Also, next time you need to do this, build another Exchange box, move all
the users to the new one. Stop the IS on the old one, delete the PRIV.EDB,
start the IS and then move everybody back. Voila! No risks, no hassles.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
agree that putting the TEMP db on a network share is a
no-no.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster debriefing
Running eseutil on a raid drive subsystem may cause p
, 2001 6:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
Its a she.
We don't have a college fund. We've got a therapy fund. Its not a matter of
IF we screw her up - we know that we will, its just a matter of how and how
much we sc
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Well it was a 10G file, which is a
t: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know where MSKB and Google are?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?
-Ori
MSKB has had a makeover today - looks totally different!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 14:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know where MSKB and Google are?
-Original Message
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc:
Kevin Shoots, Kevin scores :)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
MSKB's main site in s Redmond WA, and googles is in mountain View CA.
Kevinm M WL
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?app=WebEvents&eventid=4093
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> anyone know wh
t: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know where MSKB and Google are?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?
-Ori
anyone know where MSKB and Google are?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?
-Original Message-
From
Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
Its a she.
We don't have a college fund. We've got a therapy fund. Its not a matter of
IF we screw her up - we know that we wil
--Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Which means nothing. Try it out yourself - cut and paste,
> drag and drop,
> xcopy, whateve
anyone know what event viewer id # 4093 is?
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
Well it was a 10G file, which is about 81920 megabits. Let's say y
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Which means nothing. Try it out yourself - cut and paste,
> drag and drop,
> xcopy, whatever - a large fil
or Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> He's go
oul goes up on
the roof and gets stuck there.
-
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
She's lega
trine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha
-Original Message-
From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
You have your 3 year old working at McDonalds? S
Message-
> From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> You have your 3 year old working at McDonalds? Sheesh! ;)
>
> Phil
>
> > There is no need
Hey, they keep him away from the deep fryer
-Original Message-
From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
You have your 3 year old working at McDonalds? Sheesh! ;)
Phil
> Th
You have your 3 year old working at McDonalds? Sheesh! ;)
Phil
> There is no need for retraining this person - even my 3 year
> old can say
> "Would you like fries with that?"
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resourc
w.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> He did wait an hour... And he's confident the copy was
> c
. (James 1:27)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of AD
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
I just pray that I am never de-briefed before a disaster...
Andy
> I want to know
2001 1:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> You're assuming that the Eseutil didn't chew up some of the database.
>
> -- Drew
>
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there
rewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Yanek, look for event 1221 or something like that.
>
> -- Drew
>
> Visit http://www.drewncapr
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
I want to know how much White Space was there before the defrag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I want to know how much White Space was there before the defrag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
You're assuming tha
TECTED]]On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
Alas, I don't know. Seeing as 3.5 G were cleared, can I assume there were
3.5 gigs of whitespace? Adding a drive isn't so easy as the system's
t: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> How much white space was there before the defrag?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Kor
How much white space was there before the defrag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He did wait an hour... And he&#
How much white space was there before the defrag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He followed the KB article, whatever it
hange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database
> to finish
> being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share
> - which needs
> to complete before you get your dos prompt back.
Mark Russinovich's book about managing
exchange. It gave me some good background. Take your time and hit all the
steps.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster debrief
Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database to finish
being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share - which needs
to com
o priv.edb instead of tape restore. Then, the defrag effort
would not have been in vain.
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He followed the KB article, whate
Depends on how you like your coffee
- Original Message -
From: "Yanek Korff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> You gonn
here.
- Original Message -
From: "Yanek Korff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> He followed the KB article, whatever it was. Services were dow
You gonna pay for the training?
-Yanek.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: disaster debriefing
>
>
> Your lucky. The other guy should be regul
5 gigs.
-Yanek.
> -Original Message-
> From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
>
> The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands. It can take a
>
And I thought the bottom line was "run eseutil when you have to."
-Yanek.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
>
Your lucky. The other guy should be regulated to making cables and coffee.
But make sure he gets trained on both. Running eseutil online gee wheeze
- Original Message -
From: "Yanek Korff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 200
grounds for termination in my mind
Thank you,
Erik L. Vesneski
Internal Network Manager
Epicentric, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
The
The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands. It can take a very, very, very
long time to run. It also gets very snitty when you don't have enough room
on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is part of the
defrag processWhere did he attempt to create the temp fileon the
What did you do wrong? You ran ESEUTIL!!!
We have been over this a dozen times in here
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: disaster debriefing
Ok,
44 matches
Mail list logo
