lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Nah ... I've worked with it for a long time, but not utilizing the full
breadth of what it's capable of. There's a hell of a lot where I understand
the
nt. I still have to
reach for Tony Redmond's book often to refresh my memory. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
&g
OTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
It's called Corporate America -- I work for a company that is new to IT
cussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> That explains why you'd do a periodic eseutil /d, and it's
> not a bad reason. However, it doesn't explain why you'd do
> the rest of the stuff you described. You should do the other
> stuff on
Wow That's some experience you have there
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
y, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Financial constraints How much does a fsckin HDD cost these days?
>
> Your argument is weak!
>
> D
: Outlook appointments on Exchange
That's quite a leap, to say that offline maintenance is causing 2 or 3
mailboxes out of 1200 to be unable to respond to specific meeting requests,
even though it's been running for years without a single problem. Might
want to reconsider your logic o
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Jon,
>
> Space management and server growth is something that I'm very
> interested in, as it has a very real effect on my day to day
> management strategies. I'm vaguely familiar with Roger and
> the work h
ine, I believe) and I was wondering if
you could clarify your experience in the Exchange community so that we can
draw a frame of reference?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 19:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
Very elegantly put, nice one. I'm "borrowing" that one, to apply to someone
I know later...
G.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 18:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchang
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Quite frankly, it's because a manager somewhere thought it would be a
good idea and wouldn't argue about it. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:5
Quite frankly, it's because a manager somewhere thought it would be a good
idea and wouldn't argue about it. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE
I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Butler
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Tha
ed Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Butler
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
I'm interested in hearing some sound arguments on why offline
maintena
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Seeing as the problem you're experiencing is most likely the
> direct result of one of your offline database management
> practices, you might want to change
ystems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> I'm interest
r shocks every weekend
as "scheduled maintenance". As long as you are careful, it's pretty safe to
do so. But, why bother?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
where
it can be overwritten.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
I'm interested in hearing some so
esday, June 05, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> I'd bet the same people who say not to do exactly what you
> are doing are VERY comfortable with esetuil and i
ms
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Fair enough -- here's what we do:
> Once a quarter, p
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and some brats.
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook
Translation for the reading impaired: leave it alone.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:53 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Well if I were in your shoes I would probably start by
> creating a new mailbox and populating it with bogus
> information.
: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Explain what you mean by the phrase "rigorous maintenance".
> Your administrative practices may be the root cause of the
> problem you are trying to solve.
>
> Serdar Soysal
>
>
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and some brats.
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Expl
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook appointments on Exchange
We're having a severe problem with a few mailboxes on our Exchange 5.5
server, even though we maintain a rigorous maintenance schedule on our
stores. A few users (all running Outlook 2000 SR-1) can no longer respond
to
where to start, I would consider calling PSS on this
one.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Negative on both log counts (with the exception of the Dr
endar even
worse?
> -Original Message-
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
>
>
> Anything in your server's event log? Or the clients
Anything in your server's event log? Or the clients event log? Does it do
the same thing with the exchange client?
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook appointments on Exc
We're having a severe problem with a few mailboxes on our Exchange 5.5
server, even though we maintain a rigorous maintenance schedule on our
stores. A few users (all running Outlook 2000 SR-1) can no longer respond
to any appointment invitations -- doing so causes outlook.exe to fail with a
Dr.
30 matches
Mail list logo
