IL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Lesaca, Wally R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WLKMMAS
It's good you know so many things.
But always remember, you will always r
Thanks for the replies, sorry about the topic, I was just reading along
and felt like just throwing that out to see what people said. Nite all
-Original Message-
From: maggie whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
LMFAO!! On a side note, just because I am interested in knowing
a little about people before I start trying things people suggest, what
is "your" background, ie MSCE, MCP, MBA, MD, no college/never graduated
with a degree? The reason I ask is I went to college for 1 1/2 years,
ran out of
t
Global Settings/Internet Message formats/ -> probably in the
"Default"-Domain in your case.
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Mike Zatkalik
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. April 2002
07:14An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: prevent
Title: Message
Hello
all,
I remember in
Exchange 5.5 you could set the check boxes for the: Do not allow OOF, delivery
reports, etc to the internet. Where is this located in Exchange 2000
sp2?
Thanks,
Mike
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_char
Title: Message
After
reading this post, I laughed for a second, thought about it for a few minutes
and searched the net for it, but couldn't find anything. I hadn't
realized until today that this is annoying, going through your mail seeing
10 messages from someone and having to click throug
_faq_sec3.htm
3.32
Q2 A2
replace the words cr and custom recipient with contact..same
concept.
-Original Message-From: Mike Zatkalik
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March
19, 2002 8:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Re: mail-enable
ob for another month, now stop
> lollygagging and get back to work'
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:50 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: O
ing that comes up is
q281926.
-Original Message-From:
Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Sunday, March 17, 2002 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: Re: mail-enabled
contact...
Thanks for the reply, but have you by
chance read this in
"Well done?" What does that mean?
- Original Message -
From: "Joe L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> HAHAHA
> Now that's funny!
> jlc
>
> -Original Message-
> F
Title: FW: D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
Yeah, I am. Here comes another one for ya...
:p
- Original Message -
From:
Zangara, Jim
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tue
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q281926
Cheers
Graham
-Original
Message-From: Mike
Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 05:43To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: mail-enabled
contact...
Sorry guys I know this is a
: Newbie Exchange 2000
question
In
AD Users and computers, go up to view and Add/Remove columns. Then you
can export the info you need ;)
Paul
-Original Message-From: Mike Zatkalik
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Tuesday,
March 19, 2002 9:38 AMPosted To
Hello all,
Trying to find an way to export email addresses,
names, display name, etc to a file. I am bringing up the Exchange 2000
server live this weekend, and want to be able to export this information to a
file so another person, our Unix email guy can look over the information and
ver
, March 18, 2002 12:14
AM
Subject: RE: mail-enabled
contact...
I have used this
method in the past with no worries!
jlc
-Original
Message-From: Mike
Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 10:43
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSub
Sorry guys I know this is a stupid question, but I
am working for a new company, tomorrow is day 2. From what I can find on
technet/google articles, I can use a mail-enabled contact to forward
messages coming to my domain to another domain, ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssage-----
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment Blocking
Wow, if I didn't know better, I would say that Mr. Lefkovics, Mr. Dogg and
Mr. Blackstone have all heard that question before. :) H
Wow, if I didn't know better, I would say that Mr. Lefkovics, Mr. Dogg and
Mr. Blackstone have all heard that question before. :) However, when I
click that link to view this... dare I say... infamous list, I get a
disappointing message saying that the Server is not found. Are you guys
hiding t
Title: Message
Haven't tried this, but wondering if you could setup a rule to forward
all messages with *a*, or wildcard if possible, in the message body to
go to an external account. Anyone try this before?
MZ
-Original Message-From: Adil Hindistan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]S
I
would first verify, with your OWN eyes, that there is not a rule.
Secondly, check to see if they have some kind of spam filter or adult/junk
filter setup. Other than, haven't seen it
before.\
HTH,
Mike
Z
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: Message
We
have 2 offices downtown Chicago, connected via a point-to-point T1, they
also share our dual T1's to the 'net. At our peak employment time, we had
close to 100 users sharing this T1 and only really had connection issues in the
morning, when everyone came in, and around lun
Take two aspirin and read these documents.
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Disaster.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp
Links may wrap.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
twork, disconnect it from the live
network, promote it to be a PDC, rename it to the name of the Exchange
Server (Or build another machine on the test network for the Exchange
server) and restore.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 March 2002 18:
fects would be loss of
permissions (Like your describing). I have never tried this though and so
I'm only guessing.
Neil
-Original Message-----
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 March 2002 18:16
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: big problem with my DR proced
ginal Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 March 2002 15:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: big problem with my DR procedure
Well, I did another restore the other night of Exchange 5.5 sp3 and realized
that the primary NT account permissions DO NOT transfer ove
ctory when doing a restore and because of
that, permissions aren't being copied. So, please let me know whether I am
right in my thoughts, or completely off-track. So, whether I am wrong or
not, how do I copy permissions and restore them to a test server?
TIA,
> Mike Zatkalik
>
List Ch
There is a MSKB Q article about this. Basically, when you burn the pst to a
cd, it changes the file to archive, so you can't access it. Change the bit,
it should work, but didn't for me. I ended up having to zip them first,
burn to cd, then copy and unzip. Should work fine. Let me know.
HTH,
Title: Outlook 2K
If I
remember correctly, by default it is stored in a hidden directory. If the
user goes to folder options and says to show all system folders and files, you
should be able to track it down in local settings under that users name.
HTH,
Mike
Z
-Original Mess
Title: Counting mailboxes
~420
mailboxes @ 47GB also trying to get management to "re-implement" limits.
:)
-Original Message-From: Ken Leyba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:17
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Info store to
mailbox ra
re on
Exchange 5.5 sp3. Any help, comments, paranoid conspiracy theories welcome.
> Mike Zatkalik
>
>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
in the recipient view, double click on the user with the problem > go to
limits
-Original Message-
From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message Limits - easy answer I'm sure
I think
o: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Distribution
List Limit
I was wondering the same thing because my dl that is
"everyone" has over 500 members in it
-Original Message- From: Mike
Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:03 AM
I have Exchange 5.5 sp3, and our "Company.all" distribution list currently
has 206 members. What gives, or am I missing something?
MZ
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Well, if the person keeps sending mail, why not just leave it using Message
Filtering, and just randomly send the person a message telling him to "take
a short trip." Just keep a draft of the message and when your in a bad
mood, drop a few messages his way. :)
-Original Message-
From: J
Title: Message
Duck and cover... la la la Duck and cover lalalala.
J
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002
7:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Service
Announcement
http://chicanery.akw
Title: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
1. Jameson
2. John Powers
:)
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:09
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: My recent
$*#($#@($&#
You're all women... real men drink Whis
I am in a similar position. We had a 250MB warning, 300MB prohibit and a
sales person complained to my boss and my boss said to remove the limits on
EVERYONE. Now, I have 6 mailboxes in the 1GB+ range and the majority of the
other mailboxes are above 400MB+. Of course all of these huge mailboxe
We are using BE 8.5, and looking in to moving to BE8.6 to be able to backup
to a file, for added recovery possibilities. We have done restores numerous
times, and everything goes smoothly, but we haven't tried the restoring
using just the logs. Working on seeing if I can replay a couple of days
ction logs on an
empty DB". I would think it could
> be done then...
>
> How is your backup server
integrated into your AD site?
> Need some info!
>
> jlc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday,
Fe
tart the IS and once the
logs are replayed, be back in business? Would this work? Any comments,
articles, kb's or alternative options are highly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Mike Z
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin I
rmation, or even kbs that could
help in this matter.
tia,
> Mike Zatkalik
>
>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
We do:
nightly backups
we rotate tapes weekly to our other location, kept for 1 month then reuse
we had a 300MB limit, boss said to remove, so currently no limit(6 mailboxes
are now 1GB each!!!)
14 day retention period
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
Haven't installed it in a while, but run the setup server and components,
then select custom install
-Original Message-
From: Erickson, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Running Exchange Admin Remotely
Is
I have seen past AA, who had delegate access to the mailbox. Whenever the
manager was copied, the AA was copied, since the mailbox didn't exist, it
would bounce back. As soon as I removed this name, the problem was gone.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EM
ssage Body scanning.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...
Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...
OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL
stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...
I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
message. Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.
Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns
TIA,
> Mike Zatkalik
>
>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://ww
I disagree with this Marc. I have a E5.5 sp3 server on NT4 sp6a, and a
separate OWA 5.5 sp3 machine running on W2K sp2 without any problems.
Before I brought that online, I had a NT4sp6a running OWA that had "issues."
So I temporarily had 2 OWA servers, one available outside, one inside only
by I
...
The read only issue is well know, the second part of your
problem I have not seen. Maybe it was corrupted during the burn
process. It is no reason that you can't burn pst's to cd rom.
-Original Message----- From: Mike
Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesda
e only way around
this that I have found is to zip the file, burn to cd and when unzipped, it
works fine. Anybody else seen this problem, or know a better way to do
this? I am using O2K version 9.0.0.2711, no service packs.
> Mike Zatkalik
>
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunb
Was there anything in the app event log at all that might assist?
William
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMS hung up again...
Generally speaking, no it's not
?
William
-Original Message-----
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMS hung up again...
The other part of my question, which I guess I am also interested in your
comments on, is in regards to the max c
The other part of my question, which I guess I am also interested in your
comments on, is in regards to the max connections, both inbound and
outbound. Any thoughts, positive or negative?
TIA,
Mike Z
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:00 PM
To
performance optimiser.
William Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IMS hung up again...
This is the 3rd time my IMS hung over the past 3 months. I am not sure what
grees, or disagrees,
with this thought. They are currently at default, which is 30 inbound, 20
outbound. Any other suggestions?
Exchange 5.5 SP3 Dual P3 933 Xeon 2 1/2 GB Ram running all Exchange
services, minus IMS
Exchange 5.5 SP3 P3 550 256MB Ram running IMS
Thanks
> Mike Zatkalik
>
I am not having any problems with this type of email. I sent both an
internal message from myself and a message from an external client and I was
able to view both perfectly. I am on 5.5 Enterprise SP3.
MZ
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monda
Title: Old Mail showing up
In the past 2 weeks, I have seen the same
thing happen, but fortunately, it has only been reported by people in IS, no
other users are complaining. This
is start happening after I had to reboot my NT4
Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. In the
past, I have noticed that af
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is the offline defrag my only choice?
Public Folders? Logs?
- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Zatkalik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 15:39
-
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-----
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
S
w in the application event log?
If the whitespace is significant, then perhaps an offline defrag would be
appropriate for you.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Is
Hello,
I am running Exchange Enterprise 5.5 SP3 on NT4 Enterprise Server. Before I
started at this company, the previous Exchange admin wasn't deleting ANY
mailboxes of old employees, which totaled approximately 11 GB that could be
deleted. My pub.edb is just about up to 50GB, which takes almost
62 matches
Mail list logo
