Brightwhore?
Same crap. New name.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Fu
I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self
Extract. Download again, same thing happened again.
Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on
Exchange 5.5 Issue ?
Fin
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL
We had a similar issue when we went from 5.5 to 2K. I found that if the users put in
their username in the old NT4 fashion - domain\username - they got in. I also found
later that you can assign a default domain to the OWA website using the IIS admin
tool.
Jeff
-Original Mess
That was my conclusion after roaming in the Exchange tools web sites
yesterday night. Thank's for the ideas
-Message d'origine-
De : Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 20:18
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : Re: Distribution List
Okay, that makes it a b
Okay, that makes it a bit harder.
Since the SMTP address is unique within the org you can use it as an index.
You'll need to get fancy in Excel. Export the current list and do a matchup
between the list you get from Oracle. Use the resulting matched info to
create the list for import.
Or...
Cre
If you look at the mailbox statistic in ExchAdmin, do you see 0 message?
-Message d'origine-
De : Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 18:31
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE: Missing INBOXES
Well, since there is no such thing as an 'inbox' except as a vi
Problem is thoses users are from multiple different sites, multiples
different countainers and I only have the smtp address.
Going the import way, I need all thoses informations if I read correctly the
export file I create yesterday night for testing.
-Message d'origine-
De : Daniel Chen
Exch 5.5... Not yet at 2K
-Message d'origine-
De : Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 08:43
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE: RE : Distribution List
If you have their email addresses just highlight them and open the group in
Active Directory (assumin
Nope... Just the backbone of UUNET
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: list really slow today?
any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to
2000 does indeed have a logon screen unless someone has hacked it out.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: Need help access denied in OWA
2000 does not have
Sounds like you have the answer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 17:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box
I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but
Clear cache in IE. Reboot client. Make sure user is enabled. Double check
IIs settings for authentication/domain fields. There are articles on this on
MS's site. Check there to make your doing it right.
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Youngbauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discus
And to the questions of the NDR -
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Testing
Sent: 10/3/2002 10:25 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 10/3/2002 12:44 PM
Could not deliver the mes
Isn't UUnet having problems? That might cause somethings to be slow.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: list really slow today?
any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long ti
REAL spammers have no trouble getting into AOL. Those who don't know any
better (and who haven't paid their entrance fee) get blocked.
- Original Message -
From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:57
I feel your pain. I have been working for close to 6 months now to try to
solve that problem.
We have reverse DNS.
You dont get a NDR; nothing, it just never gets there.
If I telnet into their smtp server all goes okay but again the mail never
shows up in the recipient's inbox and I have tried qui
Well, since there is no such thing as an 'inbox' except as a view of a bunch
of items sharing a particular attribute in a big data base (i.e. the store),
one of two conditions or some combination of them must exist:
1. The would be viewer does not have the required matching attribute to
access t
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=amfes.com
You are listed as an open relay also.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP to aol.com
If you're talking about amfes.com, it'
2000 does not have a logon screen
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Need help access denied in OWA
A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then
immedia
'Cause AOL is so screwed up
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send
reliably to any o
Didn't he stay at a Holiday Inn Express once?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Ed hasnt slept since 1979.
-Original Message-
From: T
I'll do that. Thanks for your help.
Dot
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
At this point, I'd probably just watch it and if I were the curious type I
might
Thanks, a place to start.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Probably someone is trying to hack. Have you tried to investigate who this
IP address could be?
That's an Outlook limit, not an Exchange limit. IIRC the default in 5.5 was 5,000 per
DL, but could be changed.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 01:38 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Di
They get a login screen, enter their information it pops up again because
it looks like it does not like the password once you enter it 3 times then
you get the access denied. I am using basic authentication and I have set
the domain into the basic password settings in IIS. Can't think of any
ot
Filter in the view?
Vacuumed clean by a POP3 connection?
Can they see anything using OWA?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing INBOXES
We are using Exchange 5.5./
any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the
list today?
(or is this just my personal hell again)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www
I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he
needs some information for this past Employees mailbox.
What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him
permissionas and have him add it to his profile?
E2K, user is using Outlook 2K.
- John Q
_
To clarify: Are the Inboxes gone?
Or are the contents of the Inboxes gone?
If the latter, I would suspect that the users moved or deleted the mail. Check to see
if they have accessed their mailbox via a POP client, or if they have set up their
Outlook profile to direct all new mail to a .pst
Maybe they are not as popular as they think!
I have had this problem numerous times.
user> I have no mail today
admin> O.K., sorry!
user> Is something wrong w/ the mail server.
admin> no
user> then why do I not have any E-mail messages from today
admin> , why do you THINK you
should have mail?
us
You already have the spreadsheet. Add the appropriate column headings and
import them into Exchange with Exchange Administrator/Tools/Directory
Import. Just make sure you have the correct column headings, or it will
turn into a vicious nightmare (or daymare, depending on where you are).
Geoff..
Netscape being the server product rather than the client.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
>
>
> That IP address belongs in Korea. Do you have a
Downloaded via POP3? Held in a local PST file? Is it retrievable via deleted
items retention?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Missing INBOXES
>
>
> We are using E
Lots of reasons. What reason does the NDR give?
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejecte
If you're talking about amfes.com, it's because you don't have any
reverse DNS.
You can reliably send to any other domain that does not require your
server to be represented by a valid reverse-DNS lookup. Which will rule
out Earthlink, too, among others.
> -Original Message-
> From: Da
Why don't you post the NDR and we will check out.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can
Please include a copy of the NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can
send reliably to
are they using outlook express to read their email or do they use outlook
with internet only. Cause if they do by default the option to leave
messages on the server is not checked. So if someone goes home to read
their email with these options enabled when they get to the office they wont
see an
A number of reasons: AOL frequently is down; AOL is being blocked at your
IMC; message too large; attachment too large, etc.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SM
I finally can answer a question on this list :)
AOL sucks!
Seriously, the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be that were
an open relay.
Doug Kassay
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange D
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 1:39pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory
> is right.
I'll second that. There seem to be a large number of really sh*tty
IDE/ATA "RAID controllers" on the market these days. We had one customer
who (again
rDNS?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel L.
Miller
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I
can
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 10:38am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL?
Error message?
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or po
Wow...I didn't know anyone ever got rejected by AOL.
Without an NDR, it could one of several reasons:
1. You're sending to an address that is over it's quota.
2. You're sending to an address that has been disabled or deleted.
3. Your organization has been blacklisted by AOL and they are blocki
You are blacklisted by several systems. Go to www.dnsstuff.com and check to see what
lists you are on and what you can do. First thing, stop relaying.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it possible that the client has been set to use POP3 and is
downloading the mailbox to a PST file? I had a client do this
before
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missi
I have seen this before. But not with your setup. Is it all users or just
some. It may have something with the blocking at a firewall somewhere either
on where the users are connecting or your Firewall. It seems they connect
and authenticate but then something is blocking traffic. Proxy? Not enoug
Search on support.microsoft.com
Plenty of hits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11
Ben T
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 1171 help?
Scenario:
NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP
try using the domain name when you log in.
Double check your default domain in IIS.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Youngbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:35 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Need help access denied in OWA
Subj
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q317471&;
Also I would turn off intergrated perms and try using basic. Also go
ahead and set the domain name for basic.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Youngbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:35 AM
Do you have owner rights to that public folder?
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder
> Publish or perish!
>
Ummm Im no guru with exchnage 55 or 2k
But me thinks there is limit of addresses in 55.
I seem to remember hitting like a little over 200 is all I could get into a
DL.
I tried about a year ago to add like 700 to a DL for faxing and remember
getting a error from OL.. True this was not a server DL
A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then
immediately goes to access denied screen without any input?
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Youngbauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:34 AM
S
That IP address belongs in Korea. Do you have anyone that would be legitimately
connecting with Netscape from Korea?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Error - Again
Cou
If it fails, it fails. I replace it and go on with my life. No big deal.
Please read from the beginning of the thread. I only suggested this solution for those
situations when there is a limited number of drive bays.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
Andrea,
Please let me disagree.
Al
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send
reliably to any other domain.
Daniel
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came
up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database
clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at.
Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in
the inbo
Yes and Yes
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RAS Dial up issues
Did it ever work. Is the Perl Ras boxes new?
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PRO
Before you posted this question, did you explore the Knowledge Base? You'll find the
answer there.
Probably in Q324340
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Keith Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing a site (excha
I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new
Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other
servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is
and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member
server.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 October 2002 15:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
>
>
> If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no
> big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a l
Andrea,
Please let me disagree.
All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp
page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then
when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it,
with al
You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help
for "admin import"
- Original Message -
From: "Bourque Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Distribution List
I have an E
Yes, as a google search would have shown.
- Original Message -
From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
> Hi,
>
> May i know which third party are you guys talking abo
Could well be a Netscape user; the version before the current one, with
patches, would improperly try to do AUTH if it saw that tag in response to
the EHLO command.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 20
Did it ever work. Is the Perl Ras boxes new?
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: RAS Dial up issues
We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doi
It appears to be a new attempt to steal passwords. I've also seen them on
the POP and IMAP ports.
If you've only seen them one or two at a time, it could be a valid user
trying to incorrectly configure a client.
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thurs
Andrea,
I do believe though he said that...
'I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1
> volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. ' IE he had it on
Raid 1 and it still failed (don't know why probably because of a problem
with the Raid1 hardware/BIOS or it was the
Eeeeuh, maybe because they had to 'exchange' a disk.
Michel
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
>
>
> What does that have to do with Exchange?
>
We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doing a
send/receive in Outlook their services hang while Outlook is trying to
synchronize their inbox. It looks like data is transferring but there
is only like 1 email in their box and it is telling them that they have
about 6 hours to go
Scenario:
NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I'm in the processing of replacing two servers with a more powerful one.
I setup the new server and joined the site. I've moved all of the mailboxes
from the first server onto the new one and didn't appear to be having any
issues.
However, starting o
At this point, I'd probably just watch it and if I were the curious type I
might keep a list of Ips as well... And if it because a more frequent event,
I might follow Andrey's advice and block the specific IPs in question.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Picture this:
Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system
crashes.
You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system
still down)
You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start
up without page drive) (system still down)
You partiti
I've seen two, there may have been three, of these. Not ongoing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and
Add new domain to route table and check your DNS
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange with 2 email address
FAQ 3.23
> -Original Message-
> From: Gunanathan, Amir
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and the
authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IMC Error - Aga
Probably someone is trying to hack. Have you tried to investigate who this IP address
could be? I just checked it and it seems to belong to some Korean comrades. Not to
say that they are all bad guys but recently there has been a lot of spam coming from
them. Maybe you should put an explicit d
I think if you are using multicast, you have to put a static ARP entry. You need to
use the virtual MAC address that is displayed in the WLBS properties.
Have you tried not using multicast?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 0
If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting
page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a
separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store
database files; and if no more drive array bays ar
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2
Is there anything special to do about removing a site other than stopping
Directory Replication to the site and removing Site connector(s)? All
mailboxes/public folders have been moved to existing servers in other sites.
There is just one server in the site.
Any advice gratefully received!
Rega
So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop
working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every
time?
Robert Moir
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
>SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
0 rows returned
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey
Just to make sure things are interesting, W32/Opaserv-B "Magallanez" is
supposed to be raised to Level 1 by Fsecure today. Anyone seen this one
yet?
Still feeling pretty cozy behind Martin's list but curious about attachment
extensions for it.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mai
Yes, works from the inside. Results from wlbs query, Host 1 converged as DEFAULT with
the following hosts as part of the cluster: 1, 2
Also, I checked the nlbs prop and have multicast checked.
I understand that I might have to put a static entry into ARP cache on the AS5200 for
the VIP to ma
Even if the cluster has not converged, one of the cluster members should be talking on
the virtual IP address.
I still think this is a MAC address issue. Some switches and routers do not understand
the WLBS virtual MAC addresses.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Do you need me to explain it all in small details?
I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke.
Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily
make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive.
I have an even better idea. Promote him to be the manager of spam department. You can
also make some more money for your company by sending him out as a spam consultant to
content-scan other people's messages.
He is the perfect content-scanning tool that we have been wishing for on another
thr
Maybe you need a new boss that actually would do some work around the office.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large Mailing List
Ah ha ha ha hasucks to be youI
If you have their email addresses just highlight them and open the group in Active
Directory (assuming this is a global list) and just paste the names in Members and hit
check name. It should resolve the names and add them for you.
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAI
Ed hasnt slept since 1979.
-Original Message-
From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Dang..I thought you were smart before. Uh so do you like ever
sleep or anything, I spend a good de
Dang..I thought you were smart before. Uh so do you like ever
sleep or anything, I spend a good deal of time just trying to keep up
with exchange, I don't think I could handle all of that. :)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October
No, but they are kin to Guy Smiley.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Content Filtering
Is either related to Percy Dovetonsils?
Ed Crowley MC
This is one of those brainteasers, right? You want to get the same event at the same
time on both servers... OK, here's the solution: put both on the same power strip and
then turn the power strip on and off. The servers reboot simultaneously and have a
series of events that should match up, pr
I've written it in languages older than humanity. Of course, when I say
"Hello, world!", it has an entirely different meaning...
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:39 PM
To: Exchange Discus
I've never seen this error before, but three times this week I've seen this
error on one of my smtp servers. The error reported by Microsoft Operations
Manager:
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with erro
Yes, probably Veritas Backup Exec v8.6
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:09 AM
Posted To: SWYNK - Exchange
Conversation: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Hi,
May i know which third party are you
Hello,
We just migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2K SP3.
I keep getting an Event ID 8213 from MsExchangeFbPublish every 25 minutes.
KB Q296151 does not help much as there are no SRS and MSExchangeFBPublish
services on our exchange box which is running in native mode.
Is there any way to get
98 matches
Mail list logo
