--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one
can lose
it. For example, there was once a trademarked
brand of
toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark
went into
the crapper. :-)
Named for John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one
can lose
it. For example, there was once a trademarked
brand of
toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark
went into
the crapper. :-)
Named for John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
It was Sir Thomas Crapper, plumber by appointment
to King Edward VII. Really, lads, don't they teach
you anything at MIU?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one
can lose
it. For example, there was once a trademarked
brand of
toilet called a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
This and another point that got truncated are
interesting legal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sparaig@ writes:
Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the
law.
In a message dated 2/5/06 3:35:25 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I
see happening, within five years of MMY'sdeath, is that the TMO will come
running to thevery teachers it dispossessed during the "recertpurge,"
begging them for financial support to help
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/5/06 3:35:25 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I see happening, within five years of MMY's
death, is that the TMO will come running to the
very teachers it dispossessed during
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sparaig@ writes:
If one doesn't use the trademark properly, one can lose
it. For example, there was once a trademarked brand of
toilet called a Crapper, but their trademark went into
the crapper. :-)
Named for John Crapper, who invented the flush toilet.
By the way, why do you think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
[...]
Named for John Crapper, who invented the flush toilet.
By the way, why do you think they're called johns?
It was Sir Thomas Crapper, plumber
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In March 2005 the TMO announced a re-certification
requirement for all
teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in
job skills and it was all
about money. Of the 40K teachers in the US, only
In a message dated 2/5/06 1:04:13 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am
teaching TM outside the TMO - and some of the people has been in contact
with the TMO before they contact me. They do not care about MMY or the TMO
- they just want to learn Transcendental
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
From: Mike Scozzari scozzari@
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
To: Rick Archer rick@
Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Do you know who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 wayback71@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
From: Mike Scozzari scozzari@
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
To:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike, remember you are not alone in this fight. You're the point
man but
only in front at this time. There will be many ex-TM
In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not
do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then?
I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has
Mickey d's and down the street you'll have Jack in the Box or some other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mike Scozzari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
To: Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Hi Rick
Could you please post this on Fairfield Life for me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2/4/06 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike, remember you are not alone in this fight. You're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then?
I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has
Mickey
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In March 2005 the TMO announced a re-certification
requirement for all
teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in
job skills and it was all
about money. Of the 40K teachers in the US, only
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except
the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the
law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I
think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program, butnot
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:47:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but Jack
in the Box doesn't have "Original Jack with the Jack-in-the-Box speaker"
and "new improved, but over-priced Jack with extra options but no speaker"
because there is a company that owns
In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except
the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the
law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I
think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In March 2005 the TMO announced a re-certification
requirement for all
teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in
job skills and it was all
about money. Of the 40K teachers in the US, only
28 matches
Mail list logo
