As an ASP we have our clients connect with Citrix to a data centre which
hosts the exchange servers etc.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2002 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
Hi There !
Yes that right if you press shift and delete a mail
then it is a hard delete but there is a registry entry
which lets you recover mails that have been hard
deleted without the need to restore it from the backup
.If any body requires that entry then let me know and
belive me it works I
Title: RE: E2K Server Administration Question
I have to solve this problemm as well, pls some body help us
Farooq Ahmed
The Aga Khan University
Official:Yes
-Original Message-
From: _pkliste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Is the backup running on a w2k server?
;-B
-Original Message-
From: John Theed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24. februar 2002 16:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Veritas 8.5 for Windows
Is there anyway to make a Veritas Backup job timeout? If person is not there
on holiday
I am on the search for a GOOD anti-spam and content
filtering tool (software) for my Exchange 2K mail server and possibly for
internet filtering. Any suggestions?
Chris Jamison
Network
Systems Manager
Penn-America
Group, Inc.
ph:
215-773-7736
fax:215-443-3667
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NO, NT 4 w/SP6A
John
-Original Message-
From: Bue Gloeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Veritas 8.5 for Windows
Is the backup running on a w2k server?
;-B
-Original Message-
From: John Theed
Depends on what features you want. I see GFI Mail Essentials mentioned
a lot, and although we don't offer it as a product, I hear it is good.
You could use the eManager add-on for Trend products like ScanMail or
VirusWall, but if you want a more complex product that offers macro-like
Trend Micro has a good product, you might want to check it out.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Post away!
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and
Title: Message
Can
you put him (or the account operators group) in the Exchange Administrators
group. I think he'll need that level (Ex. Admin View Pnly won't do it and Ex.
Admin Full Control is way too much). You can even use the Exchange
Administration Delegation Wizard, if you like.
Hello everyone,
i was wondering if there is a way to have a copy of
everyones incoming and outgoing mail sent to a generic mailbox without the user
knowing. my boss at another company wants a copy of every piece of e-mail
coming in and going out sent to a "generic" mailbox that only he has
Take
a look at article Q239427.
Tim
Jensen
Cingular Wireless, Chicago
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:35
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5
Question
Hello everyone,
i was wondering
Title: Message
Your
boss should Hire better people if he feels the need to police them. Or fire the
people he suspects.
Milton R
Dogg
Of The
Dogg Foundation
-Original
Message-From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange
enable
journaling on exchange 5.5 you have to make registry
settings
-Mensaje original-De: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Expuesto a las: Lunes, 25 de Febrero de
2002 11:35 a.m.Expuesto en: Trafico de
MailsConversación: Exchange 5.5 QuestionAsunto:
Exchange 5.5
Message Journaling was introduced in 5.5 SP1 and should give you what
you need. You can journal messages at the server, site or organisation
level. Check TechNet for details on how to set this up.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For
Incomingyes (assuming Ex5.5) you can use the Alternate Recipients tab
to redirect a copy of all inbound mail...not sure how you would go about doing
this for outbound though. Maybe using a separate SMTP server
package?
Opinion - Sounds very Dilbert-ian to me.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE,
IIRC, isn't also known to cause slowness.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Message Journaling was introduced in 5.5 SP1 and should give you what
Title: Message
Don't forget to
speak to HR and Legal regarding this. Without the right documentation, your boss
could be looking at a lawsuit.
-Original Message-From: JENSEN, TIMOTHY C
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25,
2002 6:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
It is known for eating a ton of disk space as well.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
IIRC, isn't also known to cause slowness.
-Original
Ummm...yes, that is a polite way of saying that there's a performance
overhead! :-)
Probably a good idea to get some perfmon baselines before implementing
it
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative
Sounds like a total Cluster Fusk to me. Advice against it.
If a boss has that much time to dedicate to watching Employees there is
something else wrong with the company. Unless he wants to save it all
for legal reasons of some sort, then he is looking for more trouble. Why
save a paper trail
Title: Message
Nevermind,
RightFax was not the problem...
-Original Message-From:
Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002
9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: pure
curiosity -Mailbox Mgr database changes
Angie,
I am
missing
Hi,
I'm having a problem with KMS in our test setup.
We have two servers setup as an exchange organisation.
Server_01 has exchange 2000 w/ an enterprise root CA which has had the Enrolment agent
(computer), Exchange User Exchange Signature Only templates added.
I have waited for
I run Exchange 5.5 on an NT4.0 box. Small setup, about 15 users. Just
recently every time I go into Exchange Administration I get an error
that reads:
An unexpected, unknown error has occurred.
MAPI or an unspecified service provider.
ID no: --
Any ideas how I can fix
Run admin from a different client. That will allow you to add you users for
now. If my memory serves me correctly. I've seen this happen and I was
able to kill/restart explorer and that fixed it for a while. I was forced
to finally reinstalled just the admin piece.
Tom
-Original
Do you have outlook running on this server? I will bet you that it is,
and that is probably your problem (Microsoft does not like outlook
installed on the exchange server...) The mapi spooler is toasted right
now, reboot the server all should be fine, Or from a management server
with exchange
That's true Murray, forgot about that.
-Original Message-
From: Wall, Murray TMC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Admin Problem
Do you have outlook running on this server? I will bet you that it is,
Have you perhaps installed Outlook or some other mail client on this box?
Is the Exch admin program at the same SP as the Exch server?
-Original Message-
From: Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Admin
Doesnt Outlook replace some of the Exchange DLLs and slap the crap out of
the server ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Admin Problem
Have you perhaps installed
Why
not a program like MailMarshal ?
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 09:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5
Question
Hello everyone,
i was wondering if there is a way to have a copy
Just an update here for those who may have to run it. It took 14 hours for
a single 19.5GB (was compacted to 17.5GB) mailbox store with the hardware
below. PSS actually told me to expect somewhere between 5-7GB per hour so
they were way off. Just an FYI. Thanks.
-Original Message-
Just a bit more info on this.
If I try to mark the KMS for installation on the server which holds the CA then it
allows me to select it.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood
Sent: 25 February 2002 15:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 KMS
Hi,
I'm having
It has been known to do that
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Admin Problem
Doesnt Outlook replace some of the Exchange DLLs and slap the crap out of
the
Well outlook express was on the machine.. but that's about it. Removed
that and still get the problem.
How do I connect to it remotely? Not even sure I have the orig. 5.5
disks lying around anymore! Is there way to copy files from it?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
That pss guy was on crack with that number. That time looks to be very
consistent with everything I have seen. Glad it all went well.
Eseutil on a defrag writes a temp database, beats it up, then writes it
all back to the original priv. Which means in your environment you had
to move at least 40
Awsome, worked great. Thanks!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:30 PM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: public folder: unread count
Subject: RE: public folder: unread count
If the Public Folder
Hi everyone...
Anyone have any comments\suggestions on Network Appliance running
E2K or Exchange 5.5. We run in a E2K mixed mode currently and are going
to test a Filer 820.
Thanks All!
Brian Bauer
Jones New York
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List
Title: Message
Sorry,
SP4 on the Exch and OWA servers
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday,
February 16, 2002 10:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA again
I
have heard no mention of the SP level of this
Title: Message
Or hire
better managers. Thats their
job. Employees goof off, whether
it is on the phone, too many breaks, etc.
Does he monitor phone calls too?
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
9:39 AM
To:
Microsoft just no said they would support that configuration on 2k.. But
that still does not mean they are a good idea.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
will do...
thanks for the information everyone...
- Original Message -
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Ummm...yes, that is a polite way of saying that
Hi,
If you set a policy limit in the info store for message size limits to lets
say 2mb. Is there a way to allow maybe a handful of users to not have
message size limits? We have 500 mailboxes and approximately 98% of them we
would like to keep message size limits but there are a few members
ill take a look at it...
thanks!
- Original Message -
From:
David N.
Precht
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:53
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
Why
not a program like MailMarshal ?
-Original
Title: Message
sure doesmonitors everything except e-mail
which we all know he now wants...
- Original Message -
From:
Allen
Crawford
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:14
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
Or
You can set those on the limits tab. But for the life of me this morning
I do not recall If this over rides the IMC setting.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25,
sure, check out the properties of the individual mailboxes. If you check the
box that talks about using the below limits, and then don't put in any limits,
that should effectively do what you want.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
In
Thanks,
Yeah that's actually my question. If it would override or not.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message size limits in Ex 5.5
You can set those on the
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message size limits in Ex 5.5
sure, check out the properties of the individual mailboxes. If you check
the
box that talks about using
properties of the information store, or the internet mail conector
-Mensaje original-
De: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Lunes, 25 de Febrero de 2002 01:13 p.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: Message size limits in Ex 5.5
Hi,
If you set a policy limit in the
Title: Message
i hear youive been trying to advise against
it...and im losing...
- Original Message -
From:
Milton R
Dogg
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:38
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
Your
boss
i know... do you have any reasons why?
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Network Appliance running E2K and Exchange 5.5
Microsoft just no said they would support that
I believe it does, yes.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me, it is
the parts that I do understand. (Mark Twain, american writer and humorist,
1835-1910)
And is this registry entry for 5.5 or 2000, and on Client or Server?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level backups using Veritas 8.6
Post away!
Steve Clark
Clark
I think you better test it and report back.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message size limits in Ex 5.5
I believe it does, yes.
--
Why even that? What about journaling?
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|-+
| |
Search the KB for 'dumpsteralwayson'
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q246153
William
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level backups using
Title: RE: Brick Level backups using Veritas 8.6
Count me in, too. Thanks in advance.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level backups using Veritas 8.6
Yes please
See what MS has to say about NAS/SAN with Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Network Appliance running E2K and Exchange 5.5
Hi everyone...
Anyone have
Over the weekend at a consulting gig we were installing Exchange 5.5 SP4 and
during the middle of copying the files the installer dies with read errors.
After the second attempt with the same error we popped the CD only to find
that it had two defects on the surface. Two little plastic bumps in
Hey guys I am having issues
I have two Exchange 5.5 servers both with service pack 3
Loaded on them
Since one of the exchange servers is under power I decided to
transfer some mailboxes to the other exchange server.
My issue is when I transferred mailboxes and went into users
outlook
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Is he a spy?. He should be too busy for that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25/02/2002 17:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Why even that? What about
Title: Message
Wow
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5
Question
sure doesmonitors everything except
e-mail which we all know he now wants...
Now that is a wicked pisser. Ill bet it was scary at first too.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Watch those TechNet CD's
Over the weekend at a consulting gig we were installing
How
does message journaling work with things like read receipts?
If I
send a message with read receipts turned on and the person reading the
journaling mailbox reads it, will I get a receipt back from that? Same
with delivery receipts?
Just
curious (As I have no plans on using it or
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
I
can't imagine someone going through the 2200 emails I get per
day.
-Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5
Title: Message
Now how did you
move these mailboxes?
Did you use the
move mailbox tool in Exchange?
-Original Message-From: DENNIS ROGOV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
10:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: duplication
mailboxes
Title: Message
Out of respect to
Stu, I will refrain from saying what I think about
this..
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:21
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
I use Mail Esstenials, and am very happy with it with one execption. Lately
it seems to let certain emails leak though even though it is setup to stop
them. Management is to cheap to pay the maintence fee, so I guess I will
have to live with it. Haven't seen the ;atest version yet, so can't
Title: Message
Taken
from Medaille.edu's email policy:
"You
must respect the confidentiality of other people's electronic mail and must not
attempt to read, "hack" into other systems or other people's logins, or "crack"
passwords, or breach computer or network security measures."
They
Title: Message
Neil
if you are going to introduce a new topic, please change the
subject,
-Original Message-From: Neil Raggett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:58
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
How
Title: Message
Why?
Just
tell them straight out. Either something is fishy here, or your manager
sucks.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
February 25, 2002 1:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
I'd advise your boss to talk to his lawyers before pulling something like
that. Here's an idea, create a dead letter box and call it generic and give
him access to it. Plenty of porno and advertising in those to keep him busy
for a while!
I suggest monster.com for you while the gettin's good.
pst?
How
did you move the mailboxes? (Are the servers in the same exchange
site?)
Neil
-Original Message-From: DENNIS ROGOV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 February 2002
18:03To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: duplication
mailboxes
Hey guys I am having
Well, maybe it's just the 'psychologics' of it all.
Employees might be more careful, if they KNOW he's
watching/reading :o)!
--- Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Out of respect to Stu, I will refrain from saying
what I think about
this..
-Original Message-
From: Allen
Title: Message
No
kidding
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
10:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 Question
I
can't imagine someone going through the 2200 emails I get
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Other
than you, you mean?
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"If ignorance ever goes to $40
a barrel, I want drillin' rights on that man's head." Texas Agriculture
Commissioner Jim Hightower
Title: Message
Which would imply
that unless said boss has written permission, he is in violation and could be
terminated.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: Message
I'm
sure he took the time to write permission for himself.
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Free speech is intended to
protect the controversial and even outrageous word; and not just comforting
platitudes too mundane
Title: Message
Matthew,
Iquote "sent to a generic mailbox without the
user knowing".
Knowing the effects of read/delivery is more than relevant to this
topic.
-Original Message-From:
Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 February 2002
19:24To: MS-Exchange Admin
Well, this list is for answers to technical questions... so I gave the
technical answer.
This does not take into account that it could be violating lots of laws, as
well as taking up lots of time. And server space.
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari
Title: Message
He's
probably monitoring you on this list to make sure you're not joining the
beer/Scotch discussions.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
When
his boss figures that out, the poor guy's next project will be to crunch the
e-mails in some type of report writer to ease his snooping.
I've
been there before. My former boss wanted e-mail, voicemail, yesterdays
pantiesyou name it.
Title: Message
My
former boss wanted to monitor his boss. Imagine the position I was
in.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
Yeah
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
What
about Personal Encryption Software?
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:19
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
When
his boss figures
Title: Message
That
is when I say " good day gentlemen it was nice working for you
-Original
Message-From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Question
My
former boss
For all that it's fun to talk about how some managers are dinks, I'm not sure
it's our job to tell people that a certain thing might be illegal...
It's work. If the boss tells you to do something, pretty much you do it. Email
IS the property of the company -- and while its use may be similar
Title: Message
That's
different -- and definitely a bad place.
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"The great thing about America
is everybody should vote." George W. Bush, Austin, Texas, Dec. 8, 2000
-Original Message-From:
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
If my
boss were to insist on requesting that level of monitoring, I'd call it a Resume
Generating Event and be done with it.
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
12:19To:
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Can't
always do that... Would you have quite your job four weeks
ago?
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"In Germany, the Nazis came for
the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Would
a company that sells that be a PES dispenser?
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!If a man will begin with
certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin in
doubts, he
I'm a firm believer that if you can do a good job, be positive, and get
along with others, you'll survive. Sometimes it takes someone to grow some
balls and jump some links in the chain of command. Not just to burn
someone, but to sincerely stand up for what you think is right. There are
far
I don't suggest that alternatives not be offered. But if it's do it or clean
out your desk, well, for the past three years, I've been in the position of
covering my ass, and following orders.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
B!
John Matteson; Exchange
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 My
toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-From: Drewski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday,
Does anyone have any information about what to expect in the future version
of Netbackup from Veritas?
How will it compare to CommVault.
Galaxy?
Does any one use CommVault Galaxy on a large scale? About $4 objects?
Chris James
John Deere
List Charter and FAQ at:
Sounds
like a corrupted Outlook profile displaying the same mailbox twice. Try
deleting and recreating the Outlook profile.
-Bonnie
-Original Message-From: DENNIS ROGOV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
10:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
you
laughed, don't deny it.
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Million to one chances crop up
nine times out of ten." - Granny Weatherwax
-Original Message-From: John Matteson
Title: Merging Dissimilar Domains
We have a situation in which we will have to merge (as quickly as possible) 5 separate domains into a 6th one. The 5 domains are already physically connected, but the 6th domain (the one they all have to join) cannot be physically connected more than 1 or 2
Title: Message
1 is
the correct choice. Take your time and do it right. You hurry and people are
gonna be pissed.
-Original Message-From: Beahm, Keith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:29
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Merging
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Quit
immediately, no. Expressed my concern and let him know I would be movin on
soon... yes.
This
actually came up recently w/regards to web surfing patterns. I did the
research, passed along the restrictions, and recommended that there were better
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
Ah but
the problem with your last scenario is that if management do find out that you
knew about this subscription, then they would have your ass in a sling. My
personal tack here is to document the evidence ( just some notes, along with
copies of the
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
