The GoDaddy certificates have been trusted in Firefox since March 2007.
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/included/
However if you do not install the certificates as per the instructions from
GoDaddy then you will see trust issues.
Personally I have deployed about 200 of the
I use digicert and never had an issue until myu last deployment of Exchange
2007 on Windows 2008
From: Young Rex [mailto:rexer...@mac.com]
Sent: 10 June 2009 06:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GoDaddy.com
You get what you pay for.
Rex Young
On
I apologize if this came through a second time but didn't see it get posted.
I have a off topic subject. We have the opportunity to possibly adjust our
license agreement with Microsoft that will entitle us to Forefront both hosted
and on Premise solution for next to nothing. We went through
I used it a very little bit at my last job (also an EDU.) I barely got into
the testing phase though, so I don't really feel I can offer much feedback.
From what I saw of it, I wasn't all that impressed. We used it on our
CAS/HT and it seemed to work fine there. But I didn't feel like it was
If they aren't trusted in a default state, then that isnt really
trusted. The key here is non-user interaction.
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote:
The GoDaddy certificates have been trusted in Firefox since March 2007.
Funny �re talking about this ��� I just installed a GoDaddy cert about 20
minutes ago to setup a user���s new Pre (it actually w�t work right now
without using SSL� works great, my iPhone didn���t complain and the Pre
hasn���t either. So far so good.
Andrew Greene
IS Technician
Exactly! And what purpose is using a non-trusted CA? We use VERISIGN.
Rex Young
On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com
wrote:
If they aren't trusted in a default state, then that isnt really
trusted. The key here is non-user interaction.
--
ME2
The key here is non-user interaction.
The user doesn't need to do anything for GoDaddy Certs. There is just
one extra step to take on the server during install. The admin has to
do the interaction, one-time. Not the user.
GoDaddy certs work perfectly fine.
-Sam
+1
It is just how you install it on the server. Nothing else to roll out or do.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoDaddy.com
The user doesn't need to do anything for GoDaddy Certs. There is just
Pete,
I am using forefront hosted filtering in my environment and have found it to be
a good product. It does all of our filtering. We host our own mail and don't
use the on-premise solution. I know they have had an issue once in a while
with their smart host(which i don't use). They have
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10260879-2.html
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Pete,
We've been using the hosted Forefront for Exchange for the past 18 months or
so... Prior to that we were using a locally hosted Barracuda box for spam AV
filtering... We switched to Forefront for basically the same reasons (changing
our EA brought it along basically for free).
So far
Trying to build out the new Exch 2007 and test current functionality. We have
hub transport servers and no edge servers. I have set the Default connector to
receive anonymous connections as described in several docs. The accepted
domains at exchange.company.com. My current issue is testing
Around 1.75 million businesses are using Google Apps? 1.75 million USERS
I would believe, not businesses.
Exchange in your local shop may be doomed, MS wants you to buy it as a cloud
service too.
It was only a matter of time before somebody came up with reasonable
competition.
Carl
I dont know if I'd say doomed, but the upcoming features that Google Apps
will be pushing are going to be a killer for a lot of smaller organizations.
Microsoft wants you into the cloud too, but Google is doing it better IMHO.
The desktop, remote/offline (via Google Gears), and mobile integration
I'd say that Exchange MAIL is doomed. But really, Exchange has never
enjoyed market share for MAIL. It's integration, calendar/scheduling,
archiving and compliance that have kept it at the top.
Google has a long way to go to replace EVERY feature that business
(especially Enterprise IT) relies
All the major competitors have Outlook plugins. The many open source
solutions, like Zimbra Collaboration Suite, used to market that they were
'exchange killers' because they were able to minimize the impact of changing
to their server product on the user experience. It never really
materialized
We are using RSA with OWA and just started to have this issue today.
When a user logs in with their username and then the RSA token, it
authenticates without any problem. The problem comes in when trying to
load the OWA mailbox page and the user receives the following:
I've checked the
I can't see any company that handles any kind of confidential customer
information letting their corporate email outside the firewall.
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
So none of your corporate email goes to mobile devices or is done from
home/remote locations?
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Campbell, Rob
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote:
I can’t see any company that handles any kind of confidential customer
information letting their
I just find it hard to believe that Google will be replacing Exchange at the
corporate end. While that may be their goal, they've been saying that for many
years. The same holds true for the MS Office cloud model.
Where they are making inroads are at a number of public schools, colleges, etc
I used it once.
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Around 1.75 million businesses are using Google Apps? 1.75 million USERS
I would believe, not businesses.
Exchange
Not sure if it is really reasonable yet.
Still needs to be used for a little while yet.
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:13 PM
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
I used it once.
From: Carl
All mobile devices are company owned, and home/remote work is done via vpn into
a TS or Citrix session.
Nothing is stored on any device that doesn't reside on-site, or that we don't
have the ability to wipe remotely.
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
I too find it hard to believe that Gmail would be replacing Exchange in any
organization that really uses Exchange for more than passing email messages
back and forth... Gmail just doesn't have the same feature set yet...
I use gmail to host my own personal domain and I have a number of
Most shops I know use Exchange for MAIL. Specifically because of the
interaction between Outlook and Exchange.
The competitive marketing material for Lotus Notes proudly declares that
comparing Exchange and Notes is like Apples and Oranges - Exchange is just a
MAIL platform and Notes is a
FWIW, MS does the same for schools. Their EDU Live is actually pretty cool. We
have not moved to it but it is pretty interesting. It also includes web based
office that runs pretty darn well and looks/feels very much like the full
office. And a bunch of storage for their stuff.
From: Louis,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:01, Roger Wright rwri...@evatone.com wrote:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10260879-2.html
Oh *hell* no.
I catch that on someone's machine, and I'm going to their manager and
have them written up. Company data stays on company equipment.
Kurt
~ Ninja Email
I was with you right up to the 'Gmail is great' part and then I tasted some
throwup in my mouth.
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
I just find it hard to believe that
Can you imagine calling Google because you just got served with a
discovery request? Or needing to recover a piece of mail/mailbox?
Sent from my mobile...
On Jun 10, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:23, Carl Housemanc.house...@gmail.com
wrote:
Was that what I smelled?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM, William Lefkovics
will...@lefkovics.netwrote:
I was with you right up to the ‘Gmail is great’ part and then I tasted
some throwup in my mouth.
*From:* Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 10,
I'm about ready to propose shutting down OWA. Our SSL VPN is just too useful.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:53, Micheal Espinola
Jrmichealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
So none of your corporate email goes to mobile devices or is done from
home/remote locations?
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at
Nobody mentioned the interesting fact that Google licensed EAS from
Microsoft?
Google licensed EAS from Microsoft.
There it is. I don't think MS is worried.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:23, Carl Housemanc.house...@gmail.com wrote:
Around 1.75 million businesses are using Google Apps? 1.75 million USERS
I would believe, not businesses.
Exchange in your local shop may be doomed, MS wants you to buy it as a cloud
service too.
It was only a
Naw. Different CC.
I'm curious though as to what 3rd party Exchange vendors think about this
article. None of the ones that I deal with are scaling back on their offerings
on the fear that Google/Cloud computing will replace Exchange. Stu?
From: Joe Pochedley
If you mean MCC, then yes. :)
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
OCC the school?
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:35 PM
I believe there is too much corporate paranoia for a 3rd party email
solution on large companies. Small and medium businesses however...
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
There are reasons it is offered for free. It is still in beta, isn't it?
When you go down the list, it seems there is a lot that their Outlook
connector cannot do:
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=147751
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com]
There is also the decision that needs to be made regarding a company's ability
to live with down time. When dealing with SaaS there is more to it than simply
the vendor's uptime, there are all the other systems between the company site
and the provider. I know we would never change over to SaaS
Lots of competing companies license technology like that from each other.
That doesnt minimize any need to worry.
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Nobody mentioned the interesting fact that Google licensed EAS from
Microsoft?
Google licensed
This I agree with. And I dont think anyone at Google or Microsoft is
thinking otherwise at this point. Surely there are potential Enterprise and
Legal needs that will never be met with a cloud solution (or at least not
for a very long time).
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maglinger,
But google would never . . . umm again . . . umm get caught.oh
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is Exchange Doomed?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:01, Roger Wright
Wouldn't surprise me. darn seafood buffet.
Smelled similar to Google Customer Service.
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is Exchange Doomed?
Was that what I smelled?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009
Greetings all!
We have just purchased both Ninja and Vipre and so far have Ninja installed and
configured (awesome tech support Stu!!) but I'm wondering what everyone is
filtering and if I'm missing something glaring. I've done some google-fuing and
have the following list setup already.
If
Gee, we just tell ours to block executables and it determines by the
file format. (solves the ol' rename as well as rename and zip as well as
rename and zip and rename etc.)
-Original Message-
From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:48 AM
To:
Don't know if it can do it but I'd rather only allow what I know through and
block everything else.
Much easier to keep up dated.
-Original Message-
From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Ninja -
This might be a better question to post on the Ninja Email Security forum at
supportforums.Sunbeltsoftware.com
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.comwrote:
Gee, we just tell ours to block executables and it determines by the
file format. (solves the ol' rename as
Hello,
I have been tasked with trying to sync our Exchange GAL with our parent
companies Exchange Server GAL. We do have a trust setup and both forests
are Active Directory 2003 running Exchange 2003 Enterprise with SP2. It
appears that the IIFP tool is an option, but I did not know if there
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:48, Cameroncameron.orl...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings all!
We have just purchased both Ninja and Vipre and so far have Ninja installed
and configured (awesome tech support Stu!!) but I'm wondering what everyone
is filtering and if I'm missing something glaring.
Thanks gentlemen:
We are mostly interested in the hosted spam solution since it does have a
quarantine area and would keep the traffic from hitting our network. We were
also looking at on-premise Barracudas, Ironport, ProofPoint and Symantec all of
which are somewhat expensive so if we can
If you do go this route, make sure your block *.* rule is last in the
rules pipeline.
Please check out the Ninja forum at
http://supportforums.sunbeltsoftware.com/categories.aspx?catid=29enterc
at=y
Joe Frederick, MCSE, CCNA
QA Engineer
Sunbelt Software
-Original Message-
From: Joe
and make sure *.* doesnt unwittingly allow *.*.* through, etc.
--
ME2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Joe Frederick j...@sunbelt-software.comwrote:
If you do go this route, make sure your block *.* rule is last in the
rules pipeline.
Please check out the Ninja forum at
By default Exchange 2007 doesn't allow you to send outbound. You need
to create a new send connector - these should help:
http://www.petri.co.il/configuring-exchange-2007-send-external-email.htm
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998936.aspx
-mb
From: Senter, John
53 matches
Mail list logo
