--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > David's publishing record has taken a kind of downward turn
> > of late. Last article I heard of was in a pseudoscience/
> > paranormal/UFO journal IIRC.
>
> In fact, what O-J
Vaj:
> Here's a good article on TM research you may have
> missed, by award-winning writer Andrew Skolnick:
>
Is this the same Andrew Skolnick that got fired from
one of the scientific research journals recently for
publishing untruths and getting sued by Deepak Chopra?
So, a 'lucid dream' is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > Ahem. If this were true, wouldn't YOU be using
> > your "epistemic hubris" to claim that something
> > *you know nothing about* is *not* a scam?
>
> Ignorance and deception will always find
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
> > > level vetting decision and I
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Ahem. If this were true, wouldn't YOU be using
your "epistemic hubris" to claim that something
*you know nothing about* is *not* a scam?
Ignorance and deception will always find a breeding ground in hidden
areas of science. Nowhere are such fa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
> > level vetting decision and I am not buying it.
>
> Yes, I know. You're using your "epistemic humilit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
[Curtis wrote:]
> > > > I am so impressed with your credentials in this field.
> > > > You are just another person who mistakes intelligence
> > > > for training. Very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> If these allegedly advanced TMers aren't also lucid dreaming, it
> doesn't sound like they've actually developed a real witness-
> consciousness.
Vaj might want to read a paper by Gackenbach, a leading
lucidity researcher (cited frequently in
> > You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
> > level vetting decision and I am not buying it. So we
> > are just arguing about where your lack of knowledge
> > comes to play here.
> >
Vaj:
> One thing you can count on David O-J for is a good
> chuckle. As usual: he delivers...
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:23 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> See above where I said "make shit up and try to stuff it
> in my mouth"?
>
> Where exactly did I tout, or even hint at, my "credentials"
> or "training" in this field?
Nowhere. You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
level
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy:> And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
> > > Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
> > > he starts to make shit up and try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> Judy:> And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
> > Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
> > he starts to make shit up and try to stuff it in my
> > mouth, his standard tactic when up against the wall.
Judy:> And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
> Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
> he starts to make shit up and try to stuff it in my
> mouth, his standard tactic when up against the wall.
> Such integrity.
>
> (Doesn't it ever occur to him that the shit is going
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> David's publishing record has taken a kind of downward turn
> of late. Last article I heard of was in a pseudoscience/
> paranormal/UFO journal IIRC.
In fact, what O-J published in the Journal of Scientific
Exploration was not a "study" but a re
On Apr 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"
wrote:
>
>
> What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual experience
here to> this?
>
> Is this research no good too? Just wondering.
First of all what part of spirituality support
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > > I don't share your confidence in my ability to evaluate
> > > the professional creden
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have no way to evaluate the two German editor's
> > > > background
> > >
> > > Yes, yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > I have no way to evaluate the two German editor's
> > > background
> >
> > Yes, you do. You could look them up on the Web, as I did.
> > . . .
> > Schredl head
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
>
> > > Just because it shares some of the protocols with respected
> > > online journals doesn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fairfie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > I don't share your confidence in my ability to evaluate
> > the professional credentials of a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> > Just because it shares some of the protocols with respected
> > online journals doesn't mean it is more than a dumping
> > ground for shitty research.
P.S.: There
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > The In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> I don't share your confidence in my ability to evaluate
> the professional credentials of a foreign academic in a
> specialized field of technical research. The contex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
>
> > > The International Journal of Dream Research
> > > is a Website that has been operating for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual
> > > experience here to this?
> > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> > The International Journal of Dream Research
> > is a Website that has been operating for 3 years who lets
> > members "publish" research.
Meant to add:
The term
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual
> > experience here to this?
> >
> > Is this research no good too? Just wondering.
>
> First of all what part
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
> What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual experience here to>
> this?
>
> Is this research no good too? Just wondering.
First of all what part of spirituality supports putting down people who don't
see things your way? T
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual experience
> here to this?
What say they TO WHOM?
Possibly to insufferably elitist assholes who
consider themselves better than those who moved
on past the spiritual kindergarten they
30 matches
Mail list logo
