The cause of all disease, Vasishtha explains, is restricted awareness, the
inability to grasp the total picture of reality. The cure for this mistake of
the intellect, the cure for this ignorant perception of reality according to
Vasishtha, is the experience of the total potential of natural l
LOL, since one person started doing that in London, all of the "silent
statues" have had to incorporate levitation into their act to make any money.
If you visit the National Gallery in Trafalgar Square there is a row of
Yoda's, Chaplin's, Cybermen, Red Indians and God only knows what else
just flying -just more than one inch in the air-and what a sight to behold
Wingsuit 2014 [best moments] HD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRqnTODwvEA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRqnTODwvEA
Wingsuit 2014 [best moments] HD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRqnTODwvEA
SirensCeol - Coming
Nice!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
To paraphrase Yoko Ono,
even just one inch in the air you are flying in the sky!
Jai Guru Dev,Jai Maharishi!
Sri Jau,
The article does not state that the increase was due to the yogic flyers.
Also, it would be interesting to know how the entire country of Peru in terms
of economic growth in comparison to the rest of the world.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Did any of our members witness this event?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlw8CxTkyxA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlw8CxTkyxA
No, if you don't count watching this embarrassing recording. Nothing has
changed in the last 30 years sinc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" wrote:
>
> X seconds between repetitions of suutra-s. Why?
>
> As to the YF suutra, almost all of us know by now,
> that YF (aakaasha-gamanam) is based on the Meissner effect,
> like a magnet levitating above a superconductor (but Earth
> is the magn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems to me that "invincible" is used by the TMO most often with
> respect to countries and institutions. So if the Panama is invincible
> it is incapable of being conquered or subdued. Get 160 meditators and
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems to me that "invincible" is used by the TMO most often with
> respect to countries and institutions. So if the Panama is invincible
> it is incapable of being conquered or subdued. Get 160 meditators and
>
It seems to me that "invincible" is used by the TMO most often with
respect to countries and institutions. So if the Panama is invincible
it is incapable of being conquered or subdued. Get 160 meditators and
you are there.
http://www.invincibledefence.org/prev_wing/defence_research.html
I tak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---(confusion of terms such as "Invincibility" and "Immortality").
> Yes, in TMO-speak, Invincibility really means non-attachment; and
> Immortality really means non-attachment; and.etc..
In TM-speak, they're all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- sandiego108 wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---(confusion of terms such as "Invincibility" and "Immortality").
> Yes, in TMO-speak, Invincibility really means non-attachment; and
> Immortality really means non-attachment; and.etc..
>
eggzactly- all "the ma
---(confusion of terms such as "Invincibility" and "Immortality").
Yes, in TMO-speak, Invincibility really means non-attachment; and
Immortality really means non-attachment; and.etc..
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives"
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fairfiel
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > > over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > > over the last several decades, "In
--- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "sandiego108"
>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > > over the last several decades, "
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > > over the last several decades, "Invincibility
--- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> > invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings.
> Its
> > just
On May 20, 2008, at 8:50 PM, boo_lives wrote:
> I bet I could poll thousands of "common men" asking them to list their
> goals in life and not one would say becoming invincible.
Oh come on, even if we offered you your own phone booth?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> >
> > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> > invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings. Its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > > over the last several decades,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> >
> > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> > invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> >
> > I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> > over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> > invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings. Its
> just so silly. first, wtf does it even mean?
> Invincibility of w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings. Its
> just so silly. first, wtf does it even mean?
> Invincibility of w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had it up to my seventh chakra with this rant
> over the last several decades, "Invincibility,
> invincibility" what a pile of vedic cow droppings. Its
> just so silly. first, wtf does it even mean?
> Invincibility of w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:09 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>> So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Some old re
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:09 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
Some old research and more modern research on tummo (inner heat)
meditation which mastery of requires
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
> >
>
> Some old research and more modern research on tummo (inner heat)
> meditation which mastery of requires inner perfection of the fourth
> p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:44 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Guffaw. TM researchers have never mentioned 'the fourth pranayama"
> > in any research or
> > discussion that I have heard. Of course, I notice you neatly snipt
> > t
thing's changed!
- Original Message -
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Yogic flying video
On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:15 AM, llundrub wrote:
What was it you wanted to know?
-Exactly. W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
> > So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious
> > scientists?'
>
> Some old research and more modern research on tummo (inner heat)
> meditation which mastery
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:45 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
> >>
> >>
> > It's a key part of the YS.
>
On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:15 AM, llundrub wrote:
What was it you wanted to know?
-Exactly. What was the point of all this tattle telling?
Who knows.
What was it you wanted to know?
-Exactly. What was the point of all this tattle telling?
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:45 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
It's a key part of the YS.
jstein wrote:
But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
Vaj isn't the only
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:39 PM, sparaig wrote:
>>
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>>>
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
>>>
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:44 PM, sparaig wrote:
Guffaw. TM researchers have never mentioned 'the fourth pranayama"
in any research or
discussion that I have heard. Of course, I notice you neatly snipt
the original Yoga Sutra
context where the term "fourth" occurs in the context of pranayama
On Nov 29, 2006, at 12:55 AM, pranamoocher wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" sparaig@ wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > > And, no, o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...[
>
> In the youtube video, the gymnasts who try to imitate Yogic Flying
> give a very poor imitation of YF, and are exhausted after only 5
> minutes, in contrast to the clear height and length advantage of
> YFer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > > And, no, of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "pranamoocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The problem I have seen with YF Exhibitions and the public perception
> of this is simply that the same physically built people are always
> chosen: skinny or lean, flexible enough to sit in full lotus and hi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
>
> > > And, no, of course that's not what the fourth is. The fourth
> > > is not taught in TM o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "pranamoocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The problem I have seen with YF Exhibitions and the public
perception
> of this is simply that the same physically built people are always
> chosen: skinny or lean, flexible enough to sit in full lotus and
hit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" sparaig@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
>
> > > And, no, of course that's not what the fourth is. The fourth
> > > is not taug
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > And, no, of course that's not what the fourth is. The fourth
> > is not taught in TM or the TM siddhi program, nor have they
> > identified it correctly in rese
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
[...]
> >
> > And, no, of course that's not what the fourth is. The fourth
> > is not taught in TM or the TM siddhi program, nor have they
> > identified it corr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
>
> >>> It's a key part of the YS.
> >>>
> > jstein wrote:
> >> But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
> >>
> > Vaj isn't the only person on this forum ha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Rather a cryptic sutra.
>
>
> Not to yogis from the tradition. If it's not crystal clear, question
> the person telling or selling.
>
You're quoting the person who com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:39 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> He also claimed to find Alan Bennett locked in padmasana, tipped over
> from levitating and landing wrong.
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, llundrub wrote:
>
> > Crowley levitated for two hours after doing serious kumbhaka
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > It's a key part of the YS.
> > >
> jstein wrote:
> > But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
> >
> Vaj isn't the only person on this forum having trouble citing things.
>
I just posted the UR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
>
> >>> It's a key part of the YS.
> >>>
> > jstein wrote:
> >> But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
> >>
> > Vaj isn't the only person on this forum ha
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:39 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Dude, you've never even *don
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
Rather a cryptic sutra.
Not to yogis from the tradition. If it's not crystal clear, question
the person telling or selling.
On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
It's a key part of the YS.
jstein wrote:
But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
Vaj isn't the only person on this forum having trouble citing things.
I prefer oral transmission to written--but if you wanted a written
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
The yogattava upanishad mentions p
He also claimed to find Alan Bennett locked in padmasana, tipped over
from levitating and landing wrong.
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:55 PM, llundrub wrote:
Crowley levitated for two hours after doing serious kumbhakam. As
detailed in his small book on yoga.
> > It's a key part of the YS.
> >
jstein wrote:
> But for some odd reason, Vaj is unable to cite it.
>
Vaj isn't the only person on this forum having trouble citing things.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Even the most simple of these would blow your head off Vaj. You have
> never done YF, and I garentee you, you have absolutely no experience
> whatsoever of kundalini. It is a common experience for MANY yogic
>
Crowley levitated for two hours after doing serious kumbhakam. As detailed in
his small book on yoga.
- Original Message -
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Yogic flying video
On Nov
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> As I have pointed out many times, there ARE TM studies on this phenomenon. It
> isn't a
> long in and out breath thing though, it is a sustained out-breath where the
> diaphram
> apparently relaxes to its normal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Thicker
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >> For all siddhis, the secret is to master the "fourth"
> >> pranayama. You see the same thing in Buddhist tantra
> >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> [...]
> > > Thicker foam would provide far less support for the
> > > initial push-off. And no-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> The yogattava upanishad mentions pranayama just befo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dude, you've never even *done* the flying tech
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dude, you've never even *done* the flying tech
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:58 PM, nablusos108 wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >> Prana kundalini is usually experienced by jerking, hopping
> >> motions.
> >
> >> It's what happens when kundal
Vaj wrote:
> You see the same thing in Buddhist tantra and Hindu tantra.
>
Which one?
Buddhist tantras are different from Hindu Tantras.
Glorious Nebulae, It's my tutor's experience.
You want the exact dates. No problem. Give me 24 hours, I will get it
from him.
nablusos108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:08:15 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Yogic flying video
On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
The yogattava upanishad mentions pranayama just before it mentions
levitation. It is
unclear TO ME at least as to whether or not this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:07 AM, anywho108 wrote:
>
> > This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
> > which of course isn't flying at all. Although I've had the
sutras for
> > many many years, I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Where's that yogic flying video I saw where they showed an
> > > accompl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > The yogattava upanishad mentions pranayama just before it mentions
> > levitation. It is
> > unclear TO ME at least as to whether or not this is meant to say
> > that t
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol!
Not only have I, I was a successful hopper.
What you
have written
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
The yogattava upanishad mentions pranayama just before it mentions
levitation. It is
unclear TO ME at least as to whether or not this is meant to say
that the only way to
perform levitation is using pranayama or even if it is meant to
imply that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
> >
> > > Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol!
> >
> > Not only have I, I was a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> > Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol!
>
> Not only have I, I was a successful hopper.
>
> > What you
> > have written has nothing specific to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> wrote:
> >
> > Come on Maam, Foam ain't Vedic. Real Yogis in india used
> bed of pointed Nails.
>
> Er, no, they just sit or sleep on them. (And it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
[...]
> > Thicker foam would provide far less support for the
> > initial push-off. And no-one woulkd want to fall from
> > two feet up onto a regular wrestling
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> More that 30 years ago in Rishikesh my TM-tutor was in a large group.
> When
Maharishi started walking towards their direction immediately the instructor
said "Everybody
start hopping, Maharishi is comin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:07 AM, anywho108 wrote:
> >
> > > This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
> > > which of course isn't f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:07 AM, anywho108 wrote:
>
> > This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
> > which of course isn't flying at all. Although I've had the sutras for
> > many many years, I would l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anywho108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
> which of course isn't flying at all. Although I've had the sutras for
> many many years, I would like to hear some explanation of exactly what
> bo
Vaj wrote:
> In what centre or on what course did you learn the sidhis, on
> what date? What was the name of your TM-Sidhi-instructor ?
>
Maybe Vaj is the non-hopper - I haven't seen any evidence he's a Sidha
or even a TM meditator. For example, his name isn't on the list of
Flyers at the TM Cent
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:58 PM, nablusos108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:07 AM, anywho108 wrote:
This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
which of course isn't flying at all. Although I've had the
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:11 PM, nablusos108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol!
Not only have I, I was a successful hopper.
In what centr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> > Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol!
>
> Not only have I, I was a successful hopper.
In what centre or on what course did you learn the sidhis,
Gurudev Bramananda Sarasvati do it.?
>
> jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:50:19 -
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Yogic flying video
>
>
> Dude, you've never even *done* the flying technique! lol! What
you
> have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:07 AM, anywho108 wrote:
>
> > This brings up something I've been pondering about "yogic flying"
> > which of course isn't flying at all. Although I've had the sutras
for
> > many many years, I would
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
