[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-08 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one > > can lose > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-08 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > wrote: > > > > > > > If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one > can lose > > > > > it. For example, there was once a trademarked > brand of > > > > > toilet

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-08 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > wrote: > > > > > It was Sir Thomas Crapper, plumber by appointment > > > to King Edward VII. Really, lads, don't they teach > > > you anything at MIU? > > > http://w

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-08 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one can lose > > > > it. For example, there was once a trademarked brand of > > > > toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark went into > > > > the crapper. :-) > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-08 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one can lose > > > > it. For example, there was once a trademarked brand of > > > > toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark went into > > > > the crapper. :-) > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > In a message dat

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: [...] > > Named for John Crapper, who invented the flush toilet. > > > > By the way, why do you think they're called "johns?" > > It was Sir Thomas Crapper,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread TurquoiseB
> > > If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one can lose > > > it. For example, there was once a trademarked brand of > > > toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark went into > > > the crapper. :-) > > > > Named for John Crapper, who invented the flush toilet. > > > > By the way, why

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > > sparaig@ writes: > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 2/5/06 3:35:25 A.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> What I see happening, within five years of MMY's >> death, is that the TMO will come running to the >> very teachers it dispossessed d

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/5/06 3:35:25 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What I see happening, within five years of MMY'sdeath, is that the TMO will come running to thevery teachers it dispossessed during the "recertpurge," begging them for financial support to help "

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > sparaig@ writes: > > > > Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. > > > > I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter > > wrote: > > > > > > This and another point that got truncated are > > > interesting legal points. The TMO

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-06 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. > > I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-05 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/5/06 1:04:13 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am teaching TM outside the TMO - and some of the people has been in contact with the TMO before they contact me. They do not care about MMY or the TMO - they just want to learn Transcendental M

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-05 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter > wrote: > > > > This and another point that got truncated are > > interesting legal points. The TMO never directly > > supported any TM teacher in any way whatsoever. They >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-05 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > In March 2005 the TMO announced a "re-certification > > requirement" for all > > teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in > > job skills and it was all > > about money. Of the 40K teachers i

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. > > > > I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > In March 2005 the TMO announced a "re-certification > > requirement" for all > > teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in > > job skills and it was all > > about money. Of the 40K teachers in

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. > > > > I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong,  but I think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:47:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: but Jack in the Box doesn't have "Original Jack with the Jack-in-the-Box speaker" and "new improved, but over-priced Jack with extra options but no speaker" because there is a company that owns t

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law. I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong,  but I think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program, but not  Trans

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > In March 2005 the TMO announced a "re-certification > > requirement" for all > > teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in > > job skills and it was all > > about money. Of the 40K teachers i

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Why not do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then? > > > > > I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 2/4/06 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Mike, remember you are not alone in this figh

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Mike Scozzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800 > To: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari > > Hi Rick > > Could you please post this on Fairfield Life

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why not do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then? I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has Mickey d's and down the street you'll have  Jack in the Box or some other franchise

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Mike, remember you are not alone in this fight. You're the point man but > only in front at this time. There will be many ex

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > wrote: > > > > > > From: Mike Scozzari > > > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800 > > > To: Rick Arc

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread anonyff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > From: Mike Scozzari > > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800 > > To: Rick Archer > > Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari Do you know who the recertifie

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari

2006-02-04 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Mike Scozzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800 > To: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari > > Hi Rick > > Could you please post this on Fairfield Life