eral of them at MEC, do I really want to go
> with a backup solution that Microsoft does not fully support?
>
> Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussion
So no-one is using EMCs hot-split snapshot backup solution for Exchange
2000?
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 30 January 2003 09:48
> Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
> Conversation: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
>
Have you or someone else been removing and/or blocking inheritance of the
default permissions on your OUs? This can have the side-effect of
preventing non-admins from seeing some GAL entries.
The rebuild may well stamp new SMTP addresses however you may find that
existing modified ones stay there
Forgot to mention - this server had somewhere between 1000 & 1200 users at
that time.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford
Sent: 23 January 2003 18:04
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
not proud of it but here's the backup log
not proud of it but here's the backup log from an old server...
Backed up 1 Exchange Server store(s)
Processed 138,163,026,596 bytes in 3 hours, 44 minutes, and 52 seconds.
Throughput rate: 586.0 MB/min
This was Backup Exec & an Ultrium LTO 100/200 on a Compaq Proliant 5500. I
forget what ada
Exmerge?
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 23 January 2003 14:57
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Something to add to the EC Move server method
Subject: MIGRATING sbs2k to exchange 2k
What would the method be to migrate 2k exchange 5.5 s
No experience with IBM kit myself, but have you used diskpar to align
tracks/sectors optimally? Pierre Bijaoui's talk at the MEC highlighted the
importance of this when dealing with a SAN.
Also check out the W2K Resource Kit on this subject at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp
Put them in a contacts Public Folder instead?
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 January 2003 08:27
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Outlook Address Book - Email Address Book for an Additional
Mailbox
Subject: Outlook Address
There's probably something at Slipstick that'll help.
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mail.htm
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 January 2003 06:04
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Email Addresses
Subject: RE: Email Address
Add a replica to each top level folder and then use the "propagate settings"
feature to cascade this to every sub-folder.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 13 January 2003 14:01
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Public Folder Repl
and disk
storage space savings.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday,
Have you tried a DS/IS adjust on the server? (N.B. do NOT check the PF
options)
-Original Message-
From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help!!!
I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I
ha
Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make
for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over
time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway.
See KB article 198673 for a justification of this.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: John W.
Not really, except that prior to adding an E2K server into a 55 site, you
could configure your mbx, cr and dl agreements to be one-way only which
would mean you could remove the AD accounts/contacts/DGs that it creates
without affecting your 55 environment.
Even in 2-way mode you have the option o
The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST
file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs!
I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message
in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's
Also does the business application have any dependence on Active Directory
at all (or in the future - it may be worth asking the vendors if they
foresee this for future versions)?
A lot of the potential problems in your case will disappear since you are
unlikely to have to have a prolonged period
I found changing the outlook binding order from doing WINS lookups to DNS
lookups helped for a lot of users. There's a Q article on this somewhere.
Also check out the reply to another thread I sent out on Public Folder ACL
caching.
Lastly what do the performance counters on your exchange servers
Sounds like an AD permissions issue.
Has someone removed "Authenticated Users" from having "Read" rights from the
top level of those OUs? This is sometimes done to prevent browsing through
the OU structure despite there being Read rights further down the structure.
It can cause problems with Addr
Might be worth just checking your event log to confirm that the online
maintenance is indeed running and not being interrupted by the backup. You
should see 1221 events indicating the amount of white space for instance.
Also I assume you are doing full online backups as well since the backup api
Mixed mode
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 13 December 2002 12:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet?
-Original Message-
From: Andy Haigh [m
Take a look at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;324059
Also what is happening at 4am on your server(s)? Online
maintenance/backups/dialup-somewhere/replication-to-another-site/etc...
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 Dece
There is an updated version as of July 2002. I don't have the link to hand
but I was able to download it from the MS site as part of a set of E2K
Whitepapers.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 December 2002 13:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You can do this safely with pfadmin but I'd still try out your batch file on
a couple of test folders first.
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2002 21:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PFADMIN
Is anyone familiar with PFADMIN? I am look
Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet?
-Original Message-
From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public fol
it sounds like a consequence of some administrators interpretation of part 2
of the "Ed Crowley Never Restore Method" at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
Mark
-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 December 2002 06:47
To: Exchange Di
John - Give the following steps a go...
1) Set the ADC logging on all categories to Minimum & also increase the size
of the application log to say 20MB. Set all non Config connection agreement
schedules to "never" temporarily so you can isolate the config stuff.
2) Run up 55 Admin. Go to Org/Si
Take a look at the event log next time you stop and start the exchange event
service - I believe it logs all those with scripts.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Grimme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Discover mailboxes w/ event scri
Presumably you are going through a firewall when you access OWA from home,
and directly when you tried the laptop at work? What happens if you take
the laptop home?
Perhaps the firewall is using some sort of filter that isn't accepting your
reply request?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: E
If it is a database that has been in operation since before Exchange 55
SP3, then in some cases it will help "fix" slow performance due to space
tree fragmentation. This is one case where PSS will advocate an offline
defragmentation for maintenance as opposed to clawing back disk space in
emergenc
If the AD accounts are not being used for actually logging in with, they
should be disabled and the "Associated External Account" set to be the
NT4 account. Is this the case? In ADUC, you need to look in the
mailbox rights of the user under the "Exchange Advanced" tab. Also if
you view through E
NetIQ used to do an end-to-end email "ping"-type test so I'd be
surprised if MOM did not.
I have also used Baranof software for this in the past which did a
perfectly adequate job and had a Web reporting function for managerial
types to look at. However any decent monitoring/management package
ou
If server downtime is impossible to arrange with your business, an
alternative to an offline defrag or a repair would be to move all
mailboxes to another server, shut down the IS, delete everything in
mdbdata and then restart the IS with a clean blank priv.edb to which you
can move the mailboxes ba
Yes, it should (and does) work. You could even go so far as to repoint
the DRC to use the SRS server(s) in each site instead of the Exchange 55
servers. This would bring you another step closer to decommissioning
Exchange 55.
-Original Message-
From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
Do all the workstations/servers you run this from have Exchange System
Manager installed?
-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak@;CIGNA.COM]
Sent: 12 November 2002 18:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Delete Exchange Attributes" Option on ADU&C SNAP IN
G
So "gold" is also the server name?
I'm not familiar with IM on non-default virtual servers so the only
other troubleshooting step I can suggest is to try signing in using the
actual IM address as shown in ADUC on your account. Presumably
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Mark
-Original Message-
From:
Did you also create a Host (A) DNS record for your im server in the
domain.com zone? e.g.
host.domain.com IN A 10.111.111.111
You may not need the rvp record unless you are entering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the IM client logon. In which case what does your
rvp record look like?
-Original Mess
And there's definitely no trace on the BE servers either?
http://microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
tools/tools/redfix.asp
-Original Message-
From: Helen Best [mailto:hbest@;bournemouth.ac.uk]
Sent: 29 October 2002 09:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Get hold of the Exchange Resource Kit for Pfinfo and Pfadmin
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com]
Sent: 25 October 2002 19:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Reporting Tool
Does anyone know of any good PF reporting tools? I would l
article that recommended running exchange setup
/domainprep again to reset the default permissions for exchange server
objects but it doesn't seem to have made any difference.
Anyone got any other ideas?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:mark.harford@;bbc.co.uk]
Is your Recipient Update Service running properly, is there a Recipient
Policy that applies to these users & have you done anything funny like
blocking inheritance of permissions to the OU these new users are in?
I'd check the msexchmasteraccountsid and msexchuseraccountcontrol values aer
as outli
Are you in a mixed exchange 55/2000 environment?
Another answer to A3 might be that you have removed the mailbox belonging to
an account or possibly there are two 55 mailboxes with the same PWNT, only
one of which will replicate properly into AD.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [
There are a number of security templates provided for Windows 2000 Member
Servers and DCs which address related issues. I suggest reading the
following:-
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
prodtech/mailexch/opsguide/default.asp
and
http://www.microsoft.
Have you looked in the following key? For OL2002 there are three references
to the server.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows
Messaging Subsystem\Profiles\Profile-Name\13dbb0c8aa05101a9bb000aa002fc45a
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:a
And not only that but if you have a Premier Support Agreement I suspect it
doesn't include the extra information often available from the PSS website
KB search. Google also has a (free) Microsoft-specific search engine -
http://www.google.co.uk/microsoft.html
Even better get MOM to do the work fo
Niki,
Take a look at the outlook performance document at
http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/performance.asp
This gives some good tips on tuning for slow links/dialup/etc.
cheers
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1
http://www.wickett.net/ have a nice solution for this. Look up WN
Mailkeeper.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 16:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private
File, Open, Outlook Data File?
-
Why not split the stores across 2 Storage Groups so there is one SG per
tape?
I'll second the vote for Laurion Burchall's session - excellent!
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 00:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
Like it! Do you mind if I borrow that phrase?!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 October 2002 22:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
I tout the virtues of single-node clusters.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Inter
You could try the Slipstick website
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mssampleapps.htm
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin, Bernie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 06:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: HelpDesk Software
A HelpDesk built as an Exchange server applicat
To quote the SP3 Deployment guide...
"If you attempt to restore an SP2 database and log file set to an SP3
server, the database is automatically upgraded before it is mounted.
However, if you attempt to restore a database that is older than Exchange
2000 SP2, the upgrade will fail."
Thus it loo
Sounds like the hierarchy has not replicated through properly (or yet - you
need to be patient). Is there an E2K server with a PF store and have you
pointed ESM to use that store?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 20:03
To: Exchange D
We have also found that OL2002/Win2K can be a lot slower. I found that
changing the binding order for MAPI clients made a big difference. By
default it will use a WINS lookup first, but you can change this to use DNS.
I sent out the following instruction to colleagues:-
Go to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHIN
is still logging in with their NT 4 account.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move
Did you use ADMT to clone NT4 SIDs onto ADC-created AD account Sidhistories
or did yo
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move
Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discus
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had multiple
sites. Presumably this will mean that originally you had recipient policies
that matched the original Site Addressing. Having domainprepped your AD
domain and installed a RUS, new users will pick up whatever addresses the
ori
Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move
Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode.
The DL replicated as univ
ssage-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID:12002
Thanks for your reply. I have searched it but unfortunately non of them
matching with this error.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more
KB articles
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID:12002
Dear List,
In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is ge
Is it reverting to whatever was the original Primary SMTP address (before
you ever added the secondary)?
Also is there an ADC in the picture or is it native E2K?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2002 15:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
http://www.hauppauge.co.uk/html/analogue_usb.htm#usbfm
Seems to work quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 10:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: very OT
Sorry one of the benefits of working for a bank.
-Original Mes
Alternatively you could just import them in once a week using a directory
import csv.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Administrator Customisation
I guessed that might be another op
Oh, one more thing. When and if you set the Connection Agreement to be
two-way, make absolutely sure that you don't have an attribute mapping that
then overwrites the 55 Display Name with the CN that now matches
SamAccountName.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford
Yup. Quite easy Norman.
Check out Kieran McCorry's article in Exchange Administrator at
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm
It's instant doc id - 19712
-Original Message-
From: Patterson, Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
What does Message Tracking tell you?
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 00:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CHILD DOMAIN
smtp connector
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
To quote the resource kit (or Technet somewhere) regarding Admin groups...
"Windows 2000 sets the value of "Allow inheritable permissions from the
parent to propagate to this object" to FALSE to avoid security issues
stemming from elevation of privilege attacks.
For example, if Group X is made
Monday and Tuesday were holidays for us over here in the UK to celebrate the
Queen's Golden Jubilee
I was helping to build and light a beacon near our village on top of the
local hill which is also the site of an old Roman (& pre-Roman) Hillfort
chosen for it's good views across Somerset (South-W
logs that it has started.
---
"Chance favors only the prepared mind."
Louis Pasteur (1822-1895); French chemist and biologist.
- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Harford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
Search for "OWA and segmentation" in the Exchange 2000 SP2 help file. This
may be near to what you want.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q311154
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 14:35
To: Exchan
You'll also either need
1) Affinity (and/or referral if you have E2K involved)
or
2) A replica of the PF on the other site
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 May 2002 15:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: pf permissions across sites
allowing a u
This doesn't sound right. Would you not need the new CA to point to the SRS
on the new E2K server (use port 379) and then also set up a Directory
Replication Connector between the new site SRS and the first site 55 server?
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26
If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you
have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the
STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only
new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been o
>From http://www.groupware.com.au/prodinfo/213e.htm
Microsoft Mail 3.2 is essentially a Windows-only (local and remote)
strategy. While there is support for other platforms, it's either very poor
or requires a second mail system (see 'integration' directly below). The DOS
LAN and remote clients
1) Do you replicate the PF content to other 55 servers?
2) Do you have affinity with other 55 Sites?
> -Original Message-
> From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 May 2002 01:45
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Problem with accessing a PF
>
>
> NT 4 SP6a
Can I suggest you start with drawing yourself several diagrams:-
1) Routing - all routes/connectors/etc
2) 55/AD Replication - all Connection Agreements/SRS/Dir Rep Cons/etc
3) PF referral/affinity paths
Then overlay them and find the gaps. It's surprising how a decent diagram
can show up the h
Discussions
> Subject: RE: Active Mailboxes
>
>
> Could you give an example of a third party utility that can
> do this.. (give a report on the last mail sent)
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20,
Try the "mbinfo" utility - you may have to call Premier Support but I think
it's free.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 May 2002 23:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
>
>
> Thanks for looking.
You'd need to work out why the Service Account is logging on. Typically it
would be as a result of a virus scanning utility, Exmerge, Brick-Level
backup, etc. Eliminate those and you might start getting some more accurate
figures.
Alternatively go to a third party vendor and get a reporting too
We found it useful to keep a record of the dlists that such
"marked-for-deletion" users are a member of, so you could copy them to a
custom attribute at the same time (and perhaps do the same for the SMTP
addresses). Then if they return to the company the re-enabling process is
that much easier.
Could Allen actually be thinking of banning PST creation but just got the
phrasing/thought process slightly wrong
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 May 2002 13:49
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Private Store Perm
wo-way CA's and then back again (i.e. default)... ?
>
> Regards
> Mylo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 May 2002 09:43
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
>
>
> Fair poi
ial, particularly if
> you're dealing with a large number of foreign recipients
> within the 5.5 org.
>
> Regards,
> Mylo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 May 2002 18:46
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subje
Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As
you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in
the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in
the MS top ten list of directory service support calls.
See http://su
Do they have the AD client installed?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q288358
http://www.microsoft.com/ntworkstation/downloads/Other/adclient.asp
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: John Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 April 2002 21:27
> To: Exchange
IIRC you can't use csvde to modify objects, it can only be used to create or
delete.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 April 2002 01:00
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you nee
That's when Word search/replace comes in handy
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 April 2002 23:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
>
> I have to write batch files to p
? The answer is in the text of step #20. the alternative is to go round
everyone's profile and update it manually (or via a login
script/modify-profile type utility)
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 April 2002 07:30
> To: Exchange
There's a Technet article specifically on this which relates to removing
certain attributes from the 55 objects - "adc-global-names" amongst a couple
of others to allow them to re-replicate. I'd search on that text string.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[E
You do need ESM installed to get a proper icon. However that doesn't mean
you'll like it!
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 April 2002 06:56
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange OU
>
>
> I don't know either.
>
> I have
View-Only Admin on the Site and Config container, plus "create child" on the
recipients container(s).
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Lounder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 April 2002 15:48
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Permissions Question
>
>
> Forgive me if this ha
There appears to be an option in the latest version of Exmerge that will
allow you to import a pst into all users mailboxes. I expect this would do
the trick though I haven't tried it out.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Perley-TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 April 200
Not if you have invested in Remote Management cards. For Compaq servers
this would be the following
:-http://www.compaq.com/manage/remote-lightsout.html.
It does bump the cost per server up a little, but compare this to the
over-time costs of having to pay someone else to baby-sit your servers o
And get paid for it. Result!
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
>
>
> Overtime?
>
> You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at hom
It's possible that they only convert to USGs when the PF is actually
accessed.
Are you actually experiencing problems accessing your Public Folders or are
you just trying to pre-empt potential problems?
Mark
P.S. Please don't snip off the whole conversation thread, just the junk
signatures/di
OTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 March 2002 16:14
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: LPD utility
>
>
> Maybe there is no problem. But I thought when you choose a OU
> to look at that it would show all child objects under it. ei:
> All users under the Users/OU?
>
>
You won't see the mailbox in ESM until it has been logged onto or has rec'd
mail.
You'll need a Recipient Update Service configured for each domain with
mail-enabled users.
Also were all GCs rebooted after promoting to GC status so that Outlook can
use the NSPI proxy? & ensure the Infrastructu
Just to check - you did mean the "LDP" utility aka "Active Directory
Administration Tool" in the W2K Support Tools didn't you?
You still need to use the Connection Menu, Bind option even if you just
leave the username/pwd/domain fields blank and click ok. Then View, Tree
and leave that blank as
Are you binding as a user with rights to do so?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 17:48
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: LPD utility
>
>
>
> This maybe off topic but I'll ask any how. Seems when I run
> the LPD utility
Mike - can you please stop chopping off the conversation thread as I (and
probably others) tend like me forget how threads start and can't be bothered
to track back?
However I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's not an Organisation Unit,
more just a place-holder. I don't see extra tabs either
Nope, that's fine. It will eventually be the location for Public Folder
directory objects amongst other things so if you don't have E2K servers or a
PF connection agreement you won't see anything in there.
Check that it created a couple of Exchange-related groups in the Users OU
though (and don'
There's a tool in the Exchange 55 resource kit for exporting all IMC
settings so that may well do the job.
> -Original Message-
> From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 March 2002 21:42
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Export of domains and users being bloc
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
