Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3682 days Vincent Danen wrote: > On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 02:04:29AM -0500, Vox wrote: > >> >> > translations, the better. I will refuse none (other than perhaps >> >> > klingon!) >> >> >> >> Come on! klingon translations are important! :) >> > >> > Not to me... =) I'd ra

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3682 days Vincent Danen wrote: > On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 06:13:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > >> > Wanna do a wookie translation? =) >> >> I could offer a Kenny translation for all SouthPark addicts... > > lol. > > I kinda think we should stop this now... this is get

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 06:13:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > Wanna do a wookie translation? =) > > I could offer a Kenny translation for all SouthPark addicts... lol. I kinda think we should stop this now... this is getting *way* OT. But very humorous nonetheless! -- MandrakeSoft Se

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
Vincent Danen schrieb am Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:01:47 -0600: > Wanna do a wookie translation? =) I could offer a Kenny translation for all SouthPark addicts... wobo Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 02:04:29AM -0500, Vox wrote: > >> > translations, the better. I will refuse none (other than perhaps > >> > klingon!) > >> > >> Come on! klingon translations are important! :) > > > > Not to me... =) I'd rather have one in elvish if possible. > > Elvish is good...but

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 11:20:57PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > Look in CVS. > > http://anthill.vmlinuz.ca/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/anthill-0.2/html/backend/language/Anthill.pot > > is the file you want. That's the lastest "skeleton". It's all .po/gettext > > stuff... pretty straightforward. If

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-10-01 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3682 days Vincent Danen wrote: >> > translations, the better. I will refuse none (other than perhaps >> > klingon!) >> >> Come on! klingon translations are important! :) > > Not to me... =) I'd rather have one in elvish if possible. Elvish is good...but it's damn har

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 22:41, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 10:12:10PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > > > Do you need Korean? I might be able to get help from my wife and/or > > > > her friends if things are too Geeky. > > > > > > Absolutely! The more the merrier. Curr

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 11:43:13PM -0500, Vox wrote: > > Absolutely! The more the merrier. Currently I have finished translations > > in russian, finnish, polish, and dutch. The incomplete translations are > > french, italian, spanish, and chinese. I'd love if some folks could step > > forward

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 10:12:10PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > Do you need Korean? I might be able to get help from my wife and/or > > > her friends if things are too Geeky. > > > > Absolutely! The more the merrier. Currently I have finished translations > > in russian, finnish, po

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 06:38:11AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > translations in russian, finnish, polish, and dutch. The incomplete > > translations are french, italian, spanish, and chinese. I'd love if > > some folks could step forward and help finish those four languages > > (since it's

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 21:16, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 08:22:34PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > > > > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully > > > > > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) > > > > > but... > >

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3681 days Vincent Danen wrote: > On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 08:22:34PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > >> > > > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully >> > > > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) >> > > > but... >>

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
Vincent Danen schrieb am Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:16:56 -0600: > > Absolutely! The more the merrier. Currently I have finished > translations in russian, finnish, polish, and dutch. The incomplete > translations are french, italian, spanish, and chinese. I'd love if > some folks could step forward

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 08:22:34PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully > > > > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) > > > > but... > > > > > > Arrghhh! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. >

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 30, 2003 at 08:20:51PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > > > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > > > (self included) who've been asking for this I'd like to possibly hold > > > so

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:01, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > > > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully > > > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) > > > but... > > > > Arrghhh

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 08:43, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 04:52:43PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > > (self included) who've been as

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 08:42:50PM -0700, Eric Huff wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill > > >bug tracking system going to be available/used? > > > > This is part of the reason I've been so busy in the last 2 weeks.. > > doing some frantic bug squishing

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-30 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:42, Eric Huff wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill > > >bug tracking system going to be available/used? > > > > This is part of the reason I've been so busy in the last 2 weeks.. > > doing some frantic bug squishing in the Anthil

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Eric Huff
> >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill > >bug tracking system going to be available/used? > > This is part of the reason I've been so busy in the last 2 weeks.. > doing some frantic bug squishing in the Anthill code to make it > ready. So, will there be aplace to

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 12:16:59PM -0600, Charlie M. wrote: > > It was a little booboo on Jack's part. The gpg upload works fine. > > When we aren't making little boo-boos we probably aren't doing anything. ain't that the truth... =) > Yesterday when I cooked my friend's box I(-; > > Gott

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 29, 2003 12:13 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 11:42:08AM -0600, Charlie M. wrote: > > > gnupg key upload seems broken? It uploads the key, then says no keyfile > > > uploaded. filename was jcoates-pubkey.asc if that helps.

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 11:42:08AM -0600, Charlie M. wrote: > > gnupg key upload seems broken? It uploads the key, then says no keyfile > > uploaded. filename was jcoates-pubkey.asc if that helps. > > > > > ...> > > > > > > > http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/ > > > > ... > > I uploaded mine when I se

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 29, 2003 09:43 am, Vincent Danen wrote: [..] > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully get the > rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) but... > > http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/ > > 9.2 has a

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 29, 2003 09:59 am, Jack Coates wrote: > gnupg key upload seems broken? It uploads the key, then says no keyfile > uploaded. filename was jcoates-pubkey.asc if that helps. > > > ...> > > > > > http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/ > > > ... I upload

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully > > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) > > but... > > Arrghhh! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. > > I was so deeply

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Jack Coates wrote: > gnupg key upload seems broken? It uploads the key, then says no keyfile > uploaded. filename was jcoates-pubkey.asc if that helps. It should work. Can you send me a copy of the file you tried to upload? I uploaded mine when I set it

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 08:50:19AM -0700, Jack Coates wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > > > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > > > (self included) who've been asking for this I'd like to possibly hold > > > some fi

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Jack Coates
gnupg key upload seems broken? It uploads the key, then says no keyfile uploaded. filename was jcoates-pubkey.asc if that helps. > ...> > > http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/ > > ... -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to ht

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 08:43, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 04:52:43PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > > (self included) who've been as

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
Vincent Danen schrieb am Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:43:42 -0600: > I was going to wait until this week to mention it (when I hopefully > get the rest of the translations done and can roll out anthill 0.2.4) > but... Arrghhh! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I was so deeply wading through the mu

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Vincent Danen
On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 04:52:43PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote: >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > (self included) who've been asking for this I'd like to possibly hold > some fingers to th

Re: [expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-29 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 28, 2003 05:52 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: > Vincent, > > >I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug > tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many > (self included) who've been asking for th

[expert] Att Vincent.

2003-09-28 Thread James Sparenberg
Vincent, I preparation for the coming of 9.2, is the proposed Anthill bug tracking system going to be available/used? Since there are so many (self included) who've been asking for this I'd like to possibly hold some fingers to the fire so to speak to possibly recruit some help if you need it