Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest
getting your MS rep out there to the developers and infrastructure groups to
see what .net provides for both areas. Your basically looking at XML Web
Services that will allow you Rapid Application Development and cross
platform
servers
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .net questions
Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest
getting your MS rep out there to the developers
I run a Windows.Net Active Directory domain with beta3 release 3268.
And on a dev box I have VisualStudio.Net.
.Net is both a development platform and a name given the next version of
Windows.
William
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesd
Try this link for some pretty fair information:
http://arstechnica.com/paedia/n/net/net-1.html
| -Original Message-
| From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 17:00
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: .net questions
|
|
| Situation:
|
| Ou
I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out
the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it, and the RDP5.1 isn't
implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). The
server has 3 version on it, standard server, web server, and enterprise
server if I remember
Not William but going to reply inline...
> -Original Message-
> I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out
> the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it
> and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via
WinXP
> using rdp5.1).
I'd double chec
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, at 8:00pm, Thompson, Elizabeth wrote:
> Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services?
.NET has at least two meanings:
In one sense, .NET is just the latest thing Microsoft is using instead of
a version number. We had Windows 95, 98, 2000, ME, XP, and now .N
Note that Windows XP and Windows.NET will coexist for quite some time.
Windows XP => Client OS
Windows.NET => Server OS
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
&
Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .net questions
Not William but going to reply inline...
> -Original Message-
> I
m: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .net questions
Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM
To: M
Yea. I had the exact same issue
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .net questions
I thought that's what you meant, I have 3602, but I knew you had the newer
on
ly 03, 2002 7:06 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: .net questions
>
> I thought that's what you meant, I have 3602, but I knew you had the
> newer one and mine was 06. heeh ..
>
> Siegfried - A bunch of us went through this before, and I know some
> people
12 matches
Mail list logo