That is a good example John.
RBLs have grown up though. Some are pretty specific about what they block
from geographic source to connection method (ie. dialup) and some are
responsive to queries.
I have used Spamhaus for years, and I have not had to deal with them either.
-Original Message
Fyi, Just a heads up to anyone else using these guys
(http://www.certificatesforexchange.com/). The certs that they issue are
NOT compatible with Windows Mobile 6 (at least Cingular 8125, 8550,
tilt, and the 3125). There using an intermediate signing server (they
sent the intermediate cert with the
It's called Snowflex:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowflex
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Snow Resort in Fort Worth, TX?
Where's the details on the
Snowflex it is. If you want to see it in action, watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKU_CBeWQyY
On Jan 21, 2008 7:48 AM, David Mazzaccaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> It's called Snowflex:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowflex
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Fr
Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages,
at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the
emails originate from a specific email address.
This is Exchange 2003 by the way:
I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated
If there is the possibility of a new or unrecognised virus on a machine, I
generally use HijackThis to look for anything dodgy running - you can post
the results of the scan if you're having trouble interpreting them
On 21/01/2008, Clayton Doige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear all, I have a se
Hi, Clayton.
I second the Hijack this recommendation.
Are you saying you swept the server or the user's workstation?
I would pull the workstation off the LAN first thing.
On Jan 21, 2008 10:03 AM, Clayton Doige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde
We have swept everything on the LAN, nothing revealed from that. I have
downloaded HiJakc This and am just running the thing now, and looking at the
results.
thanks :-)
On 21/01/2008, Candee Vaglica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Clayton.
> I second the Hijack this recommendation.
> Are you
None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack
This outputs looks untowards on the server. Can the tool be used centrally
to analyse numerous hosts, or does this need to be done on a host by host
basis.
Really what I want to do is see where these messages are originating as they
My thinking is that the from is probably spoofed, so changing that
user's password isn't going to accomplish anything.
On Jan 21, 2008 10:36 AM, Clayton Doige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack This
> outputs looks untowards on the server
The first thing I would do is disable authenticated relaying.
It may cause some problems for some users, but it needs to be done.
Very unusual for a specific user account to be targeted, the usual target is
the administrator account. Therefore what might be happening is that a user
account is be
Nice work.
Thanks!
On Jan 21, 2008 10:53 AM, Simon Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The first thing I would do is disable authenticated relaying.
> It may cause some problems for some users, but it needs to be done.
>
> Very unusual for a specific user account to be targeted, the usual targ
They'll only be in sent items if Outlook was leveraged to send them. Most
viruses come with their own smtp client.
Sent from my GoodLink synchronized handheld (www.good.com)
-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 09:54 AM Cen
I'd start by unplugging the Exchange server and see if the traffic
stops. If if does you've isolated the problem If it does, then Id start
unplugging sections of the network and see when it stops. A bit severe,
but you will get an idea of where the problem lies.
John
I guess I might start by cranking up logging first.
On Jan 21, 2008 11:11 AM, Ellis, John P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'd start by unplugging the Exchange server and see if the traffic stops. If
> if does you've isolated the problem If it does, then Id start unplugging
> sections of the n
It is the admin account, there goes my attempt at being discreet lol, Found
out that Exchange 2003 SP2 is not on here, so trying that, and have disabled
authenticated relaying as per your suggestions.
Thanks
On 21/01/2008, Simon Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The first thing I would d
I'm having a similar problem trying to remove an unused Exchange 2000
server after a migration to Clustered Exchange 2003.
A MS solution was to use ADSI Edit to find the field that holds these
mailboxes for each information store, and remove the non-standard ones.
Unfortunately I there was nothing
I'm looking at implementing CCR in a couple of my datacenters with SCR
targets geographically. I don't have any first knowledge with our data
yet, so I can't answer your specific size questions. I just know when I
was going through my training last fall, that the instructors were very
adamant abo
30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.
Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LCR to cheap
disk.
I'm seeing more folks moving away from clustering with LCR and SCR. Good
riddance, in my opinion.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Ex
That's my intention as I prepare to move to 2007. I hate managing
clusters...
On Jan 21, 2008 8:30 AM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> 30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.
>
>
>
> Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LC
The first two lines are about a particular client using CCR, sorry.
The last line is a generic statement. I wasn't clear.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:35
So you guys aren't using CCR or SCC Michael?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.
Geod
... = unless they involve Blackstone and TVK
Shook
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using CCR in production?
That's my
Hi,
Thanks for the comments. I just forwarded the messages as received
from Messaglabs, i didn't think before sending, that the whole spam
would be a problem, but you're right
On Jan 18, 2008 11:37 AM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a problem sending messages to a sit
Yes.
30
100GB
Not really works great
Yes they are separated by 70 miles.
I am using SCR to back it all up.
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone using CCR in production?
Curious to know what folks have see
I've done 2 projects recently where the customers had limited clustering
experience but they'd been sold big SANs and "wanted to use them for SCC"
apparently the SAN sales guys are way better than I am because both customers
ended up with SCC in the end.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAI
I'll assume for the moment that you're NATing everything through a
single IP address, but will make some suggestions if that isn't the
case.
A properly deployed NTOP is your friend in this case. It can be set
(using the BPF filters) to monitor only port 25, and only outbound if
you want, and you'l
We implemented CCR in October of last year. We have about 2000 mailboxes,
about 225 users per DB, max limit is 250MB per mailbox (98% of our users
anyway), each DB ranging from 10 to 50 Gig in size...with the 50 Gig DB being
the exception (don't ask). Most DB's are 10-20 Gig.
Since our networ
The CCR database isn't very large - They did, what, maybe 20 albums?
Oh - you didn't mean the band, I guess.
Never Mind!
:)
On Jan 20, 2008 10:46 PM, Alex Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curious to know what folks have seen in the field when using CCR. How many
> users, how large are yo
Regarding issue #1, that sounds like a GC communication issue if restarting
the SA fixes it...
Regarding issue #2, that is not the same experience I have with my BES
server and Exchange cluster...
On Jan 21, 2008 2:14 PM, Brown, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We implemented CCR in Octob
I am setting this up, and am following the directions on Simon
Butler's web page - http://amset.info/exchange/rpc-http.asp - and
while I've read the Questions section at the end, I'm still a little
unclear on this.
1) We're (at the moment) in situation 2 WRT DC and Exchange (DC and
Exchange separa
I am being told that plain text messages being sent by ol2007 to a recipient
have the body base64 encoded. Looking at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232174.aspx it suggests that "When
SMTP messages contain elements that are not plain US-ASCII text, the message
must be encoded to p
I have an Exchange 2003 Server that has a public folder store on a
partition that has gone AWOL. Whoever built this server years ago,
created the partition in question as a dynamic partition and we lost a
drive in the RAID set(Compaq hardware raid - blah to software RAID
sets)... anyways when the
If everything has replicated, truly, then you won't lose anything. It will
all backfill.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subjec
1. Not sure about. But it looks like 2 is just missing the external
from 1, which I have never put into any of my configs, some are split
DNS others are not. Single servers running as both DC/Exchange and
separate DC/Exchange.
2. Exactly. But RPC functionality must be installed on the DC you
set-remotedomain -identity -linewrapsize
On Jan 21, 2008 5:00 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am being told that plain text messages being sent by ol2007 to a
> recipient have the body base64 encoded. Looking at
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232174.aspx
Nice, so do you know if that setting works for all child domains if I only set
it at the TLD level?
jlc
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Plain text message problem
set-remotedomain -identit
I was going too, but i thought, nah, i wont be that stupid! :)
> The CCR database isn't very large - They did, what, maybe 20 albums?
>
> Oh - you didn't mean the band, I guess.
>
> Never Mind!
>
> :)
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:46 PM, Alex Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Curious to know what f
I think so, but not 100% sure. You can add one for *.domain.com as well,
but that's a good question hopefully someone will chime in on.
On Jan 21, 2008 6:36 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Nice, so do you know if that setting works for all child domains if I
> only set it
39 matches
Mail list logo
