ. Read it. Love it. Live it.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
-- Drew
Visit
you forgot to tell us what version of the OS, Exchange, IIS, and OWA you're
running, for a start...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Perhaps the greatest social service that can be rendered by anybody to the
country and to mankind is
You need an exchange aware backup solution. Plenty around.
-Original Message-
From: Richard S Kahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am
How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?
-Original Message-
From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook session sharing disable
An Outlook session to the Exchange
There goes that New Year's Resolution!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive Mails
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Q168661
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error open pub folders with OWA
Ex 5.5 SP3, IIS 5.
When using Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on
To publish folders?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unable to Render Folder
Cuz you can share holes silly!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?
Change the display name of all other mailboxes to Username or
have him write an RFC proposal to change the order of asciibetical?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to Render Folder in OWA
To publish folders?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you
Well, there we are then.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to Render Folder in OWA
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
If you put 123 or *$#, those mailboxes will show at the top. If you
start display name with ZZ , those will show at the end.
Or you could implment Address Book Views to be more flexible.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
Got it... Thx =)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error open pub folders with OWA
Q168661
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed
and running at a particular machine, can use an active connection
from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to have free access
to the user's mailbox. So, any form of strong authentication that
could be used to enforce the
Dear Jeff,
I think that the jump in your plan is too much in one step.
When we swapped out our hardware for bigger and better, we stopped
the Exchange Services and disabled them, rebooted, then performed a special
tape backup. Took the (old) Exchange Server off of the network.
-Original Message-
From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 20:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed
and running at a particular machine, can use an
To the group...
We are going to rebuild our exchange environment (current one sucks and I haven't a
clue why it still works) and we wish to attach some administrative tools to the
project. As shown in the subject I've been reviewing tools that my department can use
to streamline anything and
Could check out ...
E-Policy : How to Develop Computer, E-Policy, and Internet Guidelines to
Protect Your Company and Its Assets
by Michael R. Overly
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814479960/qid=1011294873/sr=8-1/
ref=sr_8_3_1/103-8981035-4241454
Maybe he's got new material.
Jim
In your scenario there is certainly a security issue, but I don't see that
issue as Outlook. Not that there aren't a number of security issues with
Outlook, the scenario as described simply does not seem to be one of them.
A trojan has access to the contents of my inbox. So what? It could also
How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?
Bill Klosa
SC Electric Company
Chicago,IL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
The obvious difference is that I'm talking about the access to
my own mail stuff, not the spreading of new messages from my
place. But, as I understood, the answer is to be smart enough
to avoid Britney Spears pictures ...
_
List
Exchange Admin
Configuration--SiteAddressing--SiteAddressing
Deselect cc: mail
William
-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators
How can I remove the cc:Mail address
I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:
Configuration--Addressing--E-Mail Address Generators
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of vulnerability,
I could think of leaving my restricted mail and stuff at the Exchange
Server, considering the use of a robust authentication policy to access
it.
_
List
I have a mixed mode org consisting of 5.5/2000 servers.
If I want to add an e2k server into its own administrative group into my
environment, do I have to build a corresponding 5.5 server if I want my 5.5
users to be able to email anyone on that server???
Likewise, do I have to wait to remove
Probably because you did a standard install, which includes the MSMail and
Lotus Notes Connectors. You need to uninstall those, otherwise CCMail
addresses get generated automatically. I believe it does this even if you
remove the CC Mail connector. Just re-run the Exchange setup, and choose to
William is suggesting Configuration - Site Addressing - Site Addressing,
not what you have selected.
-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 9:47 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators
I already did that but
I'm confounded.
Scenario:
- Remote Site B introduced into Org; lists along with Site A after
connectors are configured, blah, blah..
- Site A B both coexist within same NT4 domain--no Trusts necessary.
- Installed Site B using svc acct common to the Domain
Discovery:
After cursory run thru
I did what he said but I want to know how to delete it from the menu path I
listed.
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators
William is suggesting
Bill,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp
(link may wrap)
makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.
--
be - MOS
I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or
Bill,
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...
-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill,
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL
Sitting on the steps of capital hill?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To:
Y'all are brutal. Get me out of here...
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Oh, let's hope not.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
Rogerio,
If you've got users that are able to open e-mails containing trojans,
transported by various attachment types, then you have a bigger problem.
You either have:
1. No firewall/AV software or
2. Bad firewall/AV software or
3. Poorly configured firewall/AV software.
Plug your security
What robust authentication policy would that be? Exchange and Outlook use
NTLM authentication, I'm not aware of an optional authentication policy
available for Outlook which is more robust than that Unless there's a
3rd party product out there I don't know about.
I can write a trojan which
Hi everyone,
I have a real problem that I am hoping someone in this group can help with.
We currently run an Exchange 5.5 organization with about 30 sites spanning 3
NT 4.0 domains, with a few Exchange 2000 servers from the Win2000 forest we
are migrating too. I was trying to consolidate two of
To be clear, by I can write, I mean I could design the spec on a napkin
and pass it off to one of a dozen friends who could whip up the code in
under a day. I personally couldn't write the code, even if I wanted to.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure,
That'll do pig. That'll do.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RAM
BAA RAM EWE
BAA RAM EWE
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Well, it's as accurate an answer as he could offer, under the circumstances.
:)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It would help if you were a little more specific.
Are some messages being archived and others not or does it just fail to
archive entirely? Are you getting error messages? Does it only happen on
some folders and not others...
Chances are the problem is that some messages aren't archiving
As was pointed out elsewhere you really need to check with an attorney in
the applicable state (sounds like Maryland in this case).
Generally speaking I believe the key phrase is expectation of privacy.
Merely saying that the e-mail is for business use only is probably not going
to be
http://www.lilbill.net/index.html
William
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...
-Original Message-
From:
You should benchmark your reliability. Work with your vendors to determine
exactly what your current configuration will deliver in terms of:
- mean time between data loss events
Your first supporting table for this statistic should look like a seismic
event map so you can project not just the
Win2k SP2 Native Mode
Ex2k SP2 Native Mode
I am creating Address Lists in ESM. Using 'Filter Rules' I can add groups
to a list, users to a list, but not both to the same list. I have tried
every combination under the menus. I have tried adding custom code such as
Been a while since I wrote LDAP queries and I'm over medicated at the
moment, but doesn't the query below say give me objects which are both users
and groups whose UPN and display name is *@company.com? If so, I think the
problem might be that you want to ask for users OR groups. It seems you are
hi,
I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.
anybody can help me?
thank you.
Poh Ling
_
List posting FAQ:
We need more details - how did you send the message? From inside your site or from an
external address?
What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default permission)?
What version of Exchange server are you using?
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling
I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.
The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.
I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.
Poh Ling
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18,
Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill.htm
l
Amateur.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Is the folder set up to accept messages? If you set it as a calendar or contacts
folder that could be an issue.
How did you address the message? Did you select the folder from the Global address
list or enter the SMTP address manually?
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling
ThatÂ’s the one I was thinking about.. Thanks Jennifer..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Thursday, January 17,
How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can
see the message that i send in that public folder.
I select the folder from the Global Address list.
thanks.
Poh Ling
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18,
I have that one on Laserdisc. One of the best.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Not that bill, this bill:
You've lost me. You say you can see the message that you sent in the Public Folder.
If the message appears on the folder, what's not working the way you expect it to?
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 PM
To:
does anyone use EX 2k as a file server to have one central location for
accessing files on the road or from the office ?
I tried to create a network shortcut in w2k Pro and XP Pro, connecting to
http://server/public/files
It was prompting very often for authentification.
I could drag files to
Read a little bit more
Wireless for now can be easily hacked.
It's a gift for hacker.
IF you use wireless, use stgrong encryption within it.
IPSEC, PPTP or (TSL, please correct me if I'M wrong, TLS is one of the
encryption to use to link 2 exchange ? )
SO if you go wireless, use encryption
Sorry if i confuse u. What I expect is after I send the message to the
Public Folder, Microsoft Exchange Server will automatically route the item
to recipients for approval.
thanks.
Poh Ling
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5041
-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard
Sorry if i confuse u. What I expect is
Along those lines, anyone know where I can find docs on wireless security on
a Windows LAN? Things like setting up certs, WEP encryption info, what the
dif is between 40-bit and 128-bit, how a Win2k Cert server can help, etc...
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL
You have posted this to the wrong list. This belongs on the Dilbert
newsgroup.
Ask your boss whether he knows the meaning of catch-22.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From:
If it happens once, you can bet it'll happen again.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval,
LaCretia,
It depends on a lot of factors, such as available network bandwidth, choice
of migration method or tool, speed of servers, speed of disk subsystems,
architecture of disk subsystems, etc. Your best bet would try a dry run.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom
This is discussed ad nauseum in the FAQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, January
Keep a fire extinguisher handy!
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002
Please share with me what the many many different reasons are that the
system must have the same system name.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I were in your shoes, I'd call PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kastner, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 17,
The magazines know what side their bread is buttered on.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent:
101 - 200 of 209 matches
Mail list logo