RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Ken Leyba
Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest getting your MS rep out there to the developers and infrastructure groups to see what .net provides for both areas. Your basically looking at XML Web Services that will allow you Rapid Application Development and cross platform

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Martin Blackstone
servers -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest getting your MS rep out there to the developers

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread William Lefkovics
I run a Windows.Net Active Directory domain with beta3 release 3268. And on a dev box I have VisualStudio.Net. .Net is both a development platform and a name given the next version of Windows. William -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesd

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Kurt
Try this link for some pretty fair information: http://arstechnica.com/paedia/n/net/net-1.html | -Original Message- | From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 17:00 | To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues | Subject: .net questions | | | Situation: | | Ou

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Benjamin Zachary
I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it, and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). The server has 3 version on it, standard server, web server, and enterprise server if I remember

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Siegfried Weber
Not William but going to reply inline... > -Original Message- > I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out > the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it > and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP > using rdp5.1). I'd double chec

Re: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread bscott
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, at 8:00pm, Thompson, Elizabeth wrote: > Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? .NET has at least two meanings: In one sense, .NET is just the latest thing Microsoft is using instead of a version number. We had Windows 95, 98, 2000, ME, XP, and now .N

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Siegfried Weber
Note that Windows XP and Windows.NET will coexist for quite some time. Windows XP => Client OS Windows.NET => Server OS > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:20 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues &

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread William Lefkovics
Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Not William but going to reply inline... > -Original Message- > I

RE: .net questions

2002-07-02 Thread Benjamin Zachary
m: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM To: M

RE: .net questions

2002-07-03 Thread Martin Blackstone
Yea. I had the exact same issue -Original Message- From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions I thought that's what you meant, I have 3602, but I knew you had the newer on

RE: .net questions

2002-07-03 Thread Siegfried Weber
ly 03, 2002 7:06 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: .net questions > > I thought that's what you meant, I have 3602, but I knew you had the > newer one and mine was 06. heeh .. > > Siegfried - A bunch of us went through this before, and I know some > people