I've tried that and it does not work, the chip in ESS ES56CVM-PI is
ESS198x, not a 2xxx series DSP chip so were left out in the cold so to
speak. You can actually fry your modem with the wrong driver.
Seppo Jarvinen , [EMAIL PROTECTED]Never trust an operating system
GSM+SMS +358 50 340 7350
Yup, kind of a love hate thing. Gotta hate the junk, but love the fact
that it doesn't stop the coders from getting around it. And laptop
manufacturers are also to blame, especially those "linux friendly" ones...
--- Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2001 05:17 pm,
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 05:17 pm, Ron Heron escribió:
> Look, there ARE drivers for winmodems. Go to
> http://www.linmodems.org , and you will find it.
..and it's a damn shame too 'cause it only furthers the propagation
of this junk non-hardware that Uncle Billy pushes.
--
Tom B
To all the misinformed:
Look, there ARE drivers for winmodems. Go to http://www.linmodems.org ,
and you will find it. You may not find a solution for all winmodems, but
you will for the popular ones. I have a Compaq Presario 1800 with a
lucent chip, and it works great. So, go to the site, an
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. Woods
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] WinModem ?
>
>
> Seppo Järvinen wrote:
> >
> > You ca
Seppo Järvinen wrote:
>
> You can't, there's no driver for it as it's a WINMODEM that is run by
> software on a DSP chip (Digital Signal Processor).
>
> Seppo Jarvinen , [EMAIL PROTECTED]Never trust an operating system
> GSM+SMS +358 50 340 7350 you don't have sources for.
> GSM
You can't, there's no driver for it as it's a WINMODEM that is run by
software on a DSP chip (Digital Signal Processor).
Seppo Jarvinen , [EMAIL PROTECTED]Never trust an operating system
GSM+SMS +358 50 340 7350 you don't have sources for.
GSM+SMS +358 40 568 1756 Yo
Hi, I have a Asus Notebook with a ESS ES56CVM-PI
Data Fax Voice Modem, How can install this in the Linux Mandrake 8.0 Any
body know ?
EPRO
Hello
I checked winmodem site for linux and it seems that my
modem, a
HSP 56, can work under linux. I have donwloaded the files
and compiled but a lot of errors come out and the module is
not loaded. I think that this is because the modules is for
the 2.2.X series and not for 2.4.X per chance, ha
John Aldrich wrote:
> Right...that's 2.2.4, According to my read, it was kernel
> 2.4.x (at least that's how *I* understood it!) 2.3.18
> might be released, I'm guessing, around Christmas or
My bad, the freeze currently in effect is for 2.4. 2.2.4 was released
a long time ago, and 2.3.1
Ramon Gandia wrote:
>
> Mike Hill wrote:
> >
> > Ive got a CompUSA ad in front of me.
> >
> > I see the following. Best Data 56K V.90 PCI Modem $49.99 with $20.00 mail
> > in rebate. CompUSA part number is #202878 (internal modem by the way)
>
> This is a WinModem. It used to be that ALL PCI
Mike Hill wrote:
>
> Ramon,
>
> Those part numbers are all CompUSA numbers. Not manufacturers numbers.
>
> I only posted the information since some were mentioning modems in the
> compusa ad.
>
> I like the USR Sportster Externals myself!
I am aware they were CompUSA numbers. I wanted to po
Ramon,
Those part numbers are all CompUSA numbers. Not manufacturers numbers.
I only posted the information since some were mentioning modems in the
compusa ad.
I like the USR Sportster Externals myself!
Mike
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > I looked at a best buy ad, but all I see is a Creative WinModem.
>
> All Creative modems are WinModems.
the isa creative labs modem blaster has jumper settings and can
be set. it is net a winmodem I've had them running although they
don't seem to be very consi
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> Ive got a CompUSA ad in front of me.
>
> I see the following. Best Data 56K V.90 PCI Modem $49.99 with $20.00 mail
> in rebate. CompUSA part number is #202878 (internal modem by the way)
>
> They also have a Viking 56K V.90 internal ISA modem. $39.99. Part #
Good rant, well done and informative.
Jeanette
- Original Message -
From: Ramon Gandia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] WinModem question
> 1. WinModems do not work under Linux.
>
>
Mike Hill wrote:
>
> Ive got a CompUSA ad in front of me.
>
> I see the following. Best Data 56K V.90 PCI Modem $49.99 with $20.00 mail
> in rebate. CompUSA part number is #202878 (internal modem by the way)
This is a WinModem. It used to be that ALL PCI modems were
winmodems, however there
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 1999 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: [expert] WinModem question
>
> It was in the sunday ads, which someone has thrown away for me. I may have
> my ads backwards maybe it was bestbuy. Anyways it was an actionte
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>
> It was in the sunday ads, which someone has thrown away for me. I may have
> my ads backwards maybe it was bestbuy. Anyways it was an actiontech isa
> 56k, and was between 25 and 35 dollars.
>
Ahh...probably bestbuy. :-) But they have a website, so
maybe those
John Aldrich wrote:
> >
> Axalonwhat site were you on? I just went to
> www.compusa.net and searched their modems list. The only
> thing they had under about $100 was either external or PCI.
> I couldn't find ANY modems on their "closeout" page. :-(
>
> Is this in one of their catalogs or if
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> >
> > Ok guys, winmodems aren't support, and a driver will never be accepted
> > into the mainstream kernel even if someone were to write it. Alan and
> > Linus have already made statements to this effect. On an upnote
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>
> Ok guys, winmodems aren't support, and a driver will never be accepted
> into the mainstream kernel even if someone were to write it. Alan and
> Linus have already made statements to this effect. On an upnote compusa
> has modems on sale for like 25$.
>
Axalo
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>
> Well, it was more than I really had asked for, but I am really impressed and
> grateful for all of your responses. It is really unfortunate that WinModems
> don't work with linux ( for some people, even a 40$ forkout to a comp
David Comeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > > A couple of weeks ago, some had given a possible setup for a winmodem using the
> > > setserial command. I have lost theat message. Can the person who wrote it
> > > please write back to me directly
Ramon Gandia wrote:
>
> 1. WinModems do not work under Linux.
>
[snip]
> I say, lets keep those damn things away from Linux. We do not
> need those headaches HERE.
>
>
> --
> Ramon Gandia ---Sysadmin --- http://www.nook.net
> 285 West 1st Avenue ISP for Western Alaska
> P.
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Well, I just did a quick browse-through of the mail archive for the
> > "newbie" group and it appears that there is rumors of SOME
> > rudimentary support in kernel 2.4 (considering we're on 2.2.x right
> > now, that's
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Ramon Gandia wrote:
Sorry for the big rant. I can assure you all that as an ISP, the
> proliferation of these "things" has really ruined what would
> otherwise be an enjoyable business. Look in those web pages
> that you get with a search engine and you will see many
David Comeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>
> Well, it was more than I really had asked for, but I am really impressed and
> grateful for all of your responses. It is really unfortunate that WinModems
> don't work with linux ( for some people, even a 40$ forkout to a comp shop is
>
gt; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Comeau
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 2:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [expert] WinModem question
> >
> >
> > I understand, and wholeheartedly agree
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
Well, it was more than I really had asked for, but I am really impressed and
grateful for all of your responses. It is really unfortunate that WinModems
don't work with linux ( for some people, even a 40$ forkout to a comp shop is
too much), but I agree with all of
1. WinModems do not work under Linux.
2. They would work if someone wrote a driver for them.
3. There is a french modem manufacturer that SAYS they will
release a winmodem soon with a Linux driver. It is still
vaporware.
4. WinModems require critical timing (real-time) in order
to handle the d
David Comeau
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 2:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] WinModem question
>
>
> I understand, and wholeheartedly agree, unfortunately, not
> everyone can simply
> throw something for no other reason than it not working with
Wilson
First Law of Optimization: The speed of a nonworking program is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Comeau
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 8:22 AM
From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, I just did a quick browse-through of the mail archive for the
> "newbie" group and it appears that there is rumors of SOME
> rudimentary support in kernel 2.4 (considering we're on 2.2.x right
> now, that's going to be awhile!) Other than that, the o
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > > A couple of weeks ago, some had given a possible setup for a winmodem using the
> > > setserial command. I have lost theat message. Can the person who wrote it
> > > please write back to me
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > A couple of weeks ago, some had given a possible setup for a winmodem using the
> > setserial command. I have lost theat message. Can the person who wrote it
> > please write back to me directly with that message? I am trying to
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> A couple of weeks ago, some had given a possible setup for a winmodem using the
> setserial command. I have lost theat message. Can the person who wrote it
> please write back to me directly with that message? I am trying to help an
> unfortunate friend. Thanking-
A couple of weeks ago, some had given a possible setup for a winmodem using the
setserial command. I have lost theat message. Can the person who wrote it
please write back to me directly with that message? I am trying to help an
unfortunate friend. Thanking-you in advance,
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
38 matches
Mail list logo
