Re: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder

2009-03-25 Thread David W. McSpadden
3 Mb for 30 days. But I have a lot of others that we are emails a group of people that we have to have for the auditors that end up being saved by a user anyways. So it could be 10 - 15 Mb a day for 30 days. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder

2009-03-25 Thread Martin Blackstone
So use an Exchange mailbox then put a mailbox manager policy on it to delete anything over 30 days. That should keep the mailbox under 500 MB. That's quite manageable. I've done similar in the past with mailboxes. And I've seen them going crazy and grow and grow and grow. Adding the mailbox

Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread John Hornbuckle
We're exploring options for e-mail archiving systems. Is there a standard formula that can be used to estimate how much storage space will be required per user? I don't have a clue how to come up with reasonably reliable numbers for this. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread Dahl, Peter
Typically the archiving vendor will have tools that will help you determine the storage requirements for your environment using their archive solution. Thanks, Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 25,

Re: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread James Wells
That will vary by vendor. I know that when I've used Zantaz, they had a mode that would just analyze/report but not modify anything. You'll have to see what your compression looks like, retention period for the archive, index sizes if searching...but I'd be sure to get a solution that let's you

RE: OST's PST's

2009-03-25 Thread Brown, Larry
Are you using Outlook 2003 or 2007? If 2003, can you tell me how you kept users from adding to existing PST's? Obviously I'm going about this the wrong way... From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:05 AM To: MS-Exchange

mailbox login auditing

2009-03-25 Thread Chad Spurley
Hi there, I have somewhat large (around 1500 active users) Exchange 2003 environment where the company wants to enable maximum logging for all mailbox logins and public folder access. Throwing this in a testlab, it's putting between 4 and 5 entries into the event log everytime Outlook, OWA,

RE: OST's PST's

2009-03-25 Thread Brown, Larry
This article is talking about registry settings...but isn't that really what using Policy editor does? Change the registry? Notice that the changes are to PST settings, but the article states they effect both PST and OST files. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832925 So...those of you keeping

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread John Hornbuckle
We're examining in-house verses off-site, and it's hard to compare apples to apples without knowing what would be required to do it in-house. The software costs are easy to calculate, but figuring out how much storage and backup capacity I'll need is trickier. One of the off-site vendors we're

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread David Mazzaccaro
How does an off-site vendor archive internal email? (email that is sent/received between co-workers) -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Calculating Storage

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread John Cook
As it was explained to me every message sent gets redirected to the vendors servers first and copied then delivered or something to that effect. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352)

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread John Hornbuckle
Some built-in Exchange functionality, as I understand it. Exchange can be configured to direct a copy of every message to somewhere else. -Original Message- From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin

Re: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread Don Ely
Journaling likely and since it's external and very ugly method of journaling... On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Some built-in Exchange functionality, as I understand it. Exchange can be configured to direct a copy of every message to

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread John Hornbuckle
Yes-that sounds like what these guys are talking about. This is what we're looking at: http://www.mxlogic.com/services/emaildefense/archiving/index.cfm From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread Barsodi.John
I think most vendors put an appliance internally that runs through the journal mailbox then syncs sends uploads data it to their offsite infrastructure. - John Barsodi From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re:

RE: Calculating Storage for Archiving

2009-03-25 Thread Davies,Matt
We are using the Autonomy Zantaz digital safe hosted archive for compliance, this is configured on the exchange servers using journaling, to a specific account, we then have a outlook rule that forwards the message to a external email address, which goes down a specific routing group connector to

RE: OST's PST's

2009-03-25 Thread William Lefkovics
Probably different interfaces with the same result? For Outlook 2007, the Office Customization Tool can do this for new and existing deployments. Run Office 2007 from the run/command line: setup.exe /admin From: Brown, Larry [mailto:larry.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25,

New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread Brian Dugas
We are looking to upgrade from Exch2003 to Exch2007 this year. This will include purchasing a new server. Any suggestions for config - ie. store all data on the server, get a server with an iSCSI SAN for stores, etc. I was leaning towards installing Exch on the server and storing the Priv and

fetchExc that works with Exchange 2007?

2009-03-25 Thread Jeremy Phillips
Anyone know of a software package that does something like fetchExc (http://www.saunalahti.fi/juhrauti/index.html) but that works with Exchange 2007? Thanks, Jeremy Phillips ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja

RE: New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread John Cook
50 users and 120 gigs Are these just really old mailboxes or do they swap huge files via email? Perhaps an archiving solution may be another concern. It really depends on the I/O needs created by their type of use. I have a dedicated box with separate raid 1 pairs for OS/DB/Logs covering

Re: New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread Sean Martin
What's your budget? Do you have any other uses for an iSCSI Storage device or would it be dedicated to Exchange? Are there specific benefits of an iSCSI solution you're looking to leverage? On the surface, 50 users and 120Gb stores could easily be handled by a traditional rack mount server, but I

Re: mailbox login auditing

2009-03-25 Thread Steven Peck
Enabling more logging will put it in the event log. It will also circle your event logs faster then anything. They 'make us' do that here which we find hilarious because we don't have the means to ship event logs off the Exchange servers. If I run one of my data gathering scripts it will cycle

RE: New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread Rimmel, Carl
You have 50 users each with 120 GB of email? From: Brian Dugas [mailto:br...@summit-technical.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: New Server Config Question/Suggestions We are looking to upgrade from Exch2003 to Exch2007 this year. This will

RE: New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread Cameron Cooper
We have just a little over 50 users using about a 3rd of that... beautiful things of quotas. _ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified Aurico Reports, Inc Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896 ccoo...@aurico.com mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com From:

Re: New Server Config Question/Suggestions

2009-03-25 Thread Sean Martin
Amen to that! 2138 Mailboxes, 2 Stores (117GB, 79GB) Of course, we do have Symantec Enterprise Vault. Total consumed storage is around 500GB. - Sean On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote: We have just a little over 50 users using about a 3rd of that…

Replication Issue - Cross Posting

2009-03-25 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
I have an interesting issue that has been happening for almost 6 weeks now. Every Wed. at approximately 1:40-1:45 PM, one of our domain controllers basically becomes totally unresponsive, causing the other two DC's to become effectively useless, AND causes the Exchange server to become

re: fetchExc that works with Exchange 2007?

2009-03-25 Thread will...@lefkovics.net
I don't know of any application that does this, but in the absence of WebDAV, it would use Exchange Web Services to do so. From: Jeremy Phillips jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Re: Large Mailboxes Performance

2009-03-25 Thread mqcarp
For clarification, are you suggesting that the count be under 5,000 for inbox and subfolders, or just the inbox? I am not sure if those are calculated together since you can have top level folders outside the inbox also ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~

RE: Large Mailboxes Performance

2009-03-25 Thread Webster
-Original Message- From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Large Mailboxes Performance For clarification, are you suggesting that the count be under 5,000 for inbox and subfolders, or just the inbox? I am not sure if those are calculated together since you can have

Re: Large Mailboxes Performance

2009-03-25 Thread James Wells
Correct. I'll try to dig up some links (there are KBs out there now on this; there were originally none). What matters is the critical path - both for common user operations and background tasks, Outlook in Online Mode+Exchange will keep a view of the Inbox,Sent,Calendar and I think one other

RE: Large Mailboxes Performance

2009-03-25 Thread Jeremy Phillips
Here you go: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc535025.aspx Contacts is the one you're missing. The new best practice limit is 20k items for Inbox/Sent Items 5k items for Contacts/Calendar. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Director of Operations | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: