--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
No, *you're* defining the success of the movement
in terms of wealth and influence. *He* defines it
as achieving Heaven on Earth, Sat Yuga, the Age
of Enlightenment.
And he's been hugely successful with that, right, Judy? Heaven on Earth
has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
No, *you're* defining the success of the movement
in terms of wealth and influence. *He* defines it
as achieving Heaven on Earth, Sat Yuga, the Age
of
On Feb 16, 2007, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
How convenient, seeing as how he's done whatever he
can to bankrupt the TMO
He's bankrupted the TMO?? I thought the complaint
was that he'd made it richer than Croesus.
No, the complaint has always been he's made *himself* richer than
Croesus,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
How convenient, seeing as how he's done whatever he
can to bankrupt the TMO
He's bankrupted the TMO?? I thought the complaint
was that he'd made it richer than
Don't need to look at marginal cults to find craky whacky ... the
fastest growing religion in the US, fundamentalist christianity, has
plenty. A republican state senator from Texas recently sent out a
mass mailing urging fellow politicians and citizens to read the truth
on this site
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
No, *you're* defining the success of the movement
in terms of wealth and influence. *He* defines it
as achieving Heaven on Earth, Sat Yuga, the Age
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
How convenient, seeing as how he's done whatever he
can to bankrupt the TMO
He's bankrupted the TMO?? I thought the complaint
was that he'd made it richer than
Turq,
Great story about Raquel! She did get deeply into hatha yoga and put
out those videos where you hold positions for a really long time. It
was a tough workout. She showed up as pretty pompous and full of
herself under the pressure of Stuttering John of the Howard Stern
show. That was an
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, authfriend wrote:
No, the complaint has always been he's made *himself* richer than
Croesus,
I didn't think that was taken very seriously by
anyone but the most rabid and irrational of the
TM critics.
Which, according to you, are all critics.
(Accusations
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, authfriend wrote:
No, the complaint has always been he's made *himself* richer than
Croesus,
I didn't think that was taken very seriously by
anyone but the most rabid and
On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, authfriend wrote:
No, the complaint has always been he's made *himself* richer than
Croesus,
I didn't think that was taken very seriously by
anyone but the most rabid and irrational of the
TM critics.
Which,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
snip
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only going
around and around in circles to do that. Viewed from any angle
you
want to--except, perhaps, your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, authfriend wrote:
[...]
Good. And where do you think those funds go? You're just saying the
same thing, but are, once again, unwilling to see what is in front of
you.
A huge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only going
around and around in circles to do that. Viewed from any angle you
want to--except, perhaps, your own--MMY, his family, the TMO, or
whomever you
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only going
around and around in circles to do that. Viewed from any angle you
want to--except, perhaps, your own--MMY,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only
going around and around in circles to do that. Viewed from
any angle you want
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only
going
around and around in circles to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
No, *you're* defining the success of the movement
in terms of wealth and influence.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
You're just saying it's as corrupt as I've been saying, only
going
around and around in circles to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
snip
As to the Maharishi's influence being greater, I think you are on
dangerous ground there. L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology claims to be
much
Well yeah, but it was never really adiscussion on either side. I was merely
reacting to
Paul's
quoting Gurudev about sidhis.
That's what a discussion is, Lawson. One party reacting to what another has
said or
written.
What's your take on my question regarding the Maharishi and
There is a quote from MMY that if L. Ron was in his movement the World
Plan would have been achieved years ago.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well yeah, but it was never really adiscussion on either side. I
was merely reacting to
Paul's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a quote from MMY that if L. Ron was in his
movement the World Plan would have been achieved
years ago.
Just for the record, the genesis of this quote
is that one of the early TMers (from the Hermit
in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
snip
As to the Maharishi's influence being greater, I think you are
on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mean to be facetious. How to judge the success of a
spiritual master -- at least a mass-market one, such as the
Maharishi and L. Ron -- is a thorny issue worthy of
discussion.
Well yeah, but it was never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is a quote from MMY that if L. Ron was in his movement the World
Plan would have been achieved years ago.
Due to his organizational abilities. A pointed hint to MMY's own followers that
most never
got,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well yeah, but it was never really adiscussion on either side. I was merely
reacting to
Paul's
quoting Gurudev about sidhis.
That's what a discussion is, Lawson. One party reacting to what another has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
There is a quote from MMY that if L. Ron was in his
movement the World Plan would have been achieved
years ago.
Just for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
snip
As to the Maharishi's influence being greater, I think you are on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ wrote:
I don't mean to be facetious. How to judge the success of a
spiritual master -- at least a mass-market one, such as the
Maharishi and L. Ron --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
I don't mean to be facetious. How to judge the success of a
spiritual master
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ wrote:
I don't mean to be facetious. How to judge the success of a
spiritual master --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ wrote:
Well yeah, but it was never really adiscussion on either side. I was
merely reacting
to
Paul's
quoting Gurudev about sidhis.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
John: It would seem that Scientology has greater support of nature.
Perhaps we should all become Scientologists, by that logic.
Me: Here is what matters to me in choosing a group. All I've seen in
Scientology is Jenna Elfman who is looking kinda tattered lately,and
Kristy Ally who is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John: It would seem that Scientology has greater support
of nature. Perhaps we should all become Scientologists,
by that logic.
Me: Here is what matters to me in choosing a group. All I've seen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bottom line, I don't believe it's possible to
discern what is and is not support of nature, so
the question just doesn't compute for me. I
think Unfathomable is the course of action makes
a lot more sense.
(That's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
It would seem that Scientology has greater support of nature.
Perhaps we should all
become Scientologists, by that logic.
Bottom line, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You and I disagree on our opinions regarding your master,
the Maharishi.
He isn't my master.
That doesn't make either of us evil.
Of course not. I don't believe in evil.
Certainly opinions aren't evil.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I imagine that you passionately believe in your cause. I don't
imagine that you are evil. Likewise, I believe passionately in my
cause. I wonder if you can imagine that I draw different
conclusions than you
MMY's TMO is whacky, but Scientology is completely
craky, whacky, daffy!
-Peter the Thetan
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John: It would seem that Scientology has greater
support of nature.
Perhaps we should all become Scientologists, by that
logic.
Me: Here is what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ wrote:
I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@ wrote:
Well yeah, but it was never really adiscussion on either side. I was
Lawson,
Could you expand a little on your thought, please? In what ways do you believe
the
Maharishi has grown beyond Guru Dev?
J.
---
John M. Knapp, LMSW
TM-Free Blog: 99 44/100% TM Free!
Google-bomb the TM Org!
Make us #1 on Google
when you link to
http://tmfree.blogspot.com!
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lawson,
Could you expand a little on your thought, please? In what ways do you
believe the
Maharishi has grown beyond Guru Dev?
Well, the original context was Paul's posting of Gurudev's comments on siddhis.
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lawson,
Could you expand a little on your thought, please? In what ways do
you believe the
Maharishi has grown beyond Guru Dev?
Well, the original context was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
Lawson,
Could you expand a little on your thought, please? In what ways
do
you believe the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered no_reply@
wrote:
Lawson,
Could you expand a little on your thought, please? In what ways do
you believe the
I agree with you on not being able to judge whether one is more enlightened
than the
other. I find I know next to nothing about Guru Dev -- other than Paul Mason's
work in
translating satsangs and one book, which I think was called The Real Thing,
which I read
many years ago.
As to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
As to the Maharishi's influence being greater, I think you are on
dangerous ground there. L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology claims to be
much larger than the Maharishi's movement, although they started
around the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, taskcentered [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you on not being able to judge whether one is more enlightened
than the
other. I find I know next to nothing about Guru Dev -- other than Paul
Mason's work in
translating satsangs and one book, which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guru Dev (Maharishi's guru) speaks on 'siddhis'
translated into English
http://tmfree.blogspot.com/
Though MMY will never admit it, he surpassed his Master many decades ago.
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the mysterious
powers - the siddhis arising out of yogic perfection and hard penances,
which he has undergone throughout his life.' - Brahmachari Mahesh,
October 1952.
Note in particular the words 'yogic perfection'.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the mysterious
powers - the siddhis arising out of yogic perfection and hard penances,
which he has undergone throughout his life.' - Brahmachari Mahesh,
October
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the mysterious
powers - the siddhis arising out of yogic perfection and hard
penances,
which he has undergone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the
mysterious
powers - the siddhis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the
mysterious
powers - the siddhis
You assert that MMY has surpassed Guru Dev. I point out that even
fifty years ago MMY perceived Guru Dev to have 'yogic perfection'.
Why should he have changed his mind?
And why change the subject? It is not my opinion that is in
contention it is yours.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You assert that MMY has surpassed Guru Dev. I point out that even
fifty years ago MMY perceived Guru Dev to have 'yogic perfection'.
Why should he have changed his mind?
Who said he'd changed his mind? Not Lawson,
Ho.
Lawson English posting on google group AMT tells us, referring to
Guru Dev:
'Like I said on FFL: MMY, though he will never acknowledge the fact,
surpassed his Master many decades ago.'
'And I know insider stories that you don't know and couldn't know
unless you have Indian friends with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ho.
Lawson English posting on google group AMT tells us, referring to
Guru Dev:
'Like I said on FFL: MMY, though he will never acknowledge the
fact,
surpassed his Master many decades ago.'
'And I know insider
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
'He combines in himself the knowledge of the Self with the mysterious
powers - the siddhis arising
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You assert that MMY has surpassed Guru Dev. I point out that even
fifty years ago MMY perceived Guru Dev to have 'yogic perfection'.
Why should he have changed his mind?
And why change the subject? It is not my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
'He combines in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
'He combines in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
Ho.
Lawson English posting on google group AMT tells us, referring to
Guru Dev:
'Like I said on FFL: MMY, though he will never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
Ho.
Lawson English posting on google group AMT tells us, referring
to
Despite the fact that I come from a society without a guru tradition,
I can spot the difference between a spiritual guru and a confidence
trickster, in my opinion Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is the latter.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Despite the fact that I come from a society without a guru
tradition, I can spot the difference between a spiritual guru
and a confidence trickster, in my opinion Maharishi Mahesh
Yogi is the latter.
Doesn't speak so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
wrote:
Despite the fact that I come from a society without a guru
tradition, I can spot the difference between a spiritual guru
and a confidence
For all we know Mahesh was a perfectly adequate secretary.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
wrote:
Despite the fact that I come from a society without a guru
tradition, I can spot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
premanandpaul@ wrote:
Ho.
Lawson English posting on google group AMT tells us, referring to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all we know Mahesh was a perfectly adequate secretary.
I guess Gurudev agreed with you.
snort
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as he called him), I suspect he'd be rather
disappointed (or even infuriated) at the damage this person,
supposedly his student, had done to thousands of human beings. Esp.
since he used his name to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all we know Mahesh was a perfectly adequate secretary.
Translation: Paul is too much of a coward to
take a crack at addressing my point.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as he called him), I suspect he'd be
rather disappointed (or even infuriated) at the damage this
person, supposedly his student, had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as he called him), I suspect he'd be
rather disappointed (or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as he called him),
What sterness are we talking about?
I suspect he'd be rather
disappointed (or even infuriated) at the damage
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as he called him),
What sterness are we talking about?
Why,
Did Paul surpass Jesus?
I don't think so.
Would we ever have even heard of Jesus were it not for Paul?
I don't think so.
Why did God choose Paul? Because he was a nice guy?
I don't think so (because Paul was not a nice guy).
So, why did God choose Paul?
In a message dated 2/13/2007 8:13:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did Paul surpass Jesus?
I don't think so.
Would we ever have even heard of Jesus were it not for Paul?
I don't think so.
Why did God choose Paul? Because he was a nice guy?
I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did Paul surpass Jesus?
I don't think so.
Would we ever have even heard of Jesus were it not for Paul?
I don't think so.
Why did God choose Paul? Because he was a nice guy?
In a message dated 2/13/2007 7:38:40 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com)
, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at Mahesh (as
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did Paul surpass Jesus?
I don't think so.
Would we ever have even heard of Jesus were it not for Paul?
I don't think so.
Why did God choose Paul? Because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Given his sexual escapades and the sternness that SBS is known to
have leveled at
Here's one for ya. Hubert Dreyfus of UCBerkeley, one of the great living
philosophers, tells this story. One of his graduate students (Denise D-G, I
assume) once wangled him into getting initiated. During the final night of
checking someone made the mistake of asking him what he thought.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's one for ya. Hubert Dreyfus of UCBerkeley, one of the great living
philosophers, tells
this story. One of his graduate students (Denise D-G, I assume) once wangled
him into
getting initiated. During
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
