: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 DR
All,
We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will
have no connectivity to our production environment
Yes. It's really only important to block logins to the Exchange 5.5 server.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;218920
What's not in the KB is that the Exchange 2000 server whose System Attendant
and DSA you must allow is the server on which the Site Replication Se
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 DR
All,
We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will
have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains
(bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) -
(
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange 2000 DR
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:21:02 -0600
All,
We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will
have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 d
server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the
DR exercise (Exchange 2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller
(bakernet.com). I have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical
hardware at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the
Is there a way to block Outlook users from connecting to an Exchange server?
We are moving users from one server to another and want to block them from
logging into their mailbox on the weekend.
Ralph Elmerick
NT & Exchange Administrator
Information Systems Technical Principal
**
Hi Everyone,
In our environment we have 4 Public Folder dedicated servers for each of
our regions in the US. This allows the user quick access to its
information from that region.
Well the problem we have is when a folder is over its size limit, it
generates 4 warnings every night when the ma
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 6:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy
System Folder.
Thanks for the reply!
I forget to add that the E55 and E2k
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System
> Folder.
>
>
> I've introduced Exc
Of Derrick Stevenson
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System
Folder.
I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55)
Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I t
Ive introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55)
Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling.
An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but cant
see any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither E55 nor
E2k
rading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
> What is the best way to upgrade Exchange 5.5. to Exchange 2000? Is it the
> Mailbox move method or the In place method?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch
All other things being equal? The former.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, December 27, 2003 8:43 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
What is
What is the best way to upgrade Exchange 5.5. to Exchange 2000? Is it the
Mailbox move method or the In place method?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com
Upgrade to Exchange 2003 using the swing server method. Skip Exchange 2000
entirely. Exchange 2003 is superior in just about every way and why do the
upgrade twice?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
there
be any problems upgrading (using a domain admin account). Currently we are
running AD in mixed mode with one Exchange 5.5 server on Win2k. Only 90
mailboxes. On another note...can anyone recommend the BEST way to upgrade to
Exchange 2000...eg:in-place or swing method or server move method
Gupta
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MTA error on Exchange 2000 server
I am getting the following errors on my first exchange 2k server in
exchange 5.5 organization:
A sockets error 0 on a bind() call was detected. The MTA will attempt to
recover the so
I am getting the following errors on my first exchange 2k server in exchange
5.5 organization:
A sockets error 0 on a bind() call was detected. The MTA will attempt to
recover the sockets connection. Control block index: 0. [BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR
11 258] (12)
The source is MSEXCHANGEMTA and catego
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Any ideas?
-Ryan
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite
2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Any ideas?
-Ryan
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com
-Original Message-
Fro
Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error
We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to
open their mailbox on the server: "Unable to display the selected folder or item. You
do not have permission to log on" while no permissions have changed and thei
Thank you the Q article was exactly what I was looking for.
-Timothy
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=en
A) Exchange 2000 doesn't have a service account. This would explain why
you can't get your service account to access a mailbox. :)
B) If you want an account to have the ability to open another users'
mailbox, grant it Send As and Receive As rights.
Jason
-Original Message---
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
Hi All,
I was wondering if
Hi All,
I was wondering if you all have maybe heard of a resolution for the
following problem:
As of Exchange 2k SP2, MS has removed the ability for teh service
account
to view users email content. This means I cannot bind to a user mailbox
with
my service account for maintenance or programmi
Did they recently change their passwords?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error
We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error
Any ideas?
Exchange 2000 SP3
Outlook 2000 and 2002
Win2k Domain
Thanks,
Ryan
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com
Would that make the rest of us Deckler's Hecklers?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 23:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 3: Lessons Learned GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
We should change the name of this list to "
GD wrote: "I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped"
Erm, could it be down to the fact that the budget was allocated before the
consultant even knew which GroupWise client was most suitable for the task?
The information contained in this e-mail is intended fo
GD wrote: "I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped"
Erm, could it be down to the fact that the budget was allocated before the
consultant even knew which GroupWise client was most suitable for the task?
The information contained in this e-mail is intended fo
opher
Hummert
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Actually I just gave up, and gave in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Monday, Dec
Actually I just gave up, and gave in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Looking down, I see that you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
My brain tickles when I pick my nose
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ma
er
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Day 3: Lessons Learned GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Day 3 was pretty much finishing up some details with nothing much new and
exciting to report. Was able to bring up the GW 6.5 client connected to both
GW and Exchange and this allows
other"
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Well, some day I'd like to be a dentist. - Hermey
- Matt
Well, some day I'd like to be a dentist. - Hermey
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
When I grow up I want to
When I grow up I want to be a principalor a caterpillar.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
You
: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Oh. My.
I think that was TMI, Eric.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
W6.5 to Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Sometimes I feel funny when I climb the rope in Gym class.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
You do too? I thought I was the only one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Sometimes I feel funny
Day 3 was pretty much finishing up some details with nothing much new and
exciting to report. Was able to bring up the GW 6.5 client connected to
both GW and Exchange and this allows one to drag and drop contacts but not
PDL's. Also tried with the GW 5.2.6 client with similar results.
Created a ma
other"
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
You can fix fat, but you can't fix ugly...
-Original Me
You can fix fat, but you can't fix ugly...
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Sometimes I feel funny when I climb the rope i
You've got the women just lining up for you don't ya...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
My brain tickles when
Me fail english? Thats unpossible!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Sometimes I feel funny when I climb
2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
My brain tickles when I pick my nose
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exc
, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
My brain tickles when I pick my nose
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange
My brain tickles when I pick my nose
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
My cat's breath smells lik
My cat's breath smells like cat food.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
>
>
> T
ssons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
You do not know the specifics of their situation so I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped and underbid.
Rushed, yes. Underscoped and underbid, no. The scope is to get them from
GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000 and that is wh
You do not know the specifics of their situation so I am not sure why you
are so certain that the project was severly underscoped and underbid.
Rushed, yes. Underscoped and underbid, no. The scope is to get them from
GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000 and that is what is being delivered.
Underbid
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Well, if you're big enough to look past my views on MVP, I think I can let
it slide. Many thanks for your res
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
> If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then the project
was severely underscoped > and underbid.
No kidding. The design and implementation plan alone for a project of
that size is w
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Well, if you're big enough to look past my views on MVP, I think I can
let
it slide. Many thanks for your response.
and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Vivek Singh
Subject: Server-based autoresponder for exchange 2000
Hi,
We want to send an automatic response to the sender when
Hi,
We want to send an automatic response to the sender when an email is
sent to the support mail ID of our company. I am interested in
implementing a server based autoresponder for exchange 2000. So far,
I've only seen products that run on Outlook. If you know of any
server-based products
Well, if you're big enough to look past my views on MVP, I think I can let
it slide. Many thanks for your response. And, BTW, $1200 is 25% of the
budget for this project, that's a big chunk of change.
P.S. And because I have been heckled to death on this issue, I feel the
need to clarify because I
ehalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
OK, some more specifics from the front.
ENVIRONMENT
- NetWare 6 Server, SP3
- GroupWise 6.5 PO, SP1
- Exchange 2000 Server, (Version 6.0 Build 6249.4, SP3)
M
OK, some more specifics from the front.
ENVIRONMENT
- NetWare 6 Server, SP3
- GroupWise 6.5 PO, SP1
- Exchange 2000 Server, (Version 6.0 Build 6249.4, SP3)
Migration Workstation
- Exchange 2000 Administrative Tools, no SP's
- NetWare 32-bit client
- GroupWise 6.5 client, not SP1
- Outlook
OK, I've only been onsight at the client for one day and this is my first
shot at migrating GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000. I'm having some
different experiences with 6.5 than my experiences with other GW 6.x
migrations to Exchange and I'm having some different experiences than
NJ, 07068
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: removal of first exchange 2000 server
What happens when you generate them a new profile?
Josh
What happens when you generate them a new profile?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of first exchange 2000
Have you tried creating a new Outlook profile? Removing and re-adding the
Outlook Address Book?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of first exchange 2000 server
I have
tlook opens but clicking inbox locks outlook. I have tried
repairing outlook and upgrading it to 2003 but nothing fix's it. Any
info would be appreciated.
Exchange 2003 on windows 2003 cluster.
Removed server is exchange 2000 on windows 2000 non cluster
Client outlook xp/2003
Ronald R. M
lf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter
control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual
server has every
er 05, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am
questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am
questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exc
Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected "Allow
relay to these domains" for the "* 1" address space.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
where the problem is.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
Subject:
Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization?
I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying
spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the
SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system
and mine is that
Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out
there has done this procedure before? Can you give me some ideas what to
expect? Have you run into any problems? How long
day, November 12, 2003 5:40 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
>
>
> We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard
> Edition to Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to
> know if anyone out there has done this proc
ember 2003 22:40
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out
there has
We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to Exchange 2000
Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out there has done this procedure
before? Can you give me some ideas what to expect? Have you run into any problems? How
long does it take and what impact does it
You can sort the queues themselves too.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
So far it has not grown on me... :)
I guess I am just accustomed to being
, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA: Setting IE to open maximized
I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO.
He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a maximized
IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the
2003 2:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
>
>
> I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to
> give it time
> to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management.
>
> If you want to see messages going to a
.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
All,
First I would like to thank
All,
First I would like to thank all who responded to my "secure e-mail" thread
last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the possible
solution...
Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade Project from 5.5
to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound
I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO.
He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a
maximized IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the KB or
via a Google search. Has anybody tried this or know how I might be able
to do this?
Thanks,
It came out this month.. it is called Exchange 2003.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 SP4
Has anyone heard when Exchange 2000 SP4 will be released?
Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&
Anyone, anyone...
Bueller, Bueller?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folders not replicating to Exchange 2003 from Exchange
2000
To
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
Avaliable options I'm aware of:
1. HP LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU)
2. Microsoft Identity Integration Server (MIIS)
3. SimpleSync
4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work)
5. A
bject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and
custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do
this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are
tied together in a
NP, CNA, A+
-Original Message-
From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
Hi Damian:
The DIM Report is a great resources for Identity Management Solutions
and alternativ
Of Scoles, Damian
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists
and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want
to do this because
I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists
and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want
to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies
and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there
was an
To all,
My company uses Public Folders regularly, with no problems until now.
We recently upgraded two of our Exchange servers (the FE & 1 BE) to Win
2003/Exch 2003 & moved all of the techs' accounts over to the upgraded
server test the setup. All is well, EXCEPT: some, but not all of the
Public F
Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
H... only one DC can be designated as the Configuration DC. If it
fails...
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboratio
Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
The obvious answer is to add another domain controller so your "AD"
doesn't
fail.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message---
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
Um,
We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the
next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15
minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem
Um,
We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the
next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15
minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem.
I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in
the registry. This is an issue brough
half Of Timothy Schilbach
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query
Hi All,
How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its
about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail
ov
Hi There,
Thank for the reply. Yes it is, but I think I found the answer and the
solution. Its documented here:
http://www.winnetmag.com/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook/Article/ArticleID/25332/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook_25332.html
This did the trick nicely by allowing me to increase the DS auery
in
r 16, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question
HI Everyone,
We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD
servers in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent
gotten a chance to move them yet).
Hi All,
How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now
its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it
to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff.
Any suggestions?
Timothy
HI Everyone,
We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD
servers
in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent gotten a
chance to move them yet).
For some reason when one of our DC's failed (the one with all the FSMO
roles), our other DC di
Hi All,
I am experiencing a wierd issue when making a new Web Store in Public
folders to develop in. I start by doing the following:
1. Create a new Public Folder Tree
2. Create a New Public store and bind it to new tree
3. Create an HTTP entry in the HTTP protocals for the new tree and add
nd since I know what's causing
it, I haven't put any effort in to trying to fix it.
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication Conflicts after applying KB824282 (
1 - 100 of 2048 matches
Mail list logo
