Re: Sanity check

2012-11-02 Thread Candee
** ** *From:* Candee [mailto:can...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:33 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Sanity check ** ** Apparently my server is sending it every eleven minutes, and the appliance is generating the NDR. It seems the message

RE: Sanity check

2012-11-01 Thread Michael B. Smith
I would look in the Connectivity logs to verify, but sounds like it. From: Candee [mailto:can...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 12:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Sanity check Exchange 2010 - fully patched; Outlook 2010 on the user's end. One user is getting the same

Re: Sanity check

2012-11-01 Thread Candee
Issues *Subject:* Sanity check ** ** Exchange 2010 - fully patched; Outlook 2010 on the user's end. One user is getting the same NDR every eleven minutes. I don't see any corresponding events in any of the event logs (2 CAS servers, 2 MBX servers). The tracking logs have Receive

RE: Sanity check

2012-11-01 Thread Campbell, Rob
What do the headers look like? Was the NDR issued by your server, or was it accepted and then rejected farther downstream? From: Candee [mailto:can...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 12:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sanity check Okay, so I was wrong. There's

RE: Sanity check

2012-11-01 Thread Alice Goodman
See if a smart phone is involved. I have had that experience here. Alice From: Candee [mailto:can...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sanity check Apparently my server is sending it every eleven minutes, and the appliance

RE: licensing sanity check

2012-01-10 Thread Michael B. Smith
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: licensing sanity check Online Archive in Exchange 2010 requires Enterprise CALs, not Standard, correct? The server itself can be Standard, it's the User/Device CALs that matter ...? Having a disagreement with a licensing rep, think I'm right, want to double

Re: licensing sanity check

2012-01-10 Thread Webster
Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:32:17 + To: Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: licensing sanity check Online Archive in Exchange 2010

RE: licensing sanity check

2012-01-10 Thread Reische Jay
Exchange Administrator Messaging, AD and DNS team Phone: 309-748-4704 reische...@johndeere.commailto:reische...@johndeere.com From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: licensing sanity check Online Archive

PTR Sanity Check and Failover

2011-08-12 Thread Harry Singh
All - Is it RFC Compliant or looked down upon by Anti-SPAM vendors to assign different IP's to the same host name for PTR records? I'm working on documenting soft failover scenarios when the primary ISP link goes down temporarily and all traffic is routed through a backup ISP link. A separate

RE: PTR Sanity Check and Failover

2011-08-12 Thread Simon Butler
a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 August 2011 12:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PTR Sanity Check and Failover All - Is it RFC Compliant

Re: PTR Sanity Check and Failover

2011-08-12 Thread Harry Singh
://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ ** ** Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 12 August 2011 12:52 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* PTR Sanity Check and Failover ** ** All

RE: PTR Sanity Check and Failover

2011-08-12 Thread Simon Butler
as it allows them to “learn” about your email. Simon. From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 August 2011 13:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: PTR Sanity Check and Failover Thanks for the information Simon. We currently use Postini for inbound mail and will look

partial DAG restore, two of four dbs, sanity check

2011-01-18 Thread Rick Berry
Had a spate of drive failures across a three-server DAG last week (poweredge t710 firmware took out four drives across three machines inside of 24 hour period). I'm back up and running/healed ... but on one of the three, they'd like to take the opportunity to test their Backup Exec 2010

RE: partial DAG restore, two of four dbs, sanity check

2011-01-18 Thread Michael B. Smith
, two of four dbs, sanity check Had a spate of drive failures across a three-server DAG last week (poweredge t710 firmware took out four drives across three machines inside of 24 hour period). I'm back up and running/healed ... but on one of the three, they'd like to take the opportunity

Disk upgrade plan - sanity check, plus another bonus question

2010-08-02 Thread Kurt Buff
All, Win2k3 R2 SP2, patched, E2k3 SP2 patched. C: - RIAD1 73gb OS only E: - RAID1 73gb Exchange Logs only F: - RAID1 300gb Exchange databases only All SAS 10k drives in a Dell 2950 with 3gb RAM E: and F: are filling up. I've purchased two 600gb SAS 15k drives from Dell and plan the following:

Re: Disk upgrade plan - sanity check, plus another bonus question

2010-08-02 Thread Sean Martin
It's been awhile since I've had to do this, but isn't there a process for replacing each drive in the mirror one at a time, extend the Virtual Disk, and then use DiskPart to extend the volume in Windows? I guess I would also question why the mirror holding your logs is filling up? Are you running

Re: Disk upgrade plan - sanity check, plus another bonus question

2010-08-02 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:46, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: It's been awhile since I've had to do this, but isn't there a process for replacing each drive in the mirror one at a time, extend the Virtual Disk, and then use DiskPart to extend the volume in Windows? I guess I would

Exch. 2007 OOF sanity check.

2008-10-22 Thread Kennedy, Jim
I am not sure why I have gotten myself so confused on the Exchange 2007 out of office settings, but I have. Two Mailbox servers, and one doing Client Access and Hub all with SP1. No edge server. I want to allow internal OOF's but not external OOF's Under Organization Configuration/Hub