On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange 5.5
to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and on
others it seems to go on for hours. In fact, one did take 6 hours.
One mailbox, which seemed to be relatively small in size - about 150 mgs,
took
PS...do read the security paper's on securing IIS
otherwise you could be in a for a world of hurt/hack
bill
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: installing OWA
Make sure OWA i
also there is www.e-nspect.com
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Roffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: Mailbox monitoring
> Hypersoft has a product called OmniAnalyser that reports on email tr
/resetfolders
On 1/8/03 23:48, "Johansson Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well to be honest I am not 100% sure, when I have restored for example sent
items or the inbox they have worked correctly afterwards. But I never did
any really fancy testing, just the basics.
-Original Mes
Hi,
We have a user in Germany who had a german installation of Office, which
included Outlook 97. So, when he went into the application it would show
his standard folders within the mailbox in the German language. So, whenever
he goes to a different machine, even if that machine has an English ve
I'd call that more of a good reason not to use clusters.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Actually... most of the problems were a result of the SAN and it's
failures. Of the 5 sites that had this type of SAN, 4 had problems.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch
See that's what I thought as well. I even opened up a ticket with Cisco and
went through our entire settings and they couldn't find any holes that would
be allowing this type of access.
Brian Cooke
Systems Administrator
U.S. Inspect
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PR
We have some users that consistently get errors when syncing some items
inside Public Folder Favorites. See the log:
7:47:47 Error synchronizing message 'FW: ShopKo 1/14/03 Top Hit Endcap'
7:47:47 [80070005-508-80070005-322]
7:47:47 You do not have sufficient
I use the USPS as my analogy. I do believe when Mr. Postel wrote the
original RFC he used the Post Office as his model.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "How do I explain NDRs"
OK, I'm lost on this... What is it?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Lol I found it..
No wonder the old mail filter would york it..
We have the same problem when moving 500 mailboxes.
I assumed that some mailboxes are either partially corrupt or do contain
very old as well as new messages that are scattered around in de IS store.
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Harris, Dot [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden:do
Hi,
The folder names are in the same language as your version of Outlook used that
opened the mailbox for the very first time.
See if this will help you to rename the German top-level folders to the
English equivalents:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;263668
Cheers,
All
Hi,
Exmerge can do such a thing, but Exmerge is actually a migration tool, so
probably not very handy for you.
Anyway, see the exmerge.ini file.
Underneath a part of the exmerge.ini:
[Folder Name Mappings]
;;
; Make sure that the value for MapFold
Really?
Care to share the experiences? I'm actively specing out Dell/EMC gear for a
project and anything I know ahead of time will help. Offlist is fine, too.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
Yes, some of these mailboxes are 3 to 4 years old.
-Original Message-
From: Wassink, Mw. A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Migration Wizard Question
We have the same problem when moving 500 mailboxes.
I a
Roger and Jeff,
I am also interested in the problems you encountered. We are in the
process of implementing a Dell/EMC solution. I currently have a test
bed up and running and have seen no problems yet.
Thanks
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
When you say they use Outlook, which version. The fat client, Outlook
Express or OWA?
- Original Message -
From: "Cooke, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
> See that'
They are using the fat client. Outlook 2000 primarily.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server
When you say they use Outlook, which version. The fat client,
We've been running 3 Compaq Exchange (2-E55, 1-E2K) clusters on a Compaq
MA12000 SAN now for over a year. All of the problems I've had have been
because of SAN problems. The clusters have worked fine. We have had
controller, disk and Secure Path problems. Just recently I lost one of the
mirrored dr
We have some users that consistently get errors when syncing some items
inside Public Folder Favorites. See the log:
7:47:47 Error synchronizing message 'FW: ShopKo 1/14/03 Top Hit Endcap'
7:47:47 [80070005-508-80070005-322]
7:47:47 You do not have sufficient
1. Use a windows 2000SP3/IIS5 server for OWA. It will be more stable,
and probably more securable.
2. Install IE 6 SP1 (You'll need it for a later step).
3. Run windows update and install all of the critical updates.
4. Plop the Exchange CD in the server. Select OWA.
5. Install Exchange 5.5 SP4
6.
- Original Message -
From: "Cooke, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
> They are using the fat client. Outlook 2000 primarily.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: T
Then somehow your internal network is exposed. I would worry about other
things besides people being able to access email using Outlook.
- Original Message -
From: "Cooke, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:43 AM
Su
Is an option to rename the folder from M:?
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Wassink, Mw. A.
Enviado el: jueves, 09 de enero de 2003 14:53
Para: Exchange Discussions
Asunto: RE: Outlook Client and Language
Hi,
Exmerge can do such a thing, bu
Yeah that's what I figured. For some reason though this only happened when
we migrated servers from NT to Win2k Advanced Server. I wasn't sure if any
one had seen anything like this before.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003
Unlikely the code update alone caused the current behavior.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
Yeah that's what I figured.
Yes, good idea, it works fine for Ex2000.
But if Sebastian is running Exchange 5.5 it will not work.
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Cabezas, Manuel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden:donderdag 9 januari 2003 16:19
> Aan: Exchange Discussions
> Onderwerp:RE: Outlook Client a
Maybe I missed another post but we cannot get this patch and/or txt file
to work at all on Outlook 98. I got it to work a few months back when I
found it but when we try now on Outlook 98 it will not work. Any ideas or
suggestions?
Karon M. Miller
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, LLP
Here are
I recently discovered one gotcha when using EMC & PowerPath on Windows
2000. If one fibre-channel link dies, PowerPath re-configures itself to
use only the one remaining good link. When the first link comes back up,
it can take several minutes for PowerPath to see it and again
reconfigure.
So, if
It took approximately 20-30 minutes for a 100mb mailbox in our network
here. I did most of my mailbox moves off peak hours on my production
boxes.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick
today. Our current setup is quite stable now.
I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on
which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery.
At 02:45 PM
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in
Outlook 98.
Text/HTML or RTF.
Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful.
The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3.
Thanks,
Darrin
_
List
At 08:41 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>[snip]
>John is a little off with his description... this is our current
>approach and it seems to work very well in my test restores. (this was
>developed during my nightmare, er experience with the recoveries of last
>year).
[snip]
Thanks, Jeff.
John
_
np
-Original Message-
From: Luther, John W.
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
At 08:41 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>[snip]
>John is a little off with his description... this is our current
>approach and it seems to w
At 10:11 AM 1/9/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick
>today. Our current setup is quite stable now.
[snip]
I stand corrected by Jeff Edginton's better description of our system.
John
__
We had frequent hardware failures when we had Exchange on the Dell hardware. That was
the experience that led us to focus on designing a setup that would allow for "fast"
and reliable recoveries. Now that we no longer use the Dell hardware for Exchange we
have few problems.
At 03:53 PM 1/8/20
In Outlook 2000, a user has this situation: Under "Options\Email
Options\Tracking", his defaul Read-Receipt option is set to "Always Send
a Response", and it is grayed out (hence, unchangeable).
He is the only user in such a situation, and we have no such server-side
receipt processing.
Anyone k
Are you looking for real-time monitoring or monitoring over time for stats?
Quest's Spotlight tools are good for quickly checking the queues, and the general
health of servers.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:56 PM
To:
Plain text. Nothing more, nothing less.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 January 2003 16:03
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
Wow. Slow network or servers.
I tend to see at least half a gig an hour, depending on things like SIS
ratio and the like.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Origi
Windows 2000 Active Directory in Mixed Mode, Exchange 2000 Org in Native
Mode.
I recently mail-enabled a bunch (~75) of user accounts. I noticed that
one, and only one, user account did not get updated by RUS with an email
address. 2 events appeared in the application event log, ID 8315 and ID
827
2 Exchange servers. Exchange 2000 sp3, Windows 2000 SP3.
Started out with one Exchange server, ServerA. ServerA contains a complete copy of the
public store as well as the mailbox store. ServerB was brought online a short time ago
because ServerA is running low on disk space and horsepower, so
Plain text.
On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in
Outlook 98.
Text/HTML or RTF.
Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful.
The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3.
_
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I
think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But
I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 20
Have you ever read legal briefs? They make plain text look good.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL
Help me please. Have ex2k sp3 server only server with exchange. Have one account that
can access
mailbox thru OWA no problems. Remotely from his home office can access thru outlook
2000 sr1.
From in house workstation running XP and outllook 2002 cannot match name to address
list. I can see
I try not to look at anyone else's briefs.
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
> Have you ever read legal briefs? They
It's common law.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J.
Carter
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF
The person attempted to delete an item and does not have the rights to do
so. The delete operation is failing during sync and thus the message.
Clear it by removing the folder from being synched, synch once, then add it
back.
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An HTML message will take up more space than the same content in plain text
message. Also, not every mail client will display the contents correctly (my
linux mail client shows the HTML code).
Read this:
http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
AW
On Thursday 09 January 2003
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it.
- Original Message -
From: "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the
Is the user's mailbox hidden?
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1
Help me please. Have ex2k sp3 server only server with exchange. Have one
account that can
Sue Mosher just sent this out from her EMO publication. Notice the part
about Outlook 98 clients near the bottom:
Microsoft has released an updated list of holidays for 2003-2007, just in
time for users of Outlook 2000, whose holiday list goes only through 2002.
Get the download from
http://micros
Why wouldn't they be able to access the server given the open ports?[1]
Here's a list of your currently open ports...
Open Port: 25
Open Port: 27
Open Port: 110
Open Port: 119
Open Port: 135
Open Port: 139
Open Port: 143
Open
For $200 an hour, I'd be happy to explain it to the bloosuc^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
gentlemen.
On 1/9/03 11:10, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I
think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But
I'm
ouch..say Good night Irene
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server
Why wouldn't they be able to access the server given the open ports?[1]
Here's a list
Each had its own purpose, time and place. Most people that I know, use them
all. It is common for Exchange Server users with the heavy Outlook client
to set their default to RTF and use the others on an as needed basis.
You do understand that under the hood, this is a silly question. Body part
When I try to add OWA It say I need IIS and Active Server Pages. How do I
setup Active Server Pages?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: installing OWA
1. Use a windows 2000SP3/IIS
Install IIS4
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: installing OWA
When I try to add OWA It say I need IIS and Active Server Pages. How do I
setup Active Server Pages?
-Original
Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
(858) 278-8400 EXT. 250
www.jetproducts.com
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swi
Yeah - you're more of a thong man yourself.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursda
www.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS
Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Syst
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/NT4OptPk/default
.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS
Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank
Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to
forward all email to a different external email. The error message
says: " Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough
memory or the rules are tooo complex. Try deleting some rules"
This is the only rule
Can I install IIS5 on windowsNT?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: installing OWA
1. Use a windows 2000SP3/IIS5 server for OWA. It will be more stable,
and probably more securabl
No. It is part of W2K
You get IIS4
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/NT4OptPk/default
.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: installing OWA
Can I insta
All your ports belong to us.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server
> Why wouldn't they be able to access the server given the open port
Me so horny
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server
All your ports belong to us.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "
Lordy! That's a lot of open ports. Might I suggest getting back in touch with your
firewall admin. If you want to test it yourself try:
https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
- Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09,
Exchange 2000 (recently upgraded from 5.5) with Outlook 2000 clients
Originally, the HR spec would send out a meeting request. Acceptance or decline
replies would always generate a copy to HR sec.
Now, when that happens, the user would get an NDR saying that the HR sec name/address
is not vali
Does this happen on ALL meeting requests, or the ones being replied to
that were generated before you 5.5 upgrade? I had this type of issue
myself, where people would try and reply to a message or meeting request
that was generated before the conversion and would get NDR's.
Bob Sadler
City of L
Nope, happens with no requests, too. I know what you mean, though. We had people
trying to reply to an email sent before the conversion and they'd get an ndr. That
was an easy fix, though.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[E
>Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF?
1) Not every reader in the world can read html or RTF, but to be fair that's
less and less of a concern.
2) For the same reason the lawyers use plain text on court documents. RTF
and HTML allow you to get too cought up in colors and fonts
Check the properties of the storage group and see where the default public folder is
located.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:01 P
I had that happen here when the migrated mailbox had rules applied to it prior to the
migration. I ended up having to export the mail, delete and recreate the mailbox and
then import the mail. This resolved the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
Well we did that...but there's no option for default public folder...both systems are
Exchange 2000...
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: public folder replicas and red
Okay.. I made the assumption that Server A and Server B were in the same routing
group? Are they? If not, does the connector that goes between the two routing groups
allow referrals across the connector?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Or
Real-time. We use Promodag for stats.
I'll have to look into Quest.
Thanks
> Are you looking for real-time monitoring or monitoring over time for stats?
>
> Quest's Spotlight tools are good for quickly checking the queues, and the general
>health of servers.
>
>
>
> -Original Message
John-
Thanks for the help. Yeah the A and B are both in the same routing group...they are in
the same site. ServerA is right now the master, and B is a member.
We moved a user's mailbox from ServerA to ServerB. Now that user on ServerB can access
public folders when the public store on Ser
What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction
logs or can it be done?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.as
Okay. Go to the individual mailbox stores (not the storage group) on Server A.
Open the properties page and set the Default Public folder store to Server B.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailt
eh?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: Transaction log reports
> What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction
> logs or can it be d
In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that
could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, &c. that would
substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been
received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small
print.
--
Download it? Just add it in the Add/Remove programs Control Panel applet. It
should be in the Windows options. You will probably need your NT CDROM. Make
sure you get all the windows updates after you do it.
windowsupdates.microsoft.com
J
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto
Ah. gotcha...thanks a lot John.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: public folder replicas and redundancy
Okay. Go to the individual mailbox stores (not the storage group)
*lol*
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 20:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
www.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, Ja
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL
you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for
IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an
unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior
wou
That is IIS 2.0. Way out of date and not compatable with OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Download it? Just add it in the Add/Remove programs Control Panel applet.
All the cool sites use IIS 2.0
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: IIS
> That is IIS 2.0. Way out of date and not compatable with OWA.
>
> -Original Mes
I think "jackass" might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good suggestion of a
possible alternative to IIS.
Alex
Chris Scharff wrote:
> I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL
> you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for
4 out of 5 admins prefer "jackass" .
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: IIS
> I think "jackass" might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestio
Just a quick question. How did you determine they are trying to delete an
item??
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 4:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites
The person attempted
The other one just wants ass
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
4 out of 5 admins prefer "jackass" .
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
I guess compared to some of the alternatives, I prefer "jackass", too!
;-)
Andy David wrote:
> 4 out of 5 admins prefer "jackass" .
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2
That apache.org post was a subtle anti M$ jab I think hhehe
I saw a report the other day that apache has like 66% of the market and IIS
33%.
J
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: II
Jackass might be a little strong if you're a six year old girl in Sweden,
but in Mr. Hummert's case, if the 6" heels and maid's smock fit.
On 1/9/03 15:08, "Alexander Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think "jackass" might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestion of a possib
What the hell is an M$?
On 1/9/03 15:18, "Johnny Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That apache.org post was a subtle anti M$ jab I think hhehe
I saw a report the other day that apache has like 66% of the market and IIS
33%.
J
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAI
They don't. I traded that outfit in for one with a little bit more
leather and so nipple clamps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Jackass migh
Follow by example?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the
URL you listed, b
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
