Do you have an article where MS talks about this for Exchange 2007 (the one
below is for 2003, and doesn't mention putting the journaling mailbox in a
separate database unless I'm overlooking it.)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kern [mailto:tpk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009
FYI - one of the reasons to put the journal mailbox(es) on a different
database (different sotrage group, really) is so the database and logs
can be on a different disk group than the mailboxes being journaled.
You didn't say how many mailboxes are being journaled...if it's a few
hundred, the perf
I have a vendor that is having trouble sending emails to me and wants me
to turn off inspect esmtp. I know the older pix had some issues with
this but not the newer (8.03) ASA.
Those with asa's what have you done with esmtp inspect? On or Off?
I have a ccie colleague that hasn't seen any issues w
I'm under 500 mailboxes, and as a rule of thumb our mailbox server isn't
overworked. In fact, it runs in a VM on a server with a number of other virtual
servers, and the physical server's CPU utilization and disk I/O are comfortably
low.
Of course, I suppose however I set up journaling isn't se
Google it.. you will see a few with same issues that have turned off esmtp
inspection.
-
Bob Fronk
P Please print only as needed.
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Cisco ASA and inspect esmtp
I ha
Looking at my reply now, it could be construed a bit short, and suggesting that
you didn't research. That is not how I meant it to be.
-
Bob Fronk
P Please print only as needed.
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Is
Don't worry I didn't take it that way.
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASA and inspect esmtp
Looking at my reply now, it could be construed a bit short, and
suggesting that you didn't research.
What kind of upgrade are you doing? I did an in-place upgrade to 5.0 from
4.1.6I ran into an issue with being able to log into the dashboard
after the upgrade (it could not find the website). There was an issue with the
webserver (i believe they are using apache) talking with the database.
I just finished my research into this today and started the process.
Here's my notes.
I'm upgrade to 5.0 from 4.x onto new hardware. No external SQL.
1. Upgrade to newest SP on production box
2. Get temp SRP and Migration Kit from BES Customer Support
3. Install fresh server on new hardware, insta
Thanks Jon, I'm going to be contacting my RIM support to get this migration
kit.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jon D wrote:
> I just finished my research into this today and started the process.
> Here's my notes.
> I'm upgrade to 5.0 from 4.x onto new hardware. No external SQL.
>
> 1. Upgrad
You can go into advanced view to edit the LDAP query directly.
I don't understand "remote the query for any contact and any PF,DL, or DDL" to
be able to answer it.
From: Jason Benway [benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
Did you get this resolved?
From: Senter, John [john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Moving users to Exch 2007 and Linked mailboxes
We are about ready to start mass moving our users from Exchange 2003 to
In your Exchange Management Shell "help new-exchangecertificate".
From: Liby Philip Mathew [lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR and certificate requirement.
Sorry. I forgot to
Google WHAT?
From: William Lefkovics [will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Wouldn’t surprise me… darn seafood buffet.
Smelled similar to Google Customer Service.
From: Steve
Not true.
Glaxo-Smith-Kline (GSK, one of the largest drug companies in the world) is in
the process of moving 120,000 (yes, 120K) seats to Microsoft's BPOS solution.
They aren't the first, and they won't be the last.
I know too much about this particular move that isn't public - but the fact
Google licensed EAS from Microsoft for some very specific applications. They
did not acquire a "general" license.
From: Sam Cayze [sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
I can't think that anyone is scared that "Exchange will go away". I think that
a number of vendors are concerned that Microsoft is pushing - really hard -
SMORGs to the cloud.
From: Louis, Joe [jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:50 PM
To:
Shockingly, it's happening.
A number of my hosted Exchange clients handle confidential customer information.
From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doom
i think that as a sample MAPI application, the plug-in is fantastic!
From: William Lefkovics [will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
All the major competitors have Outlook plugin
I'm not sure what I was trying to say either!
I think I was trying to say how to I use the GUI with the checkboxes to
get the same results as the LDAP query. I have around 7 of these to
setup. I would prefer to use the GUI and the checkboxes.
jb
From: Michael
use OWA for setting OOF.
From: Steve Hart [sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OOF for Outlook Anywhere user
I have a single user that uses Outlook remotely using Outlook Anywhere.
Everything see
Yes, Yes, No.
Exchange 2003 does NOT understand opportunistic TLS. That was a feature added
in Exchange 2007.
Paul Robichaux wrote a fantastic book on E-mail Security, including setting up
TLS on Exchange 2003. Hunt amazon.com for his name. It's well worth the price.
__
We just ran across that here (outlook 2007 SP2/Exchange 2007 SP1) too, and that
is what I told the user to do.
Is setting OOF not supported with Outlook Anywhere or do I have something
misconfigured?
...Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.co
We have that same problem.
We also have an issue where Outlook 2003 users can't turn on OOF even tough
they're on the local LAN. Worked around the same way.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
Like most other hosted messaging solutions.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Shockingly, it's happening.
A number of my hosted Exchange clients handle confiden
all i can simply tell you is that there are situations - especially when
outlook 2003 is being used in cached mode - where setting oof doesn't work.
it always works for me in outlook 2007 cached mode, but some of my users report
that it doesn't work for them in outlook 2007 cached mode.
so, as
Leave it to Microsoft marketing to come up with Business POS...
:)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Not true.
Glaxo-Smith-Kline (GSK, one of the largest drug companies in
I've been tasked to create a rule that deletes messages from a certain
sender after three or four days. Can Outlook do that, or can I use a tool
in ESM that will do that?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Steve
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://ww
Do you advise them against doing that?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Shockingly, it's happening.
A number of my hosted Exchange clients
Not when he is running the company that is providing the hosting service. He
encourages it. ;)
Thanks,
- JB
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed?
Do you advise them agai
Microsoft is pretty buying the seats when they do this. I've bid against
Microsoft on some of these large customers. Microsoft comes to the table saying
" no exchange licenses, and we'll sell it to you for nearly nothing a month" It
is very hard to complete...
120k users you care looking at 2-2
With 120k users, potentially, you could just be trading one cloud for
another.
Microsoft has been coming up with business POS for decades. Exchange, of
course, is no POS. J
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subjec
32 matches
Mail list logo
