--Original Message-
From: bounce-8462960-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8462960-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Davies,Matt
Sent: 20 March 2009 21:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
I'm surprised I have never seem this error
I'm surprised I have never seem this error before exchange 2003
Perhaps there is hope after all
-Original Message-
From: James Wells [mailto:jam...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 March 2009 20:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
This is not new in Exchange
007.
>
>
>
> I hope Microsoft are planning on resolving this..
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
> Sent: 20 March 2009 16:20
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:
und emails, 32,000
could very soon become depleted when we implement exchange 2007.
I hope Microsoft are planning on resolving this..
Cheers
Matt
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: 20 March 2009 16:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Prop
ilter agent that will strip all x-headers from incoming internet
> email.
>
>
>
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:20 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
>
>
>
> Set you
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Set your limit to somewhat less than the hard limit as per the technet
articles and wait for your eventlog to fill up :-)
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T.
Services Div
have received this e-mail in error please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it.
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: 20 March 2009 12:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Another
today?
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Named Property Limit
>
>
>
> Seems this turned into a b-ch fest rather than answering your original
Another quick question. Is there any way to see how close we are to the 32k
hard limit today?
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
Seems this turned
crosoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
How did you put a user name to your violators? Did you match the GUID somehow?
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
Seems
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange
> (Sunbelt)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:44 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
>
>
>
> Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse
Sent: 19 March 2009 12:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
I agree about it getting worse as it gets better I was shocked by the
whole powershell thing I know some people love it, but I think it
stinks. Hello 1960' I had to move a mailbox in the lab the other da
ay, March 17, 2009 5:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)
S
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Troy Meyer wrote:
> I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database. Â YIKES!
Wow, you're not kidding. I'm surprised they don't ask you to cut
down a tree with a herring.
-- Ben
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~
I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database. YIKES!
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me, or is
Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)
S
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
I don't have an answer for you on that.
I supp
ert
wrote:
> Is there a way to limit these X-headers, or find out what is causing so many?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
>
Is there a way to limit these X-headers, or find out what is causing so many?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
One of the things that seems to contribute
One of the things that seems to contribute are X- headers on inbound
mail - each new X-header is a new named property.
Want to DoS someone? Send them emails with new X-headers - lots of
different ones.
Spam seems to accumulate them, for one.
Just looking at your message from the list, I see 4 di
I'm not sure I understand this named property quota thing or how we reached our
limit.
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851492.aspx)
but my question is, how big of a deal is it really? We apparently reached our
16,000 limit back in December, yet nobody has had any trouble send
20 matches
Mail list logo
