from 50 ohm cable linking between pc's just as well as
apart from 2 ports all
have radios on the end !
cya
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
Co
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 15:52 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I think you can use that netgear card via the "tulip" driver.
>
> -- Asheesh.
No, actually it's the natsemi.o (National Semiconductor).
I use it and everything works and I'm a happy camper after all :)
wobo
--
"... and anyway, an htm
I think you can use that netgear card via the "tulip" driver.
-- Asheesh.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 17:22 schrieben Sie:
> > "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> > I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to
> > v
ECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
>
> "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
>
> Until a
OK, I'm answering to my own mail b/c there's an update:
> Right now I got a cheap NIC called "Netgear FA311 Fast Ethernet PCI
> Card". Problem is, it comes with Linux drivers (!) but only for Red
> Hat 6.x and the given files will not compile b/c the makefile is
> counting on kgcc. Duh... So I ca
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 17:22 schrieben Sie:
> "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
> [snip]
> I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to
> verify...
>
> Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table
> actually makes it to the other machine (basic connectivity),
> rout
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
[snip]
I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table actually makes
it to the other machine (basic connecti
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
[snip]
I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table actually makes
it to the other machine (basic connectivity), routing tables changes are not
going to help (unless the network code i
is 10.0.n.n
If the host address is dynamically assigned , a route from the host to each ethernet
port needs to be entered
and the routing beyound
HTH
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> It would help Wolfgang if you could send the routing table on both machines !
>From Wolfgang's *first* post:
> Desktop:
> 217.5.98.14 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
2001 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> > OK... give us the results of:
> >
> > ping -br 255.255.255.255
> > ping -br 192.168.0.255
>
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> OK... give us the results of:
>
> ping -br 255.255.255.255
> ping -br 192.168.0.255
Desktop (disconnected from internet)
[root@molch wobo]# ping -br 255.255.255.255
connect: Network is unreachable
ifconfig (disconnected from internet) s
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> > OK... give us the results of:
> >
> > ping -br 255.255.255.255
> > ping -br 192.168.0.255
>
> Desktop (disconnected from internet)
>
> [root@molch wobo]# ping -br 255.255.255.255
> connect: Network is unrea
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 19:07 schrieben Sie:
> by means of some power of darkness, when you connect both nics
> trough the cross-cable you are are shutting the electrical signals
> to a very low level, that isn't enough to keep the network
> connection.
>
> this don't happen with the adsl
hello wolfgang!
I've been reading your posts about your network for a few days...
great problem! that is one of these that we write on the notepad to never forget
what we did :-)
let's go...
since arp -a gives nothing, then you have no connection, but each piece in your
setup (cross-cable, not
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> OK... give us the results of:
>
> ping -br 255.255.255.255
> ping -br 192.168.0.255
Desktop (disconnected from internet)
[root@molch wobo]# ping -br 255.255.255.255
connect: Network is unreachable
ifconfig (disconnected from internet) s
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 15:45 schrieb Dave:
> On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 09:12, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > OK, I've spent another 3 hours, even reinstalling the whole
> > desktop pc. It was a fresh installation anyway.
> >
> > I bought a new cross-over cable. I borrowed 2 other NICs from my
> >
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Notebook cannot reach any other destination apart from own eth0 and
> own Io
>
> Desktop cannot reach neither notebook address.
OK... give us the results of:
ping -br 255.255.255.255
ping -br 192.168.0.255
on both machines. If it works, you may something like
m the console command line , none of the permant
routing will be lost, just what you type in , if you reboot
HTH richard
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Bornath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network proble
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 09:12, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> OK, I've spent another 3 hours, even reinstalling the whole desktop
> pc. It was a fresh installation anyway.
>
> I bought a new cross-over cable. I borrowed 2 other NICs from my
> company,
>
> Once again:
>
> Desktop has:
>
> eth0 10.0.
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 02:47 schrieb Pierre:
> PS: Here's one of my old .signature files:
> > "Until you've found *and* fixed a problem, you can NOT discount
> > *any* possibility; what you gratuitously discount will likely be
> > the source of the problem(s)." Pierre Fortin - 199
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 26. November 2001 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> > Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a desktop and a notebook, both connected via cross-over
> > > cable.
> > >
> > > All in all it looks ok to me. But the desktop doesn't ping the
> > > notebook and
Dave said:
> Did you try the traceroute command I gave you? Here it is again:
> /usr/sbin/traceroute 208.20.203.226
>
> Run this in an xterm and watch the results. When your packets stop
As I expected they aren't doing the first hop of the dance.
> At this point, I am suspecting th
Am Montag, 26. November 2001 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a desktop and a notebook, both connected via cross-over
> > cable.
> >
> > All in all it looks ok to me. But the desktop doesn't ping the
> > notebook and vice versa. The notebook can't connect to th
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a desktop and a notebook, both connected via cross-over cable.
>
> All in all it looks ok to me. But the desktop doesn't ping the
> notebook and vice versa. The notebook can't connect to the internet.
> The cable was the last resort but it's ok, I test
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 05:02, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Dave said:
> > I think the next thing I would try to do is traceroute from your laptop,
> > to some IP address on the internet. That way, we can see just where your
> > TCP packets are getting hung up.
>
> First I checked that the network car
hi just a long shot !
check /etc/sysconfig/network
is forwarding set to either yes or true ?... it should be
its very easy to miss
regards
richard
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 04:17, Dave Sherman wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 13:42, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 25. November 2001 17:36
Dave said:
> As long as your desktop is connecting to the Internet ok, then we can
> probably assume everything on that side is setup correctly.
OK
> I think the next thing I would try to do is traceroute from your laptop,
> to some IP address on the internet. That way, we can see just where y
On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 13:42, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. November 2001 17:36 schrieben Sie:
> > Couple of questions for you:
> >
> > 1. Can you ping your own interfaces? That is, from your desktop can
> > you ping each of the cards' IP addresses? Can you ping 127.0.0.1?
> > Can you a
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2001 17:36 schrieben Sie:
> Couple of questions for you:
>
> 1. Can you ping your own interfaces? That is, from your desktop can
> you ping each of the cards' IP addresses? Can you ping 127.0.0.1?
> Can you also ping your laptop's card from itself (the real IP and
> 127.0.
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 20:38, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a desktop and a notebook, both connected via cross-over cable.
> The desktop is connected to internet via ADSL.
>
> Both machines run MDK 8.1
>
> Desktop:
>
> eth0 RealTek RTL-8029 module = ne2k-pci IRQ 12
> eth1 3com
David,
Thank you very much for your help, it took me a while to digect it, plus other
things changed as well.
Most importantly -- DHCP is not the source of my problem. Our computer admins
assigned me a static IP address (with a subnet mask, gateway and 3 DNS servers), but
the story is the same -
Aleksey Naumov wrote:
> David,
>
> thank you for your help. I still can't resolve my problem (see below)...
>
> David Rankin wrote:
>
> > Aleksey Naumov wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Mandrake experts!
> > >
> > > I've just installed Mandrake 8.0 on my PII 400MHz HP at work. My
> > > computer is on a
> > >
When it rains, it pours. Someone else just asked the exact same question. I"ve
been through it myself, and so here's what i said:
When i experienced that symptom (timeout), it was because my ISP required that
i pass a hostname with the request: "dhcpcd -h cr843732-a" was the thing it
needed. To m
I'm on a similar campus, but DHCP works fine for me :-D
But that doesn't help you out ; )
I suggest taking the things your Help Desk people told you about (subnet
mask, IP address, etc.) and hard-coding them rather than trying to get
DHCP to automatically configure your settings for you. Offhan
35 matches
Mail list logo
