Released Nov 12:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2000sp3.htm
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Arch
Willingham
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
TechNet just sent out an
If it's Outlook 2002, check out Q287623
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:jjones;telemanager.net]
Sent: 13 November 2002 22:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook drops first address in TO: line
Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line it
Possibly, have you checked that it happens on this Outlook only, and if so
have you checked if he has set 'use comma as the address separator'.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J.
How is the user separating the addresses? The default settings require the
use of a semicolon, but there is an option in Outlook to allow commas as
well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
Actually, that's not going to stop them.
If mail gets delivered directly to Exchange, just make sure their address
doesn't exist in the system. If you have a mail relay in front of Exchange,
then you want to be able to set that to reject those addresses.
The reason being that, over time,
Actually, we're not to mention Peregrine. ;)
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent:
You know Vanessa as well?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: 14 November 2002 00:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stop NDR
You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no
members, and assign it the smtp
Do all the workstations/servers you run this from have Exchange System
Manager installed?
-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak;CIGNA.COM]
Sent: 12 November 2002 18:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Delete Exchange Attributes Option on ADUC SNAP IN
Does anyone have any information on the following virus:
Win32.chiracdance.trojan
None of the Antivirus vendors appear to have anything other than CA which
only show detection for their product but no information.
I have searched Google and am continuing to look around
TIA for any help.
Stu
Buffalo Andy won't you go out tonight
Go out tonight
Go out tonight
Buffalo Andy won't you go out to night
The waffles are particularly fine!
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:eastb;PFFCU.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A
Yes, I doubled checked that, the option became available in SP2 for
Exchange
Clint
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:mark.harford;bbc.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delete Exchange Attributes Option on ADUC SNAP
The discussion wasn't that big, and the information, while interesting,
proved to be less than useful. That's why I threw it back out into the pool
again. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:42 PM
To: Exchange
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/friendgr.shtml
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst;eu.sony.com]
Sendt: 13. november 2002 14:11
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Virus heads up
due (dodgy finder here) I meant SUE
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul
Can someone tell me what the best counters are to determine how a server
is performing. I know tat the ultimate test is the performance time the
users are seeing (ie.. Open messages and attachments, send messages)
But what counters will give me an accruate picture of what the users are
seeing?
Hi all.
Is there a version of Exchng32.exe (or similar) for Windows2000 or XP?
Thank you.
Eugene
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Hi,
If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account in
domain a be mapped to an exchange account in domain b?
Regards,
Erik L. Vesneski
Director - Information Technology
www.epicentric.com
_
List
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/friendgr.shtml
Børre Nilsen
Førstekonsulent IT/Senior Executive Officer IT
Riksutstillinger/National Touring Exhibition
Postboks 4762 Sofienberg
N-0506 Oslo
Norway
Tlf (sentr. b.) +47 22 99 10 70
Tlf (direkte innvalg) +47 22 99 10 81
Fax +47 22 99 10 71
I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did
not have a 'To:' (receipient). I am attaching all of the information I
could gather from the email. How is it possible for an email without a
destination recipient to be delivered?
Thanks!
Raul
I am my wits end with a problem I am having with my Exchange setup.
Environment: 2 Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers on an NT domain. (soon to be
upgraded)
We are doing the ground work to install spam filtering software and have
installed an SMTP relay server using the SMTP service built in to IIS.
Blank to: with many people bcc'ed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did
not
Well, I found this so far:
The Ultimate Guide to AutoDL
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exch2000/whitepapers
/e2kwps.asp
Hope that helps.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:Michelle.M.Harmon;conoco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002
Greetings,
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a few
clients (mixed, some OLXP and some OL2000) that are seeing delays with
mail delivery.
For example, If I send a message to my boss the message doesn't appear
in his inbox until after he clicks on a different folder
There should still be For addr in the headers, though, as part of the
received lines.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins,
Here's an oldie. I noticed in my Exchange server App Event Log a 2018
Informational event, Category = Transfer Out Of Gateway, stating my IMC was
unable to produce a delivery or non-delivery report due to error 0x80004002.
Researching it brought up the thread below and Q226202: XCON: No Delivery
Kinda like the baby ruth in Caddyshack?
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
The discussion wasn't that big, and the information, while
interesting, proved to be less than
Is smtp fixup applied to the firewall, assuming it is Cisco. If it is take
it off.
- Original Message -
From: Bailey, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: SMTP problem
I am my wits end with a problem I am
Blind Carbon Copy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did not
have a 'To:'
BCC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did
| not have a 'To:' (receipient). I am attaching all of the information I
| could gather from the email. How is it possible for an email without a
| destination recipient to be delivered?
|
|
Sounds like it could be the number of connections allowed. If your relay, or your
Exchange
server are maxed out, connection-wise, at a given moment, one or the other may bounce
the
occasional message.
Just a though,
Alex
Bailey, Matt wrote:
| I am my wits end with a problem I am having
BCC
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did
There used to be a good white paper written by Compaq and Microsoft called
Managing and Monitoring Microsoft(r) Exchange Server. I can't find it on
either site anymore.
I'll send it to you offline if you would like.
-Original Message-
From: Marshall, Ben F. [mailto:ben.marshall;usaa.com]
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=inde
xreq=viewarticleartid=1 (link wrap and all that)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Greetings,
I'm
This is the worst looking hat I've ever seen!
Oh! Looks good on you, though...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Kinda like the baby ruth in Caddyshack?
There are quite a few mistakes in that paper, unfortunately. I can sift
through it and let you know the ones I found, if you like.
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Well,
Check out www.slipstick.com. I can't remember the name of the protocol
that's beeing slowed down, but it's a known issue...
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey
Nah.. only if some mail server inserts them (which Exchange doesn't).
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
There should still be For addr in the headers, though, as part of
I disagree with their analysis. It's clearly self-replicating, and that, combined with
the fact that it doesn't infect files, makes it a worm. Yes, it requires some human
intervention, but so do most other worms. The only real difference is that the email
just contains a link to the worm, but
Erik,
Yes, we have that setup here.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik;epicentric.com]
Sent: 14 November 2002 14:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts
RFCs 821 and 822 (or the updated 2821 and 2822)
Read them.
Learn them.
Live them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik;epicentric.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi,
If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account
in
domain a be mapped to an exchange account in domain b?
Exchange32.exe being... the old Exchange client or the windows messaging
client which doesn't work with Exchange.. or something completely different?
-Original Message-
From: McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [mailto:Eugene.McCarthy;fao.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:48 AM
To:
Is it just me, or does most of the links on the referenced page come up
Page not found.
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Well, I found this so far:
The Ultimate Guide to
I initially looked at this but certain addresses are denied repetively.
What is an appropriate amount of connection for around 2500 accounts?
-
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto Inc.
602-631-7486
-
Can you define a resource?[1] It's certainly possible to do.
[1] Is that a link to info on how or an application which actually does it?
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:Steve.Bevilacqua;suntrust.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange
Found it on Active Answers finally. You'll need to register on their site to
get it.
http://tinyurl.com/2p7g
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Performance Monitoring Question
Obviously.
There is an underlying analytical issue that is more interesting. I think
it may help in diagnosing future questions assuming of course a basic
familiarity with the FAQs and documentation.
We often forget that everything in computing is 1s and 0s. All else is an
abstraction of that
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?releaseid=43346
Have a look at that document. It has suggestions for perfmon counters to
watch.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Marshall, Ben F. [mailto:ben.marshall;usaa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange
I'll bet he is using a laptop.
Now what made him say that?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Greetings,
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a
Maybe.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik;epicentric.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts
Hi,
If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account in
domain a be mapped
Is the e-mail address for reporting documentation mistakes in that paper (if
so, you should report them), if not, I can get you the address so you can
report the mistakes and they'll update the paper accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M.
Greetings,
We are planning to install the following patch, it is suppossed to be a
post-SP4 for the cdo.dll and cdohtml.dll files, the problem we have is that
some calendar-appointments simply disappearyes another M$ ilogical
behavior.
Our questionis does anybody try the installation any
OK, this may be a wacky question but have to ask it.
1)In an Exchange 5.5 environment, is there anyway to route server to server traffic
through a 3rd party gateway, ie IS-MTA-Sendmail. This being a strategy to contain
viruses on each server by filtering through Sendmail-Milter.
2)What's the
Casey
I had this same problem on and it was because of XP. As them if by any
chance they have the built in Windows XP Internet Connection Firewall
checked. If this is checked it blocks certain ports (Not sure which
one) and you don't get the email until another folder is clicked on. If
that
But, it's still important to know what counters to look at when users are
experiencing response problems.
The paper is in Technet under Products Technologies - Exchange Server
-Exchange Server 5.5 - Maintain - Monitor - Managing Monitoring MS
Exchange Server.
-Original Message-
From:
That depends. I always break it down into two areas, hardware performance
and actual message flow. It depends on what you feel you may have concerns
with.
- Original Message -
From: Marshall, Ben F. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12,
Hi everyone,
I can't seem to find a spot in exchange 2000 were I can have exchange
forward or copy a message to another email address. Any ideas or doe
sthis have to happen at the Outlook level --OHH! maybe using exchange
rules?? Did I just answer my own question?? bad week..
Does anyone have (or know of) any documentation for this utility? I've
already used it to find some messages in a corrupted mailbox, but what
I'd like to know is if there's some way to use it to extract/export
them.
Many thanks.
-Michelle
Yes, maybe, especially if it is a mixed NT4.0 domain and AD setup. It will
work but certain functions will not work in Outlook, like sharing of
calendars can be troublesome.
- Original Message -
From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I could buy that this was an issue with UDP packets being blocked if the
clients weren't behind the same router that the exchange server is
behind.
No laptops are being used either. These are regular desktop computers
sitting in the same network segment and plugged into the same switch
that the
as already stated, bcc.
The other side, is that by the subject I am assuming this is one of the
mighty send me your bank account number and I'll send you my money. We have
been getting about a dozen of these a week. I can also say that for the
ones we are getting I have been working with our
BCC:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:53 AM
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email (and possibly others in my company) but it did
not have a 'To:' (receipient). I am attaching
OK, this may be a wacky question but have to ask it.
1)In an Exchange 5.5 environment, is there anyway to route server to
server traffic through a 3rd party gateway, ie IS-MTA-Sendmail. This
being a strategy to contain viruses on each server by filtering through
Sendmail-Milter.
Any way?
Eric you've been on the same lists I have for the past 4+ years, do you
really expect helpful answers from anyone when you use the M$ moniker?
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14,
Hmmm, I thought maybe you were on to something there but I checked the
clients that are having the issue and none of them have the ICF option
enabled.
There is no router between the client and the server.
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups [mailto:Newsgroups;henwoodenergy.com]
Sent:
Where can I find information about priv.edb. Information like how big can
this file grow and how to maintain this file. Anything is helpful Thank.
Tony Nguyen
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
In any BackOffice system, all objects have to exist within a security
context. All communications (the movement of bits) has to take place within
a security context. In 5.5 and earlier, the security context is provisioned
or enforced independently of the existence of an Exchange Store mailbox.
Rules wizard will guide you.
- Original Message -
From: Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000
Hi everyone,
I can't seem to find a spot in exchange 2000
I have also seen this problem, and actually it is on my system. I'm
running Windows 2000 and Outlook XP. My server is running Windows 2000
and Exchange 2000 both running SP 3. The notification used to always
come up and it just stopped one day. I don't have a router in between
my PC and my
Go to the Exchange General tab of the Mailbox properties, click the Delivery
Options button and set the Forwarding address.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original
Increase MTA timeouts
- Original Message -
From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
I could buy that this was an issue with UDP packets being blocked if the
clients
Look at my last email. Did you check to see if Windows XP Internet
Firewall Connection was enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:23 AM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Outlook Response Times
If you have Exchange standard version, it can get to 16 gb. (Is that in
conjunction with the pub.edb? I don't remember). If you have
enterprise version, it can get as big as you're willing to let it grow.
Maintain the file by leaving it alone, for the most part.
Drew Nicholson
Technical
5.5 DR white paper
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto
re.asp
2k DR white paper
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a
sp
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Ali Wilkes (IT)
Subject: RE: Win32.chiracdance.trojan
Ali,
CA is detecting part of a commercial software named iSpyNow.
We treat this just like the Friend Greeting.this is commercial
software. We cannot write
yes, I did and it's not enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups [mailto:Newsgroups;henwoodenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
Look at my last email. Did you check to see if Windows XP Internet
I'd appreciate that. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:Michelle.M.Harmon;conoco.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Maillist
Subject: RE: AutoDL
There are quite a few mistakes in that paper, unfortunately. I can sift
through it and
Do a search for a utility called GWClient. Can't remember where I found it,
but it
should be easy to find. If I remember correctly it allows you to create/use
a
pst file to copy or move messages. Be careful with it, I think I lost some
messages by
moving them to the Top of the Folder. Good luck.
I am getting the following error. when people try to Reply to All. they do not get
this error if they hit the new message button and put in the same address.
Messages are sent back with the following error
The destination server for this recipient could not be found in Domain Name Service
Actually, I didn't get my copy from there. I found it in last month's
TechNet.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Maillist
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Is it just me, or does most of the links on the
There is no documentation on it, not even internally. Use carefully and at
your own risk.
- Original Message -
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:12 PM
Subject: documentation for mdbvue32
Does
1. Standard: 16G, Enterprise: practically unlimited
2. Leave it alone.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: Priv.edb
Where can I find information about priv.edb.
priv and pub are separate objects in this context
- Original Message -
From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
If you have Exchange standard version, it can get to 16 gb. (Is that
New mail notification comes from UDP packets, so buy it or not the lack of
status update is the result of UDP packets not getting there for reason x.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange
Monitoring and Managing Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server
ISBN: 18232X
Or its 5.5 cousin.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Where can I find information about priv.edb.
The link wraps.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002
What happen when you reach 16G and how would I know if we are running
Enterprise?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Priv.edb
1. Standard: 16G, Enterprise:
Hi
Using Exchange 5.5 how can I disable a user from receiving and sending
external email, but still able to send withing the Exchange Organisation.?
We have students being employed, and we want to restrict their email.
Any help would be appreciated.
--
Raji Arulambalam
Systems
Hi. I actually would like to hijack this thread :)
Outlook 2000 and up allows to redirect mail by creating a rule in Rules Wizard. My
impression was that such a rule would be equivalent to setting the Forward option on
the Delivery options, under the user's Properties/Exchange General in Active
I think it will stop after 3GB.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory
Hi everyone.
I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is
True. But many companies just think that they can install it [on a workstation-class
PC] and let it hum in the corner. Some of them don't even suspect that there is
Exchange-aware backup.
Also with Exchange 2000, Microsoft made hosting licensing more attractive than regular
licensing.
You don't have to wait 10 years. There is that thingie out there, called MiraPoint. It
is supposed to be e-mail in a box.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: somewhat OT
So
I found this researching a similar problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;190366
Hope it helps,
-
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto Inc.
602-631-7486
-
-Original Message-
By the same token not too many people really save money by leasing cars vs financing
them. However there are some benefits like being able to change cars every few years
or giving a car back when it is not on warranty anymore.
Same thing with hosting Exchange. Do it for a few months, don't like
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, at 4:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error. when people try to Reply to All. they
do not get this error if they hit the new message button and put in the
same address.
Obviously, they're not the same address, or it would work. Maybe the
Most likely, this error reflects the originator of the message typing in their
displayed address
wrong. When someone hits reply, double check the address that is in the To: field.
Alex
Jeffery Caudill wrote:
| I am getting the following error. when people try to Reply to All. they do not
This might be helpful. A new registry entry from SP3 for Outlook 2K
ForcePolling
OL2000 You Cannot Receive New E-mail Notifications
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=11506
Configures Outlook 2000 to poll the Exchange Server instead of using
UDP packets to receive new e-mail
Why then do other clients on the same network segment not have the same
issue?
Again, this has nothing to do with mail notification, it has everything
to do with messages showing up in the inbox. I could care less about
the small envelop icon showing up...I just want messages to appear after
Yes, but fixing that leads one to a page with several interesting sounding
white papers. Attempts to view most of them fail.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
the information store stops if you are running standard and hit 16GB.
section 3.53:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, November 14,
Check the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:rajia;envbop.govt.nz]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi
Using Exchange 5.5 how can I disable a user from receiving and sending
external email, but still able to send withing the
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo