Oh, and it's only Outlook 2003 that can use large PST files. The
Exchange MAPI drivers (exmerge, etc) are still limited to small PST
files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:17 PM
To: Exchange
The default is 20GB if I remember correctly. But can be changed via
registry key if I also remember correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I agree. Install 2003 on the swing server. That way the SRS and ADC
can be run only there and you don't have to install them on your
production box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 8:52
IMS Diagnostics Logging / SMTP Protocol Logging / Medium
You'll need to look for the AUTH handshake. The handshake is done using
base64 encoded strings. You can use
http://www.securecode.net/Base64Convert+main.html to decode them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Logging options?
IMS Diagnostics Logging / SMTP Protocol Logging / Medium
You'll need to look for the AUTH handshake. The handshake is done using
base64
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Logging options?
For the record those are event 2010
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP
?
e-
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Logging options?
For the record, :), SMTP Protocol Logging doesn't write to the App Event
Log, rather it writes to file system files
password. So I check the 2010 events but they don't correspond with the
times that the spam is getting dumped on the server. I'm not sure how I
can
get the auth username that was used to submit these messages in the
first
place.
Lost
e-
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL
coincide yes? And if its one or a few
users
that have been compd the garbage is fairly regular intervals, I would
think
it would show up.
What about this base64 thing? I cant seem to find this encoded base 64
auth
string to plug into that website.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto
: 250 ok 1072209192 qp 43075
12/23/2003 12:43:00 PM : QUIT
12/23/2003 12:43:00 PM : 221 www.redmode.com
no username, no password, no admin. Isnt that a bad thing?
E-
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange
had my entire work day to dedicate to just email, unfortunately
some of us have to wear many hats.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Logging options?
Answering myself here
/log folder yes?
Can IIS smtp logs be expected to be in the same format?
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Logging options?
The AUTH you posted below was just
The answer was correct. What Ed left out was the No. at the front in
answer to your question of whether there is any way to prevent multiple
editors of an attachment to a public folder.
Did you go look at the 80-20 web site and see what features there
product offers? What exactly makes the
to know.
Thank you for your answer though.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
The answer was correct. What
On the subject of migration tool investment by the vendors, migration
tools are considered a marketing expense. You build free tools when
you're trying to quickly gain market share from your competitors. Once
you have the market share, there's less need since the prospective
customers will want
If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then the project was
severely underscoped and underbid. It seems like the customer has
chosen cost over quality. C'est la vie.
As for your positions, they are your opinion. Not fact. Not an opinion
that many people agree with either. There
There will always be people too stupid not to use POP3 as well. What
can you say. POP3 is an unsecure and unsecurable protocol without
adding something else.
You can use multiple interfaces and have your POP clients connect
differently. You can allow relaying only if they first set up a VPN
There's no physical proof that you as a so-called professional are not
unethical either. When did you stop beating your wife?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
1. making the evidence 10 times more expensive for someone to discover
/kidding
These things always seem to come from legal. But what's worse? Having
one set of Exchange backup tapes subpoenaed or 5000 PC hard drives?
It's interesting to see how the timeframe has changed over the years.
It
Exchange 5.5 does have a mailbox management component that can be used
to auto-empty deleted items folders and other folders. You can reduce
deleted item retention and ask people to move stuff into the Public
store or into PST files (just have them do a search of anything over 5MB
and remove
ERM (www.swinc.com/erm) will definitely address all your stated
requirements. A 2-resource fully functional version is free for
download at the web site.
Andy Webb
Simpler-Webb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels
Majlandt
Sent:
Not if you use Outlook to configure the room as a resource and to
automatically accept meetings (it's in the Options on the client). This
presumes that all the people who will be doing the booking are also
using a version of Outlook that supports Direct Booking.
More flexible solutions have been
As Chris hints below, a read receipt offers no assurance that a message
has actually been read and that it has actually been read by the
intended recipient. They're pointless really except to say to someone
I'm watching you, which usually just ticks them off to the point that
they figure out how
Your plan sounds fine to me.
The only suggestion I have is to install the latest post SP3 rollup
fixes on the Exchange 2000 server. This will ensure that the Exchange
2003 ESM doesn't cause a problem if you make changes to the E2K server
config.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
TCP 25 - inbound SMTP mail delivery
TCP 443 - inbound HTTPS for OWA
TCP/UDP 53 - if you host your own DNS
If you want Outlook, use a VPN. The PIX will do IPSEC based VPNs and
you can use the Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 IAS (RADIUS) service to
authenticate against the AD. Or you can just do
Plus PST files can't be shared.
Adding a user to the cc line of a message /does not/ double the storage
required in the Exchange databases.
However as others have said, public folders seem like a good solution.
If I remember correctly, the standard version of Exchange can do 16GB in
the Private
Yup - PST files will almost always be much larger than the size reported
on the Exchange store.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick Level
You could write a global store event sink that implements onsyncsave and
cancels any deletion or rename of the folder in question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kevin
C.
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange
Don't forget you also have to fully protect the front end server from
all the other servers on the DMZ from which it is not isolated.
Those other systems may have been placed on the DMZ in an insecure state
with the thought that if anyone broke them, they would be isolated from
the internal
I'm pretty sure you can access link information via WMI too, so if you
wanted to code something...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: is there
So, the only thing that sees a bad message is the brick level backup? I's just stop
doing it. It's certainly possible that OL2003 has items that BE9.0 doesn't
understand.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Wednesday,
Yes, it sucks. Write to ICANN.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
I'm surprised how quiet this group is
Because you're looking at different security descriptors.
The only thing you can see through ADSIEdit is in the Configuration
container of the AD. Under Services/Microsoft Exchange is the top of
your Exchange organization. From there down the security descriptors
that exist are inherited by the
I you keep your IIS logs for the OWA server, then you can collect the
user information from there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Zalta
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Discovering Mailboxes
You can also use the ADSI Scriptomatic to get a rough script created to
do this with VBS.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=39044E17-2490-4
87D-9A92-CE5DCD311228displaylang=en
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
It's the assertion that doctors are more professional /because/ they
don't take benefits from the manufacturers - which is false. Further,
if a particular piece of technology is complicated enough to require a
certification, then I'd sure prefer them to not only be certified on it,
but also to
The question is, do you have anything to contribute to the ethics/book
discussion or are you just hijacking this topic?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sorry, this change in topic requires a new subject. Don't post a new
question like this with an old subject line. The people who you might
interest will ignore it and the people in that other conversation will
be a tad annoyed at your interruption.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I would, at this point, then call PSS. PSS= Microsoft Product Support
Services. They are paid to get your system back up and running.
Seems you've exhausted the quick ideas of the free support forum.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Oh, it's the same guy all right.
http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml
And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now
here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml
Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being
unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is
No. There is no client impact.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: M: Drive Removal
Hi,
If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it,
At least the apostrophe was in the right place. :)
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:19 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Subject: RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Of course I
I have had enough trouble with single-server in-place upgrades from 5.5
to E2K that I will not do them that way anymore.
The process I use is:
1. upgrade domain to Win2K (this has a large subprocess)
2. install a temporary win2k member server
3. install the ADC on the temporary server, perform
You can do the ADC beforehand. Install it without setting up any
connection agreements.
Then do all the NTDSATRB/consistency check/directorycleanup stuff
beforehand also.
Set up the ADC connection agreements at this point.
Install a temporary E2K server as the first E2K server rather than
letting
There's a removeorg switch available in the SP3 setup. You can run
this, then re-run forestprep. You should be running forestprep from the
SP3 media also. It's update /forestprep in that case.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday,
Matthew,
ERM does not require a server reboot.
Andy
Simpler-Webb, Inc.
Exchange FAQ: www.swinc.com/exfaq
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July
No stop/start of anything is necessary. :)
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released!
http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July
Are the rooms that are not working set up as Resources in Outlook and
to therefore allow direct booking? When a mailbox is enabled for direct
booking through the Outlook client, its free/busy object is modified
such that the meeting organizer's Outlook knows to write the event
directly into the
You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the
bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an
SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it
connects.
The servers should be in separate routing groups as well.
Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the
bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an
SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN
the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run
real time.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the
bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote
Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures
are.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released
http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL
Mail-Enabled public folders will have an entry in AD that you can query.
Non-mail enabled public folders have no AD entry.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released
http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original
No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties
promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was -
especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was
populated in Exchange 5.5.
ERM (Exchange Resource
As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one
thread.
IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4
threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads?
From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
first one for me :)
BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple
threads :0
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003
:)
BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple
threads :0
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Multiple threads are a nightmare
Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Then why did it fail in batch node? Are you sure?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Interactive mode runs multithreaded as well
is designed only to
reflect the mailbox rights on the user's mailbox.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Tuesday, July 01
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - /
/ / = / ? / ^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
Are you sure? The msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor property is a valid
security descriptor and is the property that is associated with the
Mailbox Rights tab in ADUC. These rights are not visible in the store,
but are inherited by the store.
On the other hand, anything changed in Outlook, is
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Well, then at least there's some room for improvement with
the server side code. That's an upside I suppose
PFs and
mailboxes, but the event service has to be restarted many times per week
because of failures that cause events in the logs that when you look up
have nothing to do with your problem. No, I haven't called PSS, but I
should, you're right.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto
: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:04 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Yes, unfortunately.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21
Use a third party product that allows you to define rules based on the
parameters set for you by your management. Then allow management to
review any messages that meet those rules. That way you can stay out of
it. :)
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager)
The line is that it was actually broken in 5.5 and they fixed it in
E2K.
Why there can't be a choice between Post type public folders and Note
(email message) type public folders I don't understand. Actually I do -
$$$. There /could/ be a choice if enough people griped about it. At
this point,
that in E2K, you'd be
able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what
happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of
PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Lots of experience with the issue. Haven't tried the fix out yet
though. :)
Siegfried Weber did an Event sink that would change the message class on
a folder-by-folder basis. There's also
http://www.ivasoft.biz/posttonote.html which is an event sink too.
You can either do the import as part of the profile creation, or you
could gather up the PST files and use the ExMerge tool from the support
directory on the Exchange CD (use the one from the E2K SP3 media).
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released!
- AVAPI 2.5.
It allows the AV vendors to actually delete messages containing viruses or matching
the spam filters, if enabled, rather than just modifying the content/attachments. It
also allows for stamping of a spam confidence level on messages so that users can
choose how spammy they
Things that increase the size over raw message byte count:
1. database overhead
2. whitespace - you can see how much in the nightly online maintenance
event log entries.
3. duplication of data - in some cases data exists in both STM and EDB.
Things that reduce the size below raw message byte
Indeed. I forgot about the Recovery Storage Group. The VSCS will be
nice for some folks too.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released
http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
1. backup/recovery is done at the storage group level. You can restore a
single database of a storage group, but it's a little trickier. Some of
the policies are also set at the storage group level.
2. an additional storage group costs you about 100MB of RAM used just to
start it up. The
The downside is:
1) it uses much more RAM to add a storage group vs. adding a database or
just staying with one.
2) it uses more space because there is a second set of STM and log files
and single-instance-store is broken.
3) it may take more backup time and backup tape
I'm not arguing against
or Additional Mailbox Store
Then what is the upside? Why would you want two Information Stores?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional
: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store
Then what is the upside? Why would you want two Information Stores?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store
Thanks Andy, that is very helpful.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003
We've posted an Exchange 2003 FAQ populated with data gathered from
various sources to the www.swinc.com site along with the Exchange 2000
and Exchange 5.5 versions.
I haven't moved over all the appendices from the E2K FAQ at this point.
I'll evaluate each one on its own for applicability over
.
The only problem now is that administrator is the only one who can log
on to
the service even if others are enabled.
Karsten
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27. maj 2003 17:15
To: Exchange Discussions
The problem I was having with RTC was that when
true !!! Any user NOT having a mailbox ... Can log on
to
the RTC server..
Does that mean anything to you?
Karsten
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27. maj 2003 19:00
To: Exchange Discussions
For that you may need to go back to the RTC folks to dig
You're right, Chris. Public Folders are much harder to use as participatory resource
calendars. ERM today only supports mailbox based calendars. We're looking at PF
support for a possible future release, but have not scheduled anything yet.
Ed Woodrick took a few, but I don't know of anyone else who did (anyone?). Perhaps if
we do it again we should make sure to get mug shots of everyone. :)
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.
No, cluster installs are not scriptable if I remember correctly.
Standalone installs are scriptable - there's an option on the setup
program to cause it to simulate the install and capture the setup
information.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL
I think you'd benefit more from something like kvault that moved the
data out to nearline or offline storage, but left it within the
Exchange environment. It will result in far less usage of drive space,
is easily backed up and will result in fewer support calls. There are
several Exchange
Finish your migration, then remove the store.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== ---Original
Message-
I would tend to believe the user in this case. Outlook does a crummy job of modifying
meetings in certain circumstances. The way it does it is by cancelling and
re-inviting. If I recall, changing the invite list is one of the things that will do
this. There is not, again working from
Could have something to do with view maintenance.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q216076
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q159196
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Slight revision - Add an x500 (case is significant) proxy address to
each user that matches their distinguished name from the old 5.5 server.
For example:
x500:/o=Vang/ou=ExchangeSite/cn=Recipients/cn=user
It ought to match the legacyExchangeDN value, but it is possible since
you created a new
You know, I also did something ugly at one site where we hid the
distribution lists, and set up contacts to appear in the AD. The user
mails to the contact, which is 1 entry against their count, then the
contact forwards to the DL, which expands and delivers the mail. I
think that's how it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the address I think.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
-- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 --
You can't do it with a csv unless you also write the script that reads the csv.
I know I have a script around here somewhere that does it. There's one on our web
site that will create a single mailbox. easy to modify for lots. I'll see if I can
dig up the one that does lots and post that
wanted to also set the passwords
for each account. My understanding it is not straight forward using scripts
for AD. Hence the need for some 3rd party App.
- Original Message -
From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:05 PM
The answer, of course, is C. (yes, I'm giving it away. I'm feeling generous today.
Hopefully I'm generous and right. g)
C isn't a horrible answer and it does meet the requirement. If I'm swapping out tapes
each night and don't have enough space on a tape for all the databases, but do have
It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to
be a sysadmin.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
That just makes him more opinionated about his interpretation of the
RFC! :)
PMDF *is* usually pretty good about adherence to the spec though. And
it lets you tune lots of stuff too.
Without seeing the entire MIME structure of the message, it's hard to
say if it's correct, loosely interpreted,
note that you can also delete a specific nickname from the list. when
the little popup appears on the screen, you can hit the delete key and
remove just that nickname.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb,
Default Recipient Policy.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
===
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot
it's impossible to correct every off-base random usenet poster.
you should, indeed, avoid looking at permissions on the M: drive.
for mailbox permissions, you need to use the Mailbox Rights tab on the
mailboxes as described in the KB articles.
Not free. Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server can index and search
public folders. There are other third party applications too.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX
I know people have done this quite a bit. Don't know about that
specific hardware though. Does OWA work on the FE without the SSLA?
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
