But you forgot to mention that you get to give all of your data to someone
else.
Remember one of the most basic of about security is that you maintain
physical control of your data.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Stephan Barr
stephanbarr.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Goggle Apps cost $50 per seat,
Actually Google's TC's are quite interesting, I'm surprised people are
so willing to agree to them when it comes to their company data.
From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 August 2010 12:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to
True to a point.
Let's face it, the cloud is here and one way or another you are going to end
up there. Either you get on board or your CFO will for you.
I will say if we were not a VAR, didn't have access to outstanding hardware,
and didn't eat our own dogfood, I would put Exchange in the cloud
Oh yes! And not to just anyone, the biggest data miners in the world.
From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 4:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
But you forgot to mention that
I want to strip all RFAX addresses from all objects in our AD as we no
longer use Rightfax.
I used ADModify to remove RFAX=* from all the users and groups, I just
wanted to be clear that to do the same for Public Folders it's the
microsoft exchange system objects folder that I need to include?
Is there some evidence to indicate that if one uses Google to host their data,
they're agreeing to allow Google to use their data?
We use Google/Postini to archive our e-mail, and I saw nothing in our contract
that would make the mining of our data by Google acceptable.
And while I'm
+1
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Is there some evidence to indicate that if one uses Google to host their
data, they’re agreeing to allow Google to use their data?
We use Google/Postini to archive our e-mail, and I saw nothing in
My customers are (always) looking for ways to save money on IT and this
qualifies.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Stephan Barr
stephanbarr.li...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Is there some evidence to indicate
Would you trust the fox in the hen house?
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
Is there some evidence to indicate
You are already trusting your ISP and inherently their ISP and so on. but
that's not the issue:
The issue is cloud computing is cheaper,less complicated,arguably as
secure,lighter,more portable and almost anyone can configure it. Do the
math.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Matt Moore
+1 I have clients on SBS 2003 and there aren't any of them that I spend more
than 1-2hrs/yr on Exchange specific stuff (I doubt it comes to even that much).
probably 90% of clients' IT costs are on the workstation side.
E-mail antispam/antivirus cost is a good point but for my clients that
When it comes to the theft or unintentional leaking of data, most of the foxes
are already in the henhouse because they're internal users.
John
From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is
As always it boils down to a personal choice. If you feel good about
advising others to use them, then do it. In all the dealings I've had with
them, I'd rather not.
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Well said Dark-rock. :)
To give you a different perspective, Peak 10 has been doing cloud for a
little over four years and the adoption rate is incredible. $SMBs to
$Fortune200s (I deal with them all) are sick of capital outlay for hardware,
they're tired of the of the IT cycle and just want
14 matches
Mail list logo
