OK - no problem. Static IP addresses work fine. Probably the easiest
way to get it going is to run InteractiveBastille, answer the questions,
have it turn on NAT for you and secure your network at the same time.
HTH
Brian
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 14:51, faisal gillani wrote:
>
> well i have this
thanks for the reply freind just help me a little more & tell me what is this InteractiveBastille
is ti present in the default installation of mandrake ? mandrake cd ? tell me where i can find it ?
also is it GUI ?
thanks
Faisal
Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK - no problem. St
It's on the Mandrake CD's. If you run the software manager and search
for bastille, you'll find it. It's sort of GUI, but is really just a
series of questions with lots of explanatory text, to allow you to set
up firewall rules without needing to know much. It also takes you
through other possi
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:41:56 -0700 Larry Sword <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The most cost effective would be by using Samba. But looks like you are
> looking for an external hardware server that connects to your hub or
> switch and allows the printer to connect via a parallels port on the
> se
Thanks a LOT !!!
Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's on the Mandrake CD's. If you run the software manager and searchfor bastille, you'll find it. It's sort of GUI, but is really just aseries of questions with lots of explanatory text, to allow you to setup firewall rules without need
Check your permissions on the wcal directory. You will want to chmod the
directory 755 and the perl script 755.
On Saturday 20 April 2002 16:56, you wrote:
> I've got a web calendar application that I'm trying to install on my
> server, but I'm having a bit of a snag. I want to stall the variou
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:26:02 -0500
Jason Guidry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any way to input multiple postscript files through ps2pdf and
> have them output to one pdf? the man page mentions nothing of this.
>
> Is there any other program that will do this?
>
> thanks
>
> --
>
Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:41:56 -0700 Larry Sword <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>The most cost effective would be by using Samba. But looks like you are
>>looking for an external hardware server that connects to your hub or
>>switch and allows the printer to connect vi
The Netgear PS110 print server is also a very good choice. I went thru
two of the Linksys printservers, and never got either one of them to
work. Of course maybe the store I purchased them from had a bad batch.
I own alot of Linksys equipment, and never had a problem with any of
it. The Ne
hi:
i test my hardware (hp lc2000) with mandrake 8.1 and 8.2.
the hardware database say this machine is certified with 8.1.
i know with machine has cdrom problem with 8.1 default install
(cause by serverworks chipset). but i don't know where to report
this problem, so i mail to "[EMAIL P
Brandon Long grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Check your permissions on the wcal directory. You will want to chmod the
> directory 755 and the perl script 755.
That stuff is pretty basic, and I had already checked it before posting my
message. :-) But thanks for the suggestion anyway.
Just f
In order to get the test-cgi script
in cgi-bin to work, I had to modify the commonhttpd.conf
setting to look like the 8.1 commonhttpd.conf settings:
# Options -All -Multiviews
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
# Order deny,allow
# Deny from all
Oh, and I had to do a "chmod
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:26:02 -0500
Jason Guidry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any way to input multiple postscript files through ps2pdf and
> have them output to one pdf? the man page mentions nothing of this.
>
> Is there any other program that will do this?
>
> thanks
>
> --
>
On Sunday 21 April 2002 12:48, you wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:26:02 -0500
>
> Jason Guidry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way to input multiple postscript files through ps2pdf and
> > have them output to one pdf? the man page mentions nothing of this.
> >
> > Is there any other
Ok, this is an odd one. How do you know if mod_perl is actually active in
your Apache server? Or better yet, how to be sure that it *is*? I've got
the various mod_perl .rpm files loaded in my system, but when I use the
test-cgi and printenv scripts on my server, I see no mention of mod_perl
Unfortunately Civ3 doesn't work yet. As a transgaming subscriber, I vote for
it every time, though...
-- Stephen
On Friday 19 April 2002 05:49 pm, Robert Fargher wrote:
> Well, so far with WineX 2, none of Civ 3 or either Serious Sams run. They
> all install OK but won't run.
Want to buy y
On Sun Apr 21, 2002 at 11:01:50AM +0900, Gavin wrote:
> I did an update from a clean install (running Mandrake linux8.0) and this is
> what I got back the next morning.
>
> Security Warning: Change in Suid Root files found :
> - Added suid root files : /usr/lib/squid/pam_auth
>
Hi
On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:20, David Guntner wrote:
> Ok, this is an odd one. How do you know if mod_perl is actually active in
> your Apache server? Or better yet, how to be sure that it *is*? I've got
> the various mod_perl .rpm files loaded in my system, but when I use the
> test-cgi an
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 22:05, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:00:29 -0500 Jason Guidry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > It looks like someone has decided that I don't have enough headaches and
> >
> > has started sending me viri. Normally this would not bother me, but the
>
I bought one of those cheap ATI TV Wonder VE cards at CompUSA today.
It installed OK (I had to create /dev/video0 by hand, though) and it
autodetected the channels and I get great video, but no sound.
I'm at a loss as to what to do for sound.
I'm using Mandrake 8.2 and an Ensoniq PCI soundcard
udo rader grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> you don't need mod_perl to run ordinary perl scripts. mod_perl is just a
> way to integrate perl scripts more deeply (and much faster) into a
> running apache.
Exactly. So how does one tell if mod_perl is part of the running server,
when it doesn't sh
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 15:18, Stephen Boulet wrote:
> Unfortunately Civ3 doesn't work yet. As a transgaming subscriber, I vote for
> it every time, though...
>
> -- Stephen
The damn rpg's are always taking a hit, too. I've been voting for
better BG2 support for ages now, and the last vote that
J. Craig Woods wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 22:05, Pierre Fortin wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:00:29 -0500 Jason Guidry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It looks like someone has decided that I don't have enough headaches and
>>>
>>>has started sending me viri. Normally this would not
David Guntner wrote:
>udo rader grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
>>you don't need mod_perl to run ordinary perl scripts. mod_perl is just a
>>way to integrate perl scripts more deeply (and much faster) into a
>>running apache.
>>
>
>Exactly. So how does one tell if mod_perl is part of the running
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 15:37, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> >
> > Original URL:
> >
> > http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/04/19/0053224&mode=nocomment&tid=5
> >
> > Now, can any of us hotshots here get the newer AOL's working?
> >
> > L8R
>
> Woa! Damn this is, by and far,
Lyvim Xaphir said onto me:
> P.S. how goes the "owner/permission" situation? Did you resolve it? Let
> me know if you need some assistance in scripting some kind of fix.
>
> Dr John
(sigh) Well, I ended up reinstalling. (this was two months ago,
actually
Kwan Lowe grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> David Guntner wrote:
> >
> >Exactly. So how does one tell if mod_perl is part of the running server,
> >when it doesn't show up in test-cgi or printenv?
>
> Try running the apache httpd process directly with:
> httpd -l
>
> This should show the com
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 20:14, David wrote:
> Does not MSEC, if set to the appropriate level, check and correct
> less-than-optimal file permissions and ownerships?
>
> Or maybe I got it all wrong.
>
> --
> °°°
> Da
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:14, David wrote:
> Lyvim Xaphir said onto me:
>
>
> > P.S. how goes the "owner/permission" situation? Did you resolve it? Let
> > me know if you need some assistance in scripting some kind of fix.
> >
> > Dr John
>
> (sigh) Well, I ended up r
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 17:49, Jason Guidry wrote:
>
> do the headers of the mail you are getting match any of the mail you are
> getting? I'm suspicious of a BBS i posted to about sheetmusic available
> on my website. I think I'm gonna contact the guy in charge and
> compare IPs. I realise
On Sunday 21 April 2002 10:46 am, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> Hoyt wrote:
> >I bought one of those cheap ATI TV Wonder VE cards at CompUSA today.
> >
> >It installed OK (I had to create /dev/video0 by hand, though) and it
> >autodetected the channels and I get great video, but no sound.
>
> I have the same
This is an interesting thread that can be educational for anyone that
wishes to follow... it is a bit off-topic and we can take it offline if
it bothers anyone...
Jason & DrJ,
Can you guys send me, privately, the headers of these messages...? I'm a
bit of a sleuth and am curious about this one
Just a vote to keeping the discussion on-line -- I'd like to try to
follow it.
Randy Kramer
Pierre Fortin wrote:
> This is an interesting thread that can be educational for anyone that
> wishes to follow... it is a bit off-topic and we can take it offline if
> it bothers anyone...
Want to bu
Yeah, keep it going. It might help me understand why I keep sending great
amounts of spam to myself.
-- cmg
On Sunday 21 April 2002 10:14 pm, Randy Kramer wrote:
> Just a vote to keeping the discussion on-line -- I'd like to try to
> follow it.
>
> Randy Kramer
>
> Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > This
Hi I'm in the way of develop in Java, In order to do it I'm looking for
a good IDE of Java for Linux Mandrake
Any comment will be appreciated
TIA
Nicolas Gomez
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
At 08:51 PM 4/21/02, you wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:14, David wrote:
>
> >
> > Does not MSEC, if set to the appropriate level, check and correct
> less-than-optimal file permissions and ownerships?
> >
> > Or maybe I got it all wrong.
>
>That a very good question, Dave. Would be nice to hav
On all previous verisons of mdk i've used from 7.0 on I've built src
rpms(rpm --rebuild) and they always came out i686. Now on 8.2 they end
up i586. I run my own vanilla kernels (like I always have b4) that are
built as march=i686. How can I get rpm --rebuild to pop out i686 rpms?
--
Chad Young
Pierre Fortin wrote:
> This is an interesting thread that can be educational for anyone that
> wishes to follow... it is a bit off-topic and we can take it offline if
> it bothers anyone...
>
Well it looks like some votes are in for learning, and that is always a
good thing. And, after all, th
Yea, but isn't it cool to have TV working like a charm in Linux? :)
Hoyt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Sunday 21 April 2002 10:46 am, Kwan Lowe wrote:
Hoyt wrote:
I bought one of those cheap ATI TV Wonder VE cards at CompUSA today.It installed OK (I had to create /dev/video0
Sony laptop PCG-SR7K, external CD-ROM drive PCGA-CD51
Install disk 1 boots, but soon stops with error about cannot find install
media. I get a list of drivers to try. Which one do I use? Or, how can I
install?
This computer has Windows 2000. I used Partition Magic to create a 3GB
partition fo
On Sunday 21 April 2002 11:57 pm, lorne wrote:
> Yea, but isn't it cool to have TV working like a charm in Linux? :)
Well, a relative charm, but much, much easier than just a year ago.
I did have to create the /dev/entries manually -- not an easy task if a
newbie were faced with it (they might
If you are running a recent MDK release (8.x) check to see if an httpd
is listening on port 8080. MDK for performance reasons that don't
affect most users put mod_perl as part of a secondary httpd process
(statically linked) that listens in on port 8080 and is proxied as the
port 80's /perl direc
To build rpms as root:
In /root/.rpmrc :
buildarchtranslate: i386: i686
buildarchtranslate: i486: i686
buildarchtranslate: i586: i686
buildarchtranslate: i686: i686
If you want to build rpms as a normal user:
In ~/.rpmrc :
buildarchtranslate: i386: i686
buildarchtranslate: i486: i686
buildarcht
I don't know what you define as good, but you can use Borland's JBuilder
for Linux. Works like the Windows version as it's Java based itself.
Enjoy,
Woody
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 20:37, ngn wrote:
> Hi I'm in the way of develop in Java, In order to do it I'm looking for
> a good IDE of
On April 21, 2002 03:47 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>
> The damn rpg's are always taking a hit, too. I've been voting for
> better BG2 support for ages now, and the last vote that was cast it lost
> by 1 vote. I'm waiting to see if that will change, or if the rpg's are
> going to always get dumped o
try LC_ALL=pt_PT
JG
Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
> Hi JG, thank you for your attention. Here goes what I have installed:
>
> rpm -qa|grep locale
> locales-2.3.1-7mdk
> locales-en-2.3.1-7mdk
> locales-fr-2.3.1-7mdk
> locales-es-2.3.1-7mdk
> locales-pt-2.3.1-7mdk
>
> Still no success.
>
>
Here is an explanation of the Klez virus. Note that based on the
explanation below, an open relay is not required. The virus can simply
using it's own SMTP engine contact the recipient's email server and drop
the email which is perfectly 'legal' (meaning within SMTP rules as
defined by the RFCs
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 00:33, Woody Green wrote:
> Here is an explanation of the Klez virus. Note that based on the
> explanation below, an open relay is not required. The virus can simply
> using it's own SMTP engine contact the recipient's email server and drop
> the email which is perfectly 'l
Add --target i686, so your rpm line would look like:
rpm --rebuild --target i686
Michael
--
Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Manager of IT Solutions
KAMedData.com, Inc -- Focused and Relevant
At 12:44 AM 4/22/2002 -0300, you wrote:
>On all previous verisons of mdk i've used from 7.0 on I've
hmm. not to worry, it's not someone intentionally sending you a virus...
it's the latest Outlook/Outlook Express ... ummm "undocumented feature". it's a new
virus that's been breaking out recently. i've alreeady got 10 different kinds of it..
it changes a lot, but it's always the same method.
Damian G wrote:
>
> but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person, virtually
> everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
>
> HTH
SHEESH!
Why in hell would I worry about a virus written for a windoze machine
running outlook? I don't do windoze. You
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:28:40 -0300
Damian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:31:37 +0900
> "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > check winex.sf.net
> > u can use the CVS version before you go out and buy the full verison if
> > u like it.
> >
> > jG
>
> i AM using the
52 matches
Mail list logo
