This should point you in the right direction
http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/whitepapers/exchange_asp_deplo
y.doc
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster
This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1
Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider
Spend a few days researching how to solve the problem. Then tell them
that it shouldn't be done and then charge them what the extra server
would have cost in the first place.
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, July 04, 2002 12:40 PM
Posted To:
Why is recovery so difficult?
If you've got the dumpster turned on, then recovery is something the
user can do without fairly easily. Never a need for brick backup.
-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:33 AM
Posted To: Mi
Wrong, Wrong, Wrong,
You are absolutely right that IT is presented with the two cases. That's
the way business should work. (Of course many big enterprises forget
this). But it's basic supply and demand. Users need storage, they need
to pay for it. Users need IT support, the management pays for
And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support.
Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was
presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits.
Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think
is stupid, I me
They are all on the same segment and the same office !
> -Original Message-
> From: Sander Van Butzelaar [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 July 2002 10:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Shared Mailbox
>
> Are all users on the same segment on your LAN? ie could it be t
All
Scenario : 10 Users all sharing one 1 mailbox. Outlook 96 SP2, Ex 5.5 Sp4a,
NT4 Sp6a
When one user sets a reminder in the calender it only appears on certain
users screens ???
Any ideas ???
Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd
London Road Henley Road
Teyn
James -
I would pay close attention to what Kim has said here.
I am not sure how large your environment is, but you could run into some
very big issues here.
Testing is another key point, and roll-back another, this sounds like a
deployment primed for failure.
What you have listed can be don
I agree as long as there is money to support it. But keep in mind that
having a large IS means that there is that much more stuff for lawyers or the
FDA (we do drug development) to go after. And if you are going to have an
unlimited store it ahs to be managed. Those tools are not free. I man I
We are a small venture capital based biotech firm. You would be amazed at the
number of files we have on the server and in e-mail. People routinely send
large PowerPoint shows and then they end up on the server and on the exchange
users sent box. I really don't want to get into numbers but I was
I remember using CHKDS a while ago. Not one of those utilities you should
run without MS PSS on the phone with you. They will then give you another
version of it (CHKDSRO), which is for Read Only mode, which is how you
should run it first to gather the information you need and is not as risky
as
I need to host two floors, two different company's. I want to do it with
a Exc Standard edition.
Is it possible to have two GAL's with users/groups... From the two
company's?
I am abble to split the users in GAL's if I use permissions, but there
is still users from both company's in both of them
When asked this question I've always gone with what Ed has said only less blunt, the
business must decide what it wants to or can afford to fork out for and then the
business must be told what it will get for its money. The Exchange designer must
present all the available options to the busines
Check your Event Viewer, Application Log for Event 1016s.
You will need to do some research to see which of these are false alarms,
however.
--
be - MOS
If you ever fall off the Sears Tower, just go real limp, because maybe
you'll look like a dummy and people will try to catch you because, h
Not to get into a war of words (as this appears to be something near and
dear to your heart), often IT is put in the position to have to:
A) Save money by not spending any, period (on Exchange or any other type of
upgrades, or disk, or what have you..)
B) Provide virtually unlimited service (unl
this is where that lovely Patsy Cline quote comes in so handy: "People in hell want
ice water".
your client may want a lot of things, but they can't really have them all at once, can
they? If they don't want to upgrade their domain to 2000 yet, and only want to buy
one new server, and can't
Hi,
I require to configure an Exchange 5.5 server to record unsuccessful
mailbox logon attempts, i.e. when a user tries to access through Webmail
and uses the wrong password.
How do I set up this sort of logging?
Thanks in advance,
Andy
My client has an NT 4.0 domain, running Exchange 5.5, and they want to
upgrade to 2000. The problem I'm having is that they're using SBS Server
4.5 (so trusts can't be used), and they don't want to upgrade their domain
to 2000 yet. To top things off, some of their proprietary software for
tele
One I have used with some success is the use of Exchange as a file server. The larger
their quota is, the more "important" things tend to wind up there. If they start
using it as a file server, and want something restored they are hosed. (unless you
are doing a brick-level backup, or can tak
I have a problem with an exchange server that will not sync with other
exchange servers in our site. We have the problem and a possible
resolution to the problem. We have found that we need to run CHKDS on the
exchange server and this will flush out packed pages, but we are unable to
find the comm
Dear God save us from lawyers
> --
> From: Woodrick, Ed
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2002 13:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
>
>
> Why do you pretend to be arrogant enough to be able to dictate the needs
Why do you pretend to be arrogant enough to be able to dictate the needs
of others? You don't seem to have any business drivers to justify your
actions. And who is to say that getting additional disk drives for the
user email storage isn't out of the question?
And as to storage, it has nothing t
In O2K2
Tools | Options | Other | Advanced Options | Reminder Options |
Probably slightly different in O97 but you get the idea
For those that do and those that don't the check boxes will probably be
different
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-ex
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Just released by equiinet.com, pretty good reasoning too. So Bob, you can add this
link to your justifications...
http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressReleases/24_06_2002.htm
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exc
For 25 users? How much disk space do you have? 9 GB?
Really... if there's no absolute need for quotas, bag the idea.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Unlimite
Don't forget the backup and restore window as well. Obviously a large IS is
going to take a lot longer to restore than a small one.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unlimited Quotas
I
I agree - the situation we had here was that limits were never established
when Exchange was installed - people will convince themselves they need
everything they've ever received if they're given the chance (this applies
to file storage, as well). In our case, it was mostly a training issue -
on
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, at 9:18am, James Liddil wrote:
> I am being asked to justify why I have set quotas for users on our E2K server
> with 25 users.
[...snip...]
> So besides these reasons are there any other reasons that I should be
> thinking about?
Also, keep in mind, that while your existing
MTC --
I would start asking your users why do they need unlimited space to store
emails? Depending on your quotas/limits I could see where this might be a
problem if they get large files (CAD drawings, spreadsheets, powerpoint
presentations, etc.). In that case they should just save the large f
You'd better off asking this at a development related list like
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mscollaboration/ instead of an Exchange
admin list.
For now, remove " LDAP://ADMINT/"; from the CreateMailbox call and it
might work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL
I see the same situation here. I have a few users with one folder (the
inbox), with thousands of messages and large numbers of attachments. Users
are only warned about being over limit.
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 05
I'm trying to edit our user creation script to build Exchange 2000 accounts
and I'm having some difficulty with CDOEXM. I keep getting the error "There
is no such object on the server." when I use the following code:
set objmailbox = usr
objmailbox.createmailbox "LDAP://ADMINT/CN=Mailbox Store (
Also keep in mind the limit on folder size in the Outlook client... You will
probably reach that before the server storage limit.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 14:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quota
Good point =). But we never had limits before - and this led to us hiting
the 16g limit with essentially 10 main users having 1-3g of email a piece.
'Twas very ugly trying to convince people to let go ;).
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
> From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EM
Fair enough, he did however say he had 25 users:-) He would need to
keep the 16 GB limit in mind. Curbing the attachments will help to
stretch the amount of actual mail you can have.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 03:40
To:
35 matches
Mail list logo
