a CONNECTION/"Specify by email domain" and set that domain to route through
0.0.0.0. This host is unreachable which means that the messages sit in the
outbound queue and retry until they expire (as well as generating a bunch of
alerts to the sender). Is there a better way to do
The messages could be sent TO: the bogus alias and have a BCC: (blind carbon
copy) to his valid address.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Users receiving messages not addressed
Nobody has ever proven that my bathtub isn't Cthulhu's summer retreat
either. Therefore we must accept that my bathtub is Cthulhu's summer
retreat.
This is the essence of the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam fallacy.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Argumentum ad ignorantiam doesn't work. Pretty common (and simplistic)
logical fallacy, mostly used in supporting religious dogmatism. "I
cannot prove that $deity doesn't exist, therefore $deity exists."
I must say that if you were to hire Ed Crowley for his employer's
prevailing wage, for the
disable the Messenger service via Group Policy as
well. Then, you don't have to worry about missing a server. GPO's are
nifty that way :-)
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a
login script, just use this in a reg file:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger]
"Start"=dword:0004
Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script:
start /w
Google search using:
"command line" "exchange 5.5" gal export
Yields a lot of stuff including:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
2.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
There is no "secret cabal"!!!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
There is no "secret cabal"!!!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret
agendas ?
-Origi
Any email with MVP in the signature is spam.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment
More ethical discussions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
experience in how many seconds delay is enough?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server
However, if you absolutely must persist with this
, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Race between client rules and BES server
Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server
(Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing
lists
etwork Administrator The Key
School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Race between client rules and BES server
Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail fr
Last I checked the Ximian connector did not work on Exchange 5.5 (it
requires exchange 2000 or newer).
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Well...
blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to
switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days
old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these
before the server deletes them.
Tom
IMAP is fine if you don't care about contacts, calendar or tasks.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange
then give you an
error). The only workaround is to stop using cache mode or trim your server
storage to much less than 2g (like 1.5gig or less as the PST format is much
less efficient than PSTs)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, D
Or export them to a pst? (Being careful to not get anywhere near the 2g pst
limit).
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exmerge? 5.5
Not to my knowledge. You have to manually copy
is not
available for download (you must call PSS and beg for it).
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager
Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager?
I am
estarted the mailbox manager
service and I think that gets it to work again at least once. I am running
exchange 5.5sp4 on win2k sp4 here.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussi
The docs are on the CD, in the \docs directory, iirc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jean-Paul Natola
> Posted At: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:48 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: symantec mail security
>
You scroll down until you find the links you told Arlo wouldn't work,
and click on them.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gregory Householder
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sy
One of those hosts file viruses relocates the hosts file to c:\windows\help
(or c:\winnt\help). It does not overwrite your existing hosts file, but
puts a bogus one in the help directory and modifies the registry so windows
looks there instead.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailt
I got a chance to stop and start the IS (and the IMC too for good measure)
and the turftable changes finally took effect. Apparently most of the time
restarting the IMC is all you need but sometimes the IS must be restarted
too (this is exchange 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp3).
Tom
-Original Message
Destroy all backups after 60 days (or whatever they want the VM retention to
be).
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Don't back anythi
I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's
help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to
restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS
right now but will try that later.
Tom
-O
I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and
it still rejects this message.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get r
r and restarted
both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another
service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can
later if necessary.
Tom
Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at
their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it
works that sound very reasonable.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wedn
it will die and you will
have to disable cache mode until you get your mailbox on the server well
below 2g.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exch
g and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Fyodorov, Andrey
Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions
What version of SAV is that? I don't think
What version of SAV is that? I don't think you can do anything like that
with the Exchange 5.5 antivirus or the latest smtp gateway antivirus.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discus
I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003. I am using the final
released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 3.6.0.54. I used to
have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook
2003.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto
y and then
to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less
likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is
directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mai
What if you turn on security event logging? Maybe that will log the change
in permissions and tell you when and what user account did it?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
http://messageone.com/solutions/EMS.asp
They had a trial by fire of that type of scenario with the recent
blackout and hurricane, I guess. Maybe they have customer referrals of
people who actually had the disaster.
Also, I hear that they include Chris Scharff's cell phone number in
every box.
Did you check out this article??
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;820852
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1
siness relationships
with. But not all of us are Amway reps or Mary Kay distributers. There are real
antispam solutions extant, and they're far more accurate than DNSBLs alone. Although
DNSBLs are a useful component of a real solution. For the next
I'd probably add a new recipient policy. I thoroughly enjoy the results I achieve by
never touching the default one. Especially never changing the default SMTP domain on
the default recipient policy. (this may be one of those superstition things, of
course)
-tom
> -Original
What is in the bounce message now that you've disabled the Stupid Mailguard "feature"?
What antispam/antivirus software do you have in there, and what sort of traffic is it
configured to dump?
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL P
e.
no fixup protocol smtp 25. Then get him or her to look at why the pix is refusing
your traffic.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conver
Look people, he's out of the comp copies of his book. Either ping Greg offline, or go
buy the darned book. It's only twelve bucks US$!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0595289703
-tom
[ various "me too" responses snipped]
>
> -Original Message
Did you try moving one back? I think that will delete the empty one and
just quit without moving it (and thus fixing the problem).
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
and deleted it (and then didn't bother moving it because of the
error). This happened to about 5 mailboxes out of 250.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox
oh yeesh. is it thursday again already?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:00 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
> Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain name
I always get "errors" in the exmerge log that I assume were due to antivirus
(NAV for exchange 5.5) slowing things down. Do you have to stop AV to run
this?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:47 PM
To
I just installed Office 2003 final from MSDN and was able to export my whole
mailbox to a PST. It shows up as 1.8Gig on the exchange 5.5 server, and the
PST file is 3.5Gig.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:35
How much $ is this software??
-Original Message-
From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Extracting to pst
Nope, I think the number of mailboxes you can read is based on the licenses
you purchased. It
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Invisible "corrupt" message on EX5.5 server
We are running exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k sp3 server. I have
cannot verify.
WARNING: "\\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom
[toma]&Finder&Unread
Mail&Œ㈴㈳¶Ø㕤êý㙢㉤ㄱ㈹㔰〰〶㜹㐱愹っ㜰〰搷㈷ㅣ㉢㝦㍡㉤ㄱㄹ㡦〰〶㜹㐱愹っㅣ㌲〰〰搷㈷ㅣ㉢㝦㍡㉤ㄱㄹ㡦〰〶㜹㐱愹っ〰〰ちㅤ㝦
〰〰Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings)" is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: &q
Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig...
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
Exmerge
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL
Veritas NetBackup can be fully controlled via CLI.
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:47 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Brick Level Backup
> Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
>
>
> We a
I have 7 pink elephants in my cube, but nobody else can see them.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
User reports - that helped. Thanks!
-Original Me
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/e2kfront.asp
"Note: User mailboxes cannot be stored on the front-end server."
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:33 PM
> Po
I use Listserv also, and I'm very happy with the product. The support is
simply excellent, also.
How much is outsourcing costing you? If money's tight and you want a
product that's got a decent installed base, look at Majordomo or Mailman
for the *n?x platforms.
http://www.greatcircle.com/majord
http://www.ontrack.com/powercontrols/ will do this, iirc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:30 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: NTBackup of Exchange * Need Restore Options *
> Subject: N
m not going
to load up my inbox again just to see. The OWA server has been running fine
since Friday.
Tom
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl
;
Don't you love it when, You tell the Doctor it hurts to do that, then he
says "Then don't do that!".
Then have you try OL2000 or OL2002?
Regards, Michael
-----Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM
To: Exchang
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;818709
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Posted At: Friday, August
, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Anyone using Outlook 2003?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1
that would probably fix the nasty carburettor problems it has
too...
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Our OWA
One other thing -- I have the "phonelist" web page set up on the server that
uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with
pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA
code)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Finch Bre
ed with my inbox
screen with frames set up but blank. I shut down and I'm running a low
level disk diag (since I saw some atapi errors in the log from a few weeks
ago) and then I'll try it again in case a full reboot is better than just
restarting inetinfo.
Tom
-Original Message---
ying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I
can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well).
I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always
started and I have to manually start it (it is s
And a quick glance shows that state.gov's email passes through (something generic),
sendmail, and Trend InterScan Viruswall before being delivered to an Exchange 5.5 box.
The latter two, and presumably the former one, are all easily configurable to block
based on any number of criteria, includi
Which begs an analysis of your .sig line, eh?
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:34 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Sobig.F alert
> Subject: RE: Sobig.F ale
I dunno how much you're paying for MessageLabs' service, but it's pretty much a
customized front end for the open-source SpamAssassin. The only benefit I can see
over a stock Postfix/Sendmail gateway using Spamassassin, perhaps with MailScanner or
amavisd or Anomy Sanitizer for some more advanc
s that far. This isn't the first time this has happened, it's just
the worst. I'm now convinced these things are less than worthless, and
I'm gonna 550 them at the gateway.
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Du
x27;t send the message, don't have a virus, and freak
out.
-tom
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mo
Yeah, it lets you do a HELO, but then on the MAIL FROM: it goes 550.
I haven't tried all their servers (they do round-robin DNS on their MX records)
because I'm lazy and it's not my problem. ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mitch Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday,
OK you win.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
42.
- Original Message -
From: "Hurst, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[
arate machine that
processes all inbound mail for our exchange server.
3- Symantec Antivirus for Exchange: Runs on the exchange server and scans
everything (not just inbound from the internet).
4- Symantec Client Antivirus: All clients have this installed and if 1,2
and 3 fail this may save us.
Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this list
I get another email from the Army.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume
I think that
for SMTP gateways) to only allow
specific extensions? Basically block all by default except for the
extensions you put on a white list?
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SAV for SMTP
POCWCP DEU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alverson, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DEU Resume Received
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709
not
it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP
files).
Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow "bad"
extensions when they are stored in ZIP files?
Tom
_
List p
(it
had to make up new names).
Using easyrecovery resulted in two good PST's (it was over 2g so the output
couldn't fit into one). Everything looked fine in the recovered PST files.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Au
Sure they do. They've had it for a few hours.
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/defs.download.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:42 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Heads up on a new virus
> Su
Find anything good here? Interesting augmentation, if you don't do business with the
target country...
http://blackholes.us/
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation:
Because you made a policy that actually applied to "EVERY single
recipient" that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be
assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite
it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General
screen, Modify, Find Now)
The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they
just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all
those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at
that point.
-Original Message-
Fr
ccuracies? Is there something in a KB doc
> that talks about this?
>
> Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> What are white space, and inherent and well-docum
I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
R
You mean this?
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:26 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Allow access to attachments
Subject: Allow access to attachments
Grrr. I
ks for playing. Besides we have an SMTP server for
that.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in
reported mailbox sizes, Alex?
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in reported
mailbox sizes, Alex?
I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays for $500, Alex.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:50 PM
Posted To: MSExc
I've used BulkAddFromExcel, and it works great with users. Maybe
BulkContactsFromExcel will do what you're looking for.
http://www.cdolive.net/download/
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Greg Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:11 AM
Posted To:
here is to uninstall and reinstall NAV for
Exchange.
> --
> From: Alverson, Tom
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 13:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
>
> Mapi/
Mapi/vapi
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI?
Nate
> --
> From: Alverson, Tom
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
ht and see how it goes. Symantec
will probably have newer definitions available by then.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks for all the replies.
I had tried stopping starting the servi
ully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the
definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav
to crash.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discu
again??
Tom
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL P
ed technical discussion. I'll be over
there adding sunbelt.com to my smtp gateway filters if you need me. Not that it'll
help me since they obfuscate the injection point of their spam.
-tom
_
List posting FAQ: ht
This could be done with a separate machine that receives mail for your
domain and only relays valid addresses to you. In order to help with the
bandwidth problem, this machine would have to be somewhere that did not have
a bandwidth limitation.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IT1(SW
Does it explode or implode?? I think this might be in the FAQ or some Q
article...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You can't clean out a black hole. Stuff goes in and never comes out.
But a
If nothing else helps, try removing the TCP/IP protocol and then re-adding
it. Even though you can ping OK this sometimes fixes outlook connection
problems.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Niko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
there some way to have it try multiple addresses in the event of a failure?
The only thing I can think of is to have our DNS person hard code these
"special" routes into the MX records so we do not end up using the MX
records on the root ser
In exchange 5.5, you can create a distribution list with no members that
will act as a black hole. I suspect you might be able to do the same with
2000.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange
After zapping those 3 emails, the
IMC has been running for about an hour now with no problems (and it has
never had a problem before). Does anyone have any insight on this problem?
If it happens again I will call MS and request the patch, as it is not
available for
config
exchange 5.5 sir
Santhosh.H
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA config
Yes.
More information available when you say what version of Exchange
1 - 100 of 864 matches
Mail list logo
