Cisco IronPort. Nil on the false positives so far, and we've had it a couple
of months. The content filters pull some false positives, for obvious
reasons, but they are easy enough to tune.
2009/12/15 Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com
Would anyone be interested in sharing what anti-spam solution
Hi all,
Can I please ask does Exchange list itself as Version 8.2 once SP2 has
been installed (in Server properties or Help, About Exchange Server 2007)?
Thanks,
Andrew
2009/12/16 Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
OK, I’ve read that recently. (Can’t talk about some things until other
They probably ran ESEUTIL as a regular management process. :)
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Glad not to be the White House Exchange Administration a few
years
I was always under the impression that it was bad to defrag a server. I
guess that was an old school notion.
David M. Ricci
IS Manager
The Health Wellness Institute
291 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
T: 401.228.1332
C: 401.256.4933
F: 401.228.1399
www.hwinstitute.com
The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't
need it, like UFS...
Heh.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:45, David.Ricci david.ri...@hwinstitute.com wrote:
I was always under the impression that it was bad to defrag a server. I
guess that was an old school notion.
David M.
Do you remember way back when? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
IIRC, they also said the NT4 Directory was superior to Netware's directory,
because a flat directory structure provided better performance.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Hehe I remember that.and then promptly appropriated all the goodness out
of NDS for AD. I can still remember people looking at their first NDS system
circa 2002 and telling me they've just ripped off Active Directory with
that thing, what is it?
2009/12/16 Campbell, Rob
Honestly, compared to FAT, fragmentation on NTFS was not nearly as big an
issue, IMO.
Yes it fragmented but the cache-manager/VMM/filesystem and the ability to
pre-read the block allocation and order them intelligently for an I/O operation
reduced the effect significantly...
-sc
Compared to the bindery, it was.
NDS, however, is what I'm sure spurred AD on up in Redmond.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting
That is where I got it from.
So now it is ok so as long as it is not a database obviously exchange, sql
just file systems.
Thank you,
David M. Ricci
IS Manager
The Health Wellness Institute
291 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
T: 401.228.1332
C: 401.256.4933
F: 401.228.1399
Yep. Heh. Long time ago...
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:01, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Do you remember way back when? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
Yup, until they ran into orgs with more than about 50k employees,
IIRC. Didn't work so well, and there were resource domains and all
sorts of workarounds. Bleh. Never worked in an org that large, though,
so was only a spectator to the pain, not a participant, and for that
I'm truly grateful.
Kurt
OK, so does that mean the databases do not get fragmented, or there is another
way to defrag them?
I do not support our databases, only the hardware that houses them, but I do
support Exchange.
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707)
There’s two different types of “fragmentation” in databases…
There’s good ol’ file system fragmentation of the database files themselves…
This type of fragmentation can be somewhat mitigated / limited by intelligently
choosing how your DB auto-grows (if you have that feature enabled, or if
All --
I could use some help with setting up a secure SMTP VS to allow users on
mobile devices to send through our SMTP gateway. I'm running Exchange 2003
SP2. I've setup the second VS to listen on port 587, I've attached a
wildcard cert, and made sure anon access is removed and auth and 128-bit
I have wondered this too Harry but I think the question is better put
to your shared storage provider. That said, we are testing out
Vizioncore's vOptimizer as well
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Harry Singh hbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it recommended to kick off defrag's for VM's who are using
After doing some digging, I did find the answer to my initial question. When
it comes to defrag'n your VM guests, it's recommended.
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/77661
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:23 PM, mqcarp mqcarpen...@gmail.com wrote:
I have wondered this too Harry but I think the
18 matches
Mail list logo
