After 3 weeks of hassel and 4 hours on the phone today with PSS it was discovered that
Windows XP and the Miscrosoft ISA firewall client don't play well together if not
correctly addressed.
In a setting, such as ours, where E2K is a SecureNAT client with the ISA and windows
XP clients have t
In any case, it's http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: M
Ed's method is the way to go. I have done it a number of times (in fact just a few
weeks ago) and it is quite painless.
Since you are installing 5.5 on a W2k server, you may find this of interest as well:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/55/Upgrade2000qi.asp
One more thing
The Ed Crowley Move Server method described in appendix A of the FAQ (I
think Martin posted the URL).
On 1/20/03 17:41, "Steven Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, considering all circumstances, I suppose there
is no real need to keep the Server name the same, the
only reason I said we nee
The one I'm working with just now uses that or SID history. I think you
can use a mapping table as well but the alias field works for us.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
Well, considering all circumstances, I suppose there
is no real need to keep the Server name the same, the
only reason I said we need to is that I read a KB
article Q177635 which said that to restore the
dir.edb, it's Windows NT Name specific thus can only
be restored to a server with the same name
Just checking. ;) Makes one wonder why the $descriptor migration software
can't key off of any field the admin chooses.
On 1/20/03 16:26, "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Br
Do you really need to keep the same name? Are you sure? Are you really sure?
For this type of restore I don't see the need to do anything off network.
Shut down the old server, restore to the new server, fix whatever is still
broke. [1]
But I try my darndest to never have to actually do that and
Just do this
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
-Original Message-
From: Steven Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full Exchange Server restore query
I have been looking to move an Exchange Server t
I have been looking to move an Exchange Server to a
new physical server (And I need to keep the server
name the same). The old server is running Exchange 5.5
on NT 4.0 and I'm looking to upgrade it to Win2K
running Exchange 5.5
Thanks
Steven Owen
Wooden Spoon Society
Charity of British Rugby
Of course.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
To answer the question reasonably, we will need to know more about what
you're doing and why.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behal
Hello all,
Windows NT4
Exchange Server 5.5
Full restore of Directory Service & Information Store
I have a query regarding the restore of Exchange 5.5
Server to new hardware. I have read over the DR
Whitepapers and KB Article 177635 and am slightly
confused and hope one of you guys can clarify
O
Exchange 2000 SP3
Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP3
Trend Micro Scanmail 6.x
LUN 1 = Storage Group 1, 8 Disks Raid 10, 136GB
LUN 2 = Transaction Logs for SG1, 2 Disks Mirrored, 36GB
LUN 3 = Storage Group 2, 8 Disks Raid 10, 136GB
LUN 4 = Transaction Logs for SG2, 2 Disks Mirrored, 36GB
While monit
A TV show on astronomy? Neat!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
OK Time for you to go on the next edition of Star Search.
- Original Message -
From:
OK Time for you to go on the next edition of Star Search.
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
>
> No, I haven't been in the military anyw
No, I haven't been in the military anywhere.
RPC packets are pretty small.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What are you, an ex English major? Thanks for am
Microsoft didn't come with their own POP3 connector, they bought/licensed
someone else's. Whose is an exercise to the reader, but POP3 connectors in
general are still limited technological solutions with a number of holes
based on what it is they are trying to achieve.
On 1/20/03 13:36, "B. van O
What are you, an ex English major? Thanks for amount of rules based on size.
Never did know a guess for that number.
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:46 PM
Subject: RE: Rule
Why would Ed be using Outlook Express to access your Hotmail account?
;o)
The 32k limit server-side is for MAPI access to Exchange. A client can
not see how much room his rules take up, but I regularly get 26-34 rules
to fit.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
One of my customers thought they were smart and bought Popbeamer. They got
a fixed IP and everything needed to use SMTP e-mail..
Popbeamear seems to work pretty well for them. No reports of lost email..
Before MS came with their own POP3 connector for NT SBS there was a product
from (IIRC) Exam
It's fairly trivial to make them the same if that becomes a requirement no?
On 1/20/03 12:24, "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some migration tools depend on it being that way for interorganizational
moves, i.e., the alias being the same as the SAM account name.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Intern
I use Outlook.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussio
Curious. If your using rules on say Outlook Express to access say my
personal email account on Hotmail, are you limited by the same sizing "32K I
believe" it is on a MAPI client to Exchange? Also is there a way to see what
your rules sizes are?
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EM
Same here, except that they sometimes don't fire, or two of the rules
come in conflict, a problem I believe I have fixed through a rule
modification. However, I use rules primarily through my personal POP
mail, not through Exchange Server. I don't find much need for them in
my work.
Ed Crowley M
I figured by using the term "software product" that you meant commercial
software. If I could find someone to buy my "Hello World" applications, I
would be a happy man.
Also, I have 15 "move email" rules for various lists and spam filtering in
Outlook 2002 and they work with no problems whatsoever
Some migration tools depend on it being that way for interorganizational
moves, i.e., the alias being the same as the SAM account name.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
I guess I should have qualified that as "commercial software".
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Mond
I think I suggested NDRs generated by a 3rd neutral party, which is a
fsckload better idea than implementing POP3 connectors for customers. I'm
glad I'm working from home today because the string of obscenities which I
just uttered caused the dog to go hide under the bed. Boggles the mind it
does.
There are still better ways to solve that scenario IMHO.
On 1/20/03 8:55, "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh goodness, I hope you have asbestos undies on! POP3 connectors are
generally considered the spawn of Satan in these circles. Don't let the
flames get you down, there are lim
312269 It's a known problem. Call Microsoft and reference the article
number. It's a non-dec call since it's just a hotfix. Install it on the
BES and the problem goes away.
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:11 AM
To: E
Messageware has just released a version of their Plus Pack for OWA 5.5. This is one
of the features included in the product. Other features include:
Spell Check
Signatures
Outlook-Style Addressing
Personal Distribution Lists
Feel free to contact me offline for more information.
Matthew Seon
T
Try looking for Hosted Exchange on Microsoft e.g.
http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/whitepapers/exchange.asp
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks for all
turn off NDRs
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Need recommendation for 3rd party Exchange 2000 POP3
Connectors - my reason
Thanks for all the responses.
I posted earlier last we
Thanks for all the responses.
I posted earlier last week about my need to host 2 separate companies on
one Exchange box, and an absolute requirement is that customers of each
company could not know that the 2 companies physically resided under the
same roof with the same management. One problem to
Outlook XP doubles.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
http://www.blackberry.net/support/faqs/enterprise/installation/index.shtml#q
8
So are
http://www.blackberry.net/support/faqs/enterprise/installation/index.shtml#q
8
So are the double appointments just on the BB or in his OL calendar as well?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Microsoft Exchange MVP
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
Microsoft
I believe it is one user. How do I get the CDO hot fix for
Exchange?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Be sure you have the CDO hotfix for
What applications?
My take is that Terminal Services works best for one server running one
application and accessed by many users. For the "car rental" application of
5,000 users all using one application - that is a good approach.
But for "normal" "professional workers", who typically use 5 or 6
Be sure you have the CDO hotfix for Exchange installed.
Is this happening to everyone or one user?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Sync
Oh goodness, I hope you have asbestos undies on! POP3 connectors are
generally considered the spawn of Satan in these circles. Don't let the
flames get you down, there are limited cases where a POP3 connector can
work well (such as mine: one-to-one mailboxes, no fixed IP address).
I don't think th
Sync
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Is this wireless calendar or sync?
> -Original Message-
> From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAI
Is this wireless calendar or sync?
> -Original Message-
> From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 January 2003 14:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
>
>
> Exchange
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [ma
Is the sync setup to allow all appts? Rather than either flag a conflict or let
Outlook (or BB) win?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 January 2003 14:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Anyone know why appoin
I once saw this - being prompted for every graphic in OWA. That was a result of
deliberately applying service pack to the back-end before upgrading the front-ends
(just wanted to see what would happen)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January
Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Exchange flavor BB or Internet mail flavor?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mai
Exchange flavor BB or Internet mail flavor?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Anyone know why appointments are doubled with Blackberry and Office
X
Anyone know why appointments are doubled with Blackberry and Office
XP?
Thanks,
Alex
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
I always specify the full domain/id/alias in POP3 and IMAP even if the nt_id
and mailbox alias match. I've found it impossible to train help desk monkeys
in exceptions. They understand "I before E" just fine, but throw in the
conditional "except after C" or heaven forbid "and sometimes Y" and sudde
Slipstick has started selling baseball bats?
On 1/20/03 4:12, "Mark Harford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's probably something at Slipstick that'll help.
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mail.htm
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 2
The store will use as much memory as it can get its hands on.
Did you run the Exchange Optimizer AFTER you had gotten everything moved
over and finished? I would recommend you do if you haven't yet.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January
Failover in such a scenario is likely a bit more complicated than simply
tossing out a new host entry or two. What are you using now to specify the
target server in your x.400 connections? Are users going to be testing this
failover too by connecting to the alternate Exchange server? The failover
s
Correct. Think about it - POP3 and IMAP4 are mail RETREIVAL protocols. They
don't deal with sending mail, just receiving. For sending, you need to use
SMTP. SMTP doesn't care about mailbox limits for send - nor should it.
That's not the use for which it was designed.
--
The two others worth looking at in that space would be Foundry Networks
(http://www.foundrynetworks.com) and Extreme Networks
(http://www.extremenetworks.com).
Some might recommend Enterasys (http://www.enterasys.com) as well (used to
be Cabletron) as well. They haven't, IMO, kept up with the othe
SO you've never managed to completely debug the requsisit "Hello World"
applications you've written in the 15 or so languages you've used? I'm
shocked!
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and E
Thanks for the reply Chris,
Well posting this message was useful in that it has questioned possibly a
long held belief. I have always made the alias for my Exchange deployments
the same as the NT user ID because I am sure someone in the past told me
this was Microsoft's recommendation, maybe I sho
All,
Environment:
NT4 Server with service pack 6
Exchange 5.5 with service pack 3
Groupshield 5 sp 1
Legato 5.5.2 client
Legato Exchange module version 2
I have just moved my exchange server over to new hardware. The server is
working fine, but first noticed in my event viewer that the Legato ex
Put them in a contacts Public Folder instead?
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 January 2003 08:27
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Outlook Address Book - Email Address Book for an Additional
Mailbox
Subject: Outlook Address
There's probably something at Slipstick that'll help.
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mail.htm
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 January 2003 06:04
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Email Addresses
Subject: RE: Email Address
Hello
Is there a way to make the Contacts folders of a mailbox other than my
principal mailbox show as email address book? If I an additional mailbox
to the list of mailboxes I can view (under the Advanced Properties of
Exchange Server Service), then I right-click the Contacts folder in that
mailb
60 matches
Mail list logo
