--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Sanskrit has many more tenses than languages like English or even
> Hindi. It was about at the level where I was studying the 9th level
> tense that I sort of lost interest and someone with expertise in the
> language suggested I didn'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> authfriend wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> >
> >> As for the website Bhairitu pointed to, all that
> >> you have to do to see its True Believer nature
> >> is to do a mental "search and replace"
authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
>
>> As for the website Bhairitu pointed to, all that
>> you have to do to see its True Believer nature
>> is to do a mental "search and replace" on the
>> text in it and replace every mention of "Sanskrit"
>> with "
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> What else would Sanskrit scholars be looking at if
> it wasn't spiritual texts, Turq? That seems to be
> the only stuff that survived.
Not according to Briggs:
"Besides works of literary value, there was a long
philosophical and grammatic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> As for the website Bhairitu pointed to, all that
> you have to do to see its True Believer nature
> is to do a mental "search and replace" on the
> text in it and replace every mention of "Sanskrit"
> with "Hebrew." Then you'll see what th
TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
intermedia
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
> > > intermediate language because it is unamb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
> > intermediate language because it is unambiguous. The program
> > will take text in a language and translate it to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> TurquoiseB wrote:
> >>> If you want an unambiguous language, choose French.
> >>> That is why all international treaties use it as
> >>> the ¨master l
TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> TurquoiseB wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
intermediate language because it is unambiguou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
> >> intermediate language because it is unambiguous. The program
> >> will take text in a la
TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
>> intermediate language because it is unambiguous. The program
>> will take text in a language and translate it to Sanskrit and
>> then from Sanskrit to the
On Jan 20, 2009, at 5:55 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Plus, just looking at the definitions Card posts
here, words often have *more* than four or five
completely different meanings, right there in the
definitions he posts.
Well a lot of these are his presumptive meanings. I'm not sure that he
is
On Jan 20, 2009, at 5:55 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
intermediate language because it is unambiguous. The program
will take text in a language and translate it to Sanskrit and
then from Sa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Supposedly some translations engines use Sanskrit as an
> intermediate language because it is unambiguous. The program
> will take text in a language and translate it to Sanskrit and
> then from Sanskrit to the target language.
I´m sorr
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > If you are willing to pay enough for "name and
> > form," I might be able to get the Supremes to
> > sing backup.
>
>
> I'm in such a good mood today after hearing the Inaugural
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:59 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
> wrote:
> >
> > If you qualify, please contact me directly (my email account is
> > real).
> >
> > I seek someone who can translate into Sanskrit and record President
> > Obama's inaugu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> If you are willing to pay enough for "name and
> form," I might be able to get the Supremes to
> sing backup.
I'm in such a good mood today after hearing the Inaugural Speech of
your new President that I even r-e-a-d what The Turq wr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
> If you qualify, please contact me directly (my email account is
> real).
>
> I seek someone who can translate into Sanskrit and record President
> Obama's inauguration speech. If possible, the invocations
> translated into Sa
19 matches
Mail list logo
