RE: Licensing

2001-10-05 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Take it either way. I don't really care, but I'm not going to rely on this list to tell me how my licensing works for my company. nor would i. i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into consideration along with what MS and the vendor says. maybe i'm wrong, but your

RE: Licensing

2001-10-05 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
for a license violation. And if you're not going to rely on it, why ask? Stephen -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing Take it either way. I don't really care

RE: Licensing

2001-10-05 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing a) damn right b) poor excuse for crap MS policy and dissemination of info c) i was thinking more along the lines of 'discussion of licensing isn't popular on the list, talk to your rep

RE: Licensing OH, FAQ GHODS!

2001-10-05 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Shall Make Your Bed So Shall You... Mess It Up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing a) damn right b) poor excuse for crap MS

RE: Editing Inbox Contents

2001-09-25 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
to behavioral problems. I don't really see how it's any different than if they compose their e-mail in Notepad, then cut and pasted it later. What is the real worry? Please provide a scenario. What does skive mean? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: Editing Inbox Contents

2001-09-25 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
on the contrary, i'm not worried in the least. i just wanted some feedback from other exchange admins on how they may respond to such a concern from their managers. in fact, your comments are much the same as what I've already sent to the manager in question. dan. I think you are needlessly

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-25 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
that's not cooking, it's pyromania with a bit of tong handling. Hey, we all have our strengths. Many guys are a lot more comfortable cooking over a fire (gas, charcoal or wood) out of doors. and that cooking is mostly of the meat variety.

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-24 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
A warmed baking stone would be better than a cookie sheet, but more difficult to come by. buy unglazed quarry tiles dead cheap, better than a pizza/baking stone. dan. _ List posting FAQ:

Editing Inbox Contents

2001-09-24 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
hi all, we've just moved a load of users onto outlook 2001 (mac) from OE5. They're not too happy because of missing features and no easy migration tools, but hey ho. The admin at one site has raised the point that in outlook, as with the pc version, you can edit and save messages in the

RE: Editing Inbox Contents

2001-09-24 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
thanks for your comments - my thoughts exactly! dan. If the staff are not trusted that much then they shouldn't be there (or the admin, for being so untrusting). Let the bosses decide what to do with staff if they do this and not worry about fixing the cause (after all, they could

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-21 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Is ice a drink? I say no. Once melted, you can drink it. If it sublimates, you go thirsty. once ice is melted, it isn't ice, so you couldn't drink it _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-21 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
The practice of rotating tyres was routinely used long before Milton Keynes was ever thought of. ah, but was Milton Keynes thought of by advocates of tyre rotation? _ List posting FAQ:

RE: today's admin backwards virus

2001-09-20 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
My users don't use OWA right now, that is something we are not even talking about until Exchange 2000 of all the feedback we've recieved during our recent exchange rollout the most positive comments have been about owa. I have very strong feelings about admins that run servers and don't

RE: today's admin backwards virus

2001-09-20 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Not a chance I'd ever want my production servers to auto update anything. I strictly want to test each patch before I apply it to any production server. absolutely, but what would be nice is something like 'MS update server', which automatically downloads ALL relevant security patches and

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-20 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
I'm trying to bake a cake and it keeps burning it Yes, you will need to install MSEO SP1 for that to stop my MS Easybake is on SP4. This morning I found that I was unable to make any bagels with SP4 installed and had to wipe the oven's disk, re-install the OS and appy SP1 thru SP3 to restore

RE: Dr. Watson (was New Virus / Worm??)

2001-09-19 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Explorer.exe Exception Access Violation (0xc005), Address:0x77f7d18e the virus seems to do something in it's later stages of infection that causes the problem you describe. Removing the virus has no effect. We have two servers with the same problem, and have tried everything to correct it

RE: today's admin backwards virus

2001-09-19 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the window!! so how are you hosting? do your users miss owa? dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: ims queues

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Yes the outbound messages are the ones that seem to get stuck. I looked at details of the messages and most of them said (host unreachable) but there were two other ones that said (network error during host resolution). it means there was an error trying to resolve the remote host

RE: ims queues

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
your DNS settings are messed up www.theircompany.com is not a valid DNS server. 127.0.0.1 is your loopback address, so unless you have DNS running on the machine you are querying from, nothing will happen. go to 'networking' in the control panel, look under protocols, look at the properties for

RE: ims queues

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
SERVER: www.theircompany.com IP ADDRESS: 127.0.0.1 whoops, think i just realised that you have substituted dummy addresses...d'oh dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Scanmail Problem

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
hi all, we are having trouble getting scanmail emanager (spam blocker) to work. It seemed to install ok, but doesn't do any spam-blocking. the manual says to check that 'contscan.exe' and 'cm_smex.exe' are running as NT processes - well, they're not, and if we restart the services nothing

RE: New Virus / Worm ??

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
at your own risk - reboot and remove the .eml files. seems to cure the problem but doesn't prevent re-infection. dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: New Virus / Worm ??

2001-09-18 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
the eml files appear all over the hard disk, although before i deleted them all I did notice that they seemed to be in all the network shares - can't confirm now they're gone! dan. _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
changing the IP address of an exchange box has no effect on it's operation, but you should bear in mind: - DNS you may need to add a new MX record in your external DNS and it will take a day or two to propogate out around the world. usually this is not an issue because there will be a firewall

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
could someone explain exactly what this xinoephoel stuff was all about? all the posts seem to have been wiped off now. the bits i did manage to read didn't make much sense either. can anyone clarify what was said and what it has to do with the terrible events of yesterday? it all seems kind of

RE: How Do I Turn on outt of ofice on other users mail box!

2001-09-07 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Subject: RE: How Do I Turn on outt of ofice on other users mail box! log in to their mailbox on OWA and set it? dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster

2001-09-06 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
hi all, we're having trouble installing scanmail on our 2 node exchange 5.5 cluster, running on win2k. it manages to install onto the passive node but fails when attempting the active node. We're not getting much joy through trend tech support, so if anyone here has any experience with scanmail

RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster

2001-09-06 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean

RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster

2001-09-06 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
I had issues. It turned out that they did not support versions 3.5 clustered on W2K with Exchange 5.5 with sp4. we have scanmail v3.52 with W2K, Exchange 5.5/sp4 - is this compatible to your knowledge? It turned out it did not get all the registry entries installed on the other cluster

<    1   2