Yup. Tough list if you were a noob, which I was. It was pretty frustrating
sometimes, since all the "exchange experts" seemed to think the purpose of
the list was to just congregate together and embarrass anyone who asked a
question that somebody may have asked within the last 6 months.For som
Yes, they know exchange. I tried to only participate when I had a
problem. The BLB conversations were usually pretty humorous as an outsider.
It was clear that people were clamoring for something more intelligent than
the DR kluge, and also clear the vendors were trying to accommodate that
desi
We're using Barracuda.
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Archive Solutions
Sensitivity: Confidential
Mailarchiva?
http://www.mailarchiva.com/
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.
We use Barracuda. I'd be leery of anything from Quest.
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone using Quest Exchange Archiver?
Just looking for opinions on it. We're a small installation
ar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ray wrote:
We use Barracuda. I'd be leery of anything from Quest.
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange
I'm in AZ and BB seems to be working.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...
I have users in Arizona telling me no email on BB since before 6 a.m. No
reports fro
Title: Message
Or try
the different startup switches and see what happens.
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:36
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 2000
hangs
She's got about 290Mb in her mailb
See www.slipstick.com for more info.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that
would w
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs
Is the
preview pane on?
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:23
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 2000
hangs
Whats her largest email ?
-Original Message-Fro
Title: Message
Byte
me!
46
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's
Friday!!
I am
so freaking old I'm thinking about arguing for early acceptance for Kroger's
Title: Message
And
yet, the one thing that most of us wish worked better was single mailbox
restore. The DR procedure is a workaround for the inability to
manage Exchange the way we'd rather manage it.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: M
William
-Original Message-----From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:07
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: backup
mailboxes with Backup Exec
And yet, the one thing that most of us wish worked better was single
mailbox restore. The DR
Title: RE: backup mailboxes with Backup Exec
Outstanding. Nice to hear the other side.
-Original Message-From: Jay Ploughe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:24
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: backup
mailboxes with Backup Exec
I
have be
Title: RE: backup mailboxes with Backup Exec
As
evidenced by some that are using BLB's just fine, why go into all the
negatives. It's working for them just fine. They are not carrying an
extra 30, 60, 90 whatever days extra data in their Priv that they have to now
backup daily. They are o
ject: RE:
It's Friday!!
Thank God, somebody on here is older than
me!
44 (with a 16 and a 2 yr old boy)
-----Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002
Yes. The downside to increasing the deleted item retention days is
more stuff in the store.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:59
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Retention
Times
In Ed Crowley's paper
a 30 day retention period will account for roughly 30-35% of
actual store content.
William
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:18
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Retention
Times
Yes.
I remember getting that with PAB files in OL98. When the users were adding
contacts, there was an option for what kind of e-mail address. They were
just choosing the first option instead of the SMTP option and typing in the
e-mail address. When they went to send to them, they would get that "no
OWA isn't a viable alternative in the meantime?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC
I agree that VPN is the way to go, but when you have 1100 remote locations
it's kind of h
t new servers.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC
OWA isn't a viable alternative in the meantime?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
For all things Outlook, go to www.slipstick.com. It'll probably have to be
a third party solution.
-Original Message-
From: John Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Create a Consolidated Diary of Diaries (or Calen
How about using DL's for the various e-mail addresses? I did this and I
know you can then create a rule to go to the various sub-folders.
-Original Message-
From: pip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: multiple SMTP
use the DL. I had about 20 "special" email addresses on our website. Since
who they were going to varied way-too-often, I created a DL for each one and
then just had to put the correct person on the list. Some people had
multiple responsibilies. They were able to create a rule to send it to the
You need to include the rest of the thread on these e-mails. I don't know
what you're trying to do.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Barak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: multiple SMTP to 1 mailbox
Or just give him the information he initially asked for and let him take his
chances by explaining the caveats to his boss.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC
Then your
Is there a particular problem you are having, like too many misspelled
addresses?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
This is not a
Interesting. Unfortunately all "errors" go to the admin mailbox, which you
can specify in 5.5, not sure how that works in e2k.
-Original Message-
From: Norm Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un
me in 2K.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Interesting. Unfortunately all "errors" go to the admin mailbox, which
you can spec
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
Actually, in Exchange2000, you won't get the body of the errant email in
the admin box.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
change2000, you won't get the body of the errant email in
the admin box.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
It's just unfortunate t
ange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 un-specific addressed email
It's an annoyance. The content is still there. You have to resend the
message to see it.
I didn't mind the NDR with the message as an attachment in 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EM
I suppose you could archive to PSTS, with a good naming scheme, burn them
and store them. Or perhaps look at the 3rd party archive products.
-Original Message-
From: lars andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlo
Title: SPAM from this list???
I got
the same e-mail, although it said I was the Exchange admin for the ISP, which I
am not. I'm on this list and the swynk exchange list.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:04
AM
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SPAM from this list???
Ray and Everyone on the list,
I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. I am currently working with
a few people who are members of this list and I was trying to see if my
organization could provide others with value. Please delete th
Title: Message
no,
cabal, which is secret, and, like an M: drive, doesn't exist.
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:41
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
GAL
Is
that like COBOL?
---
Try www.gammadyne.com - has ODBC connectivity to your database, which you
can query. Emails can be personalized too! I think the cost is $99/user,
with a maximum cost is $800, which means 8 or more clients running the
software.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Matt, you were correct in pointing out that you should analyze what's best
for your organization. For example, if you now store 30 days instead of 3
days, your store could grow substantially. If your users are typically
asking to restore an e-mail that is only a day old, then there's no reason
t
Find the docs for DumpsterAlwaysOn, and you'll probably be able to
recover the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: replay logs
I'm going to flaunt my ignorance of Exchange
Title: Message
sadly,
I remember that too. "Rampart, we have a male caucausian, age 46,
overweight, complaining of dizziness, nausea, and hallucinating about
thongs, starting an IV drip, D5W, wide open".
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
y temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for
me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something
is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth.
--Bruce
Lee
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is OWA setup so you can actually delete the deleted items, or move them
to another folder?
-Original Message-
From: Corgiat, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 Sync Error
No, there aren't any la
Title: Message
If
Paul went over the wall, why did you get the "WCA"? And KMAP for that
matter? Enquiring minds want to know.
-Original Message-From: David James
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For
Title: Message
Yeah,
well, try being unemployed right now without a cert. Regardless of the
argument, lotsa companies are wanting certs. I got an e-mail today from
one company that said they got 700+ resumes for 1 position they put in the
paper. It sucks in the marketplace right now.
www.slipstick.com = there's a user list and a developer list.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Shortcut key to insert date
Is there a list we should use to ask Outlook questio
Not that I've seen. Right now, they want certs, and they want
experience, and they want to pay as little as possible. And they'll be
able to find that person. I've talked to a couple of recruiters who are
seeing resumes from IT folks formerly making $70-$80k applying for $40k
jobs. DHL announc
Title: Message
Gee,
you think maybe the owner is the idiot, not A-Rod?
FYI -
A-Rod is leading the ML in RBI, 2nd in Total Bases, tied with Bonds and Sosa in
HR, batting .317, .661 Slugging Percentage, etc. Not doing too bad.
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMA
HP P/166 w/96meg, no raid, 50 users, Exchange 5.5, BDC, Ras, File
server.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Poll time
Exchange 5.5
130 users
Dual Xeon 1MB
1 GB
raid 5 8
Some of the ISP's charge extra. I know ATT did, and I think Sprint
would've charged extra too.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
UUNet does this for me
sclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Some of the ISP
Bummer. Sounds like another MS "Get Smart" innovation - "Missed it by
THAT much"...
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
The Logoff *button* which has bee
Hey!!!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
It's the same with .Net build 3590.
Thank you, sir. And congrats to Germany for advancing.
Go Poland!
Wi
Soccer may be the most played youth sport in the US. I know one of the
local "travelling teams" (13-yr olds) went to Holland to play some youth
teams there. Not sure of the results.
Anyway, you're starting to see the results, and hopefully it'll
continue. Unfortunately, our very best athletes
, June 13, 2002 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
Are you serious Ray? Football (soccer) stars make gazillions in
Europe!!! And they are bigger stars worldwide than the North American
baseball/football/basketball stars.
-Original Message-
From: Ray
unbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Force Logoff of OWA
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
Are you serious Ray? Football (soccer) stars make gazillions in
Europe!!! And they are bigger stars worldwide than the North American
baseball/football/basketball stars.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mai
(the guy who married one of the Spice
girls) or Maradonna? I'm a hockey fan through and through and I've heard
of those guys...and then there is that goalie from the US who wears his
hair in dreadsdunno his name though.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Even without identical hardware, couldn't you use the repair option?
IIRC folks have been able to do that after ghosting non-identical
machines.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subje
Now that's funny.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations
Depends on the president/CEO/Director.
Teaching that stuff is pretty basic
He obviously trusts Martin.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations
Indeed. How come the President didn't request a list of the three
I suggest you try the question on the Outlook list at www.slipstick.com,
although Nikki seems to be outstanding on Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Appointments.
Get
July 4th - US Holiday.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The end of 5.5
Quiet in here today...everyone on holidays or what?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
Guess it depends where you are.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The end of 5.5
Oh. Was that today?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL
Especially since not everyone feels the same - www.trendmicrosucks.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Trend Tech Support AKA I Love It.
This type of feedback is importa
t is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: F
Oh my. 2 MVP not automatically and categorically condemning Word as the
e-mail editor! Hell hath frozen (which, given the current AZ temp,
sounds wonderful).
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin I
Title: Message
Youse?? Like from Brookyn?
-Original Message-From: Lynne Seamans
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09,
2002 1:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange Conference
Yeah, i have heard that... like "you" with an 's'
on it, not li
Title: Message
Personally, I always liked it when the IT staff took away all the rights.
It was great transferring all those calls off my plate. "I'm sorry,
IT will have to handle that for you now". There's
nothing better than sending $50k employees out to do what the $25k
employees used
Speaking of which, I could use a new Goodyear Wrangler RT/S. Just left
one shredded on the freeway. It really sucks changing tires in this
heat.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
bercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:57
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup
Server
Hey, I just noticed your domain Ray, we use Qwest for our
T1.
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center
Administration Team Information Technolog
o: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup
Server
Jesus, how fast is
that?
jlc
-Original
Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:27
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup
Server
I have
qwest VD
That's nuts. I worked for a small company that used a NT-based phone
system. We could send voice messages via e-mail.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone sending voic
and when the click on the
attachment in Malaysia it plays.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone sending voice messages in email
That's nuts. I worked for a small company that use
RE: Backup Server
Jesus, how fast
is that?
jlc
-Original
Message-----From: Ray
Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:27
PMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Bac
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone sending voice messages in email
Did it use SMTP as the transport mechanism?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 2:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: RE: Annonimous mail
yes.
Just create a Custom Recipient, add it to the DL, then go back and hide it.
-Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:01
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: alternate
recipients
Title: RE: Journaling
Which leads to the other question - is this "public knowledge" or is this supposed to be a secret?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Journaling
Title: Outlook cannot open attachment
Are
you sure it's not anti-virus related?
-Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 14,
2001 10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Outlook cannot open attachment
If
the
Title: RE: Joint Exchange Account
use a public folder?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Joint Exchange Account
Hello,
I am trying to allow multiple users access to the sam
Title: RE: Joint Exchange Account
From the slipstick newsletter:
MANAGING EXTRA MAILBOXES IN EXCHANGE
From time to time, I want to highlight solutions developers who really seem to understand what people want from Outlook. One such developer is Victor Ivanidze, whom I met while I was living i
Title: RE: Is there a way to export all PRIV db to individual pst files?
What you're looking for is ExMerge which you can get from MS.
-Original Message-
From: Llanos Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is th
uot;.pst" files back to another PRIV
database?
Thanks,
Carlos
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 14,
2001 3:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Is there a way to export all PRIV db to indiv
I
don't know if you'll find anything that's exchange specific. There's no
reason why you can't just run it on an 18gig scsi disk. I am.
That
being said, uptime is the primary reason for going to the various Raid
levels.
-Original Message-From:
Micciche Robert [mailto:[EMAI
Title: RE: Sharing OST files
Maybe you can explain better what you're ultimately trying to accomplish.
-Original Message-
From: Paul K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sharing OST files
Environment: Exchange
aring OST files
Approximately six users need to access the same
Exchange mailbox REMOTELY and send and receive mail on behalf of that
mailbox. Bandwidth is limited, so working offline is ultimately required.
Thanks for the suggestions so far.
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From:
that
mailbox. Bandwidth is limited, so working offline is ultimately required.
Thanks for the suggestions so far.
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Ray Zorz
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: Sharing OST files
Maybe you can ex
Title: RE: Email Template
I posted this earlier, but maybe since there's a couple helpdesk-type questions on the table I'll repost. This is from Sue Mosher - Outlook MVP:
MANAGING EXTRA MAILBOXES IN EXCHANGE
From time to time, I want to highlight solutions developers who really seem to un
ely six users need to access
the same> Exchange mailbox REMOTELY and send and receive mail on
behalf of that> mailbox. Bandwidth is limited, so working
offline is > ultimately required.> Thanks for the suggestions
so far.> > Regards,> > Paul> -
Title: RE: MS01_044
me too, but I only use that server for OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS01_044
Intalled, so far so good (sitting with fingers, toes an
Well
there seems to be a difference of opinion on whether you can use OWA to connect
to multiple sites. Mind sharing how you did that?
-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 16,
2001 10:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubje
Title: And I still hate SP4 for exchange
Exchange 5.5 MTA Patch 2654.89
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q283/2/38.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=31920
Following Exchange Server Service Pack 4, several issues with the Message
Transfer Agent wer
gards,
Nicole
-Original
Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:49
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: And I
still hate SP4 for exchange
Exchange 5.5 MTA
Patch 2654.89
http://support.microsoft.com/suppo
Title: RE: Additional Mailboxes
What's the Reply To: address set to in exchange for this mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Shamim Rahman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Additional Mailboxes
I have already d
Title: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
See my post about the post sp4 hotfixes.
-Original Message-
From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
I'd delete the IMC and then re
should read the entire thread before I *try* to
contribute.
Don't listen to Ray... I don't think it was
luck.
-Original Message-----From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001
8:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: And I
Title: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
Did you try the additional post SP4 hotfixes?
-Original Message-
From: Angeli Garcias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
Sooo.. David, do you
the problem it
fixes were in relation to our email problem. I may have overlooked
something..any suggestions on any particular
one? Thx..
Angeli
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001
1:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange
Title: RE: New Distribution List
And then hide them so they don't show up in the GAL, unless you really want them to.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New Distribution List
Title: RE: Recover deleted items (formerly Outlook something or other)
Yes, it works that way. I just had to do this earlier this week when somebody was screwing around with there Palm and synced incorrectly. Once I added the dumpsteralwayson reghack she could retrieve her deleted items.
But
Title: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
Don Ely yes. Mr. Ely - lol!
-Original Message-
From: Angeli Garcias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: bounced or rejected mail..
William are you referring to Mr. Ely?
Title: RE: Exchange Organization Name
Make sure you have the latest version.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Organization Name
You should find it on your exch
Backups 5 days/week. 4 weeks of tapes, no offsite except the night before
that I carried with me. Deleted Item Retention set to 10 days.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
