Do everyone a favour and send out plain text emails with a link to the web
page holding the information.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
strong passwords = post-it(tm) notes on monitors = weak passwords ;-)
Merry Christmas everyone,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Or one of the many email address spoofing viruses may be doing it for you.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Try checking with http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bridges,
Samantha
Sent: 18
Looking at http://openrbl.org/#dodgy ip address is also very revealing.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Roger
How???
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
bulletin/MS03-043.asp
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
That's definitely spam. No question about it. Unless your colleagues have
specifically asked for emails about telco offers, that is. And of course we
all know that they haven't.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
This is reminiscent of the QHosts-1 trojan:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100719.htm
The information in the link will give you a few clues as to what might have
been changed.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
about to build a box using it, so I might feel differently about it in a
few weeks.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
You won't. Exchange takes but doesn't give back. Only an offline defrag
will shrink the Information Store files.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jake Wallendal
That sounds normal. In my experience users always forget to clean out Sent
Items, too.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
but I don't have anything to give our MailMarshall
support guy, so if anyone has experienced this before I'd appreciate your feedback.
Thanks in advanced.
Cheers,
Phil
Phil
Or local government ;-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
Like the M: drive ;-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
to move incoming mails into a possible junk mail folder
is a good compromise. And real mail which ends up there on
a regular basis can be dealt with by filtering rules which
deal with it before the spam rule.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
That's my preferred method of patching Exchange Servers too,
after I had some grief with Exchange 5.5 SP2.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi All,
FYI: Didn't get any replies so I rang PSS to see if it's going to be resolved.
Apparently not this is an informational only field strange as it appeared to
work in mixed mode...but then again maybe that was using Ex 5.5.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Phil
or if this might be fixed in the next SP.
Thanks in advanced,
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Infrastructure Phone: (07
as
Inbox was the default location for Drafts with OL97.
regards
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2003 18:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox
Could it be as simple as having set a rule incorrectly in Outlook
and are using
Bluetooth, however, not all the originator's have this.
At the moment its only happened to one user, but its strange enough that I
sought the advice and experience of the list.
Any information on this would be great.
regards
Phil
alone is not a sane security policy.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2003 15:22
To: Exchange Discussions
.
The it will be OK because or desktop PCs are protected
approach is a recipe for disaster.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July
1: Nobody ever reads them
2: Nobody ever reads them
3: People read the message, and forget to read the disclaimer
4: go to 1
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
On the subject of emails from , RFC2821 says your mailer must
accept them. It neededn't do anything with them, though.
There's a surprisingly large number of misconfigured mailers
which bounce them, alas.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Just what I needed, thanks!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2003 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Open
instructions are
not supported in a production environment. This is our production
environment so I'd appreciate any advice from anyone that has used or read
this article before going ahead.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Infrastructure
Thanks Ed,
It's either Q273478 or ADSIEdit and remove Exchange Server 2000 objects as
far as I can tell. We'll be looking further but thanks for you input.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange
More to the point, JScript is DANGEROUS!
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS
03-008.asp
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Roger
NDA with fries? Yummy!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2003 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Files
and firmware for your hardware and contact
the HW vendor for additional support if needed.
On 2/16/03 20:34, Phil Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We're currently testing our planned migration from Ex 5.5 SP4 to EX 2000
SP3
in our test lab. After moving mailboxes from EX5.5
server. ( I may still use this as a backup server off site).
I look forward to your comments.
If you could recommend a good book to cover this topic, that would be
great.
thanks very much
Phil
_
List posting FAQ: http
Thanx for the info. Time for some reading now!!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plain text. Nothing more, nothing less.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2003 16:03
To: Exchange Discussions
You'll need the old server up running for the client profiles to be
updated.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
sheepishlyunless you
Hi,
Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are
running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it
successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set
in Scanmail?
Thanks in advance.
Phil
-Original Message-
From
.
-Original Message-
From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi,
Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are
running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see
... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to
clean.
-Original Message-
From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi,
Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We
RFC2821 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html) section 6.1.
Such mails can be swallowed or ignored, but they should never be
bounced.
You can check your mail server's compliance here:
http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Wrong!
See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html section 4.5.1.
postmaster is required.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us
DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates?
Been there, done that, got that T-shirt more times than I care to think
: Orphaned Delegates?
That's an awefully big stick to be swinging at such a small problem.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Phil
That's one use for all your junk emails!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2002 14:08
To: Exchange
need it.
What sort of deleted item retention period do you have?
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2002 14:05
that IS
space is going, you need to set deleted items retention on:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto
ping workstation_name ???
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2002 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Tracing
Do a KB search for OpenRetryDelay. It might solve
your problem.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2002 14
Brent,
If you stop Scanmail can you read the mails then or do you still have the
problem? Apologies if you've already tried this.
regards
Phil
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
A google search for SPOOLSS.DLL found it in a few seconds.
Sighs...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 August 2002 12:15
Oh, just run Exchange Optimizer and force it to use no more than 256MB of
RAM.
Then get the boss to explain to all the users why it is running slower.
Phil ;-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message
I'm too busy to look, but is this clarified in RFC 2821/2822?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 July 2002 18:11
To: Exchange
From my experience, Groupshield 5 is a much better product than
its predecessors. Have you had experience of Groupshield 5,
Missy?
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From
!!
regards
Phil Steele
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html is a good one and checks some
RFC compliance issues too.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Its a long shot, but have you looked in /exchsvr/imcdata/in folder for any
bad inbound messages.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
with DNS then no mail would get
delivered. The Internet connection is working perfectly.
Any help would be really appreciated
Thanks
Phil Steele
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 June 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Catch All...
... stuff snipped
be sent using a null () reverse path in the
envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address
from the envelope return path (or the Return-Path: line). However,
if this address is null (), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a
notification.
Phil
GS 4.5SP1 plus Hotfix 7 (a nightmare to install).
Then increase OpenRetryDelay to 0x800 or more (google will find you the
Knowledgebase article).
Then pray :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original
What a helpful response...
This might be more helpful.
What versions of Virusscan Groupshield?
If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied?
I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( )
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
As one of Microsoft's patented Virus propagation engines?
Yup, very helpful.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 14:15
://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q264731
Oh, and make sure VirusScan isn't trying to scan your exchange
database directories. Not a good idea.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message
in.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 14:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
Precisely because they do. Except they don't work the same.
MS's virus propagation engine has been removed :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists
Thanks Ben, that has done the trick!
At last a happy customer!!
best regards
Phil Steele
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound messages. It is
a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K total size.
Can I configure this from the server?
Thanks!
_
List posting FAQ:
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Is it possible to sync up public folders locally for notebook users?
Phil
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Thanks!
Woorked like a charm.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: Offline syncronization of Public Folders
Drag them to their favorites in Outlook.
-Original
I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4
I have enabled Journaling and I want to specify which contacts to enable the
Journal for.
Under Tools, Options I selected Journal Options.
In the next screen I can select which contacts to enable the Journal for,
however these contacts are not part of the Global
you want to journal for from the GAL to your contact list.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Journal Help
I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4
I have enabled Journaling and I want
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 14:39
Yes, you did!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT
Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
To: Exchange Discussions
I wish that they would
Do that to everyone
With dodgy boxes
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For some unknown reasons meeting requests that contain attachments no longer
work if they contain an attachament. They worked fine in the past and now if
there is an attachment added to the meeting request we get the following
error:
The operation failed. Unable to
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For some unknown reasons meeting requests that contain attachments no
longer
work if they contain an attachament. They worked fine in the past and now
if
there is an attachment added to the meeting request we get the following
error:
The operation failed. Unable
?
Where did you learn how to talk?
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For some unknown reasons meeting
do not work if they contain an attachment?
Hmmm the meeting room that is the resource has a full mailbox from all
the attachments sent to it in the past and it's hit your mailbox limit?
Just
a WAG...
- Original Message -
From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
Is there a limitation on the size of message that the resource will
accept?
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting
and try it.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
It is set much higher than 45KB which is the size of the attachment I
tested
(stopping
and restarting the IS service would probably have sufficed).
The next morning the extraneous log files were gone, and
there have been no problems since.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps
growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have
problems.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList
30 secons with google gave me this:
http://www.madras.fife.sch.uk/maths/descriptive6.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
servers out there.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 15:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: testing relay
I
Oops, rfc2821... Slip of the finger and brain...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Try running memtest86 from www.memtest86.com on it to
see if it's a hardware problem.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 March
I think the two patches are independent of each other.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 12:22
To: Exchange
Eeek, wasn't that the buggy one? ;-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 12:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
folder and Favorites folder. Can I do
this and should I administer public folder permissions from the server or
from Outlook?
Phil
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Why???
Favorites is extremely useful.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 16:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public
I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4.
I have a single site and a single server. We have a new remote office. Both
sites are connected via VPN and the remote site is NOT part of the domain
they are using a workgroup.
I need to install an additional Exchange server in the remote office in
order to speed
into a workgroup.
- Original Message -
From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: Exchange Replication: Newbie question
I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4.
I have a single site and a single server. We have a new
Where are the Archives for this list. I weant to the the link at the bottom
and no luck.
Are they at the mail-archive.com website or something like that?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Get KiXtart from www.kixtart.org
Then use the getfileversion function in a common KiXtart
login script to check, etc.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto
message is desplayed:
You do not have a local copy of the Task in you task list
But there is one.
Anyone else get this type of error?
Phil.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Exchange 5.5, SP4 NT4SP6
When I create an email group I want to disable the users ability to see the
group membership?
How can I do this?
Thanks!
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
No sorry.
I want people to see the actual group name; ex, Finance but I do not want
them to be able to see who is in the Finance group.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:37
Subject
Just use www.google.com and prefix your query string with
site:microsoft.com (without the quote marks).
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
is desplayed:
You do not have a local copy of the Task in you task list
But there is one.
Anyone else get this type of error?
Phil.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
I have to ask you
if there are any more jobs
with cars where you work
Lucky devil!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08
No, shan't!
if there are en-ee more jobs :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
