gfi . . . good product. .. . bad support.
Trend = restful sleep every night.
- Original Message -
From: "Jees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams
> What is your opinion on gfi?
>
Also you might want to look at IBM solutions performance as a Co. I have
heard some bad things about a lot of their projects.
A lot of botched migrations. Ask for a previous client list and find someone
that was not too happy.
- Original Message -
From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Isn't that the reason you drink Pepsi? Otherwise there's water, right? .
. . I think that's what they call it!
- Original Message -
From: "Hatley, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: Password Mainen
Yes.
Exchange 2K
FE/BE Topology
900 users
- Original Message -
From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM
Subject: Tumbleweed
Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000?
Thanks
Richard Tracy
__
I have a user who received the followiing error.
I can not determine why. Any help? odd thing is the mailboxes are all
located on mail02. So why was the msg directe dto mail03?
Thanks,
John Q Jr.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail03.domain.ad ([10.10.220.27]) by
I know I have seen this topic discussed, but can not locate anything in the
archive.
Some users are getting the error;
One or more rules could not be uploaded to the Exchange server and have been
deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient
I have a E2K system where the default domain in the default recipient policy
was deleted.
I know you should create a recipient policy that adds the additional
domains - domain2.com, etc. - that affect
then add the users and make that domain the primary domain, you don't delete
the actual primary do
Got logging on no errors?
Looks like MTA is the issue IMC is not getting messages, non e in the queue,
If I knew where never-never-land was I would solve this.
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday
Ahh . . . . should have know, DNS!
I had the DC of 2K listed in the DNS of the 5.5 server.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
I do want mail router throgh 5.5 and no changes were made to the STMP
connector
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
> Are the servers in the
When you move a mailbox from one store to another, are server side rules
supposed to transfer. Or are they lost when you do this?
Thanks,
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
I have seen the last two models from Compaq and Toshiba as well.
I liked it physically, and am unsure what type of application it will be
used for.
I think there soon will be better technology that will work better for the
possible applications that the tablets use.
- Jason
- Original Message
---Correction ---
--
"I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY
E2K, not 5.5." should have read, "blah." [1]
Sorry for aby confusion.
- John Q Jr.
[1] Roger Seielstad (Swynk Exchange list communication, December 19, 2002)
stated that "
stad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -----Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from se
e looked at 5.5
- John Q Jr.
[1] slight look of doubt.
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from s
der has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever
> used.
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -Origi
ime I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new "contacting
Exchange" windows for a few months.
Remember user perception is 99% of the game
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Disc
Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago.
It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think
you will be happy.
One is to increase the time before the "Contacting the Exchange server"
window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order.
The bindi
rminal services to view this server?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: explorer window grayed-out
>
>
> Does anyo
Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates?
Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer
window, the folder view does not display?
It remains "grayed" out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied
the critical update last night.
Just curious.
- J
What is STFU?[1]
- John Q Jr.
[1] I just HAD to, as to those of you that MUST reply to this, don't!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/575e
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PRO
Trend just released their update, 371. You can also just "fix" your DNS to
the friendgreetings.com to point somewhere else.
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
are a daily occurnce.
So trining users is an issue.
They complain E2K OWA is too slow.
Just wondering.
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
ly. The way it was explained to me was this:
>
> If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction
logs
> will be purged. So
>
> The correct answer is...
>
> 1) Disable circular logging
> 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your
charff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: E2K question
> Why would you think A, 'disabling circular logging' would be the correct
> answer?
>
> > -Orig
Answer pelase. I think it's A.
Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three
Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that
alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and
a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store
Maybe you should familiarize him with the delete key.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrea Coppini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
About 60% of our users have mailboxes over 2
I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he
needs some information for this past Employees mailbox.
What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him
permissionas and have him add it to his profile?
E2K, user is using Outlook 2K.
- John Q
_
Maybe they are not as popular as they think!
I have had this problem numerous times.
user> I have no mail today
admin> O.K., sorry!
user> Is something wrong w/ the mail server.
admin> no
user> then why do I not have any E-mail messages from today
admin> , why do you THINK you
should have mail?
us
Do you have owner rights to that public folder?
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder
> Publish or perish!
>
Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a
unprecedented distribution.
I have not been alerted to one infected message yet.
Just curious.
- John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch
the mail? And
not it is not a relay issue. Checked that.
John Q Jr.
P.S. I'll let you know.
- Original Message -
From: "Great Cthulhu Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:00 PM
List,
Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS
system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail.
When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from
the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details.
But when I use a php script to
I know there is PSS for help from MS, but is there another number for
assistance for programming of Exchange 2K.
I have a developer tyring to create a OWA forwarding feature for users that
he is stuggling with.
Or better yet, I'm buying if someone has already created one.
- Jon Q Jr.
___
If I am not mistaken you need to revert back to the old MAPI32.dll
- Original Message -
From: "Allison M. Wittstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> Oh great I alrady inst
TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today?
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Test
> Test - is the list just quiet today
>
>
Exchange 2000, answering questions, and fish tacos
- Original Message -
From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
> Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing
How would one go about recovering from a IS that was bigger than 16GB,
crashing the Exchnage 5.5 server?
Does anything need to be done after compressing the IS with eseutil.exe?
consisitancy cheking?
- John Q
_
List posting FAQ:
Agreed, and SSL takes a big chunk of resources. Plan accordingly.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Nam
What is the IIS setup on that box? Did you mess with any permissions? Can
> you reach OWA when logged on to a back-end server and hitting the
> http:\\127.0.0.1\exchange address?
>
> (:=
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B
or on the front-end server and back-end.
Found article q280823, which describes my issue exactally, but none of the
resolutions worked.
Users can access mail through Outlook 2000, just fine.
Thanks for any ideas,
- John Q Jr.
_
L
You might want to also look into blackhole lists or proc mail.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:40 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Mass email software
>
>
> The marketing dept of my company has just told me
Any one ever run through the steps in Q282230?
After I did, it resolved my HTTP/1.1 503 error
but now the page is diplayed w/ out the great graphics, it's just a direct
directory list.
It works as it should, authenication, you see the mailboxes, then your
folders and your E-mail are listed as a fi
Do you have your AD DNS as the root & same as your E-mail domain?
- Original Message -
From: "Wendy Reetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Help stopping local delivery
> Can't tell 5000 users not to s
Have the issue too, just as described. Thought it was becuase of a hotmail
thing. No?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: *That* list...
Having been on my most excellent behavior,
What version of Scanmail did you upgrade to?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Lagase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: W2k Sp3 is out
Just be careful if you are running Scanmail for Exchange 2000 on the
but I want one!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
> E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerry Jone
If I did not see this with my own two eyes, I would not believe it!
Any one else ever see this error?
Source: MSExchnageIS
Event ID: 9582
The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in
such a way that normal operation may begin to fail. It is highly
recommended that y
Anyone have a favorite site for information on setting up an ISA server with
Exchange, and the problems one might encounter?
- John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http:
ou have over a 100GB with only 54GB of disk
> space.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Clients expirence a slow mail server
>
>
> I have a single
! (Netbackup)
network connection the mail system = <10ms. (1 100BaseT connection from mail
system, all clients on same switch)
High latency is shown for RPC packets from Perf mon, but unsure of the
cause.
Thanks for ANY ideas,
- John Q
James -
I would pay close attention to what Kim has said here.
I am not sure how large your environment is, but you could run into some
very big issues here.
Testing is another key point, and roll-back another, this sounds like a
deployment primed for failure.
What you have listed can be don
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: User lockout
> Need more data -- NT/AD, versions, rights, etc. would be helpful
>
> Geoff...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, J
I was wondering if anyone has ever had this issue?
The vast knowledge here amazes me everyday[1]
A stand-alone system, user properties has "user cannot change password",
but the system checked "user must change password at next login" when the
password expiration time expired. Thus causing both
I have also experienced this. E2K SP2 on Windows Server. The store continues
to suck up memory.
Not to the point of total max. memory, but I have found that after the
store.exe process consumes over 300MB, it's all over.
Running Trend Scanmail 5.0, and there was an issue with E2K SP2 installed
aft
une 13, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: Calendar Permissions
> Use the resource booking script mentioned in the FAQ instead.
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:41 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussi
are going to continue to schedule appointments in this manner, how
should I set the permissions so that by default, people
cannot modify existing appointments, nor can they create conflicting
appointments.
I know there is no good technological solution for poor habits.
-
Has anyone else had issues with mail queuing for a week, then sending when
forced.
Should I be forcing mail to send from the queue on a regular basis, that
seems odd.
=
When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had
SP2 the system stopped
Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot.
Data Center: 68° F
I'll stay inside today.
- Original Message -
From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Richland, WA...SE Cor
-MS02 -025
> Q287678 - that's not the most recent hotfix Q number, is it?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Product Support Services - Microsoft Se
When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had
SP2
the system stopped all the Exchange services, as expected, but a few odd
things happened.
1) The queue was cleared, does this occur everytime you shutdown the E2K
services?
2) Duplicate messages were re-sent to users,
Is there any way to synchronize system folders like you do folders in
outlook?
Or tick Outlook into thinking windows folders are Outlook foldrers?
I am attempting to resolve an Issue I have with a user that is almost always
remote.
He needs large Office files on his laptop when his not connected t
Same here as well.
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: "Horst Hinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:10 AM
Subject: RE: Virus activity
> Tons of it here too... be happy to send you some.
>
> -Original Message-
run all my mail through procmail.
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?
> User educati
IL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Store.exe memory usage
> >Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:26:09 -0400
> >
> >Is that a problem?
>
I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a
mailbox import, it never releases the memory with E2K SP2.
Has anyone else noticed this?
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussio
times that admins don't
> > trust
> > > > themselves. This may or may not have been the case here.
> Understanding
> > > > error messages is one of the basic functions of our jobs. It is
> > > frustrating
> > > > for many of us here whe
to. Oh, they are saying
that
> the message size exceeds their limit. Plus, if you know that you have no
> limits set on your servers, then it really is a no-brainer. Trust
yourself
> a little more. It will make things easier.
>
> Ben Winzenz, MCSE
> Network/Systems Administrat
inistrator carries with it an implicit ability to
logically
> think things through. The error message you are getting below is
> _completely_ clear - mail01-ens.domain.com obviously has a message size
> limit.
>
> THINK, dammit. Stop expecting the world to earn your paycheck for yo
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: mailbox size limits
> It looks like the receiving domain is rejecting the message.
>
> Serdar Soysal
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday
I have a user that is using a mail that gets this error when attempting to
send an attachment that is 47K.
mail01-ens.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;552 sorry, that message size exceeds my
databytes limit (#5.3.4)>
The default limits are set to No limit for sending mail size in Message
Delivery Properti
If using OLK2K or XP you could also use the, Do not deliver before in
Message options, and creating a template with this. Then have the user
always use this template.
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: "Rasey, Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
You mean ORDB, now.
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand
> There are equally crappy alternative to Orbz, but some inbound email i
. Knowing your systems are never safe.
Mostly due to lusers.
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office
> Kevi
t; -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC
>
>
> This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace
to
> confirm this is
our network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or
VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon
trace to see at what point the problem is occurring?
Joel
-----Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44
nication.
So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it.
Any reason I should not?
Thank You,
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
I see, well there is 1 problem there. As soon as you step off your ship and
sober up from your drunken stooper, you might find out that
is NOT an option.
I did forget to mention this is E2K.
Going through AD and selecting Exchange Tasks . . . And selecting Delete
mailbox, I get a Invalid ADSI path
I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it.
When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can
I delete it?
- John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archive
I get a "Invalid ADSI pathname was passed" when attempting to delete any
usermailbox.
Where can I get more info on what pathname is invalid.
- John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
and installed SMTP service, then restarted MS Information
store.
- John Q.
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email
> Boy can I crash Exchange servers like
Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win
2K, both SP2. All lastes Hotfixes from windowsupdate.ms.com. Running Trend
Scanmail for E2K.System was running fine for 1 year now, out of now where
this. Did activate TS licenses on this server yesterday, but that's it.
Hav
I have users that need to delete E-mail from archived PST's. But to ensure
that they do not delete messages from Exchnage server I want them to do this
offline.
I know what I am going to hear, train the users. And I swear I have, I had a
staff member do a entire PP presenation on it and man were t
Damn, your right, it;s for Win 2K and ME not XP.
For the OS of course.
Thank you,
- John Q!
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: cha
s?
>
> You're probably using a different version of outlook (the 1 I mentioned
was
> for OL2002). Just go to Microsoft's online support. You'll find the
> appropriate article to clear name caching on the Outlook version you're
> using.
>
> -Original Mes
I did read this, sorry I did not mention it.
I could not locate *.nk2 on any users system.
But the issue listed in the q article is exactally my issue.
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions"
d out where Outlook stores this info I would be curious.
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Leonard Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two account
Came out today.
Dear Premium Support Customer,
This message is to notify you that a new pattern is now available for
download.
We have uploaded:
Pattern 239 to
- http://activeupdate-t.trendmicro.com/activeupdate/Pattern/VSAPI.zip
Details about what is new in Pattern 239 is available at:
- h
accounts are listed?
Where are the users getting my old account from, is there anyway to update
this?
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Leonard Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:2
Ahhh you must know what I am talking about.
1) No same Exchange server
2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account
previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it.
- John Q Jr.
"There is a movie about me?"
- Original Message
ended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent:
3/11/2002 9:25 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM
A configuration error in the recipient's e-mail system prevented delivery of
this message. Two recipients are configured with the same e-mail address.
Co
; "Not only is zis possible, zis is ESSENTIAL!"
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:08 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar
> >
> >
r
>
>
> Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:18 PM
> Subject:
x27;re on different servers, aren't they?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar
>
>
Ohh man,
What meant to say was UserA can not see UserB's Free / Busy time.
- John Q.
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Outlo
I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar.
I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec.
UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar.
So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the
permissio
Looks like it was a issue with SP2 and TrendMicroScanMail.
If you install SP2 after installing Scanmail this issue can occur.
When I disabeled ScanMail it did not work but when i removed scanmail from
the rigistry it did
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr.&quo
realtes.
Disabeled Trend scan mail.
ANy ideas on what I can do?
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
That did it! Thanks!
Why does that work, DC communication issue. Just curious?
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Amit Zinman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:16 AM
Subject:
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
