Route Mail

Hi al, For route mail, specified domain or host server need to be specify in the SMTP Connector. One of my Oracle's Application (B2B) has to be configure to send email out to external users(e.g. Yahoo,Hotmail) hence this application needs to relay email to Exchange 5.5. What is the

RE: Routing

Hi, A question into your answer. How to do a ALL-domain route instead of per-domain route? Thanks -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing If your BT connection has an address

RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed

Glad to here that you got it to work, but I have a bought Cert (Verisign) and on the same client (my home PC) I have no trouble with connecting at HTTTPS://domain... and use the OWA with formbased logon with the same username/password that I am trying to connect Outlook/ over RPC-HTTP I cant

connection

I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: -

RE: connection

Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest

RE: connection

What should I check first? -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for

RE: connection

Mail for academset.kz is handled by mail.academset.kz (10) 193.254.251.62 sri.academset.kz (20) 193.254.251.229 samek.academset.kz (30) 193.254.251.205 test.academset.kz (40) -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange

RE: connection

If I do a trceroute via samspade then I get the following: 3130.152.180.21 6.672 ms isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net [AS226] Los Nettos origin AS 4198.172.117.161 8.894 ms ge-9-3.a01.lsanca02.us.ra.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 5129.250.29.136 9.931 ms

RE: connection

You can ignore the DNS errors, chances are there is no PTR record for those IP's. What I am concerned with is the amount of time it takes for a reply from 212.154.128.18 and the next hop appears to have timed out completey, unless they are denying ICMP replies. 820ms alone is very high, maybe

RE: Secure E-Mail

We currrently use the Certified Mail with the Mail Marshal package. It accepts site certificates from other servers so if you send to a domain that the 2 of us have shared certificates and they have a secure mail server... then all mails sent to and from those servers will be encrypted. Anyone

RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question

GWART! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which

RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions

Log on Locally is no longer required for OWA. This change came with E2k. As for your problem, see this: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327843 Neil -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 24 October 2003 23:47 Posted To: Swynk

RE: MS Instant Messaging

Download the Migration Guide. I wrote about LCS documents here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/10/live_communicat.html Neil -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 October 2003 17:35 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)

RE: Tumbleweed

Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology

RE: Tumbleweed

Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars

RE: Tumbleweed

I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Tumbleweed

Should we call you Dave or David? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson

RE: Tumbleweed

Mighty Hercules will suffice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Should we call you Dave or David? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Tumbleweed

Didn't that one girl call you Spanky? ;0) -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Mighty Hercules will suffice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone

RE: Tumbleweed

Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Tumbleweed

No idea. http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/appliance_edition.html But, they are pricey for sure. Securemail will run you about 10k. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address

Now you will have to rely on scripts or LDIFDE.exe to assign the appropriate e-mail addresses to your users. Which is fine if you are comfortable with scripts or LDIFDE. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso

RE: Secure E-Mail

Wow, this sounds pretty good. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail We currrently

RE: Tumbleweed

Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From:

RE: Tumbleweed

So in todays-money, I can excpect 3 Ferrari's and maybe a Mercedes rag-top or two? I think I have them laying around Physical Plant. Maybe I can keep 1 of the Mercs if I scrub the support... Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Tumbleweed

IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to per proc. Huge difference. Why don't you call them and find out. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed So

RE: Tumbleweed

Yep. They changed to that about a year ago. Not sure if that applies to appliances however. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to

Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall

RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

You are going to be introducing a lot of changes by doing this. Let me give you a piece of advise. Put the Xwall on a separate box. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Tumbleweed

I like to have some idea before unleashing any sales pitches these days. Over the last year I have inquired on about 5 different products (spam, backup, file management - different things) and every one of them is way beyond our reach bit I cant get the damn salespeople to stop calling me! I

RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110. Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. -K- -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Tumbleweed

We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Tumbleweed

Dude!! You're at WSU in Pullman? I'm in the SE WA State in the Tri-Cities!! Weren't those winds terrible? Wind like that really plays havoc with our microwave towers. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange

Encryption packages

Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization

RE: Encryption packages

Mike, There was a massive thread on here about this subject yesterday. Check it out. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5

RE: Encryption packages

You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5

RE: Tumbleweed

Yeah, it made a mess. It also caused a pretty big blackout over in Moscow last night. Go cougs ;) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Dude!! You're at WSU in

RE: Tumbleweed

I was just looking for an SMTP relay that has other abilities (i.e. anti-spam) and we checking out Tumbleweed's appliance. Does anyone have an opinion on this one or others I could investigate? (like there's any shortage of opinions around here!) I just signed on to the list so I may have

RE: Tumbleweed

Hit up the web interface for the list. Lots of chatter lately about tumbleweed, etc. I've heard very good things about tumbleweed from various people. -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Tumbleweed

As an SMTP engine, Tumbleweed is quite powerful. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Encryption packages

You're right on that, Christopher. It's not a requirement. However, if an org does not encrypt, they do need to document that fact and why they didn't implement it. We've looked into it to a small degree but haven't started doing it (and, hopefully, won't). Paul Chinnery Network

Re: Tumbleweed

I have used Tumbleweed's SecureMail in a 100,000+ seat Exchange shop and I can certainly vouch for them. Solid product with top notch performance. It backends on SQL, which allows for some pretty nifty stuff that you can do as an admin (assuming you know SQL...always a good time to learn). Out

Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date?

Has anyone heard when Exchange 2000 SP4 will be released? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

RE: Encryption packages

Thanks Martin. I will look and see if I can find it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages Mike, There was a massive thread on here about this subject

RE: Tumbleweed

That's how I became a SQL specialist :) Before I only knew how to install SQL. After I could write some kick-butt queries and stored procedures. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Encryption packages

OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message-

RE: Encryption packages

We tried encrypting it for about a week. After so many complaints of I can't understand this e-mail you sent we decided it wasn't worth it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:58 AM To:

Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer

RE: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

You mean, other than by simply opening their mailbox and searching through the message bodies? Not in 5.5, unless you have been journaling. You can search by subject with ISSCAN or Exmerge. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29,

RE: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

You can search the tracking.log(s) for the domain is easy enough. You can also Alternately delivery mail to Manager's Account ( inbound only ). Let's give the person a little credit for some smarts. Portable media like USB drive is so much better for stuff like that (Like in The Recruit). Don't

RE: Encryption packages

Scott, What software package was chosen to do the encryption? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent

RE: Encryption packages

Christopher, What software package did you choose? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages We tried encrypting it for about a week. After

RE: Encryption packages

Notepad -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages Scott, What software package was chosen to do the encryption? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From:

RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

But POP users send using SMTP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kevin C. Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:39 AM To:

RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

Yes, it does. But just synchronize once locally and it isn't a problem after that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H.

Can anybody help with this ?

My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

RoadRunner is notorious for blocking blocks of IP address. Your NDR should include a URL referring you back to rr. All you can do is get your ISP to email them and hope that rr releases the block. We went through this 3 months ago and it took 2 months for rr to release it. Good luck

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

Yes, looks like they're down. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

Ed truly is psychic. I received his response a good 10 minutes before the question was asked. Genius! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Yes,

Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

All advice appreciated... We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in cached exchange mode. In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart

RE : Can anybody help with this ?

If they send you a test e-mail, what is the delay? Can it be that their mail server is sending Ident Request and that your FW is dropping it instead of Rejecting it? -Message d'origine- De : Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 18:20 À : Exchange

RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail...