Re: Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-04-15 Thread Jim Dawson
2 21:30:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 22:20, James wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:59:36 -0900 > civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote and hopefully I read right: > > > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-04-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 22:20, James wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:59:36 -0900 > civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote and hopefully I read right: > > > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > > > Civileme > > When Gates said "security is now pr

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-04-10 Thread James
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:59:36 -0900 civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote and hopefully I read right: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > Civileme When Gates said "security is now priortiy 1 at MS" he didn't mean secure codeing, he meant runnin

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-31 Thread Damian
El dom, 31-03-2002 a las 13:49, Damian escribió: > > > REDMOND, WA -- In what analysts call an inevitable crisis, Microsoft has > > postponed release of Windows PU, the next version of its flagship > > operating system. Insiders say that the problem is due to the fact that > > no one in Redmond h

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-31 Thread Michael Holt
Yesterday... FemmeFatale ran for the door shrieking: >That is... sad. And disgusting. Damn I hate M$ more & more when I hear >stuff about their BS tactics. > >Jaws indeed. I hope someday that M$ goes down to a more manageable size >& gets some real competition. Be it linux or something else.

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-31 Thread Damian
> REDMOND, WA -- In what analysts call an inevitable crisis, Microsoft has > postponed release of Windows PU, the next version of its flagship > operating system. Insiders say that the problem is due to the fact that > no one in Redmond has any ideas for improvements. Some have suggested > reliab

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread FemmeFatale
Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 02:59, civileme wrote: > > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > > > Civileme > > Civ, > > I just got another newsflash that you might find interesting. > > Excerpt-- > _

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 02:59, civileme wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > Civileme Civ, I just got another newsflash that you might find interesting. Excerpt-- __

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Michael Holt
Yesterday... civileme ran for the door shrieking: >http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > >Why isn't this news exciting? > >Civileme I believe that it was just last year that I heard M$ was trying to make it illegal to announce a security bug in their software??? You're just supp

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Jason Guidry
civileme wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > Civileme > Well, I don't know about exciting, but it helps me out as an evangelist. My mom is now happily using LM8.1 because of this type of attitude. Certainly not suprising if anyof

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:12 -0500, James T. Nelson III wrote: > "...Its publication may cause our customers needless confusion and > apprehension or possibly even put them at risk," > > Well, I don't think I'd call their customer's apprehension "needless" > (or their confusion either) :-) I

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread James T. Nelson III
"...Its publication may cause our customers needless confusion and apprehension or possibly even put them at risk," Well, I don't think I'd call their customer's apprehension "needless" (or their confusion either) :-) civileme wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Dennis Myhand
Why isn't this news a surprise to anyone who has read any of the security sheet over the last 4 years? Peace, Dennis in Victoria civileme wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > Civileme > > > > -

Re: [expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-30 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:59:36 -0900, civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ > > Why isn't this news exciting? > > Civileme That is so damn funny! What I love most are the comments from M$: "responsible security researchers work with the vendor of

[expert] OT--And now for the comic relief

2002-03-29 Thread civileme
http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2199/020329nt2000hole/ Why isn't this news exciting? Civileme Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com