ch 11, 2009 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
A much nicer way to achieve the point I was looking for.
Guess I need more coffee in the morning.
Thanks Sean
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wedn
verage joe to manage.
_
John Bowles
From: Sean Martin
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:52:56 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
I guess I would question why a novice admin would be expected to handle
__
From: Sean Martin
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:16:45 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
Ideally, all of the powershell scripts would be created and documented
as
Martin
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:16:45 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
>
> Ideally, all of the powershell scripts would be created and documented as
> part of your disaster recovery plan. Any novice admin should
yer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
No, you are thinking of small business server, and I d�t believe SCR will
work with that.
Every average Exchange 2007 admin I know has a substantia
( or better a group of peoples)
knowing Powershell.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: John Bowles [mailto:john_bow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
Is there any reason that MS hasn't made this
e "east of use". E2K7 for the novice to medium level
admin is not easy to use is all I'm saying.
_
John Bowles
From: Sean Martin
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:16:45 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 S
[mailto:john_bow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
Is there any reason that MS hasn't made this more of an automated process
without going into PS and ripping through the command line while you're
th their new puppy. Just my opinion.
>
> _
> John Bowles
>
> --
> *From:* Michael B. Smith
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:30:32 AM
> *Subject:* RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
>
> See, I fa
e.com]
Sent: 11 March 2009 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
When I recommend someone to deploy SCR, I recommend identical
hardware.
The general goal of SCR is fault tolerance and site resilience.
The SCR hardware can’t take over if it can’t handle
2008 for example.
I'm with you on the automation front. J
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: 11 March 2009 15:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
See, I fall directly into the "database portability"
thing ahead of time! The
only downtime is DNS TTL across sites and you have the same issue with
single-node clusters. (Granted, this presumes Outlook 2007 or higher in the
environment.)
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
When I recommend someone to deploy SCR, I recommend identical hardware.
The general goal of SCR is fault tolerance and site resilience. The SCR
hardware can't take over if it can't handle the load.
When I recommend someone to deploy SCR, I recommend identical hardware.
The general goal of SCR is fault tolerance and site resilience. The SCR
hardware can't take over if it can't handle the load.
IMHO. YMMV.
From: 8400...@gmail.com [mailto:8400...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of jond
Sent: We
14 matches
Mail list logo
