Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK! on 9/11/06 2:58 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure Shemp, sometimes I feel a personal Guru > might be >>>>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > > > on 9/11/06 1:32 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > >> > I'm no

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > on 9/11/06 1:32 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> > I'm not sure Shemp, sometimes I feel a personal Guru might be > > >> > necessary

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come > to > > Yoga because MMY has simplified the esoteric teaching of India to > > comfo

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 9/11/06 1:32 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> > I'm not sure Shemp, sometimes I feel a personal Guru might be > >> > necessary and sometimes not! Why is it though, Shemp, all well known > >> > Sai

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come > > to > > > Y

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on 9/11/06 4:24 PM, johnlasher20002000 at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> > > > >> > and therefore you don't!?! I > > assume. How do you even

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread Peter
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 9/11/06 4:24 PM, johnlasher20002000 at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > > >> > and therefore you don't!?! I > assume. How do you even know > >> > they're > >>> saints?. > >>> >> > >>> >> I¹m a lot more sure abou

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK! on 9/11/06 4:24 PM, johnlasher20002000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> and therefore you don't!?!  I assume. How do you even know > they're >&

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread gerbal88
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 > wrote: > > > > > > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: parsnip> > He implicitly said it when he told you that with the TM Program you > would unfold 100% of your mental potential. You may be right but surely ONLY time will tell. I'm still betting on this horse (TM) c

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread johnlasher20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 9/11/06 2:18 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > >> > , Rick Archer wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> on 9/11/06 1:32 PM,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread curtisdeltablues
"He implicitly said it when he told you that with the TM Program you would unfold 100% of your mental potential." He said a lot more than just this, especially to his full time people. He designed whole programs centered on service to him. He may have been lacking on the Guru side, but he was cry

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > > > > But MMY says that all that is needed is TM. > > > > That's why I see a dilemma for True Believers in this area: if they > > feel they ne

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 9/11/06 2:18 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > >> > , Rick Archer wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> on 9/11/06 1:32 PM,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip> > > I may be pollyanna-ish about this but I truly am convinced that TM > is all that is needed...AND I believe it's the fastest most > effective way to enlightenment. And let me reiterate: I am referring > to

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 9/11/06 2:18 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > >> > , Rick Archer wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> on 9/11/06 1:32 PM,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But MMY says that all that is needed is TM. > > That's why I see a dilemma for True Believers in this area: if they > feel they need to do MORE than TM and take MMY as their personal > guru, then they are imp

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wrote: > > > > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip > > Quit a little conundrum... > > A very interesting conundrum, Shemp. It is good you have pointed this > out. > > I think that although TM is a very basic calming technique, a > somewhat refined but common mana

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK! on 9/11/06 2:18 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > , Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> on 9/11/06 1:32 PM,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "bhairitu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > snip > I have a personal guru and it is great to be able to have questions > answered plus a whole advanced path of techniques leading to the > archarya level. However I tested this guru and he tested me before > proce

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread bhairitu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come to > Yoga because MMY has simplified the esoteric teaching of India to > comform to modern standards and receiptivity; though, in the end a > personal *

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread gerbal88
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 > wrote: > > > > > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 9/11/06 1:32 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> > I'm not sure Shemp, sometimes I feel a personal Guru might be > >> > necessary and sometimes not! Why is it though, Shemp, all well known > >> > Sa

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip > I don't know. > > But MMY says that all that is needed is TM. > > That's why I see a dilemma for True Believers in this area: if they > feel they need to do MORE than TM and take MMY as their personal > guru

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK! on 9/11/06 1:32 PM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure Shemp, sometimes I feel a personal Guru might be > necessary and sometimes not! Why is it though, Shemp, all well

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come > > to > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come > to > > Yoga because MMY has simplified the esoteric teaching of India to > > comf

[FairfieldLife] Re: Why TM is Yoga/lite for modernity..and why that's OK!

2006-09-11 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To understand this is to understand and love MMY. Many have come to > Yoga because MMY has simplified the esoteric teaching of India to > comform to modern standards and receiptivity; though, in the end a > personal