--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> How do you know? All those people who bought them might be running
> around in heaven right now, having wild parties and boozing it up.
>
> Sal
>
Could be, but I wouldn't bet money on it :-)
JohnY
>
> On Apr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> [...]
> > > I love the idea of indulgences. It quanitifies the field of karma
> > > and lik
How do you know? All those people who bought them might be running around in heaven right now, having wild parties and boozing it up.
Sal
On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:53 PM, jyouells2000 wrote:
> I love the idea of indulgences. It quanitifies the field of karma
> and like things with a price on th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
[...]
> > I love the idea of indulgences. It quanitifies the field of karma
> > and like things with a price on them.
> >
>
> It may seem to quantify karma, b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
> wrote:
> Queen Elizabeth of
> > England and all her courtiers and the "Royal" family all look
just as
> > silly (to my eyes) as the current crop of TMO raja
L PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:43:06 -0000
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The four classes [Shemp]
>
>
> From day one, I always got the impression that the rank and
file were treated like shit in the TMO.
>
I often think that as well. However,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Those full-time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Those f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Those fu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Queen Elizabeth of
> England and all her courtiers and the "Royal" family all look just as
> silly (to my eyes) as the current crop of TMO rajahs.
Yes, but the Brits don't get to enjoy it:
"Great Br
The TM-org lacks compassion. Had it been a little compassionate and treated it's members like family, it would not be having so many enemies today.ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:43:06 -0000Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The four cla
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> >
> > > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though
I
> don't
> > > consider that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> >
> > > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though
I don't
> > > consider t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
While I agree, I might point out that the SCA
(Society for Creative Anachronism) is a real
bargain if what you want is a fancy title. All
you do is make up your own, make sure that the
name could have existed during the time period
and geographi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> wrote:
> >
> > It's all been done before - think buying Indulgences. Was
> > that before or after the Inquisition?
>
> The practice of 'buying indulgences' was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> >
> > > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though
I
> don't
> > > consider that insane.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's all been done before - think buying Indulgences. Was
> that before or after the Inquisition?
The practice of 'buying indulgences' was long before
the Inquisition. The Cathars formed their sect in
reaction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
>
> > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though I
don't
> > consider that insane. My main problem here is that MMY is still
> > giving out aristocr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
>
> > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though I don't
> > consider that insane. My main problem here is that MMY is still
> > giving out aristocra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
Comment below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
>
> > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though I don't
> > consider that insane. My main problem here is that MMY is still
> > givi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
>
> > Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though I
don't
> > consider that insane. My main problem here is that MMY is still
> > giving out aristocratic
On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:48 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote:
> Those full-time in the tmo definitely honor the titles, though I don't
> consider that insane. My main problem here is that MMY is still
> giving out aristocratic titles and positions of authority to people
> based on their financial contribu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > First, What is your definition of insanity.??
> >
> > It would be complex,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> wrote:
> >
> > First, What is your definition of insanity.??
>
> It would be complex, because insanity is a complex
> subject, but I'm pretty sure that one asp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> First, What is your definition of insanity.??
It would be complex, because insanity is a complex
subject, but I'm pretty sure that one aspect of it
would include defining as insane people who give
themselves th
ere have never been any "masters" in history,
only people who longed to be subservient and thus
picked someone to be subservient to so that they
could call them "master."
> TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:11:01 -
movement. Fourth, Take what is good in all the masters and leave out the irrelevant and the unnecessary.
TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:11:01 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The four classes [Shemp] And you believe this is sane?
Talk is chea
]> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:19:39 -0000
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The four classes [Shemp]
>
>
> I guess I should have been clearer with my question: why do
you feel it necessary to use these titles when writing about them?
>
>
>
>
06 21:19:39 -0000Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The four classes [Shemp] I guess I should have been clearer with my question: why do you
feel it necessary to use these titles when writing about them?
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
T
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> I refered to him as, "His Majesty". Other Ministers in the
Global country should be refered as Excellencies. Exc. Bevan Morris
says Maharishi insists on calling them as Excellencies.
I guess I should
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I refered to him as, "His Majesty". Other Ministers
> in the Global country should be refered as Excellencies.
> Exc. Bevan Morris says Maharishi insists on calling them
> as Excellencies.
And you believ
I refered to him as, "His Majesty". Other Ministers in the Global country should be refered as Excellencies. Exc. Bevan Morris says Maharishi insists on calling them as Excellencies.shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:53:47 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
35 matches
Mail list logo
