It always passed the relay tests that I threw at the though. This was a
simple environment and no other relaying was allowed. I suspect that the
systems you have worked on had some other reason for relaying besides that
ones you mentioned.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [ma
It's been a while since I've supported POP3 clients on Exchange (5.5) but,
as I recall, I had no issues with anonymous relaying. I believe that
Exchange 5.5 allowed anonymous SMTP inbound connections (that is,
connections for mail to be delivered locally) and would allow relaying by
authenticated
How about using something like
http://www.spamhole.com/
Or
http://jetable.org/
There are many of these...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Single Use E-Mail?
I'd lik
You just need an LDAP server to keep track of each Netmeeting user. MS used
to have a one called Internet Locator Service (or some such). Not sure if
it's still available.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:30 PM
T
Errr... I think you mean SMTP. POP3 doesn't deliver email.
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain?
Pop3 will let you send as whoever you'd
10Kbps per user? The way my users use Outlook, I would estimate closer to
40K So it really depends on how everyone uses Outlook and what their
expectations are.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:48 PM
To: Ex
Never have done one... I can only dream about my stores shrinking enough to
make it worth the downtime.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: priv1
How often do you guys do an offlin
Sybari Anti-spam features are still pretty poor. But, the antivirus part is
excellent. We've paired that up with Postini anti-spam service, and we have
been 100% email virus free and 97% spam free since...
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Oct
Configure Outlook to work-offline always or let them choose the mode when
starting Outlook. When Outlook is off-line, it will always refer to the
OST.
Outlook 2003 with cached mode will improve this, but for now, this is a
pretty good option.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Hall [m
How about password expiration?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Zalta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Discovering Mailboxes which are not uses
I am trying to figure out a way to find out which mailboxes (users) don't
use
Duh!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
There was an article a few months back in a local newspaper about some
people who reacted on a similar mail, they t
Postini is catching at your company?
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
>
> We are early in the process of using
We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has
been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical
support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good
job of
detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't
"Where's the KABOOM? There was supposed to be an earth shattering KABOOM!!
-Marvin the Martian
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
Nice...
-Original Messag
We are seeing a lot of this virus this morning.
Luckily, I block PIF and SCR extensions...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_
I'll second that.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
I like Antigen
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Messag
This has almost always been the first place I learn about new viruses. I
subscribe to numerous virus warning lists and this list has almost always
been first to identify a virus that is a true threat.
> Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read
this ML > today, I mi
Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Heads up on a new virus
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencycl
otal Inbound Mail
> >2599
> >
> >
> >
> > > I find that most of them are run by vigilantes. There is no
> > accountability
> > > for these lists. They can do as they please and most often
> > do. I'm not going
> > > to trust m
Really? Do you find them to be inaccurate?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists
None
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto
Hi all,
I'm planning to install spam blocking software soon and I was wonder what
mailhost black lists you all recommend.
Thanks.
Aaron
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://i
Do they have 'Log on locally' permissions?
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA permissions
Hi all,
I just reinstalled Exchange and OWA. As regular Exchange user and a domain
admin
Maybe you could request a relatively small server and move SQL to it and
then move Exchange to the old SQL box.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL
The old Exchange box
plode. :)
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors
Yup, I'm scared.
everything.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
the priv.edb and then
move everything back, no you have to do that.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors
Thanks. Do I really have to move the IMS and public store
will need to diagnose and correct these
issues before you put the server back in operation.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fixing 1018 errors
My exchange database has been reporting 1018
My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore
from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a
server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the
temporary server.
Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply d
Your either an open relay, propagating a virus, or both.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jason E. Sommers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bandwidth Help
Group,
I am having some problem with my Exchange server using way to
:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3
Yeah thanks for your help.. Do you have any ideas or program recommendation
on a quick, easy and low end user involvement for the mapi setup
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
ckouts but due to audit purposes I cannot .. Have you ran into any fixes
or workarounds until I convert to mapi
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3
I've
I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was
happening. Why not just disable account lockouts?
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and pop3
hell
http://www.slipstick.com/config/convmsg.htm
-Original Message-
From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pegasus migration utility?
Does anyone know of a decent utility that can migrate Pegasus mail files to
.
Wow. I'm a member because my wife was a member when we got married. She
was a member because her father served in the Dental Corp and is a USAA
member... And you can't get in because you've been out for 3 years! Geez!
Aaron
USAA since 1999.
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mail
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a
good fax machine.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP
that run's on unix (i
forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago).
Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of
it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...)
bill
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailt
like that in that price range.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
h
2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To
Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[
http://www.gfi.com/
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Hi All,
We receive a low volume of faxes and send
ite a program to do it for you.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Hi All,
We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in
find
Hi All,
We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could
I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without spanning tapes.
Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver you are using.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
Hi all,
I have a problem sending email using CDONTS. Digging around on TechNet
didn't help and Google indicated that this is a common problem but I found
no solutions.
Configuration is
NT 4.0 SP6a
IIS 4.0
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are trying to send email via CDONTS on the same server as Exchange.
Reducing the MTU on the client might be a good start. Try something around
1400.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: a bit OT: My DSL modem+D-Link router+OWA - weird things
I
And no one has mentioned latency... Latency can have a huge impact on
network performance. Bandwidth is only part of the equation.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: R
We have a similar setup... 40% of my users work at other locations and use
offline folders to improve Outlook performance. We also auto synch their
folders. We have configured Outlook to ask the user whether they want to
work offline or connect when Outlook starts, so if they are interested in
us
.
Nothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:Aaron.Brasslett@;KleinschmidtUSA.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
I've tested your server and it is definitely wide-open.
Wh
I've tested your server and it is definitely wide-open.
What do you have for routing restrictions?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Rel
I don't think you'll get Exchange to listen on two ports for SMTP, but you
may be able to accomplish this with your firewall.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hollingsworth [mailto:bhollingsworth@;sympatico.ca]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
What is in the Display Name field?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems
I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from a
CSV
. We have been running it for um 3 years
(latest version about 1 1/2 years). No changes, and no issues before...
Scanning both...
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 8, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA
Most of the time it is due to misconfigured AV software. What AV software
are you running? Is it scanning the files, information store, or both?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discuss
So far, I've only have seen one Bugbear-A compared to the dozen or more Klez
that I get each day.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
It'
After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a
public folders. It would take the format of
outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 0
This may be client dependant.. But this works for OL 2000 and 2002.
>From the folder list drag and drop the folder into an email body and it will
create a file with the extension xnk.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09,
ing an etech-a-sketch and trying to check his e-mail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
Hmmm... This works for
Hmmm... This works for me. I moved an email from my sent items that had a
bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed.
What version out Outlook/Exchange? I am using 2002/5.5SP4
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
That is a perfect scenario for using a VPN. Since you already have the
Internet access, you are half way towards a VPN.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/o
Oh, that is pronounced: 'jOnz
That one stumps me on occasion as well.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones"
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the la
-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory
Yah, did that too.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM
To: Exchange
Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory
Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory.
I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings
according to
Easy way would be to buy a Temperature and Humidity monitor for your APC
Smart-UPS and let Powerchute alert you.
Or, if your cheap, look at http://www.admins-web.de/digitemp/ then use
something like ServersAlive to page you.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Easy way would be to buy a Temperature and Humidity monitor for your APC
Smart-UPS and let Powerchute alert you.
Or, if your cheap, look at http://www.admins-web.de/digitemp/ then use
something like ServersAlive to page you.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Other list... Unsubscribe.
PST=BAD
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST as an archive?
On another list I am on it is suggested that outlook mail be archived to
.pst files and b
Your question would be best answered by the Servers Alive! Mailing list
http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/mailinglist.asp
SMS is your best option.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Now what starts with the letter C?
Cookie starts with C
Let's think of other things
That starts with C
Oh, who cares about the other things?
C is for cookie, that's good enough for me
C is for cookie, that's good enough for me
C is for cookie, that's good enough for me
Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie
in CYprus with a local ISP and ADSL here and had a win 2K
server with 3 clients behind it.. and the Win 2K server as a RRAS .. and all
the clients could get on to the VPN.. do u think it is an issye with the
Lucent router..
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL P
But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN issue...
IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing
hoses things
Worked for me!
Make sure you type the ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Check it out
MAn I tried it too but it didnt work
Check this website out most of the things w
I think that the lack of mention of BLB in the DR papers says it all doesn't
it? DR >< BLB.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BLB's
Anyone got any good Q articles or pages exp
Don't
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving out of a Domain
So what would be a recommendation to put an exchange box in DMZ.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Hmmm... I must have the magic touch too 120 users 17Gb priv, 6Gb pub
single PIII 550, 256MB, mirrored sys drive, mirrored log drive, RAID 5+1
database drive and the server sits idle most of the day...
Aaron
PS It also runs IIS for OWA and AV software...
-Original Message-
From:
Good idea. You could use the demo version of Servers Alive! to do that
quite easily.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Redundant OWA
You could write a script that would
do it. I don't remember the errors.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem
And those errors are...
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[
ginal Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem
Next question is why are you manually installing the updates? I run the
same version and you the auto download thingy a
I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better. Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.
What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Pro
Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on
is the hot spare.
A
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
smart array 431 controller, slot
I think you store some kind of make-up in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
What is a Compaq?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAI
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37
Is this new or just newly discovered?
If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare
light doesn't come on.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: a
I agree with Joe. Go get ERD Commander now and it will save you gobs of
time in the future... it is priced quite reasonable.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: off topic -
This works okay for me
Is the activity folder a journal folder? If not, try creating a journal
public folder and see if you can specify it as the activity folder.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:01 AM
T
Ah ha! Somebody else has this problem! We have the same problem although
we are using InoculateIT and I figured it was to blame, but it appears that
Scanmail does the same.
Even though the message's attachment has been deleted, when the message is
read via OWA, you immediately start getting the
I thought I would never have to actually post a PST question as I know
PST=BAD. But I have been asked to help a subcontractor of ours with his
Outlook woes. He has been storing his emails in a PST. Apparently, they
don't have an exchange server so PST was their only option.
He is complaining
What do expect from a cheapo Internet connection?
There is a simple rule when it comes to picking your Internet provider.
There are three basic qualities...
Lots of Bandwidth/Low latency
Great Technical Support and Reliability
Inexpensive
pick any two of those qualities.
Aaron
-Original
I'm seeing mixed opinions in the archives about the best way to upgrade
Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise. FAQ states:
1. Do a backup. (yadda yadda online, offline, ERD)
2. Run setup from the Enterprise CD
3. Select Reinstall option to upgrade the server
Archives hint at re-applying NT SPs
In my experience, this is usually related to a permissions issue with IIS.
TechNet has gobs of info on ASP 0115 errors.
Here is a test. Give everyone that has access to OWA administrative
privileges on the server. If that solves your problem, then you know it is
a permissions issue this is
For the record, I would agree this is a bad idea, but...
You could allow him to use you as a relay as long as he has authenticated.
Give him a mailbox, username, and password, configuring each appropriately.
Make sure he uses a client that allows SMTP authentication (Outlook, Outlook
Express, ?)
abacus
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
Beat that!
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 20
A recent survey indicated that 76% of all surveys are inaccurate.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Market Share
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/eva
Yuck 0115 errors suck.
Most of my random ASP 0115 errors went away with some permission changes.
Why permission changes fix RANDOM errors I will never know, but it did help
us.
The following blurb is from this article:
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q194190
Why use circular logging if they are backing up every night? I would turn
that off. Otherwise, if it works, you have pointed out the risks, and they
find this acceptable, then go with it...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31
I have two comments:
1) Never talk to that tech again... he/she has no clue.
2) Do not move stuff to personal folders... if it is worth keeping, keep it
on the Exchange server. Performance will not suffer. I have a user with a
1.5GB mailbox with no performance problems.
Aaron
-Original M
95 matches
Mail list logo
