RE: Exchange 5.5 on W2K

Title: Exchange 5.5 on W2K No problems out of the ordinary -Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on W2K Quite a happy combo.  I have 2 servers running this

RE: Circular logging?

I don't have any loose data, so can I use circular logging? ;-) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 26 June 2002 15:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Circular logging? Subject: RE: Circular logging? A mail box server will benefi

RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

What are you doing with all these names you're collecting? Are we looking at some sort of 'hall of shame' ? :) Neil -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 27 June 2002 02:13 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: DCs, Exchange and not

RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

He's writing a book entitled "The WorldCom Guide to Effective Management". This is the sequel to "A manual of shredding" sponsored by Enron and Arthur Andersen. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 June 2002 09:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R

RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

I might if someone would actually give me some. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded? What are you doing with all these names you're collectin

RE: How is server strong enough

Netfinity 1000? I have trouble remembering what they look like. Anyway, I'd suggest you need more memory and you'll need to consider buying a ServerRAID card for redundancy. The following link suggests that the best CPU supported by the NF1000 is a 700MHz/512KB Pentium III Processor. http://www.p

RE: ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA2857_1025152362_HILLY_3 was generated

Title: RE: ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA2857_1025152362_HILLY_3 was generated I use GroupShield to block all kinds of attachments.but not jpegs.why would you need to block jpegs??? Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thru

RE: Exchange 5.5 on W2K

Title: Message Oh great, here we go again.  Jerome, are you there?  You have a message stuck in your mail queue somewhere, hello, we're getting this same message about once a dayare you an Exchange Admin or what?    (Okay, it's early here in CST, I didn't get much sleep last night becau

Q: Storage Quota Notifications?

I've inherited an exchange 5.5 server. My question is on the Storage limits when a user reaches or passes their storage limit on their mailbox the server does not inform them, isn't there a place to set this up? And where would that be? Also when someone sends mail to a user who has passed t

RE: ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA2857_1025152362_HILLY_3 was generated

I was about to send some of the stuff that we get blocked but decided decency and space of memebrs mailboxes stops me from doing so. few instances of animal porn just not worth it!! and I'd break my own policy to do it. Stuart K. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [ma

RE: Storage Quota Notifications?

On the General tab of the Priv Info Store, do you have "Issue Warning" checked? You'll have to live with that cryptic message ... -Original Message- From: Burgess, Jeffrey T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Q: Storage

RE: Storage Quota Notifications?

Thanks. Yes, all three... I just tweaked the numbers a bit and will see if that fixes it, maybe they were too close? Jeff -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 08:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Quota N

RE: Storage Quota Notifications?

Hmmm... Look at this as well then: Q177780 -Original Message- From: Burgess, Jeffrey T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Quota Notifications? Thanks. Yes, all three... I just tweaked the numbers a bit

RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

LMAO! -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded? He's writing a book entitled "The WorldCom Guide to Effective Management". This is the sequ

RE: Circular logging?

You doubt me? I am innocent -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Circular logging? This statement is a lie. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMA

RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks

Stu: Kill this thread or remove Thomas Cross -Original Message- From: Thomas Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re:Groupwise Migration and tasks The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupW

RE: Storage Quota Notifications?

Thank you, sir. Jeff -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 08:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Quota Notifications? Hmmm... Look at this as well then: Q177780 -Original Message- From: Burgess, Je

Redundant site setup advice please.

Hello group.   I would like to ask for advice / opinions on setting up a "backup"  / live redundant (failover) site.   The current configuration is as follows:   One W2K Domain spread over 5 sites/locations which are connected via Frame Relay or T1s.  There is one Exchange 2K server for

RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks

He's already been removed. I took care of it last night... -Original Message- From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks Stu: Kill this thread or remove Thomas Cr

RE: Circular logging?

Ummm... No! NO! Mapi for you 2 weeks.. You must use PINE! --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:07 AM To: MS-Excha

Exchange 2000 out of memory

Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1 Antigen dual 700MHz 1 Gb memory no other applications Lately we have been seeing a problem where Exchange memory usage grows to 100%, mail slows to a crawl then the system either hangs or reboots itself. Would appreciate any help. Thanks List Charter and FAQ

RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory

Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event logs? Change anything? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:55 AM

Re: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

Can anyone point out the relevant technet articles / white papers stating what issues you will get with Exchange 2k on a DC / GC server? - Original Message - From: "Thompson, Elizabeth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002

ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?

I have a client who is using FineLine on a SCO box. Basically all their e-mail goes to one POP3 account at the ISP. Fineline retrieves that mail and distributes it to it's own internal e-mail boxes. Clients retrieve mail from the FineLine server using Outlook Express. The SCO box seems to have bit

RE: Defrag

This is worse than OOO's. -Original Message- From: Thomas Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The message has been automat

RE: Internet Address Rejections-late reply

Sorry for the late reply. Go into Exchange admin, under the site\connections you'll see IMS (Internet Mail Service) in the right pane. Open it up, and go to the connections tab. Near the bottom on the left is a "message filtering" box. Open it up, and you can add specific users and domains to b

RE: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?

That or sendmail... I don't think I'd push a E2K migration if'n I didn't have to... -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon? I have a client who is using F

RE: Defrag

Wow...someone else who shares my sadism... -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag I call upon you all to witness the effect and impact of a D'oh! Furthermore, please not

RE: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K domain)?

Beware of mailbox move wizard. Unless you have to use the wizard, use exmerge. -Original Message- From: Jay Libove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K

RE: Defrag

What do you want from a government employee? -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Defrag Wow...someone else who s

RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory

Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs. We did add a storage array about a month before the problem started. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of mem

RE: Defrag

Just as long as you don't work for the postal service... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag What do you want from a government employee? -Original Message---

remote backup

Title: Message anyone do remote backups of thier exchange server from another box?   i have to now look at this, as ridiculous as I think it is and see if we can an out of band backup     thoughts? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: remote backup

Title: Message Every night for years.   Currently using Backup Exec 8.5.  Make sure you have an Exchange Agent.   Steve     -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: remote b

RE: remote backup

Title: Message Define "another box"...  I do remote backups if you take into account I have an actual backup server that does nothing but perform backups. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:25 AMTo: MS-Excha

RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory

Is that your real name? -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs. We did add a storage array about a month be

RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory

Also I miss typed - we are on SP2. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event logs? Change anything? --

RE: Defrag

Hey hey now.. watch it bub!! Hehehehe I actually say the same thing about most gov't employees. I mean stereotypes definately exist for a reason. However, not *ALL* of us are idiots. Of course... we are now making fun of a DOJ employee... which means we'll probably have our houses surrounded

RE: Defrag

Oh I understand. That was just a backhanded comment, stereotypes DO exist for a reason but are always exceptions. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: remote backup

Title: Message Ditto, I have a backup server who's only function in life is to do backups so I touch all my servers remotely to do backups, Exchange, File/Print, Oracle, Novell (yes I still have two Novell servers, I do get to decommission one this weekend).  It must be a backup software tha

RE: Defrag

Thanks for appologizing... now I can go remove that outstanding vehicular homicide from your driving record. :) -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag Oh I understand. That

RE: Defrag

Whewwhile you're at it, can you get rid of the legit one too? -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Defrag Than

RE: remote backup

Title: Message yes its a remote box that just runs backup exec. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Ditto, I have a backup server who's only f

RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory

Then reapply Sp2 for Win2k. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch

RE: remote backup

I use ArcServe with the Exchange Agent. Works for me. Stuart K. -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 June 2002 16:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: remote backup yes its a remote box that just runs backup exec. -Original Messa

RE: remote backup

Title: Message Do you have the Exchange Agent for BE?  This will allow you to do "online" backups of the directory and Information store which will be sufficient for disaster recovery.   Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fl

RE: remote backup

Title: Message the exchange server is also the wins\dns\dhcp and AD server for that site. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Do you have

RE: remote backup

Title: Message i have a question too,   do you also need the remote backup agent in addition to the exchange agent?   i still havent got our exchange server backing up.<>   i just havent had the time to play with it, i guess alot of you can relate to that :) John SparrowIT Support

RE: remote backup

Title: Message Will you have time when your server crashes and you have no backups? -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup i have a question too,

RE : remote backup

Title: Message Just fine : you can explain me what to do exactly !   I juste purchased 8.6 ‘s VERITAS licences with OFO, Remote agents and one Exchange agent for my exchange server (remote)   I have not seen in add/remove options anything regarding this Exchange agent : I entered the l

RE: remote backup

Title: Message the logic in this place is really stupid   i keep worrying out it, everytime i want to go and sort it, a bloody user phones me up witha dumbass question and then distracts me.   i guess its my own damn fault :(   John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, London

Re: remote backup

Title: Message Yep, we use 8.6 too. What is wrong with remote backup?? - Original Message - From: Steve Hart To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: RE: remote backup Every night for years.   Currently using Backup

Re: remote backup

Title: Message I only installed the remote agent on the remote server. Of course, the one doing backups has the Exchange agent on it - Original Message - From: John Sparrow To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: RE: remote

Re: remote backup

Title: Message I would stay late and get that done. If it crashes, I would bet money you lose your job. (Well, someone will anyway) - Original Message - From: John Sparrow To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: RE: remote b

RE: RE : remote backup

Title: Message It's been a while since I set this up, but if I remember correctly, you run setup on the BACKUP server and go to "install software on remote computers". If your license numbers are already entered, you'll have the options you need. On the Exchange Server, you'll need to instal

Upgrading from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise

I'm about to upgrade from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise. Any advice/tricks? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: remote backup

Title: Message yea i think i will have to do it sooner rather than later..   it'll probably be me who'll get fired, but that would be fun for them, cus i am the only techie John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, London -Original Message-F

RE: remote backup

Title: Message a NOW i understand, i was trying other combinations before, except that one ps   will try that tonight or tomorrow   cheers for your help John SparrowIT SupportComputer DepartmentTravco Ltd, London -Original Message-From: Matthew Ca

RE: Upgrading from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise

Title: Message Just put the CD in and Go.. As always have a good backup/. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002

Moving Exchange Server 5.5

Anyone know of any issues if you try to bring a new NT 4 server into a domain using the same computer name as the old server? We are planning to move our current Exchange server 5.5 to a Compaq ML370 with 3-18 gig drives running RAID 5. The plan is to shut down the old server, install NT 4 SP6a

RE: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?

Mercury mail does all the things you say and is free. Easy to setup and configure. www.pmail.com http://www.pmail.com/whatsnew/new_m32.htm Mark -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sub

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

You should be fine as long you are on a member server and get all the names he same. 5.5 site and org names are case sensitive. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Zach Mathew [mailto:[EM

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

Yes you will have problems with the SIDs in both cases. When you bring the new machine up you will have to first remove the old server from the domain and recreate a new entry with the same name. (Or allow the machine to create it during the install). If you wanted to bring the old machine ba

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

Title: RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 Would it be easier to leave the old server online as a BDC with Exchange shut off and run the new server as a member server with a new name? -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:15 AM

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

What about the SIDs? Once he names that new machine the same as the old, he will blow out the old SIDs. Why do you want to keep the same server name? While that is certainly possible, there are easier methods if you are open to a new server name (which shouldn't be a problem unless you have a sp

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

Title: Message Here is the easiest method of moving Exchange. Step by step. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm -Original Message-From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving

RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5

Just the machine name for the server. outlook connects based on NetBIOS name not based on SID = ] I agree Ed's move method would be much simpler. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Mar

Unable to add second SMTP address on recipient policy

Title: Unable to add second SMTP address on recipient policy We have one 5.5 server and one E2k server (with ADC) in the same site and I'm trying to get E2k to handle all internet mail.  On our old exch 5.5 server, we had the IMC setup to route mail for 2 domains.  After doing some research o

mailbox limits haven't taken effect yet?

Title: mailbox limits haven't taken effect yet? I set them last night, and in all cases apparently they are still not receiving warnings even though mailbox resources in admin show them over their limits?  Now management is breathing down my back wanting to know why the users aren't getting pr

RE: Unable to add second SMTP address on recipient policy

Title: Message Are you modifying the Default policy with 'lowest' priority? and what does the 1st policy do? I have seen this on some servers that host multiple domains and sometimes the policies dont get handled in the proper order or something blocks them in the filtering from being in ano

RE: Unable to add second SMTP address on recipient policy

Title: Message That seems to be the problem.  The policy with highest priority will not let me add an additional SMTP address.  The button is grayed out.  I think that is because it is getting the highest priority policy from Exchange 5.5?    How do I add a 2nd address in Exchange 5.5?

RE : RE : remote backup

Title: Message You are right excepted that i have only two options left : OFO and remote. I don’t see anything regarding exchange agent while I entered the licence code also in the related box !   As I subscribed for assistance I will checked this point with the support. I certainly have

RE: RE : RE : remote backup

Title: Message there is no remote agent per say like the crappy arrrghserve. It is intalled on the machine you installed Veritas. In order to see the exchange server you need to install the exchange admin on the backup machine. remember must be same version that the exchange server is runnin

RE: mailbox limits haven't taken effect yet?

Title: mailbox limits haven't taken effect yet? This is the KB article Andy pointed me to this AM, haven't had a chance yet to look on my server, but check it out.   http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q177780   Jeff   -Original Message- From: Beahm, K

Restricting Users from sending mail

Hrm... maybe I'm just missing it today... but isn't there a specific option to prevent select users from actually sending mail. The users need to be able to recieve mail... but not send any. I suppose I could implement a Send Message Size limit of zero... but wanted to know if there was a bet

conference rooms

Hi all,     One of my managers asked me if there is a way they can all view conference rooms free and busy times via outlook calendar while setting up meetings.   Right now all they get is a striped bar (no info) across the whole day that doesn't display any info.   Is there a way have the

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

Internet mail? Internal mail? or both? - Original Message - From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:47 PM Subject: Restricting Users from sending mail Hrm... maybe I'm just missing it today... but i

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

The answer can be found here: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Restricting Users from sending mail Hrm... maybe I'm just missing i

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

I would say both... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail Internet mail? Internal mail? or both? - Original Message - From: "Pres

RE: conference rooms

You need to open the resource's calendar to initialize it. (To remove striped bars)  While you're in the resource check to see how much free/busy is being published. (Might be set to zero) -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 2

RE: conference rooms

Did you configure the conference rooms as auto-booking resources and set the proper permissions on the calendars? -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: conference rooms

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

Thanks William... thats what I get for eating too many cheese biscuits for lunch and being lazy... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail T

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

M...cheese biscuits. Better yet, why not pickles and cheese?? www.picklesandcheese.com - Original Message - From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:54 PM Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending

RE: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K domain)?

Why is that? -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K domain)? Beware of mailbox move wizard. Unless you have

RE: conference rooms

That sounds like a trail to follow there.    Can you be more specific or know of a paper explaining that?   Excuse my ignorance.  Believe it or not no one has ever asked me about the conference rooms before    thanks,       -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

And Beer! -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail M...cheese biscuits. Better yet, why not pickles and cheese?? www.picklesandcheese.com

RE: Defrag

Really? Could you send some of the non-idiots to Nevada? I can tell you, they do not run Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defrag Oh I understand. That wa

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

You know, I have never actually read our own FAQ. Damm fine piece of work. Now I see why "old timers" get so p*$$ed to see "certain" items repeated here. Thanks for the slap in the face! - Original Message - From: "Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMA

RE: conference rooms

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q196534   Here's the article... I've set them up here, so if you run in to any snags let me know. -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Ad

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

Go now and send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thank him for maintaining a FAQ. Tell him William said Hi. William -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users f

RE: conference rooms

What method are you using for the resource? (Event Scripting or Auto Booking for OL2K?) What version of Exchange? What version of Outlook? Is everyone using the same version of Outlook? -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 2

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

Ermm... William... the FAQ explains how to keep a user from sending AND recieving internet mail. As far as I can tell the request is for users to be able to recieve both internal and external e-mail, but not be able to send anything. I'm guessing this isn't as simple of a task as I thought it

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

I posted that prior to reading your next message in the thread. If the person can't send internal nor external email, why are the mail-enabled? -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subjec

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

Define "old timers"... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail You know, I have never actually read our own FAQ. Damm fine piece of work

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

I guess so people can email them... and they have calendar, tasks, and all the other stuff. These are basically call center people... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Res

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

Old Timers: People who were on here when "Loveletter" broke... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Define "old timers"... -Origi

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

It says to remove the SMTP addy. I am pretty sure you can still send mail without one, but can not receive Internet mail - Original Message - From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:31 PM Subject: RE:

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

Throw paper airplanes at them with memos written on them. - Original Message - From: "Preston Jeffares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:42 PM Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail I guess so people can ema

Re: Restricting Users from sending mail

Exchange admins who have been on this list for awhile - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:40 PM Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Define "old timers"... -Original Messa

RE: Restricting Users from sending mail

That is not old timers.. Those guys are still newbie's.. Old times were on the Banyan list, then became wobblers. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

  1   2   >