Message-
From: bounce-8462960-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8462960-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Davies,Matt
Sent: 20 March 2009 21:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
I'm surprised I have never seem this error before exchange
put a user name to your violators? Did you match the GUID somehow?
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
Seems this turned into a b-ch fest rather than
Another quick question. Is there any way to see how close we are to the 32k
hard limit today?
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
Seems this turned
?
--
*From:* Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2009 1:05 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Named Property Limit
Seems this turned into a b-ch fest rather than answering your original
question...;-) While I agree
received this e-mail in error please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it.
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: 20 March 2009 12:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Another quick
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Set your limit to somewhat less than the hard limit as per the technet
articles and wait for your eventlog to fill up :-)
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T.
Services Division
that will strip all x-headers from incoming internet
email.
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Set your limit to somewhat less than the hard limit as per the technet
, 32,000
could very soon become depleted when we implement exchange 2007.
I hope Microsoft are planning on resolving this..
Cheers
Matt
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: 20 March 2009 16:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
on resolving this..
Cheers
Matt
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: 20 March 2009 16:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Set your limit to somewhat less than the hard limit as per the technet
articles and wait for your
I'm surprised I have never seem this error before exchange 2003
Perhaps there is hope after all
-Original Message-
From: James Wells [mailto:jam...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 March 2009 20:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
This is not new in Exchange 2007
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)
S
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re
2009 12:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
I agree about it getting worse as it gets better I was shocked by the
whole powershell thing I know some people love it, but I think it
stinks. Hello 1960' I had to move a mailbox in the lab the other day
from Exchange 2007
: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)
S
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS
One of the things that seems to contribute are X- headers on inbound
mail - each new X-header is a new named property.
Want to DoS someone? Send them emails with new X-headers - lots of
different ones.
Spam seems to accumulate them, for one.
Just looking at your message from the list, I see 4
Is there a way to limit these X-headers, or find out what is causing so many?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
One of the things that seems to contribute
rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com wrote:
Is there a way to limit these X-headers, or find out what is causing so many?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
One of the things
Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)
S
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
I don't have an answer for you on that.
I suppose
I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database. YIKES!
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Troy Meyer troy.me...@monacocoach.com wrote:
I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database. Â YIKES!
Wow, you're not kidding. I'm surprised they don't ask you to cut
down a tree with a herring.
-- Ben
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine
19 matches
Mail list logo
