on 5/24/06 10:38 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rick,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to read what I wrote and for your reply.
> Revisiting these concepts in the light of people's experience in this
> group is valuable to me. I remember the TM party line about those
> words
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Lurk,
>
> I appreciate what you said. But really I don't view it that way. My
> intention of posting my inner experience was for people who can
relate
> on some level. Those are the return posts tha
The concept of enlightenment is way over my head. I am just focusing
on what we can articulate about our awareness and it's potential to grow.
My biggest change in wellbeing comes from physical exercise. I wonder
if wellbeing has any place in the discussion of what our awareness is
and how it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rick,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to read what I wrote and for your reply.
> Revisiting these concepts in the light of people's experience in this
> group is valuable to me. I remember the TM party line
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 5/23/06 9:33 PM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I don't think my "ability to know" fluctuates at all to
> > any significant degree day to day. Of course I don't mean this in any
> > spiritu
Rick,
Thanks for taking the time to read what I wrote and for your reply.
Revisiting these concepts in the light of people's experience in this
group is valuable to me. I remember the TM party line about those
words. Now I am interested in how people like yourself think about it
with a broade
on 5/23/06 9:33 PM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't think my "ability to know" fluctuates at all to
> any significant degree day to day. Of course I don't mean this in any
> spiritual way, it is just that I have lost all interest in monitoring
> whatever quality I used
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending comment
> > reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > "Were you supposed to be "monitoring" it, or were you
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending
> comment reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
The entire story, in 12 words, and handled with compassion
in five more. Can't do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > "Were you supposed to be "monitoring" it, or were you
> > supposed to meditate and act, meditate and act, and
> > allow it to develop spo
Hey Lurk,
I appreciate what you said. But really I don't view it that way. My
intention of posting my inner experience was for people who can relate
on some level. Those are the return posts that interest me. Anyone
who wants to criticize me on my inner experience or the way I express
it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending
comment
> > reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending comment
> reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > Just cur
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending comment
> reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
LOL!
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In
I didn't find your comment challenging. Your condescending comment
reveals your intentions. Good luck with that agenda.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > "Were you supp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Were you supposed to be "monitoring" it, or were you
> supposed to meditate and act, meditate and act, and
> allow it to develop spontaneously without having to
> keep track of it?"
>
> Thanks Judy, now I
"Were you supposed to be "monitoring" it, or were you
supposed to meditate and act, meditate and act, and
allow it to develop spontaneously without having to
keep track of it?"
Thanks Judy, now I understand. I must have missed this point made
clear in the 3 days checking, which I taught. Tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I used to think that every spiritual tradition was talking about
the
> same thing when they
> > used terms like samadhi and satori and so on, but while it may
have
> been the case in the
> > distant p
> I used to think that every spiritual tradition was talking about the
same thing when they
> used terms like samadhi and satori and so on, but while it may have
been the case in the
> distant past, I don't think its true any more.
>
> The physiology that results from various spiritual practice
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
> > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> >
> > It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
>
> --
>
>
> Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
> Scientologists Ready for 'Super Power'
> www.newsmax.com
>
[...]
>
> Scie
27 matches
Mail list logo
