They're running Reverse DNS lookups and you don't have a record for
company.com, only www.company.com?
-Original Message-
From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 23:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problems with SBS and external mail
Hi,
I've a
Hi,
I've a strange problem with SBS Server 4.5. My client can't recieve
external mail. If you look att site adressing for exchange it looks like
this @www.company.com
If you change it to @company.com they don't recieve any external mail, you
will get unknown recepient if mailing them.
But if you
It is always 32kb. The limit really isn't in the storage. The
limitation is in MAPI. All the rules must fit in a single RPC packet.
A rule of thumb is 1k per rule.
William
-Original Message-
From: Volf Miroslav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:06 PM
To: MS-E
LOL! Apparently whatever version can't read and doesn't come with a spell
or grammar checker. ;)
BTW, the rules work great in both 2000 and 2002. That SpamAssassin is
pretty cool. They add an entry into the header that gives a rating -xx.x
through yy.y based on the probability that it is spam.
How to find out how many kB is used for server-side rules?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rule Capacity in Outlook 2000
32kB per mailbox.
There are also client-side rules in
Title: Message
Don’t do that… It will hose
the installation.
Start using tools like netdiag to see what
might be wrong, if indeed it is AD.
M
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June
10, 2002 1:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Adm
Title: Message
What happens if I reload E2K over it’s
self? And redo the ADC’s?
Do I lose the mailboxes that are already on
that server?
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
S
Title: Message
I’ve been thinking the same thing.
The latest is this. When it tries to move
the mailbox, it throws an error in the event log that can’t it Open the
Message store, can not log into the System Attendant mailbox, or open an
Administrative interface (whatever the hell that
Don't bother. Create an empty DL and add the SMTP address. If you need/want
to review the messages, send it to a PF that will delete the message after x
days.
-Original Message-
From: William Colucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Iss
Is there a way to create a server side rule that will simply permanently
delete all incoming email to an account (bounce backs)? It seems when I
choose 'permanently delete' it always indicates that it's a client side
rule...
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Almost, but I don’t have Zetafax…
L
Nothing on here except pure Win2K, sp2 and
Exch2K, sp2.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:18
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OALGen encountered
error [0
Zetafax? This article suits your problem. Check it
out.
http://www.equisys.com/teknotes/ztn1167.htm
Mal Sasalu Information Systems & Facilities
Phone: (403)
295-4914
32kB per mailbox.
There are also client-side rules in Outlook, which will only run whe Outlook
is open.
> -Original Message-
> From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Rule Capacity in Outlook 20
The beta I participated on with StarOffice 6 was awesome. Some usability relearning.
I like it better than the OpenOffice, which is sorta the same.
Sorta.
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
Is the 32kb limitation for all Rules from all Users or 32kb per clients
mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rule Capacity in Outlook 2000
The amount of storage allowed for s
Coincidentally all of our problems have been with RAID 5 array's as well... where the
mirrored sets on the same card didnt have a problem...
-Original Message-
From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: P
Has anybody seen this error
message? OALGen encountered error [0x8004010f] while calculating the OALs.
For some reason my E2K server is
unable to generate the Offline Address List and as a result none of my laptop
users with offline folders can download the list, which is causing them
The amount of storage allowed for server-side rules is 32kb. Total. It is
independent of the number of rules.
This is a server-side setting, not a client-side setting, which applies to
Exchange 5.x and 2000.
If you run up against this limit, try either consolidating existing rules
togeth
Hi is there a limit to the number of Rules you can have in Outlook 2000? We
have Outlook 2000 on the clients and Exchange 5.5 at the Server. i remember
Q article on the limits of up to 50 rules in the older versions of outlook
but could not find a write up on Outlook 2000
Jeán Paul Reece
ARAE N
I did download and install Open Office on my machine. I didn't have any
problems with the documents I opened as a test, and this new version looks
much more like the "OFFICE" you're used to.
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12
How is DNS configured in each of the domains? Do they point to the same
DNS servers for their external lookup?
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 June 2002 21:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Issues sending mail.
Hi,
I'm ru
Multiple as I am a consultant, but as for Dell.
We have had 3 SavA server down issues with Dell Raid controllers (Adaptec
integrated on MB) in the last few weeks. Most of them only with the RAID5
sets as the Mirrored sets on the same channels were fine. One didn't mount
the RAID5 container becaus
Sorry if this is a repeat. Had issues this morning.
Anyone using Open Office?
I am in the middle of figuring out my MS licensing before July 31 and I am
having a hard time justifying ($$$) continuing my Office licenses and
getting software assurance for the majority of my users that may only
RAID-5 for the database files, RAID 1 (mirror) for the log files and OS.
Check out the archives for a more detailed explanation, this comes up every
few months, and I feel lazy today...well, OK every day.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring i
Title: Message
Turn
up logging on the MSexchangeIS/System/Move Mailbox Category. Maybe then
you could gather more useful errors in the application log.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002
8:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange A
Why not Raid-5 for exchange?
-Original Message-
From: Bunting, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Mirroring of Log files.
RAID1 is hardware mirroring.
333mhz for 250 users (DC, File Server, DHCP, Backup)
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Poll time
Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and
thought i
Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and thought it
might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of environments everyone is running
in. See who has the most people on the smallest boxes and who has the largest org. I
used to take pride on my little singl
Title: Message
Every time this has caused me any
problems, it was always traced back to some kind of a AD replication issue.
Hth
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June
10, 2002 8:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
It's
Monday, we forgive you.
John Matteson; Exchange
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it
would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me
anything. --Allyson Jones
-
Title: Message
Usually the HW RAID will support mirrors as well. Plug in two
drives into the array, and check the RAID options...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Monday, June 10, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject:
Title: Message
Yep. No luck
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is
hosed.
Tried all three :
Q264413
Q288598
Q262456
DOH!!! Yeah, I kind of spaced on that. You
get used to doing something one way and forget that you can do it more than one
way. I knew that RAID was RAID.
Sorry for the STUPID question. L
Thanks again.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County
Office of Budget and Informa
RAID1
is hardware mirroring. Your current RAID controller should support
it.
here's
a link on the different RAID levels
http://www.raid-storage.com/raid.html
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:51
AMTo: MS-Ex
In the discussion on server sizing for Exchange 2000 it was
mentioned by several that I should be looking at getting away from using RAID5
for my OS, the application as well as the log files. Mirroring was mentioned
quite often as how it should be configured. How are people doing this? In t
(Assumption: User is using Outlook with the OUTLOOK
TODAY feature)
Turn off the WEB PAGE properties of the top level mailbox, check
to see if there is a message that has been accidentally left in the root of the
mailbox where you would normally find Outlook Today.
John Matteson; Exch
Title: Message
Stable.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is
hosed.
Is this a stable mailbox
in place for awhile or a new one?
-Origina
Title: Message
i
wound up using NTDSUTIL.exe to increase my LDAP max queries.. then i changed the
CA to use a lesser amount of pages
and it
went.
i just
figured it out.
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002
10:02 AMTo
No I checked.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Issues sending mail.
Any of the parties blacklisted ?
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: Message
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8033&source=
http://www.winntmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4977
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002
09:32To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: ADC
Great for grabbing some SPAM
My ISP uses "X-Spam-Warning" in the header, and I grab about 5-10 a day with
this. Very little gets past that...
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 19:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
So is Vance 8 or 9 ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 20:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Filtering based on extra header info
So you're bind? I have seen some good books on you.
-Original Message-
F
Yup. For the registry.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 13:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT- Outlook will not start
Is that like a vacuum cleaner?
--
Title: Message
Thank
you, kind sir.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 09,
2002 17:23To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E2k
help
http://www.isaserver.org/pages/articles.asp?art=55
-Origin
Title: Message
Tried
all three :
Q264413
Q288598
Q262456
?
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002
18:00To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Move Mailbox
is hosed.
Hey guys and
gals,
Need some he
Any of the parties blacklisted ?
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 16:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Issues sending mail.
Hi,
I'm running an Exchange 2000 SP2 server on Win2K SP2.
I've been experiencing a delay
You don't like ScanMail ;) ?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 01:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
taken.
Byte me.
-Original Message-
F
5.5 -
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.asp
2000 -
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.asp
Regards,
Patrick
|-+>
| | Bill Beckett |
| |
Q263477 is showing errors with the dsexp which this is not. I will look into
it but am not sure I applies to my issue, but thanks for the thought.
No I am not 100% sure, but I asked the Network Engineers and Exchange Admins
and they said they are not running any reports.
Would anything elde be t
It runs like a bat out of hell. It's a dual CPU PIII/1000 with 768
meg, SCSI Raid 1 with 2 36 GB IBM Ultrastars (10K RPM) and ATA Raid 1
with 2 60 BG Seagate Barracudas. All Raids are hardware. There's
only 4 workstations on it. CPU utilization never gets above 25% on
busy days. IIS traffic i
Yes, it's possible. Use the Add Child (Delete) permission for the relevant
user on the containers in question.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delegating administration?
Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on
So where are some good links for exchange DR? (5.5)
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Re: Backups
Then burn the mailb
Eric,
In the Exchange Admin tool, you can to go the properties on the site, container,
server, etc. and set permissions. There are several roles to choose from: service
account admin, permissions admin, admin, send as, etc. I'm not sure off the top of my
head what the distinctions between th
Wanted to add a little more info to this. I can't seem to telnet on
port 25 to the domains that have problems from domain X as I do not get
the header but I can telnet to those same problem domains from domain Y.
When you telnet to port 25 does it automatically try to do a reverse DNS
lookup?
Title: Message
did
you change the LDAP port on the 5.5 server?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:32
Ian:
You might check out PageMaster/ex 2000 at
http://www.omnitrend.com/Exchange/PageMasterEX2000.html
This supports alphanumeric and numeric pagers, as well as text mesaging to
cell phones (SMS). There is also a version for Exchange 5.5 servers.
Joe Urso
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.s
Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a
Is there a way to delegate administrative rights? For example, I want a
lower level tech to be able to add mailboxes, and maybe even be able to
delete them, but I don't want them to be able to accidentally delete a whole
container or the site! Remotely possible
No, I have that option in Outlook 2K.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 7:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Filtering based on extra header info
Only in Outlook 2002...
-Original Message-
From: Will Schmied [m
Sorry for the delayed response; I was out of town over the weekend. It
still hasn't updated in the Outlook/client side, and it's been sitting
over the weekend.
I tried bouncing the mail server, in the hope that restarting the services
would force the connection/replication to AD, but no luck.
t
Title: Message
OK..
im on my test lan
Exchange 5.5 Sp4
Windows 2000 SP2
Active Directory
Im using the
Exchange 2000 SP2 ADC to replicate my exchange 5.5 recipients container to an OU
in AD
(disabled account..
then Ill use the AD cleanup wizard to properly remap)
Im getting
this
Event
Ty
Holy crap!
This machine is a DC running AD, IIS, Exchange and Proxy? Does anything ever
move through this server?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jacobson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Or it's possibly from a calendar connector (the old Linkage connectors)
as in Q263477.
You say "AFAIK no one.." etc, but are you really sure that no-one has
got a scheduled batch file running admin /e or something similar.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAI
I have a dual homed server that I am using as a gateway from a small
local area network to the internet. One NIC card goes to the internal
LAN (the intranet) , the other connects to the internet via a DSL
connection. The server runs Win2K Server (SP2) , Proxy 2.0 (updated),
and Exchange 5.5 (SP
EX 5.5 SP 4NT 4 SP 5
Starting about a week ago 1 of our exchange servers started having event id
38 and 41 (source: MSExchangeDSExp decription: directory export started and
complete) show up every hour. Now all 3 Exchange boxes are showing these
events every hour. My concern is that they are
64 matches
Mail list logo
