Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Boggis, Josh
Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does a manual scan of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down all their attachments and go through them one by one. If some default policy is set to

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Jason Gurtz
> Gee only 8 OOOs. It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn s

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Jason Gurtz
> Gee a little testy are we Jason? Sorry, I'm old school ;) For the love of all that is good, this is an administrators list not some AOL chatroom. I know it's MS related but still... > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have > the luxury of configuring their Exch

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells them. ;-) On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gee a little testy are we Jason? > > As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the > luxury of configuring their E

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
Gee a little testy are we Jason? As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the luxury of configuring their Exchange servers not to do this, company policy has dictated it to them, so to say that they should be unsubscribed from the list is a little harsh. I am one of t

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Stephan Barr
Gee only 8 OOOs. From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Symantec has been heavy on the client and the server for quite a

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Stephan Barr
Cheers. From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin?

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
I dont let users perform any type of manual scans. They could unexpectedly put a load on anything. On Jan 28, 2008 3:16 PM, Boggis, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I > am concerned about the load put on the serv

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Salvador Manzo
On 1/28/08 12:56 PM, "Jason Gurtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gee only 8 OOOs. > > It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly > configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to > standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm f

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Jason Gurtz
> Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or > out of spec. > > And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that > it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. I guess that's why searching for 'stopping "out of office" "mailing lists"'

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Don Andrews
Hmm, good point (about solicited) - I don't like 'em either but can deal with them. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or out of spec. And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. On Jan 28, 2008 4:20 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, the in

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Tom Strader
Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 5:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load On 1/28/08 12:56 PM, "Jason Gurtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gee only 8 OOOs. > > It's been posted inn

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-30 Thread Joe Heaton
Sorry ME2, did you say something? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load And he wonders why people arent listing to him

RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-02-01 Thread Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
es." Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Sorry ME2, did you say something? Joe Heaton -Original Message- From: Mi

Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-02-02 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
nday, January 28, 2008 1:11 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load > > And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells > them. ;-) > > > On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Back on Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-28 Thread Sam Cayze
I have it installed, but manual scans do not force an Outlook scan (nor do scheduled ones). The outlook pluggin is realtime only. (open/Send/Receive, etc). You really want an Exchange aware scanner that can scan your entire database. (Not file level scanners!). Like other said, use the admin

RE: Back on Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load

2008-01-30 Thread Joe Heaton
min Issues Subject: Back on Subject: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load I have it installed, but manual scans do not force an Outlook scan (nor do scheduled ones). The outlook pluggin is realtime only. (open/Send/Receive, etc). You really want an Exchange aware scanner that can scan your entir