On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:48 AM, PaliGap wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > I'm not complaining personally about TM. I figured I was
> > always fortunate, as I always had teacher-approved,
> > textbook experiences. TM-Sidhi too. But then again I'd already
> > b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> I'm not complaining personally about TM. I figured I was
> always fortunate, as I always had teacher-approved,
> textbook experiences. TM-Sidhi too. But then again I'd already
> been having experiences since I was a kid. Who knows, maybe I w
Precisely. Mantras are activated by Shakti, which builds up over time through
repetition of various rituals and continual renewal by realized Saints over the
centuries.
Piecemeal detraction of the various components of the Morphogenetic field will
eventually result in a mantra without power.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> ...and yet here you are, year after year, on a site about TM, posting on a
> daily basis.
>
> To me, that says more about the efficacy of TM than anything. If it wasn't
> so good -- particularly in this age when practically no on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> I'm not complaining personally about TM. I figured I was
> always fortunate, as I always had teacher-approved,
> textbook experiences. TM-Sidhi too. But then again I'd
> already been having experiences since I was a kid. Who
> knows, maybe I was
On Feb 21, 2010, at 5:32 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
> ...and yet here you are, year after year, on a site about TM, posting on a
> daily basis.
>
> To me, that says more about the efficacy of TM than anything. If it wasn't so
> good -- particularly in this age when practically no one is starting
On Feb 21, 2010, at 5:33 PM, BillyG wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > The mantras that are recited
> > are no mantras at all.
> > Without the immutable potency that is in the mantras,
> > as their very life and soul (jiva),
> > they are futile like a cloud that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> The mantras that are recited
> are no mantras at all.
> Without the immutable potency that is in the mantras,
> as their very life and soul (jiva),
> they are futile like a cloud that will not rain.
>
> Shiva-sutra-vimarshini
>
So Vaj-That rea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 21, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
> > "Chopra's TM has 108 mantras, TM only 11 or 12"
> >
> > Ergo, Chopra's TM must be better.
> >
> > This is how we bought electric guitars when we were 12 years old: the more
> > knobs
On Feb 21, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Vaj wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Chopra's TM has 108 mantras, TM only 11 or 12"
>>>
>>> Ergo, Chopra's TM must be better.
>>>
>>> This is how we bought electric guitars when we were 12 years old: the more
Vaj wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
>
>> "Chopra's TM has 108 mantras, TM only 11 or 12"
>>
>> Ergo, Chopra's TM must be better.
>>
>> This is how we bought electric guitars when we were 12 years old: the more
>> knobs and buttons the guitar had, the better we assumed
On Feb 21, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
> "Chopra's TM has 108 mantras, TM only 11 or 12"
>
> Ergo, Chopra's TM must be better.
>
> This is how we bought electric guitars when we were 12 years old: the more
> knobs and buttons the guitar had, the better we assumed it was.
Well 108 is
"Chopra's TM has 108 mantras, TM only 11 or 12"
Ergo, Chopra's TM must be better.
This is how we bought electric guitars when we were 12 years old: the more
knobs and buttons the guitar had, the better we assumed it was.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> LINK
>
I'm not sure these are the mantras that Chopra uses. They just happen to number
108.
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:37 PM, shukra69 wrote:
> thanks for info, not so appealing as mantras alone,, om tee namah for a
> mantra? give me the TM mantras instead
In jyotish, these sounds are the first syllables used for naming a child who
was born in a particular pada or quarter in any of the nakshatras.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shukra69" wrote:
>
> thanks for info, not so appealing as mantras alone,, om tee namah for a
> mantra? give me
thanks for info, not so appealing as mantras alone,, om tee namah for a mantra?
give me the TM mantras instead
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, false wrote:
>
> And those 108 are:
>
> http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/vedic-astrology-jyotisha/451732-primordial-sound-meditation.html
>
> T
16 matches
Mail list logo
